spionage

The Curveball Affair

John Prados – On February 5, 2003, Secretary of State Colin Powell made a dramatic presentation before the United Nations Security Council, detailing a U.S. bill of particulars alleging that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction that threatened not only the Middle East, but the rest of the world. Unbeknownst to the public at the time, a key part of the U.S. case—relating to biological weapons—was based on the direct knowledge of a single agent known as CURVEBALL, whose credibility had previously been cast in serious doubt.


U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell holds up a model vial of anthrax during his historic presentation before the United Nations Security Council, February 5, 2003.

CBS News’ 60 Minutes is now reporting the identity of the agent as one Rafid Ahmed Alwan, (Note 1) who appeared in a German refugee center in 1999 and brought himself to the attention of German intelligence. CBS News describes Alwan as “a liar … a thief and a poor student instead of the chemical engineering whiz he claimed to be.” (Note 2) If accurate, the CBS report raises even more troubling questions about the basis for the Bush administration’s decision to go to war in Iraq, as well as more general considerations about the relationship between intelligence and the policy process.

By way of background to this latest revelation, the National Security Archive is reproducing the existing public record on CURVEBALL as derived from declassified records, official inquiries and former officials’ accounts. The documents below are a small fraction of the full record, which remains almost entirely classified. The National Security Archive has filed Freedom of Information Act requests for these still-secret materials and will post them as they become available.

The public record as of this posting, while miniscule, nevertheless has an important story to tell, the centerpoint of which is Powell’s speech, which represented the Bush administration’s most powerful public argument leading to the decision to invade Iraq.

Powell’s address, modeled after Adlai Stevenson’s vivid appearance before the same body in 1962 during the Cuban missile crisis, was punctuated by a glossy slide presentation and show-and-tell devices including a vial of powder which he held up before his audience, declaring that if it were a biological weapon it would be enough to kill thousands of people. Saddam Hussein, Powell forcefully asserted, possessed stockpiles of such weapons and the infrastructure to produce them. (Note 3)

According to both of the major official U.S. investigations into Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction (WMD) programs—by the so-called Silberman-Robb Commission and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (Note 4)—Powell based this particular claim on data gathered by the CIA, which in turn relied principally on information it had obtained indirectly from CURVEBALL.

Read all at the National Security Archive

spionage

Did the FSB Betray Victor Bout?

David Dastych – In my first article, published on Canada Free Press on March 14, and then reposted on political Web sites in Britain, Switzerlands „Nachrichten Heute“and in the United States, I reported about the DEA sting operation against Victor Bout and also on some events from the past, involving him and other people.

A few hours only after the CFP publication, I received interesting documentation from Bucharest, Romania, which was published in part in my second article, posted on the CFP on Tuesday, March 18, 2008. A story recently printed in a Polish magazine Gazeta Polska provided more facts about international links of Victor Bout’s criminal network, including his business with Polish Military Intelligence, and also with Russian and Polish gangsters Semyon Mogilevich and Riccardo Fanchini (Marian Kozina). According to the Polish TV reporter Witold Gadowski, one of the high-positioned protectors of Victor Bout in the Putin’s Kremlin was Igor Ivanovich Sechin, known as an opponent of the new President of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev.

High connections, FSB and the mafia
On February 4, 2008 one of the most popular Polish TV documentary shows SuperWizjer of the private TVN network aired a sensational report entitled “The Russian Mafia, the Polish Government and Gas.” The documentary, whose authors were two Polish investigative journalists, Przemyslaw Wojciechowski and Witold Gadowski, was the result of their team’s 2.5-year work in many countries. The report stirred big waves in Poland, because it proved that the Polish Government was paying for the imports of Russian natural gas not directly to its producer, GAZPROM, but to an intermediary co-owned by the Russian mafia and “The Brainy Don”, Semyon Mogilevich.

One of the co-authors of that documentary, Mr.Gadowski, wrote a follow up story for a conservative Polish magazine “Gazeta Polska”. In the 2nd part of his article, entitled “Gas Stinking of the Mafia: Traces of the Death Barons”, Gadowski linked the recent arrest of Semyon Mogilevich in Russia to the arrest of Victor Bout in Thailand and to the election of the new President of Russia. The article is very interesting and I am going to quote from it several times throughout this piece.

“Officially, Bout fell into a trap arranged by American special services. But in fact he had been “pointed for a shot” in Thailand by the FSB [the Russian Security Service]. At the same time, FSB agents were hurriedly liquidating his base in Bulgaria…” [From another source, AIA: “The old ties have come into the limelight this week for another reason: Russian arms trader Victor Bout, who supposedly had excellent contacts to the Soviet and later to the Russian secret service, had delivered a load of weapons worth several hundred million dollars to Bulgaria just before he was arrested on March 6.”]

“According to the official version, Bout, looked for in the whole world, fell into the hands of the Thai special services…and was arrested with his accomplice, Andrew Smulian, when he tried to strike a deal to sell weapons to the Colombian FARC… But there is also another, closer to the truth version of Major Bout’s give-away. Somebody in the Kremlin has decided to wind up a protective umbrella over the most wanted international criminals. Mogilevich and Bout, used before in many actions, became useless ballast to the new ‘tsarevich’ – Medvedev.”

Following the arrest of Victor Bout, Mr. Gadowski e-mailed several of his contacts, knowledgeable of the Russian special services. One of the answers was symptomatic: “Igor Sechin, now one of the most important people of the top [Russian] leadership responsible for the management of the biggest state-owned oil company, Rosneft, which was built on the ruins of [Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s] Yukos, knows very much about Bout’s business. Sechin (a former KGB officer) was an interpreter of Portuguese language in Mozambique, where he met a fellow-interpreter, Victor Bout.”

Under the rule of the former President Vladimir, Putin Mogilevich and Bout were safe in Moscow. Now, when the President-elect Dmitry Medvedev is getting ready to do some “face-saving” in Russia, the old “kings” of the criminal underworld, serving the Kremlin as useful agents, are being dumped while new, still unknown replacements will take their place.

The Polish journalist quoted some opinions about Victor Bout:
Sergei P., a Russian businessman with a Western passport, a former AF pilot in Afghanistan: “[Bout] is a very brave fellow, he flies to the places that other guys would be scared to show up at, and he will always supply the cargo paid for.”
Douglas Farah, an American journalist who had followed Bout and other gun-runners for years, was quoted as saying: “Of course, Bout, who has armed rebels, criminals and terrorists from the Taliban in Afghanistan to the RUF in Sierra Leone to the FARC in Colombia, has always operated under the protection of Russian military intelligence.” (“Now The Fun Begins With Russia Over Bout Arrest”)

Farah made these comments on March 7, only a day after Bout’s arrest. An unnamed American investigative journalist e-mailed Mr. Gadowski: “Dear Polish Colleague, don’t mind the names, these are only pawns on a chessboard. Somebody else will replace Bout, who has made dirty arms-trading deals for Putin’s men. But you better watch your steps, as they could find a nice psychiatric hospital for you…”

Bout’s Polish trail
Not much is known about Victor Bout’s connections in Poland. Mr. Gadowski only wrote in his article that after the arrest of Mogilevich and Bout “in some Polish homes panic-buttons have been pressed, as both Mogilevich and Bout know the bank accounts, used by some Poles to collect money from suspicious transactions.” Who are these people? I have no proof to name them but there are many trails leading to some Polish businessmen and to former officers of the Polish Military Intelligence (WSI), who made fortunes on illegal trading in weapons, drugs and nuclear materials.

Bout’s air-services in Eastern Africa probably pushed out a Polish aviation business company, Joy Co. Ltd, from its base in Djibouti in the 1990s. The Russian cargo transports were offered much cheaper, and the Polish exporter lost its monopoly to sell or lease Soviet-made helicopters and planes to African governments. A clash of interests with Bout’s business dramatically ended for the Poles: top pilots and managers of Joy Co. Ltd died in a strange helicopter crash on East African desert and the company withdrew from Djibouti.

In 1996, Victor Bout moved his business HQ to Ostend (Oostende) in Belgium. According to Mr. Gadowski, his planes “transported narcotics for the Nayfeld brothers. In Belgium he also met a Pole, Marian Kozina, a.k.a. Riccardo Fancini. Bout moved some secret cargo transports for him…According to one of my informants, some Polish WSI [Military Intelligence] officers, working on foreign outposts, were also involved in some of Bout’s operations.”

At that time, the Russian-Jewish Nayfeld brothers, Boris and Benjamin, worked for an Italian mafia family, Lucese. A Polish mobster,Marian Kozina, using his father’s Sicilian name Fanchini worked for both the Italian mafia and also the Russian “Red Mafia” of Semyon Mogilevich. Known as “The Polish Al Capone”, Fanchini was one of the main “residents” of the Russian mafia in Europe. He was also suspected of being connected with killing General Marek Papala the chief of the Polish Police. In 2007 Riccardo Fanchini (Marian Kozina), a citizen of Belgium living in London, was arrested in Britain.

Dumping the “Baron of Death”
In a conversation with Peter Landesman at a Moscow second class Renaissance Hotel (2003), Victor Bout and his Syrian-born American partner, Richard Chichakli, tried to discourage the journalist from pressing them too much about Bout’s high connections:

‘’They’ll put you on your knees before they execute you,’’ Chichakli said. And Bout added, a bit later, ‘’My clients, the governments… I keep my mouth shut…If I told you everything I’d get the red hole right here.’’ He pointed to the middle of his forehead.

In a report, published in Belgium (2001), Victor Bout was presented as “the brain” of a large arms trafficking organization:

“Another Ostend-based company, which until 1997 was involved in arms’ smuggling, was NV Trans Aviation Network Group (hereafter “TAN Group“). The company was founded in 1995 and had its main office lodged in a totally new building at the end of the motorway from Brussels to Ostend. The parent company of TAN Group, AirCess is based in Sharjah, United Arab Emirates, and seems to perform a pivotal function amongst different aircraft companies trafficking in arms. The brain of the organisation is a Russian ex-KGB major, Victor Anatolevic Bout (previously referred to), reported to be now resident in Sharjah and undoubtedly on excellent terms with Russian and Ukrainian mafia and with former KGB-colleagues. As already noted, Victor Bout bought himself a luxurious house in a residential quarter of Ostend. His Belgian partner was a pilot, Ronald Desmet, resident in France near the Swiss border.”

After his true business had been exposed in the Belgian and international media, he had to leave Ostend and moved to Sharjah, but still in 1998 his illegal business via Ostend airport was not stopped:

“Crossing borders with extreme ease, the arms’ traffickers have truly multinational networks and pipelines… The Ostend operators, for example, reside in Belgium, collect their cargo from eastern European suppliers and deliver to clients across the world. Bulgaria and Slovakia are major sources of arms to be transported to war zones. Airports from where the arms’ transfer is organised or effected are mainly Burgas and Plovdiv in Bulgaria, Bratislava in Slovakia, a number of Russian airports, Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates and the airport of Ostend. The arms are subsequently delivered to the Sudanese airport of Khartoum, to Sierra Leone, Angola, the Congo or other war zones. All the airports mentioned above are still visited by aircraft from Ostend.”

Later on, Bout fled to Moscow because the FBI, the Interpol and many Western secret services were hunting him everywhere. Why would he allow himself take a great risk and go to Thailand to make a deal with the (alleged) Colombian FARC guerillas?

The answer could be found in a most recent report, published by Bruce Falconer on March 18, 2008 and entitled “Victor Bout’s Last Deal”:

“The decision to use the FARC to target Bout’s operation was not without precedent. In 2006, the same DEA unit nabbed Syrian arms dealer Monzer al-Kassar, the so-called “Prince of Marbella,” at Madrid’s international airport after ensnaring him in a bogus multimillion-dollar deal to supply weapons and explosives to the FARC. Al-Kassar remains in a Spanish jail, awaiting extradition to the United States. The sting that put him there was almost identical to the one that would later snag Bout. How could the Russian, renowned for the care he took in ensuring his own security, have fallen for the same trick? …

In Bout’s case, another factor may have come into play, namely that the FARC really was trying to acquire the types of weapons and equipment he was known to provide.”

But even if Bout had some good reasons to sell Bulgarian IGLA missiles and other weapons to the FARC, “immediately available” at his stores in Burgas and Plovdiv, why his Russian intelligence protectors (and business partners) did not avert him of a possible trap in Bangkok? The only logical answer is the following: his high Kremlin protectors wanted to “dump” him. And they really did that…with the help of the American Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA).

linkThis article was first published at Canada Free Press

linkDavid Dastych, 67, is a veteran journalist who served both in the Polish intelligence and the CIA; jailed in Poland by the Communist regime he spent several years in special prison wards; released in early 1990’s he joined international efforts to monitor illegal nuclear trade in Europe and Asia; handicapped for lifetime in a mountain accident in France, in 1994; now he returned to active life and runs his own media agency in Warsaw.

link Part I: The bad and good about Victor Bout: ‘Merchant of Death’ detained in Thailand
linkViktor Bout – Auslieferung in die USA?
linkViktor Bout, Afrikas “Merchant of Death”
linkGeheimer Waffendeal mit MEK Terroristen?<
linkSöldner, Gauner, Waffen und Rohstoffe
linkUgandas Ölfunde: Söldner fördern es, die Amerikaner kaufen es.
linkThe agency that runs Pakistan
linkThe criminal stories of the good soldier Bout
linkAlbanien/Kosovo: Mysteriöser Flugzeugabsturz im Gebirge
linkThe last Russian attack on American soil?
linkUnknown secrets of the communist past (Part I)

spionage

Gefangenentransporte nach Guantanamo wieder aufgenommen

World Content News – Die USA haben nach eigenen Angaben einen engen Gefolgsmann von El-Kaida-Chef Osama bin Laden in ihre Gewalt gebracht und ihn möglicherweise über Norwegen nach Guantanamo ausgeflogen. Die Zeitung „Stavanger Aftenblad“ berichtete Stunden zuvor in ihrer Online-Ausgabe, ein von der CIA für Gefangenentransporte verwendetes Flugzeug sei im norwegischen Sola zwischengelandet. Die Maschine einer vom US-Geheimdienst betriebenen Firma sei aus Brno (Brünn) in Tschechien gekommen und nach dem Auftanken nach Keflavik in Island weitergeflogen, hieß es unter Berufung auf Flughafenmitarbeiter.

Der Name des Gefangenen sei Muhammad Rahim, der Bin Laden 2001 zur Flucht vor den US-Truppen in Afghanistan verholfen haben soll. Er werde seit dieser Woche im US-Gefangenenlager Guantánamo auf Kuba festgehalten, sagte ein Pentagon-Sprecher in Washington. Der US-Auslandsgeheimdienst CIA habe Rahim in die Obhut des Verteidigungsministeriums gegeben, teilte er weiter mit.

Rahim soll Bin Laden geholfen haben, das Höhlensystem von Tora-Bora in den afghanischen Bergen zum Versteck auszubauen. Als US-Truppen Ende 2001 im Anmarsch dorthin waren, habe Rahim dem El-Kaida-Chef angeblich bei der Flucht Hilfe geleistet.

Damit ist erstmals seit September 2006 von offizieller Seite wieder eine Überstellung nach Guantanamo eingeräumt worden. Am 04.09.06 waren 14 hochkarätige Terrorverdächtige mit einer Militärmaschine im Folter-Camp eingetroffen. Tags zuvor wurden laut eines Zeugen, der nicht mehr auffindbar ist, drei arabisch sprechende Gefangene aus einem Gefängnistrakt der US-Kaserne Coleman Barracks in Mannheim-Sandhofen zu einem unbekannten Ziel ausgeflogen. Drei Tage später erklärte US-Präsident Bush, die Überstellungen nach Guantanamo würden für einen begrenzten Zeitraum ausgesetzt.


Folterflieger N4466A, aufgenommen in Stuttgart (2005) (Bild: airliners.net)

Bei dem am 14.03.2008 in Norwegen und anschließend auch in Island gesichteten CIA-Flugzeug handelt es sich um eine Beechcraft 350 mit der Registriernummer N4466A, die von der CIA-Firma Aviation Specialties betrieben wird. Sie landete am Freitag morgen auf dem norwegischen Flughafen von Sola bei Stavanger um 09:35 Uhr, um aufzutanken. Das Flugzeug war nach einem Aufenthalt in Stuttgart seit 2005 von der Bildfläche verschwunden. Erst am 28.01.2008 wurde sie wieder im türkischen Kayseri gesichtet, als sie auf den Weg nach Bagdad war.

Wold.Content.News hat im Anschluss an den norwegischen Medienbericht in Flighttrackern recherchiert und kann inzwischen folgendes bestätigen: Das Folterflugzeug (auf norwegisch: Fangeflyet) von Aviation Specialties landete tatsächlich im Anschluss nach der Sichtung in Norwegen im isländischen Keflavik (Icao: BIKF). Falls sich ein Gefangener an Bord befand, müsste er der Logik nach dort das Flugzeug gewechselt haben.


Terminal Air: Wann bitte geht der nächste Flug nach Guantanamo?

Denn folgendes hat sich auf diesem Flughafen abgespielt: Am Vortag (13.03.) traf eine Boeing 738 mit der Flugnummer BSK208 in Keflavik ein (Rufzeichen: BISCAYNE, fliegt für die Fluglinie Miami Air International). Sie kam aus Portsmouth, NH (Icao: KPSM) und muss wohl in Island auf das verspätete Flugzeug der CIA gewartet haben.


Ziemlich suspekte Boeing-Route: BIKF-KPSM-KGRK-MUGM (Guantanamo)

Wann die Boeing am Morgen tatsächlich wieder in Richtung USA abhob, ist seltsamerweise in den Aufzeichnungen nicht vermerkt (s.o.), diesmal hieß die Flugnummer BSK209. Zunächst ging es zurück nach Portsmouth und dann weiter auf den Luftwaffenstützpunkt Robert Gray AAF in Fort Hood, Texas (KGRK). Hier landen zuweilen auch Flugzeuge, die in Irland verdächtigt werden, Gefangene zu transportieren. Von dort aus schließlich (als BSK118) startete die Boeing mit ihrer Fracht das eigentliche Ziel an: Guantanamo Bay.


Miami Air Intl.: Endstation Torture (Flightaware)

Update: Auch aus Island liegt mittlerweile ein Bericht vor. Auf dem Flughafen von Keflavik wurden am Freitag zwei Piloten beobachtet, die es offenbar mit dem Auftanken mächtig eilig hatten. Anschließend sei die Maschine Richtung Grönland geflogen. Flugaufzeichnungen der 10-sitzigen Beech liegen erst wieder ab Sonntag vor. Sie belegen, dass die N4466A am 16.03. um 13:00 Uhr (Ortszeit) von Goose Bay in Kanada nach Manchester in New Hampshire aufgebrochen ist, und von dort weiter zu ihrem Stüzpunkt in Smithfield, NC (Johnston County) flog.

Offenbar ist es den aufmerksamen Flughafenmitarbeitern in Norwegen zu verdanken, dass das Pentagon, kaum dass der Gefangene in Guantanamo angekommen war, auch schon die Öffentlichkeit informieren musste, nachdem der Geheimdienstflug in der Presse Aufsehen erregte. Gut, dass es Leute gibt, die noch aufpassen.

Quellen:
Amnesty krever tiltak mot CIA (aftenbladet.no, 14.03.2008)
CIA flight landed in Stavanger (aftenposten.no, 14.03.2008)
USA melden Festnahme von engem Bin-Laden-Vertrauten
(markenpost.de, 14.03.2008)
Bin Laden escape agent is in Guantanamo now
(San Francisco Chronicle, 15.03.2008)

linkDieser Artikel erschien erstmalig bei World Content News

spionage

N34315: Welcome to Vienna

World Content News – Die geheimnisvollen CIA-Flugzeuge, über die seit Tagen Presseberichte aus der Slowakei, Ungarn und Rumänien kursieren, waren früher häufig zu Gast in Deutschland. Darunter auch der Guantanamo-Flieger N368CE, dem schon das Magazin „Stern“ mit einer Reportage seine Aufmerksamkeit schenkte. Und aktuell: Die zitierte Boeing N34315 ist auf ihrer Flucht vor Planespottern soeben in Wien gelandet. Herr Abgeordneter Dr. Pilz, übernehmen Sie!

Bei den gesichteten Flugzeugen handelt es sich um folgende Objekte:

N34315, Boeing 737, c/n 23366, Wilmington Trust
N731VA, Boeing 737, c/n 27456, Wells Fargo Bank
N742VA, Boeing 737, c/n 24773, Wells Fargo Bank

Alle drei Maschinen sind in Treuhandbesitz der obengenannten Firmen, der tatsächliche Besitzer und Operator ist aber die Firma Vision Airlines (früher: Premier Aircraft Management, Inc) aus Las Vegas, logistisch gesteuert werden sie wohl von Irland und Malaysia aus.

Die Boeing N731VA machte 2005 unter ihrer alten Registriernummer N368CE Schlagzeilen in der Presse, als dem Magazin „Stern“ interne Unterlagen des Frankfurter Flughafens zugespielt wurden, in der die Nahost-Destinationen der seit längerem als CIA-verdächtigen Maschine gelistet waren.

Tatsächlich ergaben Recherchen in Flugdatenbanken der FAA, dass die Boeing 2004 auch in Guantanamo landete:

N368CE   12.04.04   Wilmington, NC  –> Washington
N368CE   13.04.04   Washington –> Guantanamo, Kuba
N368CE   13.04.04   Sal, Cap Verde –> Casablanca, Marokko
N368CE   14.04.04   Rabat, Marokko –> Santa Maria, Azoren
N368CE   14.04.04   Santa Maria, Azoren –> Washington
N368CE   14.04.04   Washington –> Wilmington, DC

Im November 2006 wurde die N368CE auf die Nummer N731VA umregistriert, nachdem Planespotter aus Deutschland und später Irland wiederholt auf die mysteriösen Flüge aufmerksam machten. Jetzt fliegt sie zusammen mit ihren Schwestermaschinen direkt aus den USA nach Rumänien (Constanta und Bukarest) und Slowakei (Bratislava), wo sie auftanken und zu unbekannten Zielen im Persischen Golf weiterfliegen.

World.Content.News hat die Spuren der drei Maschinen gelegentlich verfolgt und innerhalb eines Jahres insgesamt 197 Flüge über Osteuropa festgestellt:

Von Bis Landungen N731VA   N34315   N742VA   Total
22.05.06 19.09.06 Bucharest 0 34 4 38
22.09.06 31.10.06 Budapest 0 13 12 25
03.11.06 25.11.06 Constanta 1 6 7 14
27.11.06 28.04.07 Bucharest 12 32 40 84
01.05.07   30.06.07   Bratislava   12 7 17 36


N34315: Über Bratislava in den Krieg?

In wessen Auftrag die Flugzeuge derzeit tätig sind, welche Destinationen sie am Ende wirklich ansteuern und mit welcher Fracht sie unterwegs sind, lässt sich derzeit nicht beantworten. Im offiziellen Auftrag für die US-Regierung fliegen sie jedenfalls nicht, diese Kontrakte müssen öffentlich ausgewiesen werden. Auffällig sind die zahlreichen (Zwischen-?) Landungen in Ashgabat in Turkmenistan, die die N368CE in ihrer Deutschland-Zeit aufwies, aber auch Landungen in Kabul und Bagdad sind darunter.

Dass mit den Flugzeugen nicht gut Kirschen essen ist, legt ein Bericht von slowakischen Medien nahe: Die Besatzung käme in „Wagen mit getönten Scheiben“ zur wartenden Maschine bzw. verließe sie so. Den parkenden Boeings dürfe sich niemand nähern, werden Flughafenmitarbeiter zitiert.

Möglich ist, dass sie zur Unterstützung der Kriege im Irak und Afghanistan eingesetzt werden und für private Geheimdienste oder Söldnerfirmen unterwegs sind. Parallelen dazu lassen sich nämlich in Irland festmachen. Auch in Shannon in Irland tauchen seit Monaten ehemalige CIA-Flugzeuge (N475LC, N478GS) auf, die für den Rüstungs- und Mischkonzern L3-Communication unterwegs sind, der auch einen privaten Geheimdienst unterhält.

Ob die Österreicher jetzt den geheimnisvollen Vogel rupfen werden, falls er wieder mal auftaucht? Schön wärs ja, hat man doch noch die Abfangjäger für die CIA Hercules N8183J in Erinnerung, die, wie man heute weiß, damals von einem gewissen Herrn Kamyar Pahlavi von der iranischen Schah-Familie für die CIA angeschafft wurde (Kosten: schlappe 11 Millionen Dollar), wo möglicherweise zusammen mit der N2189M Waffenschmuggel in großem Stil betrieben wurde.

Download: Flugdaten der Vision Airlines
(N368CE/N731VA, N34315, N742VA – zipped Excel-File 190KB)

Quellen:
Geheimnisvolle Boeings landen wöchentlich in Bratislava
(Der Standard, 12.03.2008)
Mysteriöse Boeing-Transporte in Europa? CIA als Initiator geheimer Flüge vermutet (networld.at, 13.03.2008)
CIA Boeing sighted in CEE (Budapest Times, 12.03.2008)
Shannon: Four suspect CIA flights refuel at airport
(limerickleader.ie, 13.03.2008)
Wo die Folterjets heute fliegen (blick.ch, 11.07.2007)
CIA-Flugzeuge sind auch nur Menschen
(N368CE-Bericht, stern.de, 09.02.2006)

linkDieser Artikel erschien erstmalig bei World Content News

spionage

Liars and Crooks: Kanzleramt war von Beginn an über das CIA-Entführungsprogramm informiert

World Content News – Endlich Klarheit: Tylor Drumheller, der Ex-Europachef der CIA, hat einem Bericht des Magazins „Stern“ zufolge die scheinheiligen Behauptungen der früheren Bundesregierung widerlegt, sie hätten von den geheimen CIA-Flügen und ihrer Verschleppungspraxis erst aus der Presse erfahren. Bereits im Herbst 2001 seien deutsche Sicherheitsbehörden sowie das Kanzleramt über das CIA-Entführungsprogramm informiert worden. Damit ist zumindest der frühere Bundesinnenminister Otto Schily offenbar der Lüge überführt, der heutige Außenminister Frank Walter Steinmeier und der jetzige BND-Präsident Ernst Uhrlau werden sich dagegen wohl wieder einmal aus der Affäre ziehen können.

Entgegen den Informationen des Stern, Steinmeier hätte behauptet, erst 2004 über die menschenrechtswidrigen Praktiken des US-Geheimdienstes informiert worden zu sein, verhält es sich tatsächlich so, dass die Politik es versäumt hat, den Rhetorik-Profi Steinmeier in dieser Hinsicht klar darauf festzunageln, wann er genau etwas davon erfahren hat. Denn der hatte stets betont, im Fall der Entführung von Khaled el Masri erst 2004 unterrichtet worden zu sein, was anderes hatte man ihm nie entlocken können.

Allenfalls Heuchelei wird man dem intern bereits als Kanzlerkandidaten für die nächste Bundestagswahl gehandelten Außenminister nachsagen können. Zitat Pressebericht:

Steinmeier selbst kündigte an, dass bei seinem Antrittsbesuch in den USA die Berichte über geheime CIA-Gefangenentransporte mit Zwischenlandung in Deutschland ein Thema sein werden. „Da das Thema auch ein Thema der innenpolitischen Diskussion in den USA ist, kann ich das nicht ausschließen“, sagte Steinmeier am Samstag in Berlin. Er erwarte eine Stellungnahme der USA, um die die EU gebeten habe. „Das, was zu lesen ist, gäbe in der Tat Anlass zu Besorgnis„, zitierte die „Bild am Sonntag“ den SPD-Politiker.

Anders dagegen Otto Schily, der hatte sich unvorsichtigerweise viel weiter aus dem Fenster gehängt. In der Annahme der Richtigkeit des Sternberichts und der Einlassungen Drumhellers wäre er der Lüge überführt. Zitat Pressebericht:

Bundesinnenminister Otto Schily (SPD) hat nach eigenem Bekunden keinerlei Kenntnis über heimliche CIA-Flüge oder über geheime Gefängnisse und Verhörzentren des amerikanischen Geheimdienstes in Europa gehabt. Er habe keine Informationen bekommen, «die mich in die Lage versetzt hätten, dafür zu sorgen, dass einem deutschen Staatsbürger kein Leid geschieht – zu einem Zeitpunkt, wo ich hätte eingreifen können», sagte Schily der Wochenzeitung «Die Zeit» unter Anspielung auf den Deutsch-Libanesen Khaled el Masri.

Und auch der stellvertretende Sprecher der früheren rot-grünen Bundesregierung, Thomas Steg, hatte somit ein falsches Statement abgegeben. Zitat Pressebericht:

Der stellvertretende Regierungssprecher Thomas Steg betonte unterdessen, es habe keine CIA-Gefangenenflüge aus Deutschland oder über deutsches Hoheitsgebiet gegeben. Die Bundesregierung habe von solchen Flügen des US-Geheimdienstes „keine Kenntnis“.

Auch das Bundeskriminalamt erklärte, es habe von derartigen Vorfällen keine Kenntnis gehabt.

Sehr viel vorsichtiger ist man dagegen in einer offiziellen Anfrage im Parlament mit dieser Frage umgegangen:

In der Kleinen Anfrage der Grünen „Berichte über verdeckte US-amerikanische Transporte und menschenrechtswidrige Behandlung von Gefangenen sowie deutsche Kooperation mit US- Sicherheitsbehörden“ heißt es:

Frage: 1. Welche Erkenntnisse hat die Bundesregierung zu Flügen seit 2003 über Deutschland und Landungen auf deutschen Flughäfen von Flugzeugen, die vom US-amerikanischen Geheimdienst CIA genutzt werden?

Antwort: Auf die Vorbemerkung der Bundesregierung wird verwiesen. Im Übrigen weist die Bundesregierung darauf hin, dass für Flüge durch den deutschen Luftraum in allen Fällen bei der DFS Deutsche Flugsicherung GmbH ein Flugplan aufzugeben ist.

Auszüge aus der „Vorbemerkung“:
1. Der Bundesregierung sind Medienberichte über angebliche Geheimgefängnisse der CIA in Ost-Europa sowie über angebliche geheime Gefangenentransporte der CIA durch Europa und die Bundesrepublik Deutschland bekannt. Die Berichte bedürfen der Klärung.

Es wird darauf hingewiesen, dass die Bundesregierung Fragen zu geheimhaltungsbedürftigen und nachrichtendienstlichen Zusammenhängen nur in den dafür vorgesehenen Gremien des Deutschen Bundestages beantwortet. Damit ist keine Aussage darüber getroffen, ob die der jeweiligen Frage zugrunde liegenden Annahmen oder Vermutungen zutreffen oder nicht. …

Und bla bla bla. Drumheller dagegen hat jetzt die Katze aus dem Sack gelassen: „Die Hauptsorge unserer Verbündeten war: Unilaterale US-Aktionen auf europäischen Boden, Terroristen abfischen, ohne ihre Genehmigung, um die dann in einen Drittstaat zu schicken“, sagt CIA-Mann Drumheller zum Stern.

Leider ist die Frage immer noch offen, ob es diese Genehmigungen gegeben hat. Dies lässt sich, wenn überhaupt, nur aus den Unterlagen der Flughafenbehörden ableiten, die die Bundesregierung nicht veröffentlichen will. Tipp an den Untersuchungsausschuss: Von der Regierung extra bewilligte Flüge sind üblicherweise mit dem Kürzel „STS“ ausgewiesen.

Wie dem auch sei, in der Bewertung dieses Theaters darf man sich getrost der Bewertung des CDU-Bundestagsabgeordneten Wolfgang Bosbach anschließen. Zitat Pressebericht:

Unions-Fraktionsvize Wolfgang Bosbach (CDU) geht bislang davon aus, dass deutsche Behörden nicht über geheime CIA-Flüge informiert waren. Sollten sie doch etwas gewusst haben, wäre dies ein „massiver Verstoß“ gegen die europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, sagte er im Deutschlandradio. Von den USA forderte er rasche Aufklärung. „Ich kann nur hoffen, dass die USA diesen Vorwurf entkräften können.“

Man darf gespannt sein, wie geräuschvoll die morgige Sitzung des BND-Untersuchungsausschusses verlaufen wird. Dann müssen Steinmeier und Uhrlau vor dem BND-Ausschuss im Fall des 2001 von der CIA entführten Haydar Zammar aussagen, der von Marokko nach Syrien verschleppt wurde.

Der SPD-Vertreter im Untersuchungsausschuss, Michael Hartmann, bezeichnete inzwischen den Vorabbericht des „Stern“ als unrichtig. Wesentliche Teile des Berichts seien falsch oder nicht durch Fakten belegt. Woher will der gute Mann denn das bloß wissen? Schlimmer gehts eben immer.

Quellen:
Ex-CIA-Mann belastet deutsche Kollegen (stern.de, 12.03.2008)
CIA-Geheimflüge: Steinmeier soll von US-Regierung Aufklärung verlangen
(Spiegel Online, 26.11.2005)
CIA Geheimflüge enthüllt – nicht vom Staat sondern von Weblogbetreiber
(readers-edition.de, 06.09.2006)
Antwort der Bundesregierung: Berichte über verdeckte US-amerikanische Transporte und menschenrechtswidrige Behandlung von Gefangenen sowie deutsche Kooperation mit US-Sicherheitsbehörden
(dip21.bundestag.de, 27.12.2005)

linkDieser Artikel erschien erstmalig bei World Content News

spionage

Unknown secrets of the communist past (Part I)

(In March of 1987, Warsaw-based journalist David Dastych, then a CIA operator was arrested and imprisoned by Communist secret police in Poland. In a series of articles for Nachrichten Heute, Dastych throws a beam of light on “Communist traitors of Poland living the high life on generous pensions and tells readers their names.)

David Dastych – On Monday, February 11, 2008 I met General Wojciech Jaruzelski, 84, in his office of a former President of Poland. It was the last in a series of meetings we held in several years. I came to discuss the trials he had to attend. He complained of catching infections and told me he probably would not live long enough to see the end of the trials. A few days later, he was admitted to a Military Hospital in Warsaw to be treated there for pneumonia and serious heart problems. Now he is back at home but still weak and convalescent.

This was the latest in a series of stays in hospitals in recent years, where Jaruzelski has been treated for lung and heart diseases. Barbara Jaruzelska, the general’s wife, was quoted in the media as saying that, in her opinion, her husband did not have the will to live any longer. Her statement referred to Jaruzelski’s resentment of a number of criminal charges that had been filed against him on account of his conduct as a top figure in Poland’s communist regime, including his role in the quashing of workers’ strikes in 1970 and the introduction of martial law in 1981.

The general has been accused of running a “criminal group of a military nature that intended to commit crimes.“ A strange accusation, indeed, against a politician and a supreme military commander who never refused to take full responsibility for all his decisions and actions in Poland’s communist past, admitting his mistakes and apologizing for all unwanted but true hardships and tragedies inflicted upon Polish citizens by the communist regime.

From the exile in Siberia to the Communist Party leadership
An extract from his biography published in the West: “Born July 6, 1923, into a family of landed gentry, Jaruzelski was educated at an exclusive Catholic school during the 1930s. During the German-Soviet invasion of Poland in 1939, Jaruzelski and his family were captured by the Soviet army and deported to the Soviet Union. There, Jaruzelski performed forced labor in the Karaganda coal mines in Kazakhstan before being chosen by Soviet authorities for Soviet Officer Training School. He participated in the liberation of Warsaw and Berlin as an officer in the First Polish Army, a Soviet-sponsored corps. He further credited himself in Soviet eyes by fighting against the anti-communist Polish Home Army (AK) from 1945 to 1947. Jaruzelski joined the Communist Party in 1947.

After graduating from the Polish Higher Infantry School and general staff academy, Jaruzelski rose quickly through the ranks. He became minister of defense in 1968, shortly before the Warsaw Pact invasion of Czechoslovakia in which Polish troops participated. In 1970 and 1976, when riots broke out due to government-imposed increases in food prices, Jaruzelski did not use the army to shoot at striking workers. He supposedly asserted in 1976, “Polish troops will not fire on Polish workers.” However, he has since been charged in Polish courts with partial responsibility for the 1970 shooting of demonstrators by the secret police. Jaruzelski rose in party ranks, becoming a candidate member of the Politburo in December 1970 and a full member in 1971.

By the end of 1980, the Polish Communist Party came under increasing pressure from Solidarity, which threatened strikes, and in turn from the Soviet Union, which massed more than 20 divisions on the Polish border for the stated purpose of regularly scheduled maneuvers. In addition to his position as minister of defense, Jaruzelski was appointed to the highest positions in both the party and the state as prime minister of Poland (February 1981) and first secretary of the Communist Party (October 1981). On December 13, 1981, after 10 months of high tension between the government, Solidarity and the populace, Jaruzelski declared martial law, arresting thousands of Solidarity members as well as Solidarity leader Lech Walesa. Martial law was not lifted until July 1983, although Solidarity remained outlawed.”

More from other Source:
“However, neither the imposition nor lifting of martial law solved Poland’s economic problems, which continued to plague the government. By the close of the 10th plenary session in December 1988, the Communist Party had decided to broach leaders of Solidarity for talks. These talks, which became known as the “roundtable talks,” with 13 working groups in 94 sessions from February 6 to April 15, radically altered the shape of the Polish government and society.

The talks resulted in an agreement in which real political power was vested in a newly created bicameral legislature and in a president who would be the chief executive. Solidarity was legalized. After the elections, the Communists, who were guaranteed 65 percent of the seats in the Sejm (the lower chamber of the parliament), did not win a majority, and Solidarity-backed candidates won 99 out of 100 freely contested seats in the Senate. Jaruzelski, whose name was the only one the Communist Party allowed on the ballot for the presidency, won by just one vote. “

Wojciech Jaruzelski remained president until being succeeded by Lech Walesa in December 1990. Subsequently, the last communist leader of Poland has faced charges for a number of actions he committed while he was defense minister and the head of state during the communist period. General Jaruzelski is to stand trial for “communist crimes” 27 years after he tried to crush the Solidarity trade union, declared a “state of war” in Poland and jailed tens of thousands of people.

The 84-year-old former military officer, who headed the Polish communist party and served as defense minister, prime minister and president, has always argued that his decision to impose martial law on Poland in December 1981, 18 months after the rise of Solidarity sent tremors through the Soviet bloc, was the lesser of two evils—aimed at preventing the greater despair and enormous human losses that could have followed an eventual Soviet Army and other Warsaw Pact troops invasion of Poland.

The never-ending trials
The Economist wrote about General Jaruzelski in 2000: “Once in a while, a glimpse into history helps to concentrate the mind. Take the life of Wojciech Jaruzelski, the apparatchik-soldier who ruled Poland under martial law. His has been an extraordinary saga, filled with tough choices. His story is also that of Poland: a noble birth, invasion, war, communism and its downfall–and perhaps retribution for its crimes. For, as part of a wider effort to confront the past, Mr Jaruzelski now faces trial for his part in the bloody quelling of the 1970 shipyard strikes that helped launch Poland’s organised, anti- communist opposition.”

This trial has a long history. The inquiry began in 1991, the indictment against 12 people held responsible for the December 1970 massacre of Polish workers at the Baltic Coast was ready by April 7, 1995. In 1970, General Jaruzelski was Minister of Defense. But he was not directly responsible for the use of firearms against the protesting workers. Jaruzelski claims he was trying to prevent the engagement of the Polish Army. The trial is not finished yet. It drags on fifteen years now, with recessions as long as five years. Some 3,500 witnesses have been called in and only 600 have been heard by the court–95 percent of them are ordinary people.

Recently, the court sessions have been taking 2-3 days in each week. General Jaruzelski told me he would not survive to the end of the trial. The chief decision-makers of that period are already dead. Jaruzelski confessed: “I have felt bad, I have been tormented by that” and I could feel “guilty in the moral sense” – because he could not prevent the use of the Army against the workers, protesting in December 1970. “The riots of 1970 were not politically motivated” he told me “these were spontaneous protests against sharp rises of food prices.” When the communist leadership of Edward Gierek repeated the same mistake in 1976, General Jaruzelski did not allow the use of the Polish Army against the workers in Radom and Ursus. He supposedly asserted in 1976, “Polish troops will not fire on Polish workers.”

The trial of the “December 1970 events” certainly has a historical significance, but one could doubt if it could help to bring about justice and to pass judgment on the true culprits. The only act of redress has been a recent decision of the Polish government to pay compensation (worth about US $25,000) to each of the surviving victims of the 1970 massacres in the Polish Baltic Coast cities and to the families of the fallen workers.

The second trial, of the decision-makers of the martial law imposed by General Jaruzelski on December 13, 1981, so far could not have been even started. The inquiry lasted three years, nine people are in the docks, including the principal defendants: General Jaruzelski, Gen. Kiszczak and Kania, a former first secretary of the Central Committee of the PUWP (Communist party), forced to resign in 1981 under Soviet pressure. A joint indictment against Jaruzelski and other accused people was made by the IPN (Institute of National Remembrance), under political pressure.

It is a criminal trial, in which the accused face charges of “communist crimes”, “conspiracy” and “breach of the Constitution of the Polish People’s Republic.” The trial was supposed to be held in the Warsaw City Center Court of Primary Jurisdiction and the indictment was sent to that court in April 2007. But the lower court rejected it and sent it up to the higher District Court, which…returned it to the previous court again.

Then a Court of Appeals sent it back to the District Court of Warsaw in December, 2007. It seems that neither the primary nor the higher court is ready to conduct this trial. Why? As this is not a criminal indictment but a political one. The case of the martial law, imposed in Poland on December 13, 1981, had been already thoroughly examined by a Special Inquiry Commission of the Polish Parliament (The Sejm), working from 1991 to 1996. The Parliament discontinued the inquiry in October 1996, by ruling that General Wojciech Jaruzelski and other decision-makers introduced the martial law (called “a state of war”) under the conditions of “higher necessity.” The criminal indictment against them, prepared by the IPN, opposes the decision approved by the Parliament in 1996.

In his Landon lecture at the Kansas University (March 11, 1996), Wojciech Jaruzelski explained his decision to impose martial law in the following words:

“The introduction of martial law was the most dramatic decision I had ever taken (…) I often had to resolve complex dilemmas. But that dilemma of 1981 was of a quite different dimension and of the very greatest specific weight since I bore the responsibility for the fate of the nation and country (…) I spent the weeks prior to taking the decision on martial law as in some horrible nightmare. I entertained thoughts of suicide. So what held me back? The sense of responsibility for my family, friends and country; the awareness that suicide would be a form of desertion unworthy of an old soldier.
You might well ask—why was another way out of the situation not found? Who carries the blame for that? My reply is—everyone and no one. “Everyone” since all parties: the authorities and “Solidarnosc” committed errors, though each evaluates them to differing extents. “No one”—since such is the outcome of assessing the realities of the internal situation and erstwhile international conditions (…) what were the circumstances in which the history of 1981 was created? It was very much something of a political, social and economic earthquake for which we were quite unprepared. Government and “Solidarnosc” were miles apart. The high temperature of the conflict raised an emotional barrier between us and darkened what could have been a rational picture (…) I am saying this to avoid any suspicion that I want to defend, at no matter what price, the decisions I took. Martial law was an evil, which resulted in various human vexations and sufferings, which I very much regret. But even so, they were a lesser evil than the multidimensional catastrophe which faced us as a very real danger.”

Over the last years, several times I discussed events of the martial law with Wojciech Jaruzelski. I also read his books, articles and pamphlets. For many of his opponents, in Poland and among the Poles living abroad, the “state of war” imposed on the country in 1981 was simply a “communist crime.” But it’s easy to jump to conclusions now, twenty seven years after that tragedy. There are many facts and decisions that are still unknown.

Documents of the KGB and the Soviet military and government have not been disclosed until now. Many secrets of the communist past remain undiscovered. In my opinion, shared by many people who personally witnessed the martial law in Poland and also the developments in the former USSR, there is no justification to try General Jaruzelski and other defendants in a criminal court, under selective accusations. They should be tried by a Tribunal of State that could properly assess their political responsibility, with the consideration of the conditions prevailing in the 1980s.

Meeting General Jaruzelski
Since leaving the President’s office, Wojciech Jaruzelski shared his time between writing articles, pamphlets and books and going to the courts. Occasionally he made short trips abroad to lecture or to attend international conferences and other meetings. I started to meet him in the late 1990s to talk about the recent Polish history and politics, about his meetings with several world leaders and also about the charges against him for his alleged crimes. During my journalist work in the 1970s and the 1980s, I had several occasions to meet General Jaruzelski.

But these meetings were always official. In 1985, for example, I sat near him at a press conference organized for over a hundred foreign journalists, including my dear American friend – Ms. Georgie Anne Geyer. More frequently, I met the spokesman of his government, Jerzy Urban and his close diplomatic adviser, the late Lt Col Wieslaw Gornicki – a known Polish international reporter and writer. In spring of 1987, Gornicki was to arrange for me a meeting and an interview of the General … but on March 20 I had been arrested by SB (the communist secret police), only a few months before my planned trip to the Soviet Union and an interview of Mikhail Gorbachev.

While interrogated in a Rakowiecka special prison ward in Warsaw, I wrote a paper addressed to Jaruzelski, proposing talks with Solidarity leaders and reinstating of Solidarnosc, the workers’ trade union declared illegal. I bet my paper never reached Jaruzelski or his deputy prime minister, Rakowski. It was his government “propaganda minister” Jerzy Urban, who contacted me to the last communist leader of Poland in the late 1990s.

In the next parts of this article series, I will write about former communist leaders that never have been accused of “communist crimes” they really committed. While General Jaruzelski is being called a Polish “Pinochet” and stands in the docks, one of these former communist high officials – a hard-liner Stefan Olszowski – is living quietly in Queens, New York City, and a former chief of the political police and intelligence, plotting with the KGB, General Miroslaw Milewski, still avoids a trial for his criminal acts. There are more of them—communists, traitors of Poland—who enjoy the good life and high pensions. I am going to expose them in my articles. There will be more in store, soon.

linkThis article was first published at Canada Free Press

sendenDavid Dastych is a former Polish intelligence operative, who served in the 1960s-1980s and was a double agent for the CIA from 1973 until his arrest in 1987 by then-communist Poland on charges of espionage. Now he is an international journalist, who writes for Poland’s acclaimed weekly, WPROST, Canada Free Press, and The Polish Panorama (Canada), Ocnus Net (Britain), FrontPageMagazine and The New Media Journal (USA), Axis Information and Analysis (international), Nachrichten Heute (Switzerland), Agentura.ru (Russia), and runs his own David’s Media Agency.

spionage

The last Russian attack on American soil?

David Dastych – After my analysis was published on the CFP on Sunday, February 24, “Russians Suspected in Shooting of Kremlin Critic Near D.C.” and Nachrichten Heute, a Reader from Texas e-mailed me with this message: “Actually it was his genitals that were blown off and Bush knew about it and called Putin on it. He got Russian support for UN sanctions against Iran and a promise not to shoot anymore of Americans. Wanna see doc Wheeler’s take on it? Let me know. Dan South Texas.” I asked him for Dr. Wheeler’s opinions and I got them today.

Let me quote from two articles written by Paul Joyal’s longtime friend, Dr. Jack Wheeler. The first was published almost a year ago, on March 7, 2007, and was entitled “What’s Dhimmitude in Russian?”

What means “dhimmitude”? It’s a Moslem term used for infidels and it means „behavior dictated by fear, pacifism when aggressed (against) rather than resistance, servility because of cowardice and vulnerability.“ This was exactly like some U.S. officials and the Main Stream Media reacted to the attempt on Paul Joyal’s life to appease the Kremlin.

“There is no word in Russian corresponding to dhimmitude – but there needs to be”, wrote Dr. Wheeler. “As I am writing this, a friend of mine for many years is fighting for his life in a hospital nearby, having been gunned down in his driveway for criticizing the leader of the world’s most powerful mafia, Vladimir Putin. On nationally televised „Dateline NBC“ February 25, [2007], intelligence expert Paul Joyal accused Putin’s secret police of poisoning former KGB agent Aleksander Litvinenko with radioactive polonium in London last November. Putin’s message in so doing, Joyal explained, was a warning: „To anyone who wants to speak out against the Kremlin: If you do, no matter who you are, where you are, we will find you, and we will silence you – in the most horrible way possible.“ Four days later on March 1st, Putin’s thugs – right here in Washington – did just that. They silenced Paul Joyal in the most horrible way possible. They blew his balls off. Media reports are that he was shot „in the groin,“ or „in the lower abdomen.“

How delicately phrased. Neither the media nor the Bush White House wants the truth clearly reported (…) The response of the Bush Administration has been to pretend it was a common robbery, to avoid embarrassing Russia’s gangster-president. George Bush has decided to be in fearful subservience to the Kremlin. Every effort has been made to squelch the truth of what happened to Paul Joyal on the night of March the 1st (…)”

“Spiking the story of Kremlin terrorism upon an American citizen in Washington DC was made more difficult, however, when the very next day after the attack on Joyal, Putin’s thugs murdered a Russian critic of their boss in Moscow. Ivan Safronov, the military affairs writer for the Russian magazine Kommersant, was thrown out of a fifth-floor window of his apartment building (he lived on the third floor). Two female students saw his body land and called emergency services to say he was still alive. They were told to call back in 30 minutes if he was still moving.

By that time he was dead. The police reported it as a suicide. Safronov was completing a story about Putin’s weapons sales to Syria and Iran. It would have created „a huge international scandal“ for the FSB – Federal Security Service, the renamed KGB – according to Kommersant’s editor. So FSB/KGB thugs with Putin’s approval, murdered him. Just like they murdered Anna Politkovskaya, author of the critical book, Putin’s Russia, gunning her down in her Moscow apartment building on October 7, 2006. Just like they have murdered a dozen other journalists since Putin came to power in May of 2000 (..)”

Dr. Wheeler concluded: “If George Bush has become Putin’s dhimmi, it would be a geopolitical disaster, a horrendous disaster for American national security. Thanks to Putin, Russia has become our enemy once again. Putin easily has the capacity to be more dangerous than Osama Bin Laden, if he is not already.”

But in the second article, published on March 16, 2007, “Your Prayers Might Have Worked”, Dr. Jack Wheeler admits that the Bush Administration had taken some steps to prevent further Russian “revenge” actions on American soil.

“As of today (Thursday 3/15), Paul is still in intensive care. He has begun to talk, but only physically, not lucidly – he can make sounds but not any sense. To be in this state after two weeks shows how horrible the attack on him was by the Kremlin-hired gunmen. And now, two weeks later, I know why the Bush White House has been quiet about it. Since the attack on Joyal, not only has Russia signed on to the latest round of UN sanctions on Iran, but has delayed completion of Iran’s nuclear power plant in Bushehr. Granted, the sanctions are weak – but the delay at Bushehr is anything but. The Russian technicians who are building the plant have already gone back home.

The terrorist act committed upon Paul Joyal is not the sole cause of this but contributed to it. Let’s say it was the catalyst (…)”

“Bush made it very clear to Pootie-Poot after the attack on Paul Joyal: There will never ever be an attack on one of your critics on American soil again – and you better offer me something worth my keeping quiet about it. The attack on Joyal was on March 1st. Bush communicated with Putin on March 6th. The Russian announcement ceasing deliveries to Bushehr came on March 12th. So just maybe, Bush has decided not to be Putin’s dhimmi after all.

Perhaps it is even of some solace to Paul Joyal that his testicles served to halt, however temporarily, the development of Iranian nukes.”

One year after Paul Joyal was fatally shot, probably by Russian intelligence paid gunmen, there are to be held “free” elections in Russia to choose a new President, who has been already “pre-elected” by President Vladimir Putin. Will these elections be rigged? Perhaps in part. But this might not be necessary as the huge propaganda machine developed under the rule of Putin might convince the Russian voters that Dmitry Medvedev will be their best choice. And what about Putin? He might become Prime Minister in the next government or retire to enjoy the wealth he had amassed as President of the Russian Federation. Some media sources report Vladimir Putin is worth about $ 40 billion. True or not, he is one of the richest men in a poor country – Russia.

As the so called “siloviki” (members of the Russian secret services) are in fact ruling that huge continent-sized country, we might still expect a continuation of their methods, so well demonstrated by a spectacular murder of Alexander Litvinenko. Beware of the wolves in sheepskin then.

senden Russians Suspected in Shooting of Kremlin Critic Near D.C.

linkThis article was first published at Canada Free Press

sendenDavid Dastych is a former Polish intelligence operative, who served in the 1960s-1980s and was a double agent for the CIA from 1973 until his arrest in 1987 by then-communist Poland on charges of espionage. Now he is an international journalist, who writes for Poland’s acclaimed weekly, WPROST, Canada Free Press, and The Polish Panorama (Canada), Ocnus Net (Britain), FrontPageMagazine and The New Media Journal (USA), Axis Information and Analysis (international), Nachrichten Heute (Switzerland), Agentura.ru (Russia), and runs his own David’s Media Agency.

spionage

US-Privatarmee “Blackwater” trainiert Taiwans Special Forces

Stephan Fuchs– Die US-Privatarmee Blackwater bildet Mitglieder der Special-Protection-Service-Gruppe des taiwanesischen National Security Bureau NSB aus. Der Special-Protection-Service bewacht den taiwanesischen Präsidenten; der NSB ist der Inlandgeheimdienst und übernimmt die Schutz – und Geheimdienst-Aufgaben des Landes.

Wie ein Insider von NSB berichtete, begann das Blackwater-Training bereits 2007 auf den Trainingsgeländen der Firma in Amerika. In den letzten zehn Jahren integrierte Taiwan seine Spezial-Brigaden mit der Army-Aviation-Brigade unter einem Kommando, dem Aviation & Special Forces Command (ASFC). Diese Einheit vereint die 60. und 603. Aviation-Brigade, die 862. Special-Warfare-Brigade und die neue Airborne Special Service Co, welche in Co, welche Antiterror-Operationen ausführt.

spionage

Russians Suspected in Shooting of Kremlin Critic Near D.C.

David Dastych – One year ago, Kremlin critic Paul Joyal was gunned down in the driveway of his suburban Maryland home. The case remains unsolved — but some see the hand of Russia in the shooting.

Joyal, 53, is the former chief of security for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and a former business partner of retired Soviet KGB Gen. Oleg Kalugin.

In February 2007, Joyal appeared on NBC’s “Dateline” and accused the Kremlin of seeking to silence its critics abroad.

Joyal said he suspected the regime of Russian President Vladimir Putin was involved in the assassination of dissident former Russian intelligence agent Alexander Litvinenko, who died from a dose of the rare radioactive Isotope polonium-210 in London in 2006.

On March 1, 2007, four days after his “Dateline” appearance, Joyal was returning to his home in Adelphi, Md., after meeting with Kalugin in Washington, D.C. As he stepped out of his car in his driveway, two men jumped out of nearby bushes. One grabbed him from behind, and Joyal was shot in the abdomen.

He spent the next 20 days in an induced coma and underwent five operations to repair the damage to his intestines, Congressional Quarterly reports.

Prince George County police considered the shooting a random street crime.

But Karl Milligan, a retired Prince George County police detective who knows Joyal, thinks otherwise.

For one thing, Milligan noted that Joyal’s home is located in a remote subdivision with no drive-through traffic.

“It’s so secluded you’d hardly know anybody lived there,” Milligan, who spent decades in homicide before becoming chief of the intelligence unit, told CQ.

“Crime was very low there and still is. There were no [violent] incidents prior” to the attack and none since.

What’s more, Joyal’s assailants ran off after the shooting without taking his wallet, computer, briefcase or car.

Kalugin told CG: “Why were they waiting for him? That’s not how robbers act. There are dozens of houses in the neighborhood. Why would they pick his? And why would they wait for him in the bushes at the house?”

The day after Joyal was shot, Russian journalist Ivan Safronov fell to his death from his 5th-story window in Moscow.

“A military correspondent for the daily Kommersant, Safronov was working on a story about the Kremlin’s furtive sale of anti-aircraft missiles to Iran and jet fighters to Syria,” said journalist Alex Shoumatoff.

The FBI was briefly involved in the Joyal case, but did not pursue it for long.

Paul Goble, a U.S. government specialist on Soviet and post-Soviet states, told CG:

“If the Russians were behind the attack on Paul Joyal, then they crossed a line that they had not [crossed] earlier even in Soviet times — attacking a native-born American citizen on American territory.”

This article was first published at Canada Free Press

sendenDavid Dastych is a former Polish intelligence operative, who served in the 1960s-1980s and was a double agent for the CIA from 1973 until his arrest in 1987 by then-communist Poland on charges of espionage. Now he is an international journalist, who writes for Poland’s acclaimed weekly, WPROST, Canada Free Press, and The Polish Panorama (Canada), Ocnus Net (Britain), FrontPageMagazine and The New Media Journal (USA), Axis Information and Analysis (international), Nachrichten Heute (Switzerland), Agentura.ru (Russia), and runs his own David’s Media Agency.

spionage

Investierte der BND in Liechtensteiner Bankmitarbeiter?

World Content News – Von wegen Informant: Die „Berliner Zeitung“ berichtet heute unter Berufung auf Geheimdienstkreise, dass der BND selbst jahrelang in Liechtenstein Banken ausspähte und dortige Mitarbeiter bestochen hatte, um an vertrauliche Kundendaten zu gelangen. Die Version des ominösen Daten-Anbieters soll erfunden worden sein, um diplomatische Verwicklungen zu vermeiden. Bestätigt sich dies, bekommt wohl nicht nur der BND Probleme, dann steht uns auch eine waschechte Regierungskrise ins Haus.

Laut der Zeitung soll der Bundesnachrichtendienst hohe Geldsummen investiert haben, um leitende Bankmitarbeiter im Fürstentum als Quellen anzuzapfen. Mit Hilfe mindestens einer dieser Quellen sollen demnach auch die Unterlagen über deutsche Kapitalanleger beschafft worden sein. Der Geheimdienst sollte mit stichhaltigen Beweisen den Verdacht belegen, dass Liechtensteiner Geldhäuser doch an Geldwäsche und Steuerhinterziehung beteiligt sind, was das Fürstenhaus abgestritten hatte. Die damalige rot-grüne Bundesregierung soll bereits vor Jahren die Schnüffel- und Bestechungspläne abgesegnet haben.

Liechtensteins Regierungschef Otmar Hasler kommt am Mittwoch nach Berlin, um sich mit Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel (CDU) auch über die künftige Zusammenarbeit der beiden Länder auszutauschen. Liechtenstein hat zwar für die Aufklärung der Steueraffäre in Deutschland Unterstützung zugesichert, will aber auch für deutsche Anleger weiter als Steuerparadies attraktiv bleiben. Wenn der obige Zeitungsbericht zutrifft, dürfte es dann hinter verschlossenen Türen ordentlich zur Sache gehen.


„Finanzdienstleister“ BND: Umschulung zum Kontoauskunftsmanager

Mittlerweile ist eine heftige Grundsatzdebatte darüber entbrannt, ob der Bundesnachrichtendienst nach Recht und Gesetz gehandelt hat, als er an der Beschaffung der Daten mitwirkte, die die Steueraffäre aufgedeckt haben. Aufgabe des BND ist es, Erkenntnisse über das Ausland von außen- und sicherheitspolitischer Bedeutung zu gewinnen.

Das bis 2006 gültige Verbrechensbekämpfungsgesetz sah in Art. 12 vor, dass der BND im Rahmen der strategischen Telefonüberwachung auch zur Bekämpfung von Straftaten in den Bereichen Terrorismus, Betäubungsmittel, Geldfälschung und Geldwäsche eingesetzt wird. Diese inzwischen außer Kraft gesetzte Regelung verwischte aber in einigen Punkten das Trennungsgebot zwischen Polizei und Nachrichtendiensten. Maßgeblich für die Zuständigkeiten ist jetzt das „Gesetz über den Bundesnachrichtendienst“, (BND-Gesetz – BNDG), das wiederum mit dem Bundesverfassungsschutzgesetz (BVerfSchG) korreliert.

Das für die Geheimdienste zuständige Parlamentarische Kontrollgremium wird sich am Mittwoch mit der Rolle des Bundesnachrichtendienstes in der Steueraffäre befassen. «Der BND wird in dieser Sitzung routinemäßig über diesen Vorfall berichten», sagte der Vorsitzende des Gremiums, Thomas Oppermann, am Montag im rbb-Inforadio.

Gegenwärtig sind im Großraum München Durchsuchungsaktionen angelaufen. Bereits am Sonntag sei eine Spezial-Einsatzgruppe der Steuerfahndung aus Düsseldorf nach einer Einsatzbesprechung am frühen Abend in die bayerische Landeshauptstadt gereist, berichtet die „Rheinische Post“. Es werden auch Razzien aus Bochum, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Ulm, Köln und Düsseldorf gemeldet.

Quellen:
BND späht Banken seit Jahren aus (Berliner Zeitung, 18.02.2008)
BND kauft angeblich Informanten
(Liechtensteiner Vaterland, 18.02.2008)
Gremium des Bundestags prüft Rolle des BND (Netzeitung, 18.02.2008)
Kontrollgremium des Bundestags befasst sich mit Steueraffäre (pr-inside.com, 18.02.2008)
Liechtensteins Regierungschef kommt in schwieriger Zeit nach Berlin
(net-tribune.de, 18.02.2008)
Ex-BND-Chef: Bezahlung für Informationen ist „die Regel“
(presseportal.de, 18.02.2008)
Steuer-Skandal: Koalition erwägt härtere Strafen
(Lausitzer Rundschau, 18.02.2008)
Steuerskandal lässt Aktien der Liechtensteiner Banken abstürzen
(Reuters, 18.02.2008)
Razzien im ganzen Land (Frankfurter Rundschau, 18.02.2008)

linkDieser Artikel erschien erstmalig bei World Content News