terror

Sicherheitsrisiko: Fernweh eines Heimkindes

Harald Haack – Menschen machen Fehler. Und wenn Menschen Fehler machen, gilt das als menschlich. Fehler, so wissen wir inzwischen, gibt es immer wieder – selbst bei massiven Sicherheitsvorkehrungen. Das lehrt uns, dass es keine echte Sicherheit geben kann.

Kein Mensch, außer dem der es geschafft hatte die Kontrollen am Flughafen London-Gatwick zu überwinden – ein zwölfjähriger Junge nämlich -, weiß, wo es die Schwachstelle gab. Trotz der massiven Sicherheitsvorkehrungen aufgrund der kürzlich verbreiteten Terrorwarnungen konnte der Junge, der aus einem Heim in der Nähe von Liverpool ausgebüchst war, sich am Montag, den 14. August 2006, als Großbritannien es mit seiner Terrorwarnung noch ganz „ernst“ meinte, in ein Flugzeug nach Lissabon schmuggeln. Er hatte schon ein Getränk und einen Snack erhalten, als er Flugbegleitern kurz vor dem Start als „überzähliger Passagier“ auffiel. Typisch britisch und hochnäsig borniert kommentierte ein Flughafensprecher die Panne: „Wir sind zuversichtlich, dass keinerlei Gefahr für Passagiere, Besatzung oder das Flugzeug bestand.“ Dagegen zeigte sich die Fluglinie „Monarch Airline“, in dessen Flugzeug der kleine Rotzlümmel einen Sitzplatz gefunden hatte, sehr besorgt. Auch die Mutter des Jungen war schockiert und versteht nicht „wie um alles in der Welt er in den Flieger gekommen ist.“

Aber es gibt Hinweise: Unbestätigten Berichten zufolge soll das Gatwicker Personal irritiert und überlastet gewesen sein, weil die Koffer und Taschen der Heathrower Passagiere in die Ausgabe des Ankunftsbereiches von Gatwick gelangt waren, es dort daraufhin ein irres Durcheinander gab und der Abflugbereich zeitweise vernachlässigt werden musste. Vielleicht war an dem Durcheinander eine Art „Mr. Bean“ schuld, ein übereifriger, chaotischer Sicherheitsmann. Vielleicht fällt in diese Kategorie auch ein Mann, der ebenfalls in Gatwick am frühen Dienstagsmorgen vom Reinigungspersonal an Bord eines leeren Flugzeuges entdeckt wurde. Er soll eine Aktentasche bei sich getragen und nach seiner Brieftasche gesucht haben. Damit löste er eine Durchsuchungsaktion aus. Eine Bombe wurde offensichtlich nicht gefunden. Ob aber die Brieftasche des Mannes gefunden wurde, gab die britische Polizei nicht bekannt. Sie sah die Sicherheitsvorschriften jedenfalls nicht verletzt. Das betreffende Flugzeug konnte dann endlich nach Mallorca starten – ohne dem Mann.

Krieg

Al-Qaida will in die Politik

Stephan Fuchs – Wie Reuters gestern berichtete will al-Qaida im Irak eine politische Operation starten. Der amerikanische US Militärsprecher General Major William Caldwell sagte gegenüber Reuters, die Terrorgruppe will sich nebst dem Köpfen und Bomben werfen nun auch zu einem politischen Faktor etablieren:

„Al Qaeda in Iraq wants to present itself as a legitimate organization and is striving to increase its operational power by building a political base with a military wing. Al Qaeda wants to build a political operation in Iraq to broaden its campaign against the U.S.-backed government.“

Dabei soll der politische Arm vor allem propagandistisch arbeiten um die amerikanischen- und ihre verbündeten Truppen moralisch zu schwächen und Unruhe in die Bevölkerung zu bringen:

„Al-Qaida in Iraq, through the media and other grassroots propaganda, will promote a theme that portrays the Sunnis as under attack by coalition forces, and the government of Iraq as being corrupt.“

Nicht nur; al-Qaida will, so befürchtet Caldwell, die miserable Sicherheitssituation und die hohe Arbeitslosigkeit sowie den Mangel an Elektrizität und Brennstoff als Anlass zu propagandistischen Schlagthemen nehmen, die den Besatzern schaden könnten. Wobei man bei diesen Themen nicht allzu fest am Esel reissen muss, um auf diese Weisheit zu kommen.

Dabei will Caldwell nicht zu vergessen wissen, dass der militante Arm der al-Qaida bestimmt nicht auf Gewaltorgien verzichten wird. Al-Qaida wird nach wie vor Anschläge ausführen und trotzdem sagt er:

„Al Qaeda in Iraq realizes killing of innocent Iraqi civilians has damaged their public support and is working to reverse that perception. By no means does it mean they intend to stop creating sectarian violence, but rather change the perception.“

Der militante Arm soll weiterhin vom Nachfolger Al-Zarkawi’s, dem Ägypter Abu Ayyub al-Masri aka Abu Hamza al-Muhajir geführt werden. Jener ist aber auch weiterhin ein Rätsel. Ein Anwalt will ihn in einem ägyptischen Gefängnis gesehen haben, dort sitzt er seit sieben Jahren ein. Pressesprecher zur Erklärung der genauen Personalitäten des neuen Terrorführers Abu Ayyub al-Masri aka Abu Hamza al-Muhajir, war ebenfalls Militärsprecher General Major William Caldwell. Sowas!

Peinlich: Al-Zarkawi-Nachfolger sitzt im Knast

deutschland

Tanz der Bluthunde um Günter Grass

Harald Haack – In Deutschland gab es immer wieder politisch rechts gesinnte Promis, die von sich und ihrer Meinung überzeugt waren und sich eines Tages vergaloppierten. Aber lange Zeit war es in dieser Hinsicht in Deutschland still. Zum Beispiel: Mölleman von der FDP. Sein Tod von liegt inzwischen lange zurück und der Streit um seine antisemitischen Äußerungen, die er als Kritik gegenüber der Politik Israels verstand, scheint vergessen. Nun aber hat es einen Linken erwischt, einen, den man bislang für einen Linken hielt, einen über den die „Bluthunde“ wieder hergefallen sind.

Besonders beißen sie jetzt an seinen linken „Heiligenschein“ herum. Ein wildes Geflatter wüster Beschimpfungen seitens der angeblich zutiefst Enttäuschten wie seiner Gegner füllt gegenwärtig die dünne Luft in der Presse-Landschaft.

Wahrscheinlich zähle ich zu jenen Zeitzeugen, die mitbekommen haben, wie Günter Grass auch Ende der Siebziger Jahre des Zwanzigsten Jahrhunderts seine Mitgliedschaft in der Waffen-SS erwähnte. Ich hörte es bei einem Vorgespräch zu einem Fernseh-Interview für Transtel, einer Tochtergesellschaft der Deutschen Welle, in Grass‘ damaliger Wohnung in Berlin.

Dem Interviewer und Kameramann Dieter M. hatte er dies beiläufig mitgeteilt. Doch M. war dies offensichtlich zu heikel, als das er es in dem Interview hätte verwerten wollen. Schließlich zählte es auch nicht zu seinem Auftrag darüber zu berichten. Und so einigten sich Grass und er, das in knappen Worten zum Ausdruck zu bringen, um was es der Redaktion in Köln eigentlich ging. Was das genau war, weiß ich leider nicht mehr. Ich war damals als Kameraassistent für die Ausleuchtung und für den Ton zuständig. Doch die Mitteilung von Grass über den wunden Punkt seiner Vergangenheit habe ich bestens in Erinnerung behalten, weil nämlich kurz danach eines seiner Bilder wie von Geisterhand angestoßen von der Wand fiel und das Schutzglas zersplitterte.

Grass war darüber sehr verärgert und machte uns den Vorwurf dafür verantwortlich zu sein. Doch ich zeigte ihm dann, dass der Nagel, an dem er das gerahmte Bild aufgehängt hatte, garantiert lose in der Wand steckte, wohl mehrere Male heraus gefallen war und dann jedes Mal wieder hineingeklemmt wurde.

Ich halte es für durchaus möglich, dass Günter Grass seine Mitgliedschaft in der Waffen-SS seit seiner Kriegsgefangenschaft nie verheimlicht hat, es gelegentlich gegenüber Journalisten erwähnte, die jedoch darauf nie konkret eingegangen waren. Der Tanz der Bluthunde um Grass ist wahrscheinlich eine Inszenierung jener, die Grass’ Mitteilung über die Jahre hinweg (wahrscheinlich vorsätzlich) überhört haben und die nun wohl, da er auf jetzt seine „Trommel“ schlug, sich fühlen, als hätten sie sich selbst angepinkelt.

Krieg

Kaum zu Hause…schon wieder an die Front

Stephan Fuchs – Krieg aus! Hieß es für rund dreihundert Soldaten die eben nach einem Jahr Krieg in Irak nach Alaska zurückgekehrt sind. Die Freude für die überlebenden und unverwundeten Soldaten war verständlicherweise enorm. Doch jetzt müssen sie zurück nach Bagdad, Donald Rumsfeld fürchtet eine sich ausweitende Eskalation der Gewalt. Die Soldaten und ihre Familien sind verärgert.


Müssen in Bagdad wieder ausladen

Die Soldaten der 172nd Stryker Brigade sind Bestandteil einer 3’900 Mann starken hochmobilen und kampfstarken Einheit aus Fort Wainwright in Alaska. Die Heimwertsbewegung der Brigade hatte sich bereits so weit entfaltet, dass 378 Soldaten schon in Alaska angekommen sind und weitere 300 auf dem Zwischenstop nach Alaska in Kuwait angehalten wurden und wieder an die Front geflogen wurden. Was bedeutet diese chaotische Aktion? Ist Rumsfeld von Panik ergriffen? Läuft ihm das Ruder aus der Hand?
„Of course, this comes as a huge disappointment to the families and perhaps a greater disappointment to kids that were really expecting dads and moms home,“
meinte Maj. Gen. Charles Jacoby, Chef der Armee in Alaska zu Reportern.

Aus taktischen Gründen sei es notwendig, dass ein erfahrenes Team wie diese Infanterie Einheit, welche mit den Stryker Armored Vehicle, einem vierachsigen Radpanzer an der Front für Sicherheit sorgte, meinte der Mayor weiter.

Die Einheit, welche im verhältnismäßig ruhigen Norden bei Mosul stationiert war, dient jetzt nach der unverhofften Rückkehr neuerdings in Bagdad. Dort scheinen die amerikanischen und irakischen Kräfte am Limit zu sein. Ob die 1000 Dollar extra im Monat über den Groll und die Enttäuschung weghelfen?

spionage

Ollie North and the C-123 Story

Bear Bottoms – Barry Seal made a decision to try and work off his legal problems. He started trying to get someone to work with him. He was having difficulty finding someone. Finally, in March of 1984 he flew his Lear Jet to Washington and received an audience with Vice President Bush’s Anti-Drug Task Force.

He first went to the National Narcotics Border Interdiction office and was referred to DEA Agent Frank White. Mr. White was a staff investigator for DEA Chief of Cocaine Desk Ron Caffrey. He told them an unbelievable story. He left without a deal.


One of Mr. North’s Contra Plains, a C-123. Now a Restaurant

Soon after, he was contacted and told that DEA Agents Robert Joura and Ernst Jacobsen would get with him and see if he could produce anything they would be interested in. Barry sat them down at a telephone and he called Carlos Bustamante and Felix Dixon Bates, who represented the Jorge Ochoa organization. Bob Joura and Ernst Jacobsen became Barry’s „handlers“. With that telephone call, Barry set up a meeting in Colombia.

The Colombian meeting resulted in plans for a large load of cocaine to be flown from Colombia to the US Barry returned to the US, briefed the DEA, and prepared for the trip. He flew a Lockheed Lodestar down to Colombia to get 1500 kilos of cocaine. Carlos Lehder was on the field to meet him. Barry did not want to attempt takeoff because the field was muddy. Lehder made him go anyway. Barry crashed on takeoff. The Cartel produced a Titan Cessna for Barry to continue on to the States. Barry said the plane didn’t have enough range. They said he could refuel in Nicaragua.

He flew the Cessna loaded with cocaine to Nicaragua, refueled at Los Brasiles, and took off for the US He was struck by anti-aircraft fire shortly after takeoff and landed in Managua where he was arrested and released through Frederico Vaughn’s efforts after a few days. Frederico Vaughn was an associate of Nicaraguan Government Officials. Barry told the Cartel that he would go to the States, get a larger plane and would return to Nicaragua to get the cocaine. Barry was flown back to the States in an aircraft owned by Pablo Escobar.

He briefed Joura and Jacobsen. Nicaragua!-They couldn’t believe it. It was not a known fact, prior to this event, that Nicaragua was involved with the Medellin Cartel. Barry purchased a C-123 from Harry Doan. Joura and Jacobsen started working on the details in Washington for clearances, and finally they were ready to go to Nicaragua. What they didn’t know was Washington DEA agents Ron Caffrey and his boss Dave Westrate were briefing Ollie North about the details of the undercover operation. What was being discussed in these meetings would greatly effect the undercover operation. Before the plane left for Nicaragua on its first trip, the CIA approached them and installed a 35mm camera in the airplane at Homestead AFB in Florida just before they departed for the first C123 trip to Nicaragua. That is the first indication that North/CIA/NSC had an interest in the operation.

The CIA also moved a satellite over Nicaragua and took photos while the plane was in Nicaragua. A U-2 spy plane also flew a photo mission over Nicaragua. That is the only direct involvement with the CIA Barry had…ever! Barry went to Nicaragua in the C-123 and returned to Homestead AFB on 06-26-84 loaded with 666 kilos of cocaine. Barry had used the 35mm camera installed by the CIA. Those grainy pictures became famous.

A second trip was planned and the agreement with the Cartel was after that trip everyone (Seal, Jorge Ochoa, Pablo Escobar, Rivas Gacha, Carlos Lehder, Frederico Vaughn, etc.) would meet in Panama or Guatemala to celebrate and pass around money. The whole Medellin Cartel and other high level people would have been arrested by the DEA in one fell swoop.

North blew the cover BEFORE the second flight ever left. Barry was taking $1.5 million in cash and other goodies requested by Escobar. North asked Caffrey and Westrate to have Seal land close to the Contras and give them the money. They refused because it would destroy the operation and hence the arrest opportunity. North threw a temper tantrum and leaked the information to General Paul Gorman , Commander of Southern forces in Central America. North figured that if the cover was blown then the DEA would give him the money for the Contras.

North was briefed about every aspect of the Nicaraguan sting by the DEA. There were at least two meetings in the Executive Office Building as testified to in Oversight Hearings before the Subcommittee on Crime of the Committee on the Judiciary, House of Representatives, One Hundredth Congress, Second Session, July 28, September 23, 29, and October 5, 1988 conducted by Congressman William J. Hughes,Chairman of the Subcommittee and Congressman Bill McCollum. Three top level DEA agents were interviewed by this committee. DEA Assistant Administrator Frank Monastero, DEA Deputy Assistant Administrator Dave Westrate, and DEA Chief of Cocaine Desk Ron Caffrey..

(Barry’s first flight to Nicaragua in the C123 was on June 26, 1984.) Present at the first meeting on June 27, 1984 were Dave Westrate, Col. North, Dewey Clarridge of the CIA, Kennedy Grafinrid assistant to the President, and Greg Johnstone Office of Indian Affairs at the State Department. North onducted the meeting.

Mr.Clarridge opened the meeting by producing photos of the first trip to Nicaragua. They were told that Frederico Vaughn was an associate of Nicaraguan Government Officials. The CIA later denied that they had knowledge about Frederico Vaughn’s relationship with Sandinista Officials. Second on the agenda was discussion about releasing the facts of the case would enhance the probability that Congress would vote for funding the Contras, if they knew the Sandinistas were involved with the Medellin Cartel. Next the rules of press releases were discussed.Then the future potential of the DEA case was discussed. Westrate testified that he made it very clear that a press release would jeopardize the case, and the future potential of the case was great. The DEA would not agree to blowing such a significant case.

(Note in North’s diary June 27: I am going to ask one of my staff to put it up.) Present at the second meeting on June 29, 1984 was Dave Westrate, Ron Caffrey, Col. North, Dewey Clarridge, and Greg Johnstone. North again onducted this meeting.Ron Caffrey testified in the oversight hearing that he brought the photos to this meeting.North already had the photos in the first meeting.

Clarridge produced them. Clarridgeclaimed that one of the people in the pictures was Frederico Vaughn, an associated of Nicaraguan Government Officials. Pressure was stepped up to get the DEA to go along with releasing the information about Sandinista involvement in drugs. North warned Westrate and Caffrey not to send Seal on the second flight, it would be dangerous. Westrate and Caffrey claimed they would not agree to blow the cover on such a significant case.

On 06-29-84, PRIOR to the second trip to Nicaragua, Gen. Paul Gorman makes a speech to the American Legion in El Salvador in which he mentions Nicaraguan involvement in drug smuggling. That speech said we had proof the Nicaraguan Government was involved with cocaine, and the speech was on a radio broadcast.North was sure that this leak would subvert the second trip and the Contras would get the $1.5 million that Seal was supposed to bring with him on that second flight. This leak reverberated back to the DEA who now were at a quandary as to what to do next.To North’s dismay, the DEA sent Seal and crew to Nicaragua anyway without telling them their cover was blown. DEA agents Joura and Jacobsen found out about the leak after the plane had already departed on July 7, 1984.

They tried to contact Seal and warn him but couldn’t make HF radio contact. When Seal landed at Los Brasiles in Nicaragua, they got a cold reception and no return load of drugs even though they saw cocaine at the airfield. Escobar said plans had changed and wanted him to go on to Peru and fly coca paste to Nicaragua.

Escobar would then send the cocaine manufactured from the paste to the US in small aircraft. North then desperately tried to cover his leak to Gen. Gorman by again leaking the information to the Washington Times AFTER the plane had already returned. Then blamed the leak that shut down the operation on the Washington Times story by Edmond Jacoby dated 07/17/84.On 07/17/84 Carlton Turner, Drug Policy Advisor at the White House, accused DEA Assistant Administrator Frank Monastero that the DEA had leaked the story. Monastero said that during this meeting and ccusation, Mr. Turner was very knowledgable about the case. Monastero angrily denied that the DEA had leaked the story and said that the White House had leaked the story. Nevertheless, the case was over and further evidence of Sandinista involvement would never be developed.

Their cover was blown, but Barry and his crew took off on the second flight to Nicaragua without this information. One of the crew members, the only one still alive will testify to this. North warned the DEA not to send the second flight. The government has maintained that Seal was informed their cover was blown before the flight, but Seal decided to go anyway in hopes that the Cartel had not heard about the leak.

Barry and crew departed on 07/07/84 for their second flight to Nicaragua. After a cold reception and the request by Escobar for him to go to Peru, Barry told Escobar he would have to make some repairs on the aircraft first, and returned to the US empty. The flight engineer that went on both flights will testify that they were not informed their cover was blown before landing in Nicaragua the second time and they saw cocaine at Los Brasiles. During the debriefing following their return from the second trip to Nicaragua was when they were informed about the leak.

North had blown the cover on the most significant criminal drug investigation in America’s history, while it was on going, and he and Reagan later used this information to get $100 million from Congress for the Contras. Remember Reagan showing the pictures of the plane on the ground with Barry, Escobar, Gacha, and Vaughn etc. clearly visible on national television. The Medellin Cartel went on to make history. North went on to wreak havoc.

The C-123 was taken to Mena and repaired where it remained from 07/84 to 06/85. There were two flight during this period, a maintenance test flight and a flight in which Investigative Reporter John Camp and Barry filmed „Uncle Sam Wants You.“

All of the people who have said they flew guns down and drugs back with Barry are lying. Everything Terry Reed says about Mena is a lie. Besides, Maj. Gen. John Sinlaub has stated that the Contras didn’t use American made weapons because as guerrillas the distinctive sound would easily give their positions away. Arkansas Sheriff Al Hadaway watched that aircraft during this period and verifies that it was not used for any more flights. Seal sells the C-123K on 06-15-85 back to Harry Doan for $250,000.I delivered it to his hanger at New Smyrna Beach Airport in Florida. We were never again associated with that airplane. It was later shot down in October of 1986 over Nicaragua with Eugene Hasenfus aboard.

Note: This story has never before been written in the detail and accuracy I have provided here. Some of it is totally unknown to the public.

Raul Castro’s fidele Kokain Connection
Gasmasken, Giftgas und Milliardenbetrug – auf den Spuren des Moshe Regev
Der Wonga Coup
Prostituierte, Parties, Pferderennen, Penny Stocks, Deutsche Bank in Toronto und Khashoggi
Gletscher, Safari und Zyanid – Barricks-Gold
Massenvernichtungswaffen für den Iran
Söldner, Gauner, Waffen und Rohstoffe
Geheimer Waffendeal mit MEK Terroristen?
Koks in Mexiko – Heisse Kartoffeln in Clearwater
Bermudadreieck: Koks, Gambling & Politik
Mit Nebelgespenstern, Koks & Poker rund um die Welt
Skyway und die Räuberpistolen
Der seltsame Weg einer DC-9
Hasenfus Kokain? Oder kein Hasenfus Kokain?
Swissair DC-9 „Graubünden“ steckt mit in der Kokain Affäre
Special Operation Samurais & die 5.5 Tonnen Koks
Kokain nicht nur Straffrei sondern bald Pflicht?
Wer war denn Mr. Bramble?
In Coca Mekka Schnee bis in die Niederungen
Die Old Boys Dirigenten von Genf
Das Old Boys Netzwerk
CIA-Flieger in Mexiko mit 128 Koffern voll Kokain erwischt
Verbindung von US-Politiker zu 5,5 Tonnen Kokain
Fallout an Heroin
Mit dem Flugzeugbomber, Oli North & Felix Rodriguez auf der Pista Coca
Pizza aus dem Hindukusch gefällig?
Islamische Mullahs & kalte Krieger in der Liebkosung
Krausköpfe mit Stinger-Raketen

umwelt

Endlich auch in Deutschland / Teil 4

Der Alkohol-Boom hat begonnen, Teil 4 (Bill Gates und George Soros investieren in Alkohol)

Karl Weiss – So mancher aus – sagen wir – Frankfurt rümpft innerlich die Nase, wenn man ihm etwas von Leuten in Bayern erzählt, geschweige denn solchen aus der Region Straubing-Bogen in der Oberpfalz, die Gegend nennt sich Gäuboden, nicht weit von München entfernt. Die Gegend galt als rückständig und die Leute dort als ‚Holzköpfe’. Nichts ist weiter entfernt von der Wahrheit als dies.

In Wirklichkeit sind die Leute dort lebenslustig, aufgeschlossen, viele junge Europäer und in einigem auch der hessischen Großstadt voraus. Zum Beispiel ist in Frankfurt noch jeder gezwungen, sauteures und umweltvernichtendes Benzin in sein Auto zu füllen, das die deutsche Außenhandelsbilanz belastet (wenn er nicht bis nach Homburg fahren will), während bei Straubing soeben eine der ersten deutschen Alkohol Tankstellen eröffnet wurde, ein Gemeinschaftsprojekt des Autohauses Reinholz in Ittling, des Autohauses Griesbeck, des Mineralölhändlers Diermeier und der Firma Röhrer.

Dahinter steht die Stadt Straubing, die sich zur Stadt der nachwachsenden Rohstoffe gemausert hat, die ‚biomasse GmbH’ dort und die bundesweite C.A.R.M.E.N., das bedeutet Centrales Agrar-Rostoff-Marketing- und Entwicklungs-Netzwerk (wer interessiert ist: die Website heißt carmen-ev.de), die in Straubing ihren Sitz hat in der Schulgasse 18 und die dort auch ein Kompetenzzentrum hat und ein Forschungsinstitut baut.

So mancher deutsche Automobilhersteller rümpft die Nase, wenn er von den US-Fahrzeugkonzernen General Motors und Ford hört. Sie galten als nicht sehr innovativ, wenig dynamisch und die Autos als eher hausbacken. Tatsache ist, daß sowohl Ford als auch GM über seine Tochter Saab heute weit fortgeschrittenere Autos anbietet als die deutsche „Hocharistokratie”, angefangen von DaimlerChrysler über BMW hin zu Volkswagen, nämlich die Flex-Fuel-Autos, die Benzin oder Alkohol in jeder beliebigen Mischung tanken können. Es scheint, daß deutsche Konzerne ihre Dynamik verloren haben, außer wenn es um Massenentlassungen geht.

Ein klarer Fall von: “Wer zu spät kommt, den bestraft die Geschichte.”
Ford bietet in allen seinen Verkaufsstellen schon jetzt oder spätestens ab Anfang September den Ford Focus als Flex-Fuel-Version ohne Aufpreis an. Damit hat der Focus gegenüber seinen wesentlichen unmittelbaren Konkurrenten Golf, Astra, Peugeot 307 und Renault einen wesentlichen Vorteil gewonnen: Die Zukunftsicherheit. Auch die Gebrauchtwagenpreise werden für veraltete Nur-Benziner einbrechen und für Flex-Fahrzeuge steigen. Wer in diesem Moment noch einen Nur-Benziner kauft, müßte bekloppt sein.

Daneben bietet Ford auch den Ford C Max als Flex-Fuel-Version an, ebenfalls ohne Aufpreis.

Das gleiche gilt für Ford-Tochter Volvo. Einige der Volvo-Modelle können ab sofort in jeder deutschen Volvo-Vertretung in der Flex-Version erstanden werden – genauso ohne Aufpreis.

Bei GM ist es ebenfalls die schwedische Tochter, die SAAB, welche einen Teil der Palette bereits in der Flex-Version auf Lager hat. Zwar wissen das noch nicht alle Opel-Händler, die auch SAAB vertreiben, aber mit etwas Nachhilfe lernen die schnell.

Wer heute ein Flex-Fuel-Fahrzeug kauft, ist zukunftssicher, ohne jetzt irgendwelche Nachteile hinnehmen zu müssen. Falls es noch keine Alkohol-Tankstelle in der Nähe gibt, fährt er so lange ganz normal mit Benzin. Sobald es eine gibt, wird er den Preisvorteil nutzen können und seine Kollegen mit veralteten Nur-Benzinern auslachen.

Besonders unverständlich ist die Weigerung des VW-Konzerns, seine ausführlichen Erfahrungen aus Brasilien mit der Herstellung von Flex-Fuel-Autos in Deutschland zugunsten des VW-Käufers anzuwenden. In Brasilien war man sogar Vorreiter in dieser Sache und hat bereits letzten Monat beschlossen, daß ab Januar 2007 alle VW-Personenwagen in Brasilien mit
der Flex-Fuel-Technik vom Band laufen werden.

Die einzige Erklärung für diese völlige Mißachtung seiner deutschen (und europäischen) Kunden ist darin zu suchen, daß die Oberen bei VW, angefangen vom Porsche-Chef, aufs engste mit der Ölindustrie verkungelt sind und den Verbrauchern diesen Vorteil vorenthalten, weil sie ihren Freunden dort zu höheren Profiten verhelfen wollen. Ausgerechnet Volkswagen, daß sowieso seit Monaten in den rufschädigenden Schlagzeilen steht wegen Prostituierten-Reisen-Skandalen und Korruptionsaffären und deshalb eine Verbesserung seines Images dringend gebrauchen könnte. Wenn nun die Umsätze einbrechen, werden es wieder die Arbeiter zu spüren bekommen statt der Schuldigen.

Jeder, der jetzt ein Flex-Fuel-Fahrzeug kauft, sollte sich übrigens auf der Site ethanol-statt-benzin.de registrieren lassen, weil er dadurch die Verbreitung von Ethanol-Tankstellen fördert.

Heute gibt es bereits 16 Alkohol-Tankstellen in Deutschland, die im folgenden aufgezählt werden:

1. Postleitzahlgebiet 9:
– 91583 Schillingsfürst, Ansbacher Str. 1
– 92421 Schwandorf, Regensburger Str. 55
– 93059 Regensburg, Weichser Weg 5
– 94559 Niederwinkling, Industriestr. 2
– 94699 Deggendorf, Hengersberger Str. 33
– 99439 Weimar – Großobringen, Wohlsborner Str. 1

2. Postleitzahlgebiet 8:
– 80469 München, Baaderstr. 6
– 84109 Wörth a.d. Isar, Siemensstr. 2
– 86529 Schrobenhausen, Pöttmeser Str. 9

3. Postleitzahlgebiet 6:
– 61352 Bad Homburg, Benzstr. 15
– 66740 Saarlouis, Schanzenstr.

4. Postleitzahlgebiet 5:
– 53773 Hennef, Frankfurter Str. 150
– 53842 Troisdorf, Hauptstr. 338

5. Postleitzahlgebiet 2:
– 24558 Henstedt-Ulzburg, Philipp-Reis-Str. 12

6. Postleitzahlgebiet 1:
– 16515 Oranienburg/OT Wensickendorf, Hauptstr. 69
– 16761 Henningsdorf, Fabrikstr. 8a

Wer Näheres über diese Tankstellen, ihre Lage usw. wissen will, kann auf der Site mobilohnefossil.de mehr erfahren.

Die großen Ölkonzerne mit ihren lichdurchfluteten, ultramodern stilisierten Tankstellen rümpfen schon mal die Nase über die „Freien Tankstellen“, aber sie haben sich soeben abhängen lassen und sind in die Liste der Dinosaurier geraten (groß, aber überholt). Wie zu erwarten, ist keine der oben genannten Tankstellen eine der großen Konzerne, sondern sie sind allesamt „Freie“ oder von kleinen Tankstellen-Gruppen. Offensichtlich verbieten die gigantischen Ölkonzerne ihren Pächtern, Alkohol-Zapfsäulen zu installieren.

Das ist ein Skandal!
Natürlich verdient Big Oil sein großes Geld hauptsächlich mit der Herstellung und dem Verkauf von Benzin, Diesel und Kerosin (auf Deutsch: Petroleum). Man glaubt dort offenbar, das Hochkommen von erneuerbaren Kraftstoffen auf alle Ewigkeit verhindern zu können, wenn man denn nur genügend Druck auf Politik, Pächter und Autoindustrie ausübt. Man hat dort aber anscheinend noch nicht gemerkt, daß der Alkohol-Zug längst abgefahren ist. Wenn Gates und Soros in Alkohol investieren, hätten die Alarmglocken klingeln müssen. Ab sofort ist jeder Moment, den sie noch verlieren auf den Zug aufzuspringen, der bereits in voller Fahrt ist, verlorenes Geld für sie. Andere werden Räume besetzen, für deren Eroberung man Jahrzehnte gebraucht hat.

Im Gedächtnis der Verbraucher wird der Eindruck bleiben, daß man erst Alkohol an Markentankstellen zugelassen hat, als bereits deftigste Umsatzeinbußen hinzunehmen waren. Und die Verbraucher sind keine Idioten. Sie erinnern sich, wo zuerst Flex-Autos verkauft wurden und wo sie zunächst zum Alkohol-Tanken hin mußten.

Daß die Öl-Giganten völlig unflexibel geworden sind, ist nicht nur eine Folge ihrer Größe und Unübersichtlichkeit (die wichtigsten gehören zu den 15 größten Unternehmen der Welt), sondern auch eine Folge ihrer absoluten Fixiertheit auf finanzielle Geschäfte, während ihre Tradition, die eine technische ist, völlig in Vergessenheit gerät. Keiner von ihnen hat in wirklich großem Umfang das Bohren an weniger rentablen Stellen begonnen, seit der Erdölpreis über 70 Dollar pro Barrel sich festgehakt hat, obwohl das die technische Vernunft geboten hätte. Dazu kommt bei einigen die Zusammensetzung ihrer Aktionäre.

Der Shell-Konzern zum Beispiel hat bereits ausführliche Erfahrungen mit dem Alkohol-Geschäft in Brasilien und verkauft u.a. brasilianischen Alkohol in die USA. Daß sie trotzdem diesen Vorsprung nicht ausnutzen und ihre Pächter Alkohol-Zapfsäulen installieren lassen, mag wohl teilweise mit den Aktionären zusammenhängen. Bekanntlich ist der Konzern mit dem genauen Namen „Ruyal Dutch – Shell“ immer noch zu wesentlichen Teilen in den Händen der Niederländischen Königsfamilie. Daß die Adeligen nach jahrhundertlangem Inzest nicht gerade zu denen gehören, die mit besonderer Intelligenz glänzen, ist verzeihlich.

Ähnliches mag auf den BP-Konzern zutreffen, ein anderer in Europa beheimateter. In Fernseh-Reklame-Stücken stellt man sich dar, als ob man ernsthaft an nachwachsenden Rohstoffen interessiert sei, doch die Realität ist eine andere. Alkohol gibt es an keiner europäischen BP-Tankstelle. Auch hier die Verbindung zum Königshaus, in diesem Fall dem Englischen. Man sehe sich nur den Thronfolger an.

In diesem Teil soll auch noch etwas eingehender auf die Frage des Kraftstoff-Verbrauchs im Vergleich Benzin-Alkohol eingegangen werden. Tatsache ist, daß Benzin pro Liter einen höheren Energieinhalt bei der Verbrennung hat, der etwa 1: 0,67 beträgt. Das bedeutet, Alkohol hat pro Liter nur etwa zwei Drittel des Energie-Inhalts von Benzin. Dieser Vorteil beruht darauf, daß die wesentlichen Inhaltstoffe von Benzin Kohlenwasserstoffe sind, d.h. das gesamte Molekül besteht nur aus Kohlenstoff- und Wasserstoff-Atomen und trägt vollständig zur Wärmetönung der Verbrennung bei. Der Alkohol dagegen hat als wichtigen Bestandteil ein Sauerstoff-Atom, das nicht im Sinne eines verbrennbaren Bestandteils fungiert.

Die Praxis hat aber in diesem Fall eine ganz andere Seite. Es gibt nämlich, auch mit modernsten Einspritzpumpen, keine ideale Luft-Benzin-Mischung, die eine glatte und vollständige Verbrennung des gesamten Benzins bei der Explosion im Otto-motor garantieren würde. Dies wäre nur der Fall, wenn man reinen Sauerstoff statt Luft mit Benzin mischen würde. Das ist ja offensichtlich kein in Frage kommendes Modell. Die tatsächliche Verbrennung im Otto-Motor mit Luft ist vielmehr unvollständig und verbrennt in Wirklichkeit nur etwa 75% des Benzins. Der Rest wird zwar gecrackt (das heißt, die Moleküle werden verkleinert) aber sie verbrennen (anfänglich) nicht vollständig. Dazu kommt, daß Benzin noch andere Komponenten als Kohlenwasserstoffe enthält, die zusätzlich die Verbrennung unvollständig machen. Die betrifft in etwa weitere 5% des Energieinhalts von Benzin. Im Effekt wird also zum Vortrieb des Autos im Ottomotor mit Benzin nur etwa 70% des Energieinhalts des Benzins genutzt.

Genau gesagt, verbrennen auch noch andere Bestandteile des Benzins nach dem Ausnutzen von 70% des Energieinhalts, aber diese Anteil tragen nicht mehr zur Explosionswelle bei, die den Kolben bewegt, der wiederum das Auto antreibt. Nur die Bestandteile, die bei der ersten eigentlichen Explosion verbrennen und den Kolben bewegen, werden genutzt.

Beim Alkohol hingegen haben wir so etwas wie ein Einblasen von reinem Sauerstoff in die Verbrennung: Der Sauerstoff kommt aus dem eigentlichen Molekül. Das ist der Mischung mit Luft weit überlegen. Das bedeutet in der Praxis, daß die Explosion mit einer viel vollständigeren Verbrennung in den ersten Momenten einhergeht, in denen der Druck gegen den Kolben aufgebaut wird. Dadurch kann bei Alkohol ein weit höherer Prozentsatz als 70% unmittelbar in Bewegung umgesetzt werden, wahrscheinlich um die 90%. Dadurch entstehen auch höhere Temperaturen im Verbrennungsraum.

Wer das gleiche Auto einmal mit Benzin, einmal mit Alkohol fährt, spürt diese Tatsachen sofort. Mit Alkohol ist das Auto deutlich temperamentvoller. Es beschleunigt schneller, nimmt das Gas leichter an, Überholvorgänge können schneller abgeschlossen werden und die Höchstgeschwindigkeit wird höher. Es wird auch der Motor stärker beansprucht, weshalb man heute bei Flex-Fuel-Autos Ventile und Ventilsitze mit spezieller Härtung verwendet.

Aber – und nun kommt das aber – dies geht auch mit erhöhtem Verbrauch einher. Ein normaler Fahrer, der diesen Vorteil nutzt, wird etwa ein Drittel mehr (also etwa 133%) verbrauchen als beim Benzin. Das sind zwar nicht die 150%, die man aus den Unterschieden des Energieinhaltes vermuten könnte, aber eben doch deutlich mehr. Aus 10 Liter auf 100 km werden da 13,3 Liter auf 100 km.

Aber – nun kommt das andere aber – wer genauso fährt, wie er mit dem Benzin gefahren ist, also die schnellere Beschleunigung nicht ausnutzt, sondern etwas weniger Gas gibt und die beim Fahren mit Benzin verwendeten Geschwindigkeiten wiederholt, wird so gut wie keinen Mehrverbrauch haben. Dieser könnte bei 5 bis 10 Prozent liegen, aber das liegt im Bereich der normalen Schwankungen, so daß dies nicht feststellbar ist.

Da unsere heutigen Motoren mit Benzin bereits eine absolut ausreichende Beschleunigung (sprich: Drehmoment) zur Verfügung stellen, kann man sich also bewußt dazu bringen, den „Sportlichkeitsfaktor“ des Alkohols nicht zu nutzen und wird dann den Preisvorteil rein im Geldbeutel haben: Alkohol kostet an den Tankstellen, wo man ihn bekommt, in der Regel ein Drittel weniger als Benzin.

Dies ist aber nur eine Momentaufnahme. Ist der Erdölpreis erst einmal bei 100 Dollar pro Barrel angelangt, wird dieser Preisunterschied nicht weit deutlicher werden.

Die Serie wird fortgesetzt

In den folgenden Teilen: Wie ist die Energiebilanz von Bio-Alkohol? Welche anderen Bio-Kraftstoffe gibt es und welche anderen natürlichen Land Produkte können zur Verbesserung der Umwelt beitragen? Für welche anderen Zwecke kann der Alkohol gebraucht werden? Was wäre die beste Alkohol-Quelle in Deutschland? Wie sieht es mit den Fahrzeugen mit Erdgasantrieb aus? Ist Alkohol ein Konkurrent zum Wasserstoff-Antrieb? Wie ist es mit den Brennstoffzellen? Können die mit Alkohol betrieben werden? Kann ein Flugzeug mit Alkohol fliegen? Und andere Fragen.

Der „Rush“ gewinnt an Tempo / Teil 3
Bill Gates und George Soros investieren in Alkohol: Was spricht gegen Bio-Kraftstoffe? Teil 2
Bill Gates und George Soros investieren in Alkohol Teil 1

Krieg

A Coup for a Mountain of Wonga

Dr. Alexander von Paleske — 16th August 2006– — The failed coup in Equatorial Guinea in 2004. Or: How a slew a British public school boys turned mercenaries/politicians/businessmen tried to take over an African state in 2004. Casting: Sir Mark Thatcher, Simon Mann, Eli Calil, Tony Buckingham, David Hart, Greg Wales and many more

The failed coup in oil rich Equatorial Guinea is in the headlines in Britain again, after the satirical movie COUP! is being shown and a book about the failed coup „THE WONGA COUP“ by Adam Roberts has just been published. The British paper „Observer“ in an article by Robert McCrum wrote two days ago:

“ adly the plotters, led by ill-fated Simon Mann, allowed their greed to get the better of their organization. Adam Roberts shows with merciless precision, how the dogs of war panicked, where they should have been cool, and screwed up, where they should have been clinically efficient.“

Efficient? In other words there is nothing wrong if a slew of former British public school boys stage a coup in Africa with some dozens of former apartheid soldiers turned mercenaries, provided they are cool and efficient.

We want these mercenaries out of Africa forever.

The Actors and the Spiderweb

Let’s start with the alleged leader, Simon Mann, former SAS man, Etonian, son of a rich beer brewing family in Britain, who after his service for queen and country became a mercenary under his boss Tony Buckingham, the latter number 244 on the list of the wealthiest Englishmen and former owner of British mercenary company Sandline and founder of and director in the oil company Heritage Oil, listed on the Toronto stock exchange.

His employee Simon Mann was basically looking after Buckingham’s ventures in many African countries, to call him the real godfather of that attempted coup seems far fetched, Tony Buckingham is fitting much better in these shoes.

Let’s continue with other persons in Britain, accused of being involved in the failed coup and their connections.

There is first to name Eli Calil, Britain of Lebanese origin, a friend of Equatorial Guineas’s opposition leader, Severo Moto Nsa. He allegedly brought Simon Mann and Moto together.

Calil happily and illegally allegedly banked money for the former horrible Nigerian dictator Sunny Abacha, who died a few years ago..

Calil is also being investigated in France for money laundering on the one side, and on the other side he is a close friend of Tony Blair’s Ex-Minister for scandals, Peter Mandelson.

Mandelson could no longer be gainfully employed in Tony Blair’s cabinet, because of several scandals involving “small gifts” from good friends including Calil. He, however, managed to get another job with Tony’s helping hand – a friend is a friend – more distant to the mother of all parliaments, this time as EU trade commissioner in Brussels.

Peter Mandelson has strictly denied to be involved or even have heard anything about the planned coup beforehand, we will see what the taped telephone calls will reveal.

There is Lord Jeffrey Archer, former chief of Maggie Thatcher’s Conservative Party who spent just a few years in prison for perjury and perverting the course of justice, however still a member of the House of Lords, whose sessions he must have sadly missed while in prison. He allegedly wanted to benefit financially from Simon Mann’s coup, as the stock market these days does not offer much and the interest rates are lousily low. So he allegedly put a bit of his pocket money, a few ten thousands of British pounds into Simon Mann’s coup savings account, placed in the tax haven of Guernsey. Of course, he denies, but there was a payment made by a J.H. Archer into that account. And he phoned Mr. Calil before the coup, most likely to tell him, that crime does not pay.

Unfortunately we must wait a bit to get insight into this account, into which other fashionable peers are accused to have paid money in as well, because a British court on the small Guernsey Island has blocked the request of the government of Equatorial Guinea to have a closer look.

And, alas, the former vice-chairman Howard Flight of the same party via the Investec banking group offered a loan of US $ 30 million for agricultural development in Equatorial Guinea – after the coup – of course.

Next in the line Greg Wales, old friend of the Thatcher family with African experience.
He denies having been involved, however an E-Mail, passed on to me to the by the widow of the alleged transportation officer for that coup, the German Gerhard Merz, who died after his arrest in Equatorial Guinea amidst allegations of torture, shows the exact opposite.

And there is David Hart, 60, Old Etonian like Mann, and old friend of the Thatcher family. He was Maggie Thatcher’s chief enforcer during the British miners strike in the 80s he handed out money for strike breakers from a suite at Claridges, a hotel in London, that takes per room per night, what a miner earns in one month. The Government of Equ. Guinea accuses him of being involved as well.

Not to forget Sir Mark Thatcher, Mummy Maggie’s son who has been famous for making headlines, negative ones mostly and who cobbled together an income without breaking too much sweat. Now barred from entering the US where his former wife and children live, after he was arrested in Cape Town and later confessed to have violated South Africa’s anti-mercenary laws and sentenced to a suspended prison term and a fine.

Buckingham, Spicer and Mann are old African hands, experienced to get mining rights in exchange for military hardware and software. The software consiting of old apartheid soldiers.

For Example Sierra Leone in 1998
Tony Buckingham’s company Sandline, of which Tim Spicer, Ex SAS, Ex British Colonel, OBE, was the chief executive until 2000, offered their service to ousted president Kabbah in exchange for diamond mining rights, with old apartheid soldiers of the infamous Buffalo Battallion, and Koevoet, well known killer units, their motto: shoot to kill, no prisoners, and their battleground in those days were the newly independent states of Angola and Mozambique with the refugee camps of the ANC and SWAPO.

The unit, named Executive Outcomes, was founded and headed by Eeben Barlow, former member of the Buffalo Battalion and then of the Civil Cooperation Bureau (CCB) the latter a South African apartheid death squad, which can take credit for countless extrajudicial killings inside and outside South Africa including hundreds of captured SWAPO freedom fighters allegedly killed with poison delivered by a Dr. Wouter Basson and the bodies thrown out of a plane over the Atlantic Ocean.

The international crook Rakesh Saxena, resident in Canada since 1996, offered them 10 million US Dollars, he had mining interests there as well, and with Saxena’s money Spicer bought tons of weapons in Bulgaria and elsewhere.

This was the start, of what was later called the Arms to Africa Affair. Active in this scheme there were also Simon Mann and Nick du Toit.

Nick du Toit was a former member of the apartheid South African terror and destruction gang called Reconnaissance Commandos or Recce. He came with his murder squad on 14th June 1985 into Gaborone/Botswana on a killing spree. They murdered 14 people amongst them a pregnant mother and a six year old child.


Mourning the victims of the raid, Michael Dingake, Ex Robben- Island prisoner
Photo: Dr. v. Paleske

This military intervention in Sierre Leone was in flagrant violation of an UN arms embargo, who cares, and with the approval of the resident British High Commissioner, Penfold. When the things came out, it nearly brought down the Blair Government.

Global Players
Already before their Sierra Leone job, Spicer, Mann and Buckingham had gone global in 1997, this time to the other end of the globe, Papua New Guinea for a lump sum of 36 million US Dollars to be paid by one of the poorest states on earth.

The Government there fought unsuccessfully against a rebel group on the Island of Bougainville to get hold of a copper mine, owned by the British company Rio Tinto. The fight erupted because of the environmental disaster, caused by the mine, that threatened to destroy the livelihood of the people there.

Buckingham, Spicer and Simon Mann offered “help”, the mercenary way via Sandline and Sandline subcontracting the dreck of the Ex Out mercenaries.

Also with them Lafras Luitingh, another former member of the Apartheid-CCB, who can take credit for having been involved in the murder of ANC activist Dr. David Webster on 1st May 1989 in Johannesburg and SWAPO Advocate Anton Lubowski in Windhoek on 12 October 1989.

However the army rebelled, Spicer was arrested and later released only thanks to discrete diplomatic pressure by the British government. Still they made their fortune, as they had worked on prepaid basis.

In preparation for the Wonga Coup attempt of 2004 Mann was collecting the former Executive Outcome mercenaries, promising them huge returns and off they went, their journey ended prematurely at Harare International Airport , capital city of Zimbabwe.

There Mann still is, guest of President Robert Mugabe in his Chikurubi Maximum prison, serving a four year prison term for illegally buying arms of war and earmarked for the extradition to Equatorial Guinea.

Mercenary Spicer big in Iraq
Meanwhile Spicer was busy elsewhere, He opened a new mercenary company after he left Sandline by the name of Aegis and the Invasion of Iraq brought him a fat contract by the Pentagon to the tune of 293 million US Dollar. He is now overall in charge of all the mercenaries in Iraq, totaling more than 20.000, quite a few former Executive Outcomes dreck.

And Tony Buckingham is busy in Iraq as well.
In 1995 he paid a courtesy call to Iraq, walking in the Hotel lobby of the Al Rasheed Hotel over a distorted picture of former US president Bush and exploring with former Iraq’s Oil minister possible oil ventures.

After he Invasion he is back, go with the flow, having good contacts with Iraqi Oil ministry officials and getting a prospecting license in Kurdistan for his company Heritage Oil.

And he quickly closed the mercenary company Sandline after the failed coup on 16th April 2004 with the flimsy excuse, that he did not get enough support from the British government while at the same time Tim Spicer got his 293 million US contract with the Pentagon.

Simon Mann has not revealed, who is behind the failed coup Calil? Buckingham? Ranger Oil Canada, Buckingham’s business partner plus Heritage Oil?, or all of them? and did they have the tacit approval of the British government?

The British Government and the Wonga Coup
The British Government got wind of the planned coup two month before it started. The Foreign office called in mercenary Tim Spicer, yes, Spicer, to tell the coup plotters something – what? Something what?

And what was the role of the British secret service Mi6?
Justin Longley was an employee of Simon Mann. He is the nephew of Sir Dearlove, who was the head of the Mi6 at that time.

What did Germany’s Foreign Office know, who tries to put the torture and death of Gerhard Merz in Malabo under the carpet and how much was Spain involved, where Severo Moto lives?

However Mann may talk now, seeing, that the Black Beach Prison in Malabo might be his last and final destination.

We will see, the scandal has not come to an end yet.

Dr. Alexander von Paleske is Head of the Department of Oncology at the Princess Marina Hospital in Gaborone/Botswana and Ex-Barrister-at-Law, High Court Frankfurt (M), Germany

linkAdnan Khashoggi, Rakesh Saxena and the Spiderweb
linkViktor Bout, Afrikas “Merchant of Death”
linkViktor Bout – Auslieferung in die USA?
linkNo „buy recommendation” for a book about a former mercenary.
linkUgandas Ölfunde: Söldner fördern es, die Amerikaner kaufen es.
linkKokain, Kindersoldaten und Killerkommandos – auf den Spuren des Waffenhändlers Yair Klein.
Bulelani Ngcuka and his Apartheid Soldiers

When the Regular Army goes, the Mercenaries come

linkHypo-Alpe-Adria – A Bank-Scandal in Austria?
linkBritish Mercenary Simon Mann’s last journey?
US aganist Iran (Gerhard Merz)
Conflicts in Africa – Millions suffered, a few became millionaires, one of them: Viktor Bout (Butt)

Geheimer Waffendeal mit MEK Terroristen?
Koks in Mexiko – Heisse Kartoffeln in Clearwater
Bermudadreieck: Koks, Gambling & Politik
Mit Nebelgespenstern, Koks & Poker rund um die Welt
Skyway und die Räuberpistolen
Der seltsame Weg einer DC-9
Hasenfus Kokain? Oder kein Hasenfus Kokain?
Swissair DC-9 „Graubünden“ steckt mit in der Kokain Affäre
Special Operation Samurais & die 5.5 Tonnen Koks
Kokain nicht nur Straffrei sondern bald Pflicht?
Wer war denn Mr. Bramble?
In Coca Mekka Schnee bis in die Niederungen
Die Old Boys Dirigenten von Genf
Das Old Boys Netzwerk
CIA-Flieger in Mexiko mit 128 Koffern voll Kokain erwischt
Verbindung von US-Politiker zu 5,5 Tonnen Kokain
Fallout an Heroin
Mit dem Flugzeugbomber, Oli North & Felix Rodriguez auf der Pista Coca
Pizza aus dem Hindukusch gefällig?
Islamische Mullahs & kalte Krieger in der Liebkosung
Krausköpfe mit Stinger-Raketen

terror

Sicherheitsrisiko: Sony-Akkus in Dell-Notebooks

Harald Haack – Für Flugreisende könnte es bald ein weiteres Ärgernis geben. Denkbar ist, dass Mobiltelefone, Kameras und Notebooks auch im Koffer künftig nicht mehr mit auf die Reise gehen dürfen. Die Akkus solcher Geräte stellen nämlich ein Sicherheitsrisiko dar. Wahrscheinlich wird es den Anti-Terror-Kämpfern der Flughäfen egal sein, ob die Akkus nur dann möglicherweise eine Gefahr sind, wenn sie ihre Energie abgeben oder den Strom über Netzgeräte aufnehmen.

Theoretisch wie auch praktisch ließe sich Plastiksprengstoff in Akkus unterbringen und Geräte könnten winzige Vorrichtungen enthalten, um den Sprengstoff zu zünden, ohne dass die Geräte zuvor in ihrer Funktion beeinträchtigt wären. Zwar bestätigte die Pressestelle der Bundespolizei am Frankfurter Flughafen, dass es durchleuchtungstechnisch möglich sei Sprengstoffe in Akkus aufzuspüren, doch ob dies für alle Sprengstoffe gilt, wollte man nicht verraten und verwies ans Bundesinnenministerium. Dessen Antwort steht gegenwärtig noch aus.

Aber es geht auch ohne Explosivstoffe, die in Akkus versteckt werden. Vor einigen Jahren litt der Mobilphonehersteller Nokia unter der Blamage, seine Akkus seien ein Sicherheitsrisiko für die Kunden. Von explodierten Handys war die Rede; ein technisches Problem soll die Ursache gewesen. Dann gab es angeblich einen anderen Fall in Schweden: Ein Notebook-Nutzer will sich seine Hoden angekokelt haben, weil das Notebook, das er auf seinem Schoß benutzte, zu heiß geworden war.

Und nun sah sich der Computerhersteller Dell veranlasst, den größten Rückruf in seiner 22-jährigen Geschichte auszurufen, weil viele der 4,1 Millionen Lithium-Ionen-Batterien „im Extremfall“ die Notebooks in Brand stecken könnten.

Dell muss Akkus zurückrufen, die von Sony hergestellt wurden. Ein Konzernsprecher sagte, sie könnten sich überhitzen, Rauch entwickeln und Feuer fangen. Davon betroffene Kunden sollen von Dell mit Ersatzbatterien versorgt werden.

Fast jeder Fünfte der 22 Millionen Dell-Notebooks, die zwischen dem 1. April 2004 und dem 18. Juli 2006 verkauft wurden, sollen solche gefährlichen Akkus enthalten. Besonders die Modelle Latitude, Inspiron und Precision zählen dazu. Aber welche Modelle genau von der Rückrufaktion betroffen sind, will Dell auf einer Internet-Seite erläutern. Leider versäumte es Dell diese Internet-Seite mit entsprechenden Sicherheitsmerkmalen auszustatten. Sie ist nicht zertifiziert. Entsprechend gibt es vom Firefox-Browser Warnungen.

Besitzer von Dell-Notebooks mit Sony-Akkus sollten diese Batterien entfernen und den Computer vorerst an die Steckdose anzuschließen, rät Dell.

Dell Battery Recall
Dell Batterierückruf

terror

The London Terror Gang III

01►Why is the Bank of New York Collecting Donations for a Designated Foreign Terrorist Organization?
02►Did LeT Earthquake Relief Money Fund the London Airline Plot?
03►Pakistani Charity Under Scrutiny in Plot
04►Pakistan Denies Islamic Charity Link to UK Bomb Plot
05►Italy: Over 13,000 Potential Terrorist Targets ‚Under Control

Why is the Bank of New York Collecting Donations for a Designated Foreign Terrorist Organization?
By Evan Kohlmann / Counterterrorism-Blog– As my colleague Victor Comras has written, this week, the U.S. State Department finally took the step of naming the Pakistani organizations Jamaat-ud-Dawa and Idara al-Khidmat-e-Khalq (IKK) as banned derivatives of the Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) entity known as Lashkar-e-Taiba (LET).

Last January, the Danish Institute of International Studies published a paper I wrote on the role of Islamic charitable groups in terrorist financing including a lengthy discussion of LET, Jamaat-ud-Dawa and IKK. These organizations have a militantly anti-American agenda and according to the U.S. Defense Department–provided direct assistance to Al-Qaida members fleeing Afghanistan in 2001.

Americans might be surprised to learn that–all along–the IKK has been collecting donations from inside the U.S. via the Wall Street branch of the Bank of New York (only steps away from the former site of the World Trade Center). The IKK’s website advertised this arrangement openly in English: „FOR TRANSFER OF FUNDS IN US DOLLARS… Please transfer the amount on the routing as follows: To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK. ONE WALL STREET, NEW YORK. NY 10286, USA.“

Any funds collected by the Bank of New York were then routed on to an „Islamic Banking Account“ held at Bank Alfalah Limited in Karachi, Pakistan. For IKK donors in Europe, a corresponding Euro routing system was also established, care of „Bayerische Hypo – und Veriensbank AG“ in Munich, Germany.

It remains to be seen whether the Bank of New York will finally close up shop in its dealings with Lashkar-e-Taiba as a result of the latest State Department designation. This case is a reminder that interdicting international terrorist financing remains a major ongoing challenge for U.S. banking institutions and regulators.

Did LeT Earthquake Relief Money Fund the London Airline Plot?
By Evan Kohlmann / Counterterrorism-Blog – An article in today’s New York Times suggests that Pakistani investigators have found a possible financial link between those arrested this week in connection with a would-be terrorist plot targeting U.S. airliners and a Pakistani militant group that, until just a few months ago, was raising money directly from the United States through the Wall Street branch of the Bank of New York.

The group in question, Jamaat-ud-Dawa, is merely a cover name for the internationally-banned terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT)–which has strong links to Al-Qaida and harbors a violently anti-American agenda. The relationship between the two groups is no secret, and even senior Pakistani government officials have acknowledged as much in media interviews. Last January, in a paper published by the Danish Institute of International Studies (DIIS), I discussed the troubling continued existence of LeT/Jamaat-ud-Dawa, and its questionable role in providing „earthquake relief“ inside Pakistan.

My advice to the Pakistanis is the same now as it was then: „Pakistan must take care that a humanitarian disaster like October’s earthquake does not lead to a manmade disaster fomented by religious fanatics emboldened by the sudden spread of [Jamaat-ud-Dawa’s] populist message. At a time when Pakistan’s government is increasingly under siege by fundamentalist militants, it must take care to keep such NGOs and missionary charities at arms length – to avoid inadvertently becoming their next victim.“

More relevant excerpts from the paper as follows:
„Organizations such as IHH are quick to respond to natural disasters and other human catastrophes. Unfortunately, these groups often seek to use these situations to gain leverage with destitute Muslim refugees. In August 1999, when a devastating earthquake struck Turkey, IHH reached the affected zones, in some cases, even before the Turkish government. Friction quickly grew between authorities tasked with relief and independent Islamist “humanitarian” groups. Ultimately, Turkey was forced to ban the IHH from participating in earthquake aid efforts because it was counted among several “fundamentalist organizations” operating “secret bank accounts” that were refusing to allow local authorities to oversee the distribution of their aid resources.“

„A similar situation is now brewing in Pakistan following the catastrophic October 2005 earthquake. Prompted into action by public anger at the slow pace of aid to local refugees, a host of religious extremist organizations have stepped forward in hopes of filling the void and presenting themselves as populist alternatives to the secular rule of President Pervez Musharraf. One such group is the political wing of the terrorist organization Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) – an entity formerly known as Markaz Dawa wal-Irshad and currently operating under the name“Jamat-ud-Dawa” (“The Islamic Missionary Movement”).

The MDI/LeT was founded during the late 1980s as Muslims from across Central Asia and the Middle East were fighting together against the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan.

After witnessing the formation of organized mujahideen units in Afghanistan – consequently – a group of Pakistani Muslim militants decided to “take[] a leaf from the book of [the] Afghans … [and] lit the torch of Jihad movement.” This new movement – which became eventually known as Lashkar-e-Taiba (a.k.a. “The Army of the Pure”, “The Army of Madinah”) – wascomprised of both intellectual and military components.

Markaz al-Dawa wal Irshad (MDI), the political wing of the LeT, was established first in 1986 for the purpose of “organi[zing] the Pakistanis participating in Afghan Jihad on one platform.”

According to internal documents published by LeT, the Pakistani founders of MDI “had [the] full co-operation of Arab Mujahideen who taught [them] the intricacies of Jihad and Qital [combat].”

On February 22, 1990, a group of Pakistani clerics and mujahideen commanders led by Hafiz Mohammed Saeed from the Ahl-e-Hadith movement in Pakistan “laid the foundation” for the MDI’s military wing (known as Lashkar-e-Taiba) with the joint establishment of their Camp Tango training facility in Kunar Province, Afghanistan.64 According to both Hafiz Mohammed Saeed and foreign recruits who joined Lashkar, one of the key individuals responsible for LeT’s formation and development was a prominent Saudi Al-Qaida member known as Shaykh Abu Abdel Aziz “Barbaros” (a.k.a. Abdelrahman al-Dosari).“

„Since its inception in 1990, the MDI’s military wing Lashkar-e-Taiba has participated in countless guerilla attacks on Indian soldiers, bombings of civilian and military targets in Jammu-Kashmir, and terrorist assaults on civilian targets in India proper, including a December 2000 attack on the Red Ford complex in Delhi, the Indian national capital.

Red Fort is considered a geographic landmark, featuring a museum and hosting thousands of tourists each year. According to LeT sources, a two-man Lashkar fidayeen (“suicide commando”) unit forced its way into Red Fort, opening fire indiscriminately inside the ancient, Mughal-built structure. The fidayeen squad reportedly killed two people and seriously wounded another – the senior commander of LeT Hafiz Muhammad Saeed later declared that the Red Fort attack was “a symbolic activity” intended to force India into withdrawing from Kashmir.66 In December 2001, the U.S. State Department officially named Lashkar-e-Taiba as a designated Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO).

In his public statement on the designation, U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell accused Lashkar of “seek[ing] to assault democracy, undermine peace and stability in South Asia, and destroy relations between India and Pakistan.” LeT’s political wing MDI was subsequently forced to change its name after it was identified in the same U.S. government designation as a “Sunni anti-US missionary organization” and part of LeT’s “fraternal network.'“

„Though the organization (currently known as Jamat-ud-Dawa) remains under the lead of Hafiz Mohammed Saeed, it has somehow managed to survive Pakistani purges on Islamic
militants – perhaps by publicly disavowing any direct link to Lashkar-e-Taiba.

Nonetheless, Jamat-ud-Dawa continues to push forward the agenda of LeT, including through charitable subsidiaries such as Idara Khidmat-e-Khalaq (a.k.a. “the Humanitarian Services Institution”). The mission behind the establishment of Idara Khidmat speaks volumes about the intentions of its founders. According to the website of Jamat-ud-Dawa, Idara Khidmat was formed in order to frustrate “certain hidden objectives” of other competing relief agencies from around the world:

In particular the aid donor institutions funded by the western countries are busy in preaching Christianity. They lure the people into meeting the basic needs of life to convert their faith avoiding argumentation. Africa is a special target of these Christian aid donor agencies. All the countries of South Asia in Middle East and Central Asia, western missionaries are engaged in changing the faith… Tsunami was the worst catastrophe of this century that rocked many countries.

More than twenty hundred thousands peoples were dead and hundreds of thousands were rendered homeless. Many aid-giving agencies reached this hour with their hideous traditional agenda and the news of their interest in making the people Christian instead of giving aid spread all over the world. Muslim orphan children of Ache were sent to Christian educational institutes and literature of Christianity was distributed. This conspiracy failed soon.

„Indeed, in the aftermath of the Tsunami disaster in East Asia, Idara Khidmat-e-Khalaq urged charitable donations and emphasized “[s]ome of the scholars are saying that it is imperative for all muslims do their bit for the relief efforts – for the sake of humanity as well as to compete with the non-muslim efforts.” In order to accomplish that goal, Idara Khidmat has likewise established “partnerships” with other suspect fundamentalist charities – including the previously discussed IHH in Turkey.

The designated recipients of support from Idara Khidmat admittedly include “relatives of martyrs” – presumably referring to the families of Pakistani mujahideen killed while fighting in Afghanistan and Kashmir.

Despite having been quick in the past to crack down on some suspected Arab-Afghan charitable front groups like Mercy International, Pakistani officials have not been as eager to crush the financial infrastructures of native militant groups like Jamat-ud-Dawa/Lashkar-e-Taiba. Despite having placed Jamat-ud-Dawa on a “terrorism watch list” in late 2003, Pakistani Interior Minister Aftab Khan Sherpao recently conceded during an interview that Jamat-ud-Dawa had nonetheless prospered by playing a key role in “the lifeline of our rescue and relief work.”

Sherpao was quick to insist that Jamat-ud-Dawa was “only involved in extensive charity work, and their footprint now covers almost the entire quake-affected zone in the country.”74 Sherpao’s comments reflect the surprising degree of deference paid to Hafiz Mohammed Saeed and his colleagues by the Pakistani government.

Perhaps Pakistani President Musharraf hopes to blunt the wrath of fundamentalist Pakistani militants by permitting them to continue on in a limited national role. Undoubtedly, given the desperation of thousands of Pakistani earthquake refugees, he seeks to avoid being accused by “domestic Islamic organizations” of “attacking legitimate Islamic institutions and intentionally hampering relief efforts.’”

„However, any strategy by Musharraf that offers legitimacy to Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jamat-ud-Dawa, or Idara al-Khidmat also carries with it major risks. One cannot but recall the prophetic warning of the Bosnian Muslim Military Intelligence Service in 1995 about the “polarizing” effect of extremist NGOs and the “far reaching damaging consequences” of tolerating them.

In a time of national emergency, no genuine, unconditional aid can logically be refused. But Pakistan must take care that a humanitarian disaster like October’s earthquake does not lead to a manmade disaster fomented by religious fanatics emboldened by the sudden spread of their populist message. At a time when Pakistan’s government is increasingly under siege by fundamentalist militants, it must take care to keep such NGOs and missionary charities at arms length – to avoid inadvertently becoming their next victim.“

Pakistani Charity Under Scrutiny in Plot
By Dexter Filkins & Souad Mekhennet /// New York Times, Aug. 13 – British and Pakistani investigators are trying to determine whether the group of Britons suspected of plotting to blow up as many as 10 commercial airliners may have received money raised for earthquake relief by a Pakistani charity that is a front for an Islamic militant group.

The charity, Jamaat ud Dawa, which is active in the mosques of Britain’s largest cities, played a significant role in carrying out relief efforts after last October’s earthquake in Pakistani-controlled Kashmir.

It is one of the most militant of the groups battling the part of Kashmir controlled by India. In May, it was labeled a terrorist organization by the United States government.

British and Pakistani investigators are looking into the possibility that the group, whose name means the Association of the Call to Righteousness, passed the earthquake donations raised in British mosques to the plotters, according to two people familiar with the investigation.

One former Pakistani official close to the intelligence officials there said Jamaat ud Dawa provided the money that was to be used to buy plane tickets for the suspects to conduct a practice run as well as the attacks themselves. The money is believed to have come directly from the group’s network in Britain and was not sent from Pakistan, the former official said.

“The Pakistanis have been asked by the British to examine the links between Jamaat ud Dawa and the suspects in the airplane attack,” the former Pakistani official said.

According to a former British security official familiar with the investigation, some of the money raised in British mosques also went to the group’s militant activities in Indian-controlled Kashmir. Both the former Pakistani official and the former British official spoke only on the condition of anonymity.

On Wednesday, Pakistani officials detained Hafiz Mohammed Saeed, the head of the organization.

On Sunday, a senior American law enforcement official said that the British police and intelligence officials had identified several suspected accomplices of the plotters who were believed to have provided support to the plot outside Britain. The new suspects were identified by checking the arrested men’s computers, the official said.

After the earthquake, which killed some 73,000 people, Jamaat ud Dawa raised funds in British Pakistani areas in London, Birmingham and Manchester. The group also urged British people of Pakistani origin to go to the region to help in the relief efforts, and hundreds did.

Several of the 23 suspects still in custody after the arrests by British police on Thursday — most of them Britons of Pakistani descent — traveled to Pakistan last year, ostensibly to help with earthquake relief efforts, said Nasir Ahmed, a leader among Britain’s Pakistanis and a member of the House of Lords.
Mr. Ahmed said he was not sure how many of the suspects rounded up last week had gone to Kashmir to help, but among those who had gone were the suspects arrested in High Wycombe, west of London. The former Pakistani official said several of the suspects had gone to Pakistan at the time of the earthquake.

The official declined to say whether the suspects were believed to have been organizers or people who had provided support, like passports and safe houses.

Mr. Ahmed said it was possible that those who went came into contact with the militant Islamic organizations that were doing the relief work on the Pakistani-controlled side of Kashmir, where most of the casualties were. Indeed, at the time, Jamaat ud Dawa was welcomed by people in the area for stepping in where the Pakistani government had failed. The group was praised as one of the few providing aid efficiently, while Muslims around the world complained that Pakistanis had been abandoned.

“In the first few days, it was only religious organizations, the militant organizations, that were prepared to dig out people and provide relief supplies,” Mr. Ahmed said. “It is possible that young people, many people, who have gone from U.K., may have fallen into hands of organizations like Jamaat Ud Dawa.”

As both a militant group and a social welfare organization, Jamaat ud Dawa resembles its brethren in other parts of the Muslim world, like Hamas in the Palestinian territories and Hezbollah in Lebanon. In the days after the Sept. 11 attacks, the United States government shut down many Muslim charities that it said were financing militant activities.

No one from Jamaat ud Dawa could be located Sunday in Britain. Its Web site says the organization has provided food to some 54,000 families who were struck by the earthquake. It also claims to be “one of the most feared militant groups fighting in Kashmir.” The Web site displays a photograph of Mr. Saeed leading a demonstration protesting the United States government’s designation of his group as a terrorist organization.

The details of the suspected plot to blow up the airliners began to emerge Thursday, when the police in Britain detained 24 people. The authorities said the suspects, most of them British-born young men of Pakistani descent, intended to smuggle liquid-based explosives onto 9 or 10 commercial airliners headed for the United States and detonate them as they approached. British officials said the plot, had it been successful, could have killed thousands.

The day before, on Wednesday, the police in Pakistan had arrested a British-born man they said was linked to Al Qaeda. They say they have at least one other British man in custody and are looking for at least one other suspect.

American and Pakistani officials have long believed that Jamaat ud Dawa is the successor organization to Lashkar-e-Taiba, which was banned in 2002 by the Pakistani government, under American pressure, after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

It has called for holy war against the United States, India and Israel. Although it has avoided direct association with Al Qaeda, links between the groups have often surfaced. Abu Zubaida, the senior Qaeda member captured by Pakistani forces in the city Faisalabad in 2002, was found hiding in a safe house for Lashkar-e-Taiba.

Pakistan Denies Islamic Charity Link to UK Bomb Plot
By Benjamin Sand 15 August Pakistan has rejected recent news reports linking a local charity with the alleged plan to blow up passenger planes headed to the United States from Britain. Officials insist money donated for earthquake relief did not fund suspected terrorists.

Pakistan Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Tasnim Aslam told reporters the allegations that money was diverted from charities to terror groups are completely baseless.

„These are all absurd stories. The objective is to malign Pakistan and to cast a shadow on the efforts made by Pakistan to uncover and foil this terrorist plot,“ she said.

The New York Times and Washington Post newspapers published stories this week suggesting a Pakistani charity, Jamaat ud-Dawa, may have provided funds for the alleged bomb plot.

Authorities in London are reportedly investigating an unnamed Pakistani charity with offices in Britain.

Britain is holding 23 people for questioning in connection with the broader investigation into the alleged bomb plot.

Pakistan, which has been credited with helping uncover the plan, has also arrested at least 17 other suspects, including a British citizen with alleged ties to the al-Qaida terrorist network.

The New York Times also said this week that Pakistani authorities are exploring a possible link between the suspects and the Jamaat ud-Dawa charity.

The United States has banned the charity as a terrorist organization on the grounds that it has links with the Pakistani Islamic militant group Lashkar-e Tayyiba, which is a State Department designated terrorist organization.

Lashkar-e Tayyiba is one of the largest groups fighting Indian forces in the disputed Himalayan region of Kashmir. U.S. officials accuse the group of maintaining ties with al-Qaida. Pakistan banned the organization in 2002 for links to terrorism.

Despite those concerns, Jamaat ud-Dawa, the charity, operated relief camps in Kashmir following last year’s deadly earthquake.
Jamaat ud-Dawa has denied funding any terrorist activities. It has also denied claims in The New York Times that it raises funds in mosques in Britain.

Don Van Natta contributed reporting from New Jersey for this article.


Italy: Over 13,000 Potential Terrorist Targets Under Control

August (AKI) – Security services in Italy are keeping under surveillance some 13,664 potential terrorist targets and have deployed some 19,559 operatives to do the job, the Interior Ministry announced on Monday. In the wake of last week’s foiled bomb plot at London’s airports securty measures in Italy have been „additionally reinforced,“ the ministry said in its latest report on security in the country.

Security at potential targets such as airports has come under greater scrutiny, and with British authorities arresting alleged Muslim extremists in connection with with the plane bombing plot, Italian police have also stepped up controls at „meeting points used by the Islamic community, call centres, Internet points and Islamic butcher shops,“ the ministry report said.

In recent months police have been able to deploy more agents to monitor terrorism threats by cutting down on the number of staff previoulsy involved in security escort duties from 3,116 to 2,686, the report said.

Over the last year security agents had identified 82,752 terrrorism suspects, reported 1,508 to the judicial authorities and arrested 618. In addition deportation procedures were in place for 2,012 foreign citizens, of whom 55 have already been expelled from Italy.

Since the beginning of August deportation procedures have started against seven North Africans – one Moroccan, three Algerians and three Tunisians – previously detained but released due to a recently introduced general amnesty. The seven are believed to be linked to „international terrorism cells,“ the report said.

The London Terror Gang II
The London Terror Gang I

Fair Use Notice: JNvH contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. The material is being made available for purposes of education and research of the subscribers themselves. This constitutes a „fair use“ of such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law.

surveillance

Danke Herr Präsident

Stephan Fuchs – Mit seiner Air Force One eben in Wisconsin gelandet, erklärte Bush den Medien, vor was wir uns fürchten müssen. Vor den islamischen Faschisten. Dazu Bush:..”a stark reminder that this nation is at war with Islamic fascists who will use any means to destroy those of us who love freedom, to hurt our nation.” Freedom? Die verlieren wir doch gerade dank Ihnen Herr Präsident.


Vielen Dank Herr Präsident

Dabei bedankt sich Bush bei der Regierung Blair für die gute Arbeit und natürlich bei den Geheimdiensten welche die lebenswichtigen Informationen sammeln um uns zu beschützen. Rühmlich war die Zusammenarbeit laut Präsident zwischen den amerikanischen und britischen Stellen und allem voran …“the cooperation amongst agencies within our government was excellent.“ Bei was denn? Als Agent Provocateurs? Ähnlich wie in der Moschee in Genf?

Bush erklärt, dass seit 9/11 Amerika sicherer sei. „Wir haben viel unternommen um Amerikaner zu beschützen …“ but obviously, we’re still not completely safe, because there are people that still plot and people who want to harm us for what we believe in. It is a mistake to believe there is no threat to the United States of America. And that is why we have given our officials the tools they need to protect our people.” Seltsam, müssten wir nicht Regierungsorgane haben die uns vor Leuten wie Bush und Blair schützen? Orwellsches Newspeek?

Zum Glück, und danke Herr Bush. Nicht etwa dass Terroristen mittels RFID und biometrischen Pässen und allerlei elektronischer Feindaufklärung an Gräueltaten gehindert würden, nein, einfach weil die Regierung damit unser Leben durchforsten wird und wir alle grundsätzlich suspekt geworden sind.

Bush: “The American people need to know we live in a dangerous world, but our government will do everything we can to protect our people from those dangers. Thank you.”

Der Dank liegt an uns Herr Präsident. Dank Ihnen und Ihren Regierungskameraden wird uns demonstriert, dass wir in einer gefährlichen Welt leben. Nur: die wirklich gefährliche Welt sind Sie.