kultur

Das Bild und das Wort

Marcel Pinon, Paris – Unsere Welt, schon bald der Elektronik ausgeliefert, scheint von Bildern und Worten in immerwährender Bewegung besetzt, deren Kraft und tägliche Allgegenwart (die Last der Worte, der Schock der Fotos) den vergänglichen Charakter oder die allzu oft kommerzielle Botschaft nicht verwischen können. Wir sollten weder den Platz der Worte und der Bilder vernachlässigen bei der Etablierung unserer sensiblen Beziehungen für die Kenntnis des Anderen; des Universums oder uns selbst; noch die Wichtigkeit dieser zwei spezifischen Charakteristika in der Entwicklung der Menschheit.


Eines Tages stellt sich das Bild in den Dienst des Wortes, um die Schrift zu bilden und erlaubt dem Menschen in die Geschichte einzutreten.

Das menschliche Wesen könnte definiert werden durch seine Fähigkeit Bilder hervorzubringen und Worte durch eine artikulierte Sprache auszustoßen. Die Erfindung des Werkzeugs und die Zähmung des Feuers können nur das Ergebnis einer Kette von konkreten Erfahrungen sein, um mit einer fast animalischen Fähigkeit die Kräfte der Natur zu bändigen. Es scheint nützlich, ja sogar notwendig, dem Bild und dem Wort ihren Sinn oder ihre ursprüngliche Funktion zurückzugeben, die in der Erscheinung der Kunst, der Spiritualität und der Wissenschaft entscheidend ist.

Gewiß ging die Rede dem Bild voraus, unterstützt durch eine körperliche Fähigkeit und dank der lautmalerischen Töne, die nach und nach in Worten Form annahmen und in ein mehr und mehr rationales Wortsystem eingefügt wurden. Das lateinische Wort „muttus“ bedeutet auch murren. Der Schrei und der Ausruf sind wohl dem Wort voraus gegangen, das – wie das Bild und das Wort übrigens später auch das Bild – im Blick, der Grimasse, der Haltung und in der Geste gründete (vielleicht auch in der Berührung und der Liebkosung).

Noch heute hängt das Verständnis des Wortes häufig von seinem hör- und sehbaren Zusammenhang ab. Dieses Zusammenspiel von Ton und Rhythmus läßt sich zu allen Zeiten in der Poesie, im Gesang und im Tanz erleben. Ein viel größeres Geheimnis umhüllt die Erscheinung des Bildes: der Widerschein, der Schatten, eine Spur oder eine Prägung. Die schweigende Bewegungslosigkeit des Kadavers konnten einen Prozeß einleiten, der zum Auftauchen der neuen Fähigkeit führte, die Umwelt mit einem wieder erkennbaren Zeichen zu versehen: Bild, Repräsentation, Wiedergabe, Entwurf, Marke, Bezugspunkt; später Allegorie, Emblem, Symbol, Code – siehe Fotografie, Kino, Hologramm… Eines Tages stellt sich das Bild in den Dienst des Wortes, um die Schrift zu bilden und erlaubt dem Menschen in die Geschichte einzutreten.

Die Schrift – und die Schriften – berichten von Rivalität zwischen dem Bild und der Rede, kaum ist ihre Verbindung in den Dienst der Bezeichnung getreten! (Über die Frage des Ursprungs der Beziehung zum Transzendenten, der Teilung zwischen dem Menschsein und dem Göttlichen) Von Gilgamesch zu Mohammed haben sich unerschöpfliche Quellen theologischer Streitereien vorbereitet. „Menschengott“ oder „Gottmensch“? Bilder und Worte einmal im Dienst erhofften Ruhmes, ein andermal im Dienste der unerbittlichen Verbote.

Aber wie viel Wunderbares – Monumente der Menschheit – wie viele oft grundlegenden oder erhabenen Werke sind noch erhalten durch die Magie des Bildes oder des Wortes, das in den Stein, den Ton, das Holz oder auf das Papier gezeichnet wurden. In diesem neuen Jahrtausend sind Wort und Bild durch Slogans und Logos skrupellos entwertet, in den Rang eines raffinierten Köders für fügsame Konsumenten degradiert. Führwahr, mehr denn je können das Wort und vor allem das Bild, das vielleicht universeller und absoluter ist, den Zugang zum Wesentlichen des Menschen wieder öffnen. Dort, wo Schönheit und Weisheit sich offenbaren, bestätigt die Kunst die symbolische und mittelnde Kraft des Bildes. Das Wort, das uns stets zu entgleiten droht, begleitet uns dennoch auf diesem Weg zu uns selbst und entzieht uns vielleicht ein wenig dem bequemen Schutz endgültiger Meinungen.

Marcel Pinon,« Passé Conseiller Fédéral de la Grande Loge De Françe », ist Chemiker und Alchemist. Er gilt als ausgezeichneter Kenner der Symbolik. Für ensuite – kulturmagazin und journalismus – nachrichten von heute schreibt er in lockerer Folge eine Trilogie. Die erste Folge: „ Das Bild und das Wort“, gefolgt von „Symbole“ und schließlich „Totentanz“.

Bild: Francois Bucher; Luzern & Burgund. Ohne Titel

vermischtes

Prejudging Bush in Iraq

Rachel Alexander – If reports by the National Intelligence Council and the Undersecretary of Defense can just be dismissed and replaced with dumbed down sound bites like „no WMDs have been found,“ why bother having Intelligence?

Ongoing criticism of the Bush administration’s actions in Iraq generally consists of the same two accusations; one, that the administration exaggerated the possibility that Iraq had WMDs, and two, that the continued presence of U.S. troops in Iraq is turning into another Vietnam. The left-leaning American press knows that if it continues to repeat these two themes, the American public will eventually start to believe them. Studies have shown that the more something is repeated in official looking articles or reports, the more people are inclined to believe that it must be true. Both issues are much too complex for the average American to digest in a few news sound bites or by scanning newspaper headlines. But it is easy to understand a few clichés; „another Vietnam quagmire,“ „more American troops being brought back in bodybags,“ and „the Bush administration lied.“

Critics of Bush contend that Hans Blix’s inconclusive search for WMDs was persuasive evidence that Iraq did not pose a threat to the U.S. However, this places an undue emphasis on the fact that Hans Blix did not find any WMDs at that particular time. In actuality, how significant were Hans Blix’s findings? Hans Blix is not the objective inspector that he has been portrayed as. As a student, he was president of the World Federation of Liberal and Radical Youth. He served as a member of Sweden’s delegation to the Conference on Disarmament in Geneva in the 1960s and 1970s. He is considered a leading scholar on Sweden’s neutrality policy (translation: avoid war at all costs). Former Deputy Prime Minister of Sweden, Per Ahlmark, has noted that Blix is considered, „a little too accommodating to dictators,“ and describes him as, „politically weak and easily fooled.“ Blix was appointed to head the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in 1981, the agency charged with inspecting Iraq for weapons under the Non-Proliferation Treaty. Right under Blix’s nose, Iraq built its nuclear weapons program. David Kay, an official of the IAEA at that time, stated that Iraq perfected techniques for hiding its program from Blix’s inspectors. According to David Albright, president of the U.S. Institute for Science and International Security, „Blix was fooled for years…He ran a toothless agency, and despite many reports that Iraq had a nuclear program, they [the IAEA] didn’t do anything.“

Because of Blix’s pacifist stance and history of incompetence in inspecting Iraq, he wasn’t UN Secretary General Kofi Annan’s first choice to lead UNMOVIC, the U.N. agency set up in the late 1990s to continue weapons and disarmament inspections. Annan settled on Blix as a compromise, because Russia, France, and China vetoed his first choice as too hawkish. Russia, France, and China were concerned with keeping on friendly terms with Iraq in order to continue their secret arms sales to Iraq. After Blix’s appointment, one newspaper editorialized, „To choose Blix, 72, to ferret out Iraq’s nuclear secrets is like hiring Inspector Clousseau to do the job.“ Blix conducted inspections in Iraq under UNMOVIC for three years, between 2000 and 2003, and admitted that the Iraqis were not cooperating but hoped that given even more time, they might begin to cooperate. Given this admission, as well as Blix’s inability to discover Iraq’s nuclear weapons program in the early 1990s, how could anyone think that Blix’s inability to find WMDs this time around conclusively meant anything? Furthermore, the Iraqis have now had many more years to further perfect their hiding techniques, and their refusal to cooperate should raise suspicion. Some of the Iraqi scientists who have cooperated have been killed.

Instead of relying upon Blix’s dubious findings, the Bush administration looked instead to the October 2002 National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), a report put together by veteran CIA analyst Stuart Cohen, the vice chairman of the National Intelligence Council, composed of senior intelligence analysts responsible for advising the CIA. The report concluded that there was a high probability Iraq had chemical and biological weapons, and missiles with ranges exceeding the 150-kilometer limit set by the U.N. Security Council. In a recent article in the Washington Post, Cohen pointed out that the U.N. as well as several friendly and unfriendly intelligence services had reached the same conclusions. The NIE conclusions were based upon information accumulated over 15 years, and Cohen noted that participants in the NIE swore under oath to Congress that the Bush administration did not put any pressure on them to come to any particular conclusions.

The Bush administration also relied upon information linking Saddam Hussein to Osama Bin Laden. Although the Left repeatedly insists there is no link, evidence has been emerging showing that there was a connection. The Weekly Standard obtained a copy of a memo from Undersecretary of Defense for Policy, Douglas J. Feith, dated October 27, 2003, addressed to two Senators on the Senate Intelligence Committee. It contained information compiled from a variety of domestic and foreign agencies, including the FBI, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Central Intelligence Agency, and the National Security Agency. The report included substantiated and corroborated evidence that Iraq established contacts with al Qaeda in 1990, and continued that relationship until this year. Iraq provided al Qaeda with explosives and weapons training, and in return al Qaeda used its connections with Afghanistan to facilitate the shipment of weapons and equipment to Iraq.

What this information reveals, is that the argument that Bush tricked the American people into supporting a war on Iraq is a straw man; in actuality, the real disagreement is over philosophy. Fundamentally, the Left will criticize whatever Bush does in order to hurt his chances of re-election. Defeating conservative politicians and supporting liberals is their first and foremost goal. Secondary to that in importance is actual adherence to their philosophy. As we saw with President Clinton in Kosovo, many on the Left will support military action if it is initiated by one of theirs. Leftists generally dislike assertive defense, but compromised in Kosovo because it was more important to them to support Clinton.

The second criticism of Bush currently repeated ad nauseum is that the U.S. needs to withdraw its troops and completely relinquish control of Iraq’s government to the U.N. and the Iraqis; otherwise the U.S. may find itself enmeshed in another Vietnam. Superficially, this statement makes a persuasive sound bite. But it is not accurate. Unlike Vietnam, thousands of American soldiers are not being killed, the numbers are far less. Less than 450 U.S. troops have been killed since major combat was declared over on May 1, 2003. There is no draft of soldiers as there was in Vietnam; all of the men and women serving in Iraq volunteered prior to the war to serve in the military. And handing over complete control this quickly to the Iraqis will likely allow the hard-line majority Shiites to set up a theocratic government that is oppressive to the Kurds and the Sunnis, resulting in needless more deaths. Allowing the U.N. to take full control immediately could also result in a Shiite controlled government, since countries like France and Germany, which have consistently questioned outside intervention in Iraq, would push for a very limited U.N. role. Criticism of the U.S.’s continued presence in Iraq is another straw man argument, because the Bush administration is gradually ceding control to the U.N. and the Iraqis. The Left is simply quibbling about a few months here and there along the timeline.

The citizens of Iraq do not want the U.S. to leave; according to a recent Gallup poll, 71% of Baghdad residents want the U.S. to remain in Iraq over the next few months. There is some valid criticism of the expense it will cost U.S. taxpayers to rebuild Iraq. It is hoped that the Bush administration will find some way to deflect most of this cost; either by convincing other countries to contribute to the expense, or by skimming off a temporary small profit from the sale of Iraqi oil. Bush has just appointed a „debt envoy,“ former Secretary of State James Baker, to assist Iraq with paying its foreign debt.

Unfortunately, instead of criticizing the expense to U.S. taxpayers, or the loss of lives of American troops, most critics revert back to quibbling with the timeline of disengagement in Iraq, and repeating the increasingly discredited argument that Bush misled the American people about WMDs in Iraq. There is room for valid disagreement over the policy in Iraq, but not disagreement that comes at the expense of facts. If reports by the National Intelligence Council and the Undersecretary of Defense can just be dismissed and replaced with dumbed down sound bites like „no WMDs have been found,“ why bother having Intelligence?


Rachel Alexander
ist praktizierende Anwältin für die Regierung in Phönix im U.S. Staat Arizona. Als ehemaliges Redaktionsmitglied und Kolumnistin des Arizona Daily Wildcat, gewann sie für ihre journalistischen Arbeiten drei Auszeichnungen und schreibt Kolumnen für IntellectualConservative.com und oraclesyndicate.org

vermischtes

Kampf um Wasser

Seit Anbeginn der Geschichte ist Wasser der Quell menschlichen Seins. Ohne Wasser kein nichts. Als symbolischer Träger der Schöpfungsgeschichte, der Materia prima, spielt es in sämtlichen Religionen und Mythen eine zentrale Rolle des Werdens und des Seins. Es ist Symbol der körperlichen, seelischen und geistigen Reinigungs- und Erneuerungskraft. Das Symbol des Lebens schlechthin. Ohne Wasser gibt es kein Leben auf der Erde.


Materia Prima!

Wasser ist aber auch ein Zeichen der Macht. Seit Menschengedenken wird um das Wasser gekämpft. Wer sich Zugang zum Wasser beschafft, überlebt nicht nur, sondern sichert sich auch die geistig-symbolische Macht und die Gunst der Durstigen.

Anderthalb milliarden Menschen haben keinen Zugang zu Trinkwasser und zwei milliarden Menschen haben nur Zugang zu schlechtem Wasser. Die restlichen vier milliarden Menschen sind Günstlinge.

Die Raubritter
Das chaotische Wachstum der Megastädte, von denen 17 von 22 in der dritten Welt stehen, die rigorose Abholzung der Regenwälder, die maßlose Verschmutzung und Vergewaltigung dieses kostbarsten Gutes des Menschen nimmt, wie alle wissen, bedrohliche Ausmaße an und hinterlässt irreparable Schäden.

Damit aber nicht genug, Wasser fällt immer mehr in die Hände der Raubritter großer globaler Konzerne. Das kostbarste Gut der Menschheit wird zum Raubschatz der Konzerne, die ihrerseits das Wasser und dessen Verteilung kontrollieren. Zu den Wassermächtigsten Powergruppen gehören Danaone und Nestlé.
Dass die Macht über Wasser durchaus auch symbolischen Charakter hat, zeigen Beispiele:

In den sechziger und siebziger Jahren wurde, vor allem in der kalifornischen Wüste, der Swimmingpool zum Symbol der Freiheit, zum Inbegriff eines triumphierenden Amerika, das eben dabei war den Mond zu betreten und als Erbe der Menschheit das All zu erkunden. Es ist der Sieg über die Natur.

Riesige Staudämme werden gebaut. Nicht zuletzt auch um die Überlegenheit über die Natur und konkurrenzierenden Nationen zu demonstrieren. Das „Bezwungene“ Wasser in der Flasche, auch gesehen als Symbol für die Macht und den Fortschritt der Technologie, wird mit dem „Urquell des Lebens“ angepriesen. Der „Urquell des Lebens“ ist aber durch die Technologie im Glas gefangen und ist qualitativ nicht mehr was es mal war.

Für die Raubritter ist klar: Wasser ist Macht. Eine Waffe die gewaltiger eingesetzt werden kann als Öl. Durch diese Waffe lassen sich Staaten und Menschen kompromisslos regulieren und dikdatieren. Diese art von Macht, in der Hand einiger Globaler Power Konzerne zu wissen, ist ein erschreckender Gedanke.

Mehrere Länder und mit ihnen Millionen von Menschen können davon betroffen sein, wenn die Quellbesitzer einen gigantischen Staudamm bauen, wenn Flüsse umgeleitet, oder schlicht und einfach durch die Besitzer das Wasser abgedreht wird.

Beispiele hierzu sind die Nutzungsansprüche auf den Jordan, die zum sechs Tage Krieg geführt haben, oder die Geplänkel um Euphrat und Tigris, die seit Jahren die Beziehungen zwischen der Türkei, Irak, Syrien und dem Iran vergiften. Die Türkei, die am Oberlauf der beiden Flüsse liegt und somit auch Herr über die Quellen ist, hat sich die Macht und somit auch die Vormachtsstellung über die anderen Länder ergaunert.

Endlos könnten Konflikte der neueren Geschichte aufgezählt werden. Sie beginnen in regionalen, Nachbarschaftlichen Streitereien um den Wildbach hinter dem Haus und können in Globalen Verzweiflungskämpfen der Durstigen enden. Und es ist in der Tat zu befürchten, dass die Konflikte zunehmen werden.

Das Bevölkerungswachstum, die rapid sinkende Qualität des Wassers, sowie der verschärfte technologische und finanzielle Wettkampf um die Eroberung von Weltressourcen zwischen den aggressivsten Firmen und Ländern, lässt auf jeden Fall darauf schließen.

Die zum globalen Powergame gehörenden Firmen werden die geopolitischen Konflikte notfalls mit offenen Kriegen zu ihrem Besten entscheiden. Erfahrung genug haben sie: die Kriege um Öl, Diamanten, Gold, Uran, Opium, Kokain und Gas haben sie noch immer erfolgreich gewonnen.

Dass auch die scheinbar „Brücken überwindenden“ Globalisierungstechnokraten eine strammere Marschrichtung in die Zukunft unternehmen, stellt der Journalist John Barham in einem Artikel der Financial Times vom 2. Oktober 1997 fest:


Materia Prima?

Der Direktor der International Finance Corporation, der Gruppe, die für die Weltbank im Privatsektor zuständig ist meint zum Thema Wasser Ressourcen: „Sogar die Armen sind bereit, hohe Preise für das Wasser zu bezahlen.“ Wobei er wohl meint, dass die Armen wohl gar keine andere Wahl haben, als in welcher Form auch immer, horrende Preise für das Überleben zu bezahlen. Die Weisung der Weltbank, IWF und der WTO „forget aid, think business“, erklärt wohl auch den Slogan der Raubritter globaler Piraterie. Somit fügt sich der ehemalige Chefplaner des Irak – Krieges und zukünftige Chef der Weltbank Paul Wolfowitz bestens in die Riege der Raubritter.


Unkategorisiert

Impressum

Nachrichten Heute, ist eine Plattform für Journalisten und Whistleblowers. Die aus verschiedenen Staaten stammenden Autoren bringen aktuelle News, fundierte Hintergrundberichte und bissige Reportagen zum Politik- und Weltgeschehen auf Ihren Newsdesk. Häufig ist das Online-Magazin „Nachrichten Heute“ ein Vorkäuer und legt die Stories, die nächste Woche im Print gelesen werden heute auf den Tisch.

Herausgeber
Alexander Von Paleske

E-Mail Adresse: avonpaleske(at)yahoo.de

Autoren:

Europa
– Großbritannien: Adrian Gatton
– Polen: David M. Dastych

USA
– Phönix: Rachel Alexander
– Washington: Larisa Alexandrovna
– New-York: Kevin Coogan

Afrika
– Botswana: Dr. Alexander von Paleske
– Südafrika: Dr. Günter Pabst

Südamerika
– Brasilien: Karl Weiss

Pakistan
– Islamabad: Hamid Mir

– Weitere Gastautoren siehe hier: Gastautoren

Abgrenzung:
Die Webseite „Nachrichten Heute“ ist eine private, Nicht- komerzionelle Seite. Die Autoren sind für ihre eingereichten Artikel verantwortlich. Die Web-Präsenz Nachrichten Heute ist Teil des WWW und dementsprechend mit fremden, sich jederzeit wandeln könnenden Web-Sites verknüpft, die folglich auch nicht diesem Verantwortungsbereich unterliegen und für die nachfolgende Informationen nicht gelten. Dass die Links weder gegen Sitten noch Gesetze verstoßen, wurde genau einmal geprüft: bevor sie hier aufgenommen wurden.

Urheberschutz und Nutzung:
Wenn nicht ausdrücklich anders vermerkt, liegen die Urheberrechte und die Verantwortung für Texte bei den jeweiligen Autoren. Zitate aus den Veröffentlichungen in Print- oder Online-Medien sind gestattet, sofern sie die gängigen Zitatlängen nicht überschreiten, den Autor namentlich erwähnen und einen Link zu bzw. eine Nennung der Website-URL enthalten. Die Texte dürfen ohne die ausdrückliche Zustimmung des jeweiligen Autors nicht für kommerzielle Zwecke weiterverwendet werden.

Haftung:
Die Inhalte von Nachrichten Heute wurden sorgfältig geprüft und nach bestem Wissen erstellt. Jedoch wird für die hier dargebotenen Informationen kein Anspruch auf Vollständigkeit, Aktualität, und Richtigkeit erhoben. Es kann keine Verantwortung für Schäden übernommen werden, die durch das Vertrauen auf die Inhalte dieser Website oder deren Gebrauch entstehen. Für die Artikel sind die Autoren Verantwortlich.

Schutzrechtsverletzung:
Diese Webseite richtet sich an LeserInnen, die außerhalb der BRD und der EU leben. Falls Sie trotzdem vermuten, dass durch Nachrichten Heute eines Ihrer Schutzrechte verletzt wird, teilen Sie das bitte umgehend per elektronischer Post mit, damit schnell Abhilfe geschafft und Richtigstellungen verfasst werden können. Kommentare von LeserInnen obliegen ausdrücklich nicht der Verantwortung des Herausgebers. Für alle Rechtsstreitigkeiten sind unsere Anwälte zuständig.

Richtlinien für Leser-Kommentare
Veröffentlichte Meinungsbeiträge müssen zu einer sachbezogenen Debatte des im jeweiligen Beitrag dargestellten Themas beitragen. Von der Diskussion ausgeschlossen sind Texte mit rechtswidrigen Inhalten, namentlich beleidigende, verleumderische, ruf- und geschäftsschädigende, pornografische, rassistische, aber auch rechts- wie linksradikale Äusserungen sowie Aufforderungen zu Gewalt oder sonstigen Straftaten.

Art. 16 Meinungs- und Informationsfreiheit
1: Die Meinungs- und Informationsfreiheit ist gewährleistet.
2: Jede Person hat das Recht, ihre Meinung frei zu bilden und sie ungehindert zu äussern und zu verbreiten.
3: Jede Person hat das Recht, Informationen frei zu empfangen, aus allgemein zugänglichen Quellen zu beschaffen und zu verbreiten.

zeitgeschichte

Die Oraclesyndicate Archive

Oraclesyndicate.org – das Medienhaus – ist Besitzerin eines der umfassendsten Archive und Sammlungen zeitgenössischer Dokumente aus FBI, CIA und aus privaten Beständen. Das gesamte Archiv beinhaltet ca. 300’000 Archivseiten und tausende Fotos. Oraclesyndicate.org macht einen kleinen Teil der Öffentlichkeit zugänglich.


Propagandaplakate: Die Sammlung umfasst 3900 Plakate aus den beiden Weltkriegen

Die John F. Kennedy und Jacqueline Kennedy –Onassis Kollektion auf CD-ROM.
Die Kollektion beinhaltet Text, Foto, Video und Audio Dokumente des Secret Service, der CIA, FBI, der National Security Agency, dem State Department, dem Assassination Records Review Board, der Warren Commision, dem Dallas Police Departement, Department of Defence, Department of Justice und der Lyndon Johnson und JFK Presidential Libary.

Die Mafia Akte
Die Umfassende Mafia Akte umfasst mehr als 8000 Seiten aus FBI Untersuchungen. Abhörprotokolle, Memos, Berichte und Hintergründe der grossen Mafia Familien in N.Y, Miami, Kalifornien und Las Vegas. Das Mafia Archiv ist unterteilt in 8 Dokumentationen, gespeichert auf CD im PDF Format

LA COSA NOSTRA/JOHN ROSELLI
Die Roselli Serie umfasst 1200 Seiten der FBI Investigation über John Roselli AKA Filippo Sacco. Roselli war in Las Vegas und Kalifornien aktiv, als Vertreter der Cosa Nostra Familien in Chicago. Roselli war Präsident der Columbia Pictures und ehemaliger Leutnant von Al Capone sowie Bodyguard von Harry Cohen. 1976 fand man Rosellis Leiche beim Dumfounding Bay, Florida, in einem 55 Gallonen Ölfass.

AL CAPONE
2400 Seiten der FBI über die Erkenntnisse des Top Gangsters Alphonse Al Capone AKA Scarface. Die Dokumente beinhalten Reporte über die Lage in Chicago und Zeitungsartikel, sowie Capones Zeit in Alcatraz. Al Capone war einer der berüchtigtsten Verbrecher Amerikas in den 1920er und 1930er Jahren. Capone kontrollierte die Chicagoer Unterwelt und machte seine Geschäfte vor allem in den Bereichen illegales Glücksspiel, Prostitution und während der Prohibitionszeit im illegalen Alkoholhandel.

Das „St. Valentine’s Day Massacre“
107 FBI Seiten über die Untersuchung in Capones berüchtigtster Mord, dem „St. Valentine’s Day Massacre“. Am 14. Februar 1929 töteten Capones Leute, die als Polizisten verkleidet waren, sechs Mitglieder der Morans-Gang sowie einen zufällig anwesenden Freund. Mehr als 150 Kugeln durchlöcherten die sieben Opfer. Wie immer hatte Capone auch diesmal ein Alibi. Er hielt sich zum Zeitpunkt des Massakers in Florida auf. Dennoch wusste eigentlich jeder, dass nur Al Capone hinter diesem Mordanschlag stecken konnte.

CARLO GAMBINO
Die Carlo Gambino Akten umfassen 1011 Seiten aus FBI Beständen. 1970 war Gambino der Boss der Bosse und somit der mächtigste Mafiosi der USA. Leider sind viele der Seiten geschwärzt, um die Quellen zu schützen. Gambino war der Führer der 5 führenden Mafia Familien in N.Y.

LUCKY LUCIANO
Die FBI Akten umfassen 645 Seiten über Lucky Luciano. Davon rund 350 Seiten Memos von FBI Agenten. Das Gross des Materials umfasst die Zeit aus den späten 40er und frühen 50er Jahren.

Die FBI MAFIA Bibel
Der 285 Seiten umfassende Bericht wurde 1958 als Mafia Monograph als geheimes Dokument für die Spezialisten der Anti Mafia Behörden gefertigt. Geschrieben wurde die mafia Bibel von der Central Research Section des FBI. Das Dokument beschreibt wie die Mafia nach Amerika kam, den Aufbau der Mafia, die frühe Geschichte in Sizilien und New York. Beschrieben werden zudem folgende Personen: Lucky Luciano, Louis Buchalter, Albert Anastasia, Vito Genovese, Joseph Profaci, Frank Costello, Santo Trafficante, Sr, Santo Trafficante, Jr, Al Capone, Jacob Shapiro, Meyer Lansky, Benjamin Siegel, Abner Zwillman, James Hoffa, Joseph Barbara, Joseph Boanno, und Carlos Marcello.

VITO GENOVESE
135 Seiten der FBI über Vito Genovese. Vito Genovese, Top Offizier der Mafia, war in den 20er und 30 er Jahren Lucky Lucianos Rechte Hand. 1937 floh er nach Italien und wurde ein Freund von Benito Mussolini. Nach dem Krieg kehrte er nach Amerika zurück, um sich dem Gericht zu stellen. 1945, verstarb der Hauptzeuge gegen ihn, Peter La Tampa, an einer Vergiftung. Genovese wurde freigelassen und wurde daraufhin zum Boss der Bosse, offensichtlich durch die Morde an Willie Moretti und Albert Anastasia. Wegen Rauschgiftdelikten wurde er 1958 verhaftet und inhaftiert. 1969 verstarb Vito Genovese an einer Herzattacke.

BUGSY SIEGEL
2’421 Seiten der FBI Investigationen über “Bugsy” Siegel. Er galt – neben Meyer Lansky und Capone – als einer der wichtigsten amerikanischen Gangster. Er wurde verdächtigt an über 30 Morden direkt oder indirekt beteiligt gewesen zu sein. Siegel wurde unter dem Namen Benjamin Siegelbaum 1902 im New Yorker Ghetto Williamsburg geboren und geriet schon als Kind in die Gesellschaft von Kleinkriminellen. Dabei tat er sich mit dem wesentlich älteren Meyer Lansky zusammen, und die beiden waren bald als „Bug and Meyer Mob“ bekannt. Sie ergänzten sich nahezu ideal: Der große und cholerische Siegel schüchterte Kontrahenten und andere Jugendliche ein, der kleine und höchst intelligente Lansky entwickelte dazu die Strategien und vermittelte unter anderem ein Bündnis zu Frank Costello und Charles „Lucky“ Luciano. Während der 20er-Jahre war Siegel zwar das am wenigsten einflussreiche Mitglied dieses Quartetts, stieg aber dennoch zu einem mächtigen Gangster auf.

Die Iran Files
Die Sammlung beinhaltet 4’600 Seiten aus CIA und State Department Archiven. Rund 300 Seiten sind von der Central Intelligence Agency aus den Jahren 1953 – 1993. Sie beinhalten die politische Situation in Iran nach dem Coup gegen die Regierung von Mossadeq und die Reinstallation des Schahs. Die Aufstände von Mekka 1987, Irans Beziehung zur Sowjet Union und verschiedene Aspekte des Iran- Irak Krieges. 4300 Seiten sind aus dem State Department. Unter anderem Beinhalten die PDF Dokumente den amerikanischen Abschuss der iranischen Airline Fluges 655, die Entwicklung im iranisch-irakischen Krieg und des Terrorismus.

WWI & WWII Propaganda Plakate
Die Sammlung umfasst 3900 Plakate aus den beiden Weltkriegen, als PDF Datei. Die Dateien sind Druckbereit. Unter ihnen befinden sich wahre Leckerbissen. Die Sammlung umfasst Plakate der Marine, der amerikanischen Luftwaffe und aus verschiedenen amerikanischen Departamenten. Die Sammlung präsentiert eine gute Mischung von bizarren und unterhaltsamen, aber auch tragischen und in unserer heutigen Zeit unverständlichem Propaganda Material.

Die Irak Files
266 CIA Files datiert zwischen 1974 bis 1992. Inhalt: Einschätzung über biologische Schäden während dem Golf Krieg, Scud Missiles, dem Report über die Charakteristik der irakisch- militärischen Industrialisierung, geschrieben nur einige Tage vor der Invasion in Kuwait, sowie die Beziehung Irak – Sowjet Union.

1,800 State Department Dokumente datiert zwischen 1970 und 1993. Die Politik der Bath Partei, Einschätzung über Saddam Hussain’s macht, iranisch-irakische Grenzzwischenfälle, der Iranisch-irakische Krieg, der irakische gebrauch chemischer Waffen, die Beziehung der US Diplomaten und Irak. u. A.

377 Seiten des Congressional Research Service datiert zwischen 1998 bis Dezember 2002. Beleuchtet wird darin die internationale Unterstützung für die US policy, die irakische Fähigkeiten für biologisch / chemische Kampfstoffe, das Oil for Food Programm, Iraks Weapons of Mass Destruction Möglichkeiten, die irakische Opposition gegen Saddam Hussain. u.A.

Die Papst Akte
Am 13. Mai 1981 verübte der türkische Rechtsextremist Mehmet Ali Agca auf dem Petersplatz in Rom ein Attentat auf Johannes Paul II. Dieser wurde dabei durch drei Kugeln schwer verletzt. Die Hintermänner wurden schon bald beim sowjetischen Geheimdienst KGB vermutet. Aufsehen erregte der Papst, als er den Attentäter, dem er schon auf dem Krankenbett vergeben hatte, nach der Genesung im Gefängnis besuchte. 218 Seiten der Central Intelligence Agency – Dokumente, berichte über das Attentat im Jahre 1981. Inklusive 45 Seiten des US Kongresses über die päpstliche reise nach Kuba.

Die Nixon – Watergate Audio Aufnahmen
Die Anhörungen die vom Watergate-Komitee des US-Senats durchgeführt wurden und in denen John W. Dean als Starzeuge neben vielen anderen ehemaligen Schlüsselpersonen der Nixon-Administration ein verheerendes Zeugnis ablegte, wurden fast während des gesamten Sommers 1973 im Fernsehen übertragen und verursachten einen katastrophalen politischen Schaden für Nixon. Die Ermittler des Senats entdeckten am 16. Juli eine ausschlaggebende Tatsache: Alexander Butterfield sagte, dass ein Tonbandsystem im Weißen Haus automatisch alles aufzeichnete, was im Oval Office gesprochen wurde. Diese Tonbandaufnahmen könnten zeigen, ob Nixon oder Dean die Wahrheit über die Schlüsseltreffen im Weißen Haus aussagten. Die Bänder wurden daraufhin sowohl von Cox als auch vom Senat zur Beschlagnahme verlangt. Im Januar 1974 verweigerte Nixon jedoch die Aushändigung der verlangten Materialien. Im August wurde ein zuvor unbekanntes Tonband vom 23. Juni 1972, also nur wenige Tage nach dem Watergate-Einbruch, publik, worin Nixon und sein Stabschef Haldeman den Plan zur Blockierung der Ermittlungen durch fiktive Gründe der nationalen Sicherheit schmiedeten. Dieses Band wurde als „Smoking Gun“, also als rauchender Colt, bezeichnet.
Die CD beinhaltet 14 Stunden original Audio Aufnahmen, inklusive der „Smoking Gun“ Sequenz.

spionage

New Special Forces unit will spy on the terrorists

Thomas Harding – The Army’s first new regiment in more than three decades begins operations today to provide covert surveillance for Special Forces fighting the international terrorist threat.

The Special Reconnaissance Regiment will draw on the experience of undercover soldiers who have conducted successful operations in Northern Ireland. The new unit, the first to be formed since the Ulster Defence Regiment in 1970, will have an international and domestic role to provide intelligence to fight terrorism. Geoff Hoon, the Defence Secretary, said yesterday that the unit was been formed to meet a worldwide demand for „special reconnaissance capability“.

It will incorporate the surveillance skills learnt by the SAS and other units over decades of carrying out close target reconnaissance missions in enemy territory. The formation of the regiment will free up a large portion of elite fighting troopers in the SAS and Special Boat Service to carry out the „hard end“ of missions. The SAS is finding it difficult to recruit enough soldiers to pass its tough selection course. But an equally rigorous selection test is likely to be used by the new unit, whose troops will have to undertake the arduous task of acting behind enemy lines.

It will absorb the 14th Intelligence Company, nicknamed „14 Int“, which was formed to gather intelligence on Ulster terrorists. Recruits undergo a rigorous selection course, equivalent to the Paras‘ „P Company“ training, and are trained by the SAS in close quarter battle.

The detachment, which is still operating in Ulster and the Balkans, recruited men and women from all three Services. At its height, 14 Int numbered about 200 troops. The new regiment could have up to 300 troops and will be based alongside the SAS.

The new cap badge shows a Corinthian helmet with a sword inserted in the mouth and coming out of the back of the head. A scroll reads: „Reconnaissance“. The Ministry of Defence said the cap badge design was related to the SAS and SBS badges, „ensuring conformity within the Special Forces Group. „The Corinthian-style helmet, favoured by the ancient Greeks from the early 7th to 4th centuries BC. The helmet faces forward and suggests the viewer is being watched while the wearer behind the mask is anonymous.“

spionage

Forschungen zeigen: Geheimarmeen in Europa wurden von der CIA bezahlt, von der Nato koordiniert

Katrin Holenstein – Es war Guilio Andreotti, der katholische Ministerpräsident Italiens, der die Existenz der italienischen Geheimarmee und Terrorzelle «Gladio» 1990 öffentlich machte. Das war der Anfang eines der größten Skandale in der europäischen Nachkriegsgeschichte. Es kam heraus, daß seit den 50er Jahren in allen Nato-Staaten solche Untergrundarmeen mit geheimen Waffenlagern existierten, und daß einige sogar blutige Terrorakte gegen die eigene Bevölkerung verübt hatten. Auch die Schweizer Geheimarmee P-26 war mit diesem geheimen Netz unter Nato-Führung verknüpft, sagt Daniele Ganser, Experte für Sicherheitspolitik an der ETH Zürich, im Gespräch mit der Basler Zeitung.

baz: Herr Ganser, die Nato bestreitet bis heute, in diesem europäischen Untergrund-Netz eine zentrale Rolle gespielt zu haben. Das stimmt offenbar nicht?

Daniele Ganser: Heute steht einwandfrei fest, daß die Nato das geheime Netz von Brüssel aus koordiniert hat. Das ACC (Allied Clandestine Comitee), das dem Nato-Zentrum Shape in Mons angegliedert ist, hat zusammen mit dem CPC (Clandestine Planning Committee) die Geheimarmeen koordiniert und hätte im Falle einer Invasion in Westeuropa auch als Schaltzentrale funktioniert.

Der US-Auslandgeheimdienst CIA und der britische Dienst MI6 waren die Triebfedern – mit welchen Interessen?

Die Nato wurde schon damals von den USA dominiert; die Briten ihrerseits sind die Meister der verdeckten Kriegsführung. Sowohl MI6 als auch CIA und Pentagon hatten großes Interesse, in Europa solche geheimen Strukturen aufzubauen, um im Falle einer sowjetischen Invasion für den Untergrundkampf gerüstet zu sein und die Machtergreifung der Kommunisten zu verhindern.

Dafür ist viel Geld geflossen…

Sehr viel Geld. Das CIA steckte viele Millionen in den Aufbau dieser Untergrundorganisationen. Sie wurden vom CIA und vom MI6 ausgerüstet und trainiert. Die einzelnen Geheimarmeen ihrerseits nahmen sich aus diesen beiden Quellen, was sie für ihre nationalen Strategien brauchten. Nach den Erfahrungen im 2. Weltkrieg wollten sie gegen fremde Besetzungen gewappnet sein. Guerilla-Truppen wurden bereitgestellt und geheime Waffen- und Sprengstofflager angelegt, um die Invasoren aus dem Untergrund zu bekämpfen.

Die italienische Geheimarmee Gladio war verbandelt mit den Faschisten, mit der Mafia und der katholischen Kirche. Gelten für andere Länder ähnliche Strukturen?

Man steigt überall in eine Art Unterwelt. Die Muster aber sind national verschieden. In Frankreich arbeitete die Geheimarmee mit Nationalkonservativen zusammen. In Deutschland saßen alte SS-Offiziere in der Untergrundorganisation.

Wie stark richteten sich diese Untergrundarmeen auch gegen «innere Feinde», also gegen die eigene Bevölkerung?

Dieser Kampf gegen den inneren Feind war in einigen Ländern Teil des Konzeptes. Er basierte auf der sogenannten «Strategie der Spannung» und war auf Terror aufgebaut. In Italien und der Türkei wurde diese schon fast teuflische Strategie wohl am erfolgreichsten umgesetzt: mit Bombenanschlägen und Massakern gegen die eigene Bevölkerung, die man anschließend dem politischen Feind, also den Linken in die Schuhe schob. Man versetzte die Menschen mit blutigen Anschlägen in Furcht und Schrecken, um politische Ziele zu erreichen. In Griechenland ging das 1967 bis zum Militärputsch, an dem die «LOK»-Geheimarmee beteiligt war. In der Türkei, wo die Geheimarmee auch an Folterungen beteiligt war, richtete sich der Kampf gegen die Kurden.

Kam es auch in anderen Ländern zu verdeckten Terrorakten?

Für die Anschläge 1980 am Münchner Oktoberfest mit 13 Toten und über 200 Verletzten wurde Waffenmaterial aus den Lagern der Geheimarmee verwendet. In Belgien wurde die Geheimarmee Mitte der 80er Jahre verdächtigt, in die Brabant-Anschläge verwickelt zu sein, bei denen wahllos Menschen in Geschäften niedergeschossen und 28 getötet wurden. Die Untersuchungen liefen in beiden Fällen ins Leere, weil die Geheimdienste sich weigerten, zu kooperieren.

Und dahinter standen immer die USA?

Es waren natürlich auch handfeste nationale europäische Interessen im Spiel. Daß die USA aber ihren Einflußbereich derart manipulierte und sogar Terroranschläge mitfinanzierte, hat man bisher schlicht nicht gewußt. Entsprechend schockiert sind die Menschen in Europa.

Wurden die Geheimarmeen 1990 nach ihrer Entlarvung tatsächlich aufgelöst?

Die nationalen Vertreter der Geheimarmeen trafen sich im Oktober 1990 nochmals in Brüssel. Danach wurden die Armeen in ihrer damaligen Form vermutlich aufgelöst. Nach dem Fall der Sowjetunion war der strategische Sinn ja hinfällig geworden. Nicht abgeschafft wurde aber die Taktik der «geheimen Kriegsführung» mit verdeckten Operationen. Klar ist auch, daß die Strategie der Spannung weiter existiert, daß es Terroranschläge gibt, und daß man sie braucht, um Menschen zu manipulieren und politische Ziele zu erreichen. Das spielt noch heute eine zentrale Rolle, etwa bei den Vorbereitungen zum Irakkrieg, als man den 11. September Saddam Hussein angehängt hat – eine dreiste Lüge.

Sind Verstrickungen der US-Geheimdienste bei den Anschlägen vom 11. September oder beim Bombenattentat von Madrid denkbar?

Aufgrund der Erkenntnisse über verdeckte Kriegsführung und Terrorismus ist überall absolut alles denkbar. Schwieriger ist es, die Fakten zu finden und richtig zu kombinieren. Die Gladio-Untersuchungen zeigen, daß die ersten Spuren allesamt falsch waren und vom Staat selber gelegt wurden, um die Bevölkerung zu manipulieren. Gräbt man tiefer, gerät man in ein komplexes Labyrinth der Unterwelt. Auch beim 11. September.

War auch die Schweiz mit ihrer Geheimarmee P-26 Teil des Nato-Netzes?


Schweizerischer P26 Stützpunkt

Die Frage nach der Nato-Verbindung ist immer noch brisant. Eine direkte Verbindung zur Nato-Geheimorganisation hätte ja ganz klar das Neutralitätsprinzip verletzt. Von einer direkten Verbindung kann man nach heutigem Wissensstand aber nicht reden.

Die Schweiz hat nicht an den geheimen Sitzungen in Brüssel teilgenommen?

Nein. Es gibt dafür zumindest keine Hinweise. Die Schweiz hatte aber sehr enge Beziehungen zum britischen Geheimdienst MI6. Die Schweizer trainierten in England, richteten in London eine Funkübermittlungszentrale ein und verwendeten das «Harpoon»-Funksystem der Nato-Geheimarmeen. Mit dieser engen Verbindung nach London hatte die P-26 natürlich auch direkten Kontakt zur Geheimarmee-Leitstelle; sie war so also indirekt durchaus integriert.

War die P-26 nur eine Widerstandsgruppe, wie das ihre Vertreter bis heute sagen? Ihre Tätigkeiten waren ja auch gegen den «inneren Feind» gerichtet.

Die P-26 war eine Widerstandsgruppe. In der Schweiz gab es keinen einzigen Fall von Gewalt und Terror. Das ist im Blick auf andere Länder beruhigend: In der Türkei wurde gefoltert, in Griechenland kam es zum Staatsstreich, in Italien wurden Bomben gelegt und Menschen ermordet.

Es existiert ein Grundlagenpapier des US-Generalstabs von 1970 (unterzeichnet Westmoreland), in dem indirekt über Geheimarmeen und über die Verhinderung von «unfriendly governments in Europe» gesprochen wird. Kommen in diesem oder anderen Dokumenten des US-Generalstabs die Schweiz, Schweizer Akteure oder die P-26 vor?

Dieses Field Manual 30-31B ist ein sehr brisantes Dokument, das in Italien entdeckt wurde. Es bezieht sich nicht nur auf die Geheimarmeen, sondern grundsätzlich auf die Zusammenarbeit der US-Militärgeheimdienste mit Geheimdiensten in anderen Ländern und geheime antikommunistische Operationen. Darin werden sogenannte «false flag operations» beschrieben, manipulierende Terroranschläge, um die Bevölkerung von der kommunistischen Gefahr zu überzeugen. Aber es werden keine Länder spezifisch genannt, auch nicht die Schweiz.

Wie beurteilen Sie die Qualität und Glaubwürdigkeit des Berichts Pierre Cornu vom 19. September 1991 über die P-26?

Damals wurde nur eine vom Bundesrat gekürzte Fassung der Öffentlichkeit vorgestellt. Ich habe die parlamentarische Geschäftsprüfungsdelegation kürzlich um den noch immer als geheim eingestuften Bericht angefragt. Die Einsicht wurde aber verweigert, da die Beziehungen der Schweiz zu anderen Staaten beschädigt werden könnten. Ich kann den Originalbericht also nicht beurteilen.

BERN. Daniele Ganser (32) arbeitet seit 2003 an der Forschungsstelle für Sicherheitspolitik der ETH Zürich. Er hat in Basel studiert und 2001 bei Professor Georg Kreis promoviert. Von Ganser ist in London soeben ein Buch über die Nato-Geheimarmeen erschienen: «Nato’s Secret Armies. Operation Gladio and Terrorism in Western Europe», Frank Cass. London 2005.

Basler Zeitung; 16.12.2004; KATRIN HOLENSTEIN, Bern


surveillance

Fußball-WM als Überwachungs-Großprojekt

Die Fussballweltmeisterschaft 2006 in Deutschland wird zum Datenschutz-rechtlichen Fiasko. Die Tickets enthalten einen RFID-Chip, über den eine eindeutige Zuordnung zur berechtigten Person hergestellt werden kann. Die Weisung ist einfach: wer sich nicht durchleuchten lassen will, geht nicht Fussball gucken. Und klar ist, wofür sich die Mehrheit voraussichtlich entscheiden wird: Bis Mitternacht 22. März 2005 wurden insgesamt 3.945.487 Karten geordert.

Der ehemalige oberste Datenschützer Schleswig Holsteins Helmut Bäumeler schlug Alarm: „…Welche Person ist im Stadion, das will man damit feststellen können. Und so sehr ich Verständnis dafür habe, dass man Fußball-Rowdys rechtzeitig abwehren und erkennen möchte, hier sieht man ganz genau, wohin diese Technologie führt, nämlich zur Überwachung von Menschen.“ So ist es möglich Bewegungsprofile von WM-Zuschauern anzulegen ohne dass diese es merken. Die Ticket-Kontrolle erfolgt an den Eingangsschleusen der Stadien per RFID-Leser, möglich sind aber auch Kontrollen außerhalb der Stadien. Auf dem Chip werden zwar weder Name noch sonstige Identitätsdaten gespeichert, es handelt sich bei der Kennnummer des Chips um ein personenbeziehbares Datum. Über die eindeutige Kennnummer auf dem RFID-Chip werden sämtliche in einer Datenbank des Deutschen Fussball Bundes (DFB) erfassten Antragsdaten erschlossen und sind online abrufbar.

Die Problematik der RFID-Technologie besteht darin, dass die Transponder-Chips noch aus einer Entfernung von 10 cm unbemerkt „ausgelesen“ werden können. Wer also Zugriff auf die DFB-Ticket-Datenbank hat und die Chips ausliest, kann genau zuordnen, wer der Karteninhaber ist und wo sich der jeweilige Mensch gerade aufhält. Wäre an jedem Sitzplatz im Stadion ein RFID-Leser angebracht, so könnte präzise lokalisiert werden, welcher Fußball-Fan auf welchem Platz sitzt.

Ob damit die Sicherheit in den Stadien erhöht und Fälschungen verringert werden ist fraglich, denn Hooligans finden es auch in den Städten lustig sich zu prügeln und mit Hilfe einer Chipkopie ist es möglich vor dem tatsächlich Berechtigten das Stadion zu betreten. Viele Datenschützer und Bürgerrechtsgruppen befürchten es gehe eher um die Akzeptanz neuer Überwachungstechnologie. Die WM2006 soll den grossen RFID Durchbruch schaffen. „Die Weltmeisterschaft wird von Sponsoren und Überwachungsindustrie missbraucht, um Schnüffeltechnik einzuführen und die Fans auszuspionieren“, meint Rena Tangens vom FoeBud e.V. in Bielefeld. In Bezug auf RFID wird es im Nachhinein wohl heißen: Auf geht’s! Die Fußballfans haben die neue Technik positiv aufgenommen.

Siehe auch: Die grosse Welt der kleinen Chips

vermischtes

Imperial Hubris: Why the West is Losing the War on Terror

Rachel Alexander – A senior U.S. intelligence official has written a book under the pseudonym „Anonymous“ highly critical of the U.S. war on terror. It should be noted that it is no mystery who „Anonymous“ is, Michael Scheuer, a senior official in the CIA who resigned in November during the Bush administration’s shake-up of that department. [1] Scheuer ran the Counterterrorist Center’s bin Laden station in the late 1990’s and authored another anonymous book entitled Through Our Enemies‘ Eyes: Osama bin Laden, Radical Islam, and the Future of America two years ago. It is not clear whether it was CIA regulation or because of Scheuer’s own reasons that these books were published anonymously. [2]


Anonymous

The theme of Imperial Hubris is „Blame America.“ Scheuer attacks reactive U.S. policy in Afghanistan, and instead of placing responsibility for terrorism on bin Laden and the terrorists or on the excesses of Islam, Scheuer instead claims that it is U.S. overseas policies that have caused the terrorist attacks. The problem with this reasoning can be seen in the analogy of placing the blame upon a rape victim for dressing provocatively, instead of the rapist who chose to rape her. Scheuer writes in a strident tone, reminiscent of Michael Moore, using repetition to hammer his main point across – which is that top U.S. officials ignored the lessons of Afghanistan history when they decided to instill a secular democratic government in Afghanistan. Although Scheuer offers ample reasons why he believes a secular democratic government cannot work in Afghanistan, he omits including any proof of the other half of his thesis – that senior officials failed to review the lessons of history, known within the CIA as the „checkables.“ This is a serious flaw in his book. It is simply not plausible that senior-level officials, particularly top advisors within the Bush administration with extensive and impressive backgrounds in foreign policy, would be ignorant of recent events in Afghanistan. It is a stretch to assert that they had no knowledge of the former Soviet Union’s inability to capture the regime in the 1980’s and 1990’s. What is ironic – and noted briefly by Scheuer himself – is that it was U.S. aid to the Taliban that defeated the Soviets.

Since the entire book is based upon this arguably false premise, unless you agree with it, the rest of the book falls apart. Any history or political science major knows the history of the Soviet Union in Afghanistan – and anyone who has seen Rambo III knows the Soviet Union lost in Afghanistan. Scheuer is essentially an isolationist and if anything, is himself ignorant of history. He wants you to believe that a non-democratic country cannot change into a democracy, at least not with any outside aid. This theory conveniently ignores the history of most democratic countries today – the U.S. itself was at one time a collection of matriarchal and tribal Indian governments, which became a republican democracy through the influx of European and other immigrants as well as a few wars.

Scheuer’s arguments are nothing more than philosophical differences. Scheuer disagrees with the widely accepted conclusion reached by Francis Fukuyama in The End of History and the Last Man, which postulated that the world had finally reached a consensus that liberal democracy had proven to be the most viable political institution in man’s ideological evolution. [3] Scheuer mocks this belief as „imperial hubris;“ a „way of thinking American elites have acquired since the end of World War II.“ (p. 165) Instead, he glumly predicts that no more countries will become democracies, „…most of the world outside North America is not, does not want to be, and probably will never be just like us.“ (p. 167) His is a philosophy of „uniformitarianism;“ that nations and institutions forever remain the same.

Scheuer fails to offer any credible evidence to support his second main point that terrorists hate the U.S. because of its policies, not its democratic society. It is not disputed that the terrorists resent U.S. support to Israel and countries such as India that are hostile to fundamentalist Islam. However, if the U.S. took a more isolationist path and halted its aid and arms assistance to these countries, the terrorists would continue to deeply resent the U.S. The U.S. is one of the wealthiest nations in the world and home to Hollywood where women run around scantily clothed. If Scheuer really thinks the terrorists are not bothered by the excesses of democracy in the U.S. as flaunted by our unofficial royalty of Britney Spears and Madonna, he is either naïve or has a political agenda. Under the ideal fundamentalist Muslim regime with its sharia law, epitomized by Afghanistan under the Taliban, women who behaved and dressed as Britney Spears and Madonna would have been beheaded. Scheuer himself even points out that bin Laden preferred to watch old Westerns over other types of Hollywood movies, because the women were usually fully covered. Scheuer claims that fundamentalist Islam has no problem living „side-by-side in peace with monotheists, polytheists, communists, democrats, snake-charmers, and even National League baseball fans.“ (p. 9) This is a pipedream. The fundamentalist hard-line Muslims who Scheuer believes are the only ones capable of ruling Islamic countries insist that non-Muslims must either convert to Islam, obey Islam, or be executed. [4]

The book does contain a few insights that cannot be dismissed, however, such as the fact that over 95% of all Saudis between ages 25-41 polled in 2002 expressed sympathy with Osama bin Laden. (p. 72) This is a serious concern and supports Scheuer’s proposition that it is not only the terrorists that hate the U.S., but many so-called „moderate“ Muslims as well. And to his credit, Scheuer does not fall into the easily predictable left-wing positions that so many Democratic attack dogs defend. Scheuer is quite critical of multilateralism, criticizing the U.S. for deliberating with its allies first instead of attacking al Qaeda in Afghanistan immediately after 9-11.

Ultimately, Imperial Hubris suffers from its extremist rhetoric. It is difficult to continue reading it with statements sprinkled throughout like the following: „…evangelical Christians have a fervor for God and his word similar to the Islamists‘, though the former have yet to take up arms in his defense.“ (p. 2) This is a bizarre comparison, considering evangelical Christians (and note Scheuer does not even say fundamentalist Christians) are composed of law-abiding Christians such as the Reverend Billy Graham and Dr. James Dobson, who have never taken up weapons in the name of God nor does the Bible instruct them to (religious crusades supposedly taken in the name of God in the past were certainly not done by „evangelical Christians“).

Scheuer claims that the U.S. is losing the war on terror, declaring that we have seen „no tangible evidence of victory“ on p. 170, yet on pp. 87-91 he lists 30 victories against al Qaeda by the U.S. and its allies after 9-11, which he describes as „impressive.“

If anything, Imperial Hubris is an interesting read if only to hear what fashionable arguments today’s opponents of the Bush administration’s war on terror are relying upon. If you can tolerate the strident repetition of its core premises and finish the book, you will breathe a sigh of relief, having discovered that the arguments are flawed and lacking in support, reinforcing confidence that the Bush administration is on the right track in the war on terror as well as in establishing democracy in Afghanistan.

[1] http://www.wsws.org
[2] http://www.bostonphoenix.com
[3] http://www.marxists.org
[4] http://www.freedomhouse.org


Rachel Alexander

ist praktizierende Anwältin für die Regierung in Phönix im U.S. Staat Arizona. Als ehemaliges Redaktionsmitglied und Kolumnistin des Arizona Daily Wildcat, gewann sie für ihre journalistischen Arbeiten drei Auszeichnungen und schreibt Kolumnen für IntellectualConservative.com und oraclesyndicate.org

kultur

How Black is Black Metal?

Kevin Coogan – Lords of Chaos (LOC), a recent book-length examination of the „Satanic“ black metal music scene, is less concerned with sound than fury. Authors Michael Moynihan and Didrik Sederlind zero in on Norway, where a tiny clique of black metal musicians torched some churches in 1992. The church burners‘ own place of worship was a small Oslo record store called Helvete (Hell). Helvete was run by the godfather of Norwegian black metal, 0ystein Aarseth („Euronymous“, or „Prince of Death“), who first brought black metal to Norway with his group Mayhem and his Deathlike Silence record label.


A kick in the back

One early member of the movement, „Frost“ from the band Satyricon, recalled his first visit to Helvete:

I felt like this was the place I had always dreamed about being in. It was a kick in the back. The black painted walls, the bizarre fitted out with inverted crosses, weapons, candelabra etc. And then just the downright evil atmosphere…it was just perfect.

Frost was also impressed at how talented Euronymous was in „bringing forth the evil in people – and bringing the right people together“ and then dominating them. „With a scene ruled by the firm hand of Euronymous,“ Frost reminisced, „one could not avoid a certain herd-mentality. There were strict codes for what was accept-ed.“ Euronymous may have honed his dictatorial skills while a member of Red Ungdom (Red Youth), the youth wing of the Marxist/Leninist Communist Workers Party, a Stalinist/Maoist outfit that idolized Pol Pot. All who wanted to be part of black metal’s inner core „had to please the leader in one way or the other.“ Yet to Frost, Euronymous’s control over the scene was precisely „what made it so special and obscure, creating a center of dark, evil energies and inspiration.“

Lords of Chaos, however, is far less interested in Euronymous than in the man who killed him, Varg Vikemes from the one-man group Burzum. Vikemes, a church burner who dubbed himself „Count Grishnackh“ after an evil ore in Lord of the Rings, is now serving a 21-year sentence – Norway’s toughest penalty – in a maximum security prison for brutally stabbing Euronymous to death on 10 August 1993. After his arrest just seven days later, the Count justified himself by claiming that Euronymous was a communist „queer“ who had cheated him out of Burzum royalties. He also claimed that Euronymous was plotting to kill him. After being ostracized from the black metal community, Vikemes announced that he was now no longer a black metal Satanist, but rather a Nazi Odinist because the Jews had „killed my father Odin.“


explosive Molotov cocktail

If Lords of Chaos were only about the antics of the most extreme wing of black metal, it would be an informative and entertaining look at pop culture Grand Guignol. The book, however, suggests that the events in Norway reflect a growing tendency among alienated youth from Miami to Moscow, who are now allegedly blending black metal, Satanism, and currents of fascism into a culturally explosive Molotov cocktail. Vikemes, however, is really famous for murder, not music, while the overwhelming majority of black metal musicians and fans are not, and are not likely to become, church burners, murderers, or Nazi Odinists.

To buttress its thesis, LOC points to metalheads turned murderers, including „Belfagor“ from the Swedish Satanic band Nefandus, who attacked a black man in a self-described „niggerhunt“; Bard Eithun („Faust“) from the Norwegian group Emperor, who murdered a gay man that sought to seduce him; and Jon Nodveidt from the Swedish group Dissection, who butchered an Algerian immigrant. LOC even devotes an entire chapter to an obscure two-man German band called Absurd, who coldly executed an annoying fellow high school student . Although the members of Absurd are self-pro-claimed Nazis and Vikernes fans, even they reported that they committed the crime for personal, not political, motives.

LOC also dwells on the activity of otherwise highly obscure fascist propagandists with no direct ties to black metal who are nevertheless trying to recruit its followers into their cause. It even adopts a far right spin on Jungian theory when it suggests that Vikernes may have tapped into an anti-Christian racial/cultural archetype that is allegedly still aglow in the Norwegian collective unconscious. The book also profiles racist killers with no known ties to black metal, such as the Florida youth clique called the Lords of Chaos. Before being dethroned by LOCal police, the Lords burnt down a church, murdered a gay teacher, and were planning to slaughter black visitors to Disney World with silencer-equipped automatic weapons.

LOC culminates with a paean to the „fire“ which, it claims, bums bright inside the black metal under-ground despite the attempts of mysterious unnamed „forces of finance and materialism“ to „root it out and stamp it out.“ If the jailed murderer Faust is to be believed, however, just the opposite has occurred. In a recent interview in the top Norwegian black metal zine Slayer, Faust complained:

As for the black metal scene, it is not really interesting anymore…! mean there must be over a hundred underground labels releasing albums of every immature, pre-ready band around. I’m amazed about the absence of every little sign of a critical attitude from record labels.

When asked if all this bothered him, Faust replied: „Not really, it is just a normal development. We saw the signs already in ’93. As soon as the arrests were made and when people saw the publicity the happenings made, they thought ‚Hey, maybe I can make something out of this too-‚“ If anything, the „forces of finance and materialism“ have used the events of 1993 to mass market black metal. Lords of Chaos’s publisher, Feral House, itself distributes one of Vikernes‘ Burzum CDs, Filosofem.

NORWAY’S FAR RIGHT
Despite its apparent fascination with elements of fascism, LOC studiously avoids comparing black metal to „white power“ music, a sound much beloved by real Scandinavian fascists within a certain age group. A longtime leading Norwegian far rightist named Erik Bliicher, who currently controls a major white power label called Ragnarok Records, is only mentioned once in passing. LOC also ignores Norway’s right populist Progress Party, which won 25 parliamentary seats in the 1997 elections with a pumped up anti-immigrant, anti-welfare state, and anti-Lapp platform, even though Vikernes seems to have shared many of its prejudiced beliefs. He even justified murdering Euronymous because he „was half Lappish, a Sami, so that was a bonus.“ When it does briefly mention Norway’s right, LOC admits that the links between the goose steppers and the ghouls are extremely tenuous. Indeed, with its white corpse paint, medieval Viking imagery, and industrial strength angst, black metal seems, if anything, overtly anti-political.

LOC has generally been perceived as an expose of a colorful music sub-culture, and it does indeed provide much valuable information about an otherwise inaccessible scene. Yet what really makes the book fascinating is that its main author, Michael Moynihan, is himself an extreme rightist whose fusion of politics and aesthetic violence shapes a not-so-hidden sub current that runs throughout LOC. The book itself, however, is not a „fascist“ tract in the strict sense of the term, in part because Moynihan co-wrote the book with Didrik Saderlind, a former music critic for a mainstream Norwegian paper who is now an editor at Playboy. Moreover, Feral House editor Adam Parfrey clearly wanted to publish a popular book on the strange universe of black metal rather than a political polemic. Nor does Moynihan himself fit easily into the more conventional definitions of fascism. LOC is best characterized as a palimpsest with the author’s own political ideology at work just’ below the surface of a text ostensibly devoted solely to analyzing an extremist musical sub-culture.

THE ABRAXAS AXIS
Michael Moynihan is an interesting fellow. Some might argue that he is actually three people -„Michael Jenkins,“ „Michael Moynihan Jenkins,“ and „Michael Jenkins Moynihan“ – since all three monikers have graced his projects. In 1989 the youthful Bostonian joined forces with the San Francisco-based Abraxas Foundation, which he described as an „occultist-fascist think tank“ linked to the Church of Satan. Moynihan dubbed his own wing of the Abraxas Foundation „Axis Sanguinaries“ [Blood Axis) because:


It is the key fluid of history…

Blood can be seen as LIFE, and at the same time it can be equated to DEATH. It is essential to violence in almost all instances. It has powerful sexual connotations. It is the key fluid of history… [Axis]. highlights the genetic aspect of blood, bound together in the will of a people or race. It describes allies of mind and blood, mobilized for total warfare. It also reiterates the pivotal nature of blood in human existence, both personal and world-historic.

According to some reports, Moynihan’s blood fetish included drinking (non AIDS-infected) blood. He was also suspected of setting fire to a manger scene on the Cambridge Commons, just across from Harvard University, in 1987. A note left by the firebug at the smoky scene the day after Christmas asked: „How many more fires before you realize your gods are dead? DEAD!“

As for the Abraxas Foundation, it was founded by another blood fetishist named Boyd Rice in 1984. The name came from Abraxas, a Gnostic deity that combined within itself the forces of light and dark-ness, good and evil. Rice hoped that his foundation would help create „a new demographic of people who are into the occult, Fascism, and Social Darwinism. It’s out there as an alternative for kids who are growing up and need that information.“

Both Rice and Moynihan came out of the „industrial“ music scene. Rice, who calls his musical project NON, released his first self-produced „noise music“ Black Album in the late 1970s. As for Moynihan, he created his own one-man „power electronics“ group called Coup De Grace in 1984. In the summer of 1989 Rice invited him to come to Japan, where Rice was doing a NON tour. That same year Moynihan renamed his project Blood Axis.

THROBBING GRISTLE
And then you have hypocritical people who use this kind of [total-itarian/fascist] imagery and then claim they’re against all the things they’re singing about which has always bothered me…they’re using these fascistic, totalitarian, disciplined tactics and there’s an inherent irony in that. The people in these bands use this incredible level of violence, and yet claim they’re in favor of peace and are opposed to violence. What I liked about the black metal people that I saw right away was that they seemed totally unhypocritical…Because you’ll see these other bands like TG [Throbbing Gristle] who were also in a lot of ways using really violent imagery and ultimately you have someone like Genesis P-Orridge being some hippie, flower child in reality. – Michael Moynihan

The chain of events that led Moynihan and Rice to an eccentric and avant-garde form of cultural fascism that would have made Hitler himself apoplectic began in the „industrial culture“ movement of the late 1970s, and particularly with the seminal British industrial band Throbbing Gristle (TG). Boyd Rice and TG played together at Rice’s first London concert in 1978, and then again later in Berlin. TG’s Industrial Records even agreed to release a Boyd Rice LP before he signed up with Mute. TG and Rice were also lauded by Re/Search in its influential 1983 „Industrial Culture“ issue.

TG’s most important member, „Genesis P-Orridge“ (a pun on General Post Office),legally changed his name from Neil Megson after becoming active in the mail art movement of the early 1970s. He also did extreme performance art with his then-girlfriend „Cosey Fanni Tutti“ under the name C0UM Transmissions. Their shows incorporated whipping, self-mutilation, masturbation, enemas, and vomiting. C0UM Transmissions lasted until 1976 when GPO, Cosey, and their friend „Sleazy“ (Peter Christopherson, who had joined COUM in its last year) created TG with electronics wiz Chris Carter to reach a broader audience.

Boyd Rice recalled that when he and GPO first met in London in 1978:

I played Gen an early NON concert tape and he played me an early T.G. tape. We both agreed that there were some amazing similarities not only in the musical (if you can call it that) direction we were exploring, but also on a personal level – a lot of shared interests. I had no idea what T.G. was when I went around to look up Gen, all I knew is that he was an artist who was very into Manson and Hitler. Back then. NO ONE was into that sort of thing…In those days. Gen still wore swastikas and would tell anyone who’d listen (and many that wouldn’t) what a great guy Hitler was. Uncle Adolf he called him. But that was a long time ago.

GPO’s interest in Hitler was not unique. British punks often incorporated swastika imagery and Malcolm McLaren’s Sex boutique sold Nazi symbols side-by-side with S/M and fetish gear. More than just a cheap shock, the swastika deliberately mocked the ideals of the 1960s, the era of long hair, free love, and flower power.

Nor could English swastika wearers be completely oblivious to the fact that the racial populist National Front (NF) was then polling at an all-time high. The NF took 18.5% of the vote in the Leicester by-election in the summer of 1976, and it appeared likely that it would win its first seat in the House of Commons from the Hackney section of east London. To the aesthetically rigid NF and its „John Bull“ allies in the neo-skinhead/soccer hooligan scene, however, punk was too mockingly anti-patriotic and nihilist, just one more symptom of England’s sad decline.

TG, the linchpin of the post-punk „industrial“ turn, dressed in camouflage gear decorated with an SS-looking lightning bolt patch, and issued songs like „Zyklon B Zombie“ and „Salon Kitty“ (named after an SS-run brothel in Berlin). The cover for the TG song „Discipline“ on Fetish Records showed the group outside the former Nazi Ministry of Propaganda building in Berlin. TG called their Hackney-based recording studio the Death Factory, and its Industrial Records logo was an unidentified picture of Auschwitz. Many punks despised TG as misogynist „death art“ fascists. At a 6 July 1978 con-cert at the London Film Co-op (where Boyd Rice also appeared), a fight even broke out between TG and members of the Rock Against Racism-allied bands the Slits and the Raincoats.

T(ECH)G(NOSIS)
TG’s fascination with violent totalitarian imagery, however, had its roots not in politics but in industrial culture. At a time when disco celebrated the body, sensuality, and mindless pleasure, industrial culture had an almost Gnostic contempt for the flesh. Believing that rock music had turned into yet another pop culture narcotic, TG’s sound was deliberately abrasive. The Beatles pro-claimed: „All you need is love.“ TG mockingly defined its sonic assault mission as „Entertainment through pain.“

Beginning with Lou Reed’s „Metal Machine Music“, industrial culture demanded sounds that screamed about meaningless life lived inside concrete boxes in decaying cities. Like the Futurists of the early 1900s, it was obsessed with the tradition-smashing technological wonders of modem life – the roar of jet engines, the wail of air-raid sirens, and the screech and sparks of subway cars all served as sources of aural inspiration. Cosey Fanni Tutti later recalled that for TG industrial „wasn’t just [about] the music. It was a philosophy. It was a serious-ness of what life is about. That has nothing to do with what is called industrial now. It was so anti-music to call something industrial.“ Unlike their optimistic and Utopian Futurist forebears, however, TG and their fans were filled with pessimism about the future.

These dystopian British „industrialists“ saw mass consumer society, the Situationist „society of the spectacle,“ as -to quote from Guy Debord – a „permanent opium war“ that reduced all who were trapped inside it to docile sleepwalkers. To anyone who wanted to break the stranglehold of media high priests over the imagination, providing „entertainment“ was viewed as collaboration with the enemy. The artist’s mission was to short-circuit the psychic control machine by breaking cultural and social taboos. For just this reason, TG also toured with bands like SPK, whose live performances included eating raw brains from recently opened sheep skulls.

The industrialist fascination with taboo breakers extended to charismatic leaders like Hitler and Manson, who became iconic figures in a world where evil, was more real than good, and hate more strong than love. Yet because they, like the Marquis de Sade before them, were also fearless disrupters of middle-class morality, a Hitler or Manson were also, in a sense, perverse role models. The sheer bleakness of industrial culture also provided fertile ground for future misanthropy. If evil was more powerful than good, evil was also more natural. In a truly Hobbesian world the Social Darwinists and the Malthusians were right when they argued that only the strong could and should survive.

„COUNTERCULTURAL FASCISM“ AND THE RADICAL EVOLANS
The sense of despair felt by industrial culture was not unique. A similar heroic/pessimistic worldview appeared in Europe after World War I. In the early 1920s there arose what I shall call „counter-cultural fascism.“ More a sensibility than a movement, it fused Friedrich Nietzsche’s idea of the individual will-to-power and his contempt for middle-class morality with Oswald Spengler’s belief in the imminent downfall of the West. Artists like Futurist founder Filippo Marinetti, Ezra Pound, Gabrieie D’Annunzio, and Ernst Jiinger viewed traditional forms of conservatism with the same contempt that they felt for social democracy, rationalism, and the Enlightenment. While GPO was not really a counterculturat fascist, TG stood on the cusp of a revival of a „counter cultural fascist“ turn in segments of haule bohemia.


„Herbert Marcuse“ of the postwar European far right.

Another set of ideas associated with the Abraxas network had earlier been promoted by a radical Italian fascist named Franco Freda. Freda, who advocated a combined right-and left-wing terrorist assault on the middle class Establishment, first outlined his ideas at a 1969 meeting of the far-right European Revolutionary Front in Regensburg, Bavaria. In his talk, which was later published as La disintegrazione del sistema [The Disintegration of the System], Freda argued that the „nervous system of the bourgeois world“ had to be disrupted with utmost violence by far right „political soldiers“ working in an alliance with the far left.

Freda derived essential parts of his strategy from the Italian conservative revolutionary theorist Julius Evola, the „Herbert Marcuse“ of the postwar European far right. Evola argued in books like Cavalcare la tigre (Riding the Tiger) that the total collapse of modern mass society was something to be welcomed, not resisted. Radical Evolans like Freda believed that violent shocks to the system could only hasten the inevitable collapse of the hated modern order.

OVER THE TOPY
GPO chose art and music, not pistols and plastic explosives, as his „aesthetic terrorist“ weapons. He declared that he and his supporters were „waging war on mass culture. That’s our job. The bottom line is to always keep destroying the status quo.“ In his continual quest for cultural electroshock, he had no qualms about making inflammatory statements. In his article „Giftgas“, for example, he wrote:

When you kill someone, you affirm your own existence. You heighten your perceptions… Killing puts your social intentions into perspective. If you can kill some-one with the correct altitude, you can do anything. You realize the hidden fear of retribution which has informed every action.

Such ideas were later to be reprised by the countercultural fascist milieu within which Michael Moynihan operated.

TG split up in the summer of 1981. CPO and Sleazy then formed the music group Psychic TV along with the Temple of Psychic Youth (TOPY). GPO’s idea for TOPY came from one of his heroes, Aleister Crowley. Crowley, a British sex magician dubbed „The Most Evil Man in the World“ by the tabloid press, led a purported magical order called the Ordo Templis Orientis [OTO). He used drugs, ritual magic, sadomasochistic sex, homosexuality, and anything else he could think of in order to magically transform his and his followers‘ mundane consciousness, GPO saw TOPY as an aesthetic/magical/paramilitary/political order, a new improved OTO. TOPY also fetishized Charles Manson, Jim Jones, the Process Church, and Adolf Hitler, whom GPO viewed as a powerful magician not unlike himself:

I mean, at least somebody like Hitler had vision! And did some-thing pretty exciting…you can maximize the chance of things happening if you have a vision. And I think that’s what happens with people like Hitler…they apply the forces of magick without understanding all of them…But that’s how someone like Hitler could get so much done in ten years. He kind of went from cavalry to space travel in ten years! …So he was applying the laws of magick completely, but he was misapplying them, because he wasn’t genuinely concerned with everybody else. And that’s where the big break comes…Basically he was probably very much like we are, bat he chose the political arena. And when you choose the political arena…very weird things happen, because it’s on such a scale that you can’t control it – That’s why I’m interested in the individual and not the mass. And precisely why I’ve been interested in the individual is anti-fascist. And it’s always accused of being fascist, and I always think that the mass is what is fascist – mass movements and mass systems of thought.

TOPY was also meant to act as a seed crystal for a rejuvenated youth culture. GPO, however, always remained an „aesthetic terrorist.“ Moynihan was in a way right when he lambasted GPO as „some hippie, flower child in reality“ because, for all his excess, GPO saw his project as anti-fascist. Boyd Rice, however, clearly took a page from GPO’s idea of an aesthetic/political order when he formed Abraxas.

CRUEL COOL
Imaginary evil is romantic and varied; real evil is gloomy, monotonous, barren, boring. Imaginary good is boring; real good is always new, marvelous, intoxicating. – Simone Weil

Industrial culture in the United States never attained the brooding complexity of its British cousin. In America it remains jumbled up with a salmagundi of styles that include John Waters‘ consciously anti-political „trash aesthetics,“ slasher movie Grand Guignol, and the deconstruction of highbrow academia by Parisian postmodernism. The French invasion was closely tied to the cultural left through intellectual icons like Michel Foucault. Unlike the bleak British industrialists, transgressive leftist „art workers“ like Karen Finley wanted to epater les bourgeois and promote good causes like feminism and gay liberation.

Since all good transgressives used drugs, liked porn, and despised „middle America,“ Norman Rockwell, Jesse Helms, and Pat Robertson, a natural alliance existed between the West Side liberals at MOMA and the downtown avant-garde at La Mama. Small group of mostly straight white male scenesters, however, used transgressive tactics to attack what they saw as the therapeutic left’s hegemony over bohemia. Unapologetic bad boys in search of an aesthetic that couldn’t be co-opted, they turned to cult leaders like Manson and Jim Jones, serial killers like John Wayne Gacy, violent images of deformed or dismembered bodies, weird conspiracy theories from the far left and far right, UFO abduction tracts, and hate rants by black nationalists and Klansmen.

Some wanted to “épater les communists” because they believed that artists should not live in a world of self-imposed censorship for fear of violating every leftist and feminist dogma de jour. There was also the fear that bohemia, long a bad boy Shangri-La for sex, drugs, and rock ’n roll, was turning into a therapeutic „No Smoking“ zone. And what better „in-your-face“ way to say „fuck you“ to the sissies, parlor pinks, and Feminazis than to play the ace card of transgression-aesthetic fascism.

EXIT
The new hip regime of mean was exemplified by the infamous Los Angeles Amok catalog. Amok Press‘ bestseller Apocalypse Culture, a collection of rants, raves, conspiracy theories, and aesthetic terrorist tracts, was another key text. Adam Parfrey, owner of Amok and later Feral House, first entered the scene in 1980 with IDEA, a southern California-based Re/Search-type journal about punk culture. He then moved to New York where he met the art designer George Petros. Parfrey also became friends with Joe Coteman, a painter and performance artist once famous for biting the heads off live mice and blowing himself up on stage.

In 1984 Parfrey and Petros created Exit, a New York-based journal heavy on graphic design. Exit also drew on contributions from „Cinema of Transgression“ film makers Richard Kern, Nick Zedd, and actress/musician Lydia Lunch, as well as from artists and musicians like Joe Culeman, Jim Thirlwell (Foetus), Genesis P-Orridge, and Boyd Rice. Exit even included drawings by convicted murderers Mark David Chapman, John Wayne Gacy, Charles Manson, and the „Night Stalker“ Richard Ramirez. It used strong psychedelic-like designs, cartoons, totalitarian agitprop images, photos of Hitler, and John Heartfield-style collages to punch outraged readers in the eye.

Parfrey worked with Petros on the first three issues of Exit before leaving to create Amok Press. Once a success de scandale. Exit’s increasing fascination with fascism doomed it to just six issues. Issue five, for example, featured a particularly rancid piece of anti-Semitism entitled the „Execution of Carl Jung“, which was „conceived by George Petros“ with „text researched by Robert N. Taylor,“ a former paramilitary Minuteman leader turned racial Odinist. The final 1994 Exit included contributions from Michael Moynihan and James Mason, an American Nazi whose book Siege was published by Moynihan, While producing Exit, Petros also served as an editor at Seconds, an eclectic New York-based music magazine that Moynihan, Rice, and Parfrey regularly write for.

ENTER SATAN
The new glorification of the instinctual and the barbaric, the belief in the survival of the fittest, and the hatred of both Christian morality and liberal humanism were all music to the ears of Anton LaVey, the founder and head of the San Francisco-based Church of Satan. Not surprisingly, Boyd Rice developed close ties with LaVey in the early 1980s. In 1984, Rice set up the Abraxas Foundation as a „social Darwinist think tank.“ An Abraxas tract called WAKE pro-claimed „Long Live Death!“ and hailed Malthusianism as „Nature’s Eternal Fascism.“ (The Church of Satan also maintained close ties to TOPY. ) Today Rice is himself a member of the Church’s governing inner circle, the Council of Nine. He also conducted the last interview with LaVey for Seconds prior to LaVey’s death on 29 October 1997.

LaVey, who is often only seen as just a libertarian maverick, called for a new kind of fascism in a 1994 interview with Michael Moynihan in Seconds, Moynihan’s essay, „The Faustian Spirit of Fascism,“ was also published in the Church of Satan’s magazine, The Black Flame. LaVey even contributed an introduction to a new edition of „Ragnar Redbeard’s“ Might Is Right, a Nietxschean and Social Darwinist tract first published in 1896 which LaVey had liberally plagiarized in his own book. The Satanic Bible. The editor of the new edition of Might is Right is listed as Katja Lane. She is the wife of David Lane, an Odinist leader of the high-profile far right paramilitary group called the Order, who is now serving a life sentence for conspiring to murder a Denver radio personality named Alan Berg.

The author of Might’s after word is, arguably, even more „devilish“ than LaVey. He is none other than George Hawthorne, head of the white racist musical group RaHoWa (Racial Holy War) and founder of Resistance Records, whom Michael Moynihan interviewed for Seconds and The Black Flame. Moynihan is also thanked in the new edition of Might Is Right for helping make the book possible.

MANSON/MASON
In the mid-1980s Adam Parfrey formed Amok Press, the precursor to Feral House, with Ken Swezey of the Amok catalog. Amok’s first book, Michael, was an English translation of Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels‘ sole novel. Parfrey’s next book. Apocalypse Culture was followed in 1988 by The Manson File, which was edited by Nikolas Schreck (the boyfriend of LaVey’s daughter Zeena) in collaboration with Boyd Rice and others. Rice regularly visited Manson, and even campaigned to get him released from jail through an Abraxas spin-off called the Friends of Justice.

Via Manson, the Abraxas circle came into contact with James Mason, a former member of George Lincoln Rockwell’s American Nazi Party (ANP) and the eccentric head of the National Socialist Liberation Front (NSLF). Mason had established contact with Manson in the early 1980s through an NSLF member named Perry „Red“ Warthan. Warthan later murdered a 17-year-old high school student in Oroville, California, because the boy told police that Warthan had been distributing racist literature.

In the late 1980s Rice got into hot water due to his friendship with Robert Heick (aka „Bob Blitz“), Heick is the leader of a skinhead group called American Front that once attacked the San Francisco anarchist bookstore Bound Together Although he denied having any political ties to Heick, the growing unpopularity of Abraxas in San Francisco led Rice to decamp to Denver, Colorado.

As for Parfrey, he first moved his publishing operation from New York to Los Angeles. After the LA riots, he reLOCated to Portland and then returned south to Venice, California. While in Portland, Parfrey (whose own mother is Jewish) hired the late Keith Stimely, an openly gay former editor of the journal of the Institute for Historical Review, the world’s leading HoLOCaust-denial outfit, to write Feral House press releases. Stimely’s name also appeared on a leaflet, along with that of Moynihan and Portland artist Diabolos Rex, as part of a Boyd Rice/NON „Total War“ performance in that city.

SIEGE
Michael Moynihan was Boyd Rice’s Denver roommate in 1991. That summer their apartment was visited by men who first said they wanted to talk to Moynihan because, as he later recalled, „they believed 1 had witnessed the murder ‚of a black man.'“ The visitors, who turned out to be Secret Service agents, next accused the stunned Moynihan of plotting with some Manson followers to assassinate then-President George Bush during a visit to Denver!

One year later, Moynihan was more preoccupied by literary than legal matters. His Denver-based Storm Press published Siege, a 400-page anthology of the writings of James Mason, the Nazi fan of Charles Manson. In his acknowledgments, Moynihan („Michael M. Jenkins“) thanked (among others) both Adam Parfrey and Anton LaVey • for their help in facilitating Siege’s publication.

Mason argued in Siege that National Socialism had lost its violent, revolutionary edge. „We want to see crime and chaos rise to such a degree where the System becomes no longer viable and falls apart,“ he wrote. In a tract called „Smashing the Pig System,“ he growled: „If a bunch of Black Nationalists rob a Brinks truck, if they kill some System Pigs, WHO CARES??!!“

Siege also paid homage to white racist „lone wolf“ assassins like Mason’s former ANP colleague Joseph Franklin, who specialized in shooting interracial couples („race traitors“); and James Huberty, who massacred a largely Hispanic clientele at a McDonald’s restaurant in San Diego. Mason felt that the lone wolves were merely expressing healthy „Viking berserker rage“ against „Big Brother.“ He especially liked the fact that, since they acted alone, these lone wolves were very difficult to catch. Siege also glorified Charles Manson. Mason even created a Manson-inspired successor group to the NSLF called the Universal Order in an effort to transcend the traditional „left-right spectrum.“

In his introduction to Siege, Moynihan also highlighted Mason’s call for a unity of extremes against the System:

AC this point in history there were no such things as „innocent bystanders.“ The degeneration and decline of the West had long since passed the point where such ideas had any meaning. Now it all boiled down to whether you were working „for“ or „against“ the System, and anything which helped further augment instability in society – no matter what comer it came from, or what „opposing“ (i.e.. Left Wing or Marxist) group might be responsible. The break with conservatism and „Right-Wingism“ (the categories most people invariably believe Nazism falls into) had now been made once and for all…Mason will reiterate that he wishes the best of luck to anyone willing to attack the System head-on.

For all its crudeness, Siege echoed Franco Freda’s radical Evolan call for total social disruption in La disintegrazione del sistema. Storm also plans to issue the first English translation of Evola’s 1953 book, Gli uomini e Ie Rovine (Men Among the Ruins).

In August 1993, one year after Siege was published. Varg Vikernes murdered Euronymous. Although Moynihan was not a black metalist, the lure of Norway’s new Charles Manson was too much to resist since

Varg Vikemes serves the rote of a pariah and heretic (o Norwegians, similar on a number of levels to that of Charles Manson in America. Both profess a radical ideology at odds with, and at times unintelligible to the average citizen. Both insist they have done nothing wrong. Both espouse a revolutionary attitude with strong racial overtones. Both have become media bogeymen in their respective countries, and both knowingly contribute to their own mythicization. Both also under-stand well the inherent archetypical power of symbols and names – especially those they adopt for themselves.

BOMBING BLITZ HOUSE
In LOC Moynihan suggests that Vikernes is an avatar of a long-repressed Odinist archetype analogous to what -lung claimed for Nazi Germany in his famous 1936 essay on Wotan. Moynihan clearly believes in racial archetypes and told Ohm CLOCk: „racial achievements are distinctive between different races and I think that culture is based on race. I don’t understand why it’s a taboo topic to discuss.“

In LOC Moynihan relies upon „Kadmon,“ editor of a Vienna-based journal called Aorta, to bolster the racial archetype thesis. Kadmon argues that Norwegian black metalists are modern day examples of an ancient martial/mystical band of Werewolf-like „berserker“ warriors known as the Oskorei. No disinterested scholar, Kadmon is also a political supporter of Vikernes as well as Moynihan’s collaborator. His band Allerseelen, for example, put out a joint CD with Moynihan’s group Blood Axis. A blood fetishist, Kadmon named his journal Aorta because it is „a blood-red cycle. In Aorta there is my blood. The blood of the poet, the blood of the magician, the blood of the warrior.“ Kadmon also devoted one issue of Aorta to „the Odinist Norwegian composer Varg Vikernes…who is currently in prison due to his Viking ethics.“

But should Odin take the rap for Vikernes‘ „Viking ethics“? LOC offers strong evidence that Vikernes, who came from a divorced family and was raised by his mother Lene Bore, was a fascist well before he became a metalhead. Vikernes reports that his mother „was actually afraid that I was going to come home with a black girl! She’s very race-conscious…She could just as well be my friend as she is my mother.“ He also said about his acts:

It’s not a rebellion against my parents or something, it’s serious. My mother totally agrees with it. She doesn’t mind if someone bums a church down. She hates the church quite a lot.

Few doubt the truth of Vikemes‘ remarks, especially after Lene Bore was arrested in 1997 for giving close to $20,000 to a neo-Nazi clique that wanted to break her son out of jail. Her racialism clearly affected her son who „insists his racial/nationalist feelings have been present since childhood.“ Vikernes also said: „I was a skinhead when I was 15 or 16. Nobody knows that. People say that I suddenly became a Nazi, but I was actually a skinhead back then. It was in waves -in 91′ I was into occultism, in „92 Satanism, in 93′ mythology and so on, in waves.“

Vikernes recalled that when he was a skinhead, „there were these Punks – that was more the reason I went over to the other side. But of course the main reason is weapons: German SS helmets, Schmeizers [sic] and Mausers and all these weapons. That’s what they shot the British and Americans with, great – we hated British and Americans.“ In January 1993, some months before his murder of Euronymous and at a time when Vikernes wasn’t openly identified with fascism, a photo taken in his apartment displayed his Nazi memorabilia.

Given how much valuable information LOC does present, it is some-what incredible that the book fails to note that at the time that Vikernes murdered Euronymous, he was also planning to destroy an Oslo-based punk anti-fascist squat called Blitz House. After his arrest for murder, the police discovered that he had about 330 pounds of stolen dynamite in his possession. Vikernes may have felt that he had no choice but to kill Euronymous before bombing Blitz House because „the Communist“ would almost certainly have opposed such an act- Recall in this context that Vikernes also claimed that Euronymous had been plotting to have him killed- It may well be true that Vikernes really did murder Euronymous for petty personal reasons. By refusing to even mention Blitz House, however, LOC glides over another potentially highly relevant motive.

LOC also ignores another obvious cultural influence on Vikernes, the Abraxas network’s glorification of killers like Charles Manson! Vikernes‘ home town, Bergen, is also home to Jan Bruun’s Hypertonia World Enterprises. Bruun is a major distributor of Charles Manson memorabilia like „Watching Satan -the Legacy of Charles Manson-“ He knows Moynihan and interviewed him for an Italian journal aptly named Healter Skelter. Moynihan also thanks Bruun, an avowed social Darwinist and Malthusian, in the acknowledgements to LOC. It seems almost impossible to believe that Vikernes would not have known about Hypertonia World Enterprises, especially since Bruun was in contact with Euronymous and even sold Mayhem LPs.

THE ASATRU CONNECTION
Despite his use of Kadmon’s theories, Moynihan claims in LOC that „there is absolutely no specific connection“ between practitioners of Nordic religion and the black metal scene. „In fact,“ he writes, „public assumptions that such a link would exist have been a severe liability to these groups.“ Moynihan, however, neglects to mention that he himself is a leading member of a U.S.-based racialist „Old Norse and Germanic religion“ movement called the Asatru Alliance of Independent Kindreds (AA), which is headquartered in Arizona.

The AA evolved out of a 1960s Odinist/Nordic revival movement called the Asatrii Free Assembly. The AA faction argued that a Norse religious movement should only include people of Northern European descent. It also publishes a journal called Vor Tru which is edited by Robert Ward, the former editor of a rightist music zine called The Fifth Path. He is also almost certainly the „R, Ward“ thanked by Moynihan for his typesetting contribution to Siege. Another AA leader, „Valgard“ (Michael) Murray, was a former member of Rockwell’s American Nazi Party.

Moynihan’s close friend Robert Nicholas Taylor, who publishes an Odinist journal called The Continuing Clan, is yet another AA bigwig with a far right bio. The rightist music journal Ohm Clock reports that during „a 12-year stint as a national spokesman for the Minutemen, he [Taylor] went on to become Director of Intelligence and set up the first guerrilla training schools ever to exist in the United States.“ Taylor’s call for the racial balkanization of America, an argument associated with the late „Klanarchist“ leader Robert Miles, was also featured in the last issue of Exit.

BYE BYE BOYD
Moynihan now lives in Portland, where he moved in order to work for Feral House. He also left Colorado after a falling out with Boyd Rice. In an interview in Momentum, Moynihan announced that Blood Axis „will not ever work with Boyd Rice again, due to personal differences.“ He also told Heater Skelter: „I don’t have any contact with Boyd Rice anymore, mainly because we just went our separate ways.“

Unlike Moynihan, Rice is usually quite careful to call himself a fascist only in aesthetics and not in politics. He did, however, tell Seconds: „I think basically I am a Fascist, because I do think there is a hierarchy, and there are people that are stupid, and there are people that are clever,“ a definition so bland that it hardly does justice to the complexity of fascism as a political ideology and the extremism of fascism as a political system.

Moynihan clearly seems fed up with Rice’s bob and weave. In the Momentum interview, he groaned:

I’m sick of people saying they’re „not political,“ as I think this is a cup-out…If you’re going to espouse „fascist“ ideas, then I believe you have to accept some of the responsibility for their application in the real world; otherwise what is the point of espousing them in the first place?… Terms which are bandied about like „occult fascism“ don’t have any tangible meaning as far as I can tell, though they sound impressive.

Moynihan apparently feels that „occult fascists“ like Rice „cop out“ when they refuse to carry their „aesthetic“ agenda to its real world conclusions. For the same reason Moynihan hates black metal bands that don’t use violence because they fear it might prevent them from becoming rock stars.

THE FAR RIGHT AND BLACK METAL
True to his principles, Moynihan is quite active in the propaganda support network for Vikernes. He is, for example, a leading contributor to a rightist journal called Filosofem, which is published by a group also called Blood Axis. Filosofem is LOCated at 5 Rue Gabriel Price in Metz, France. This same address is the source of a series of pro-Vikernes leaflets which carry the name Cymophane on them. Filosofem also takes its name from a Burzum CD that Vikernes recorded in 1993 while out on bail. That CD is currently being jointly distributed by Misanthropy Records, Cymophane Productions, and Feral House Audio.

LOC also contains an interview with Kerry Bolton, a New Zealand-based Satanist who is trying to popularize fascism inside pop culture with a series of small journals like Key of Alocer, The Nexus and The Flaming Sword. His essays have also appeared in The Black Flame and Filosofem. In one of his writings Bolton even calls the Futurist (and later Fascist) Filippo Marinetti a forerunner of „Industrial Culture“. His publications also feature Moynihan, R. N. Taylor, Boyd Rice, Kadmon, and others like them.

In his interview in LOC, Bolton denounces Christianity in classic „right meets left“ jargon as:

One product of the Magian [i.e. Jewish-KC] infection of Western culture, the others being plutocracy, liberalism, globalism, egalitarianism. and so forth…Since the thrust of the present civilization in its phase of senility is towards a global plutocracy, with the plutocrats and globalists utilizing con-sumerism and multi-culturalism to break down the different nations and cultures and archetypes upon which they are based, it is fitting that „new“ forms of Satanism are emerging with a nativist heathen basis to challenge this globalism.

Bolton also leads an overtly fascist magical sect called the Black Order. The Black Order’s New Zealand address is conveniently reprinted in an illustration in LOC.

A French far rightist and OTO leader named Christian Bouchet also pops up in LOC. Along with publishing his own occult journal Thelema, Bouchet helps lead Nouvelle Resistance, a fascist „third way“ grouping whose journal Lutte du People he edits. Bouchet advocates an alliance with the far left, applauds Castro for resisting American imperialism, and praises the French nineteenth century anarchist Pierre-Joseph Proudhon. He even offered a eulogy for the German ultra-leftist Ulrike Meinhof, a leader of the terrorist Rote Armee Fraktion, RAF. Nouvelle Resistance is also behind a pro-Vikemes music fanzine called Napalm Rock, whose editor LOC interviews.

Given his own background and publicly proclaimed political’ views, it seems fairly obvious that Moynihan would not be terribly distraught if a new wave of „berserker youth“ chose to follow in Vikernes‘ path – regardless of whether or not he holds the Count’s most extreme political statements in high regard. Although Vikemes was later ostracized for killing Euronymous, LOC claims that black metalists who act out their violent fantasies gain „a perverse form of credibility over the bands who merely sing and dream of empty morbid fantasies.“ Speaking to Ohm Clock, Moynihan was even more explicit:

I would see these forms of music and expression talk about violence, people who were clearly obsessed with violence, but never would actually go out and do what they were talking about. They never take the logical step…If you’re going to sing songs or record entire records about killing people then after a while it gets silly when it’s just fantasy. I think that’s why a lot of the death metal stuff got really cartoonish and stupid. Then the black metal phenomenon superseded death metal and basically wiped it off the map. They actually did some-thing more than just release records for their friends to buy. The others had been doing a disservice to themselves by not actually going out and committing the act.

For much the same reason LOC highlights non-black metal killers like Florida’s Lords of Chaos or the teenager in France who stabbed an elderly Catholic priest to death. They too are part of the fiery youth of the future, in whom „rebellious embers grow brighter.“

CONCLUSION
Lords of Chaos contains a good deal of fascinating information about both black metal and cultural fascism. But does it all add up? While one could persuasively argue that church burnings per se might well arise from black metal’s dime store satanic ethos, LOC’s musings about fascism and black metal largely hang on a thin evidentiary thread, Varg Vikemes. Yet when Moynihan replaces his steel helmet with a reporter’s fedora, LOC shows that Vikemes had been a far rightist well before he became a black metalist. After his murder of Euronymous, Vikemes lost almost all his credibility in a scene where the old timers still mourn for the „Prince of Death“.

LOC gives an especially clear, even restrained, summary of its core thesis in the following paragraph:

There are many divergent political views found across the spectrum of Black Metal musicians and fans (the communism of Euronymous provides a prime example of some-one taking leftism to its utmost extreme), but no one will deny that right wing attitudes have become a natural extension of the interests of some involved.

But just how many black metal „fascists“ are there? Ten? One Hundred? One Thousand? LOC doesn’t tell us. And are these unnamed fascists the natural children of black metal? For all its cleverness in seeking to portray Varg Vikemes as the Charles Manson of the Marilyn Manson Gen-generation, LOC fails to make a convincing case that black metal and fascism walk hand in hand.

LOC may even get the story of Norwegian black metal backwards. There really was a small clique of black metal Satanists whom Euronymous dominated. Vikemes made his mark in the scene by torching a church, an act so extreme that Euronymous had little choice but to go along or be revealed as a con man or a coward. After Vikernes killed Euronymous -for whatever reason- the subsequent wave of arrests decimated the underground. Nor did massive press coverage spawn a new wave of Vikemes copycats. The exact opposite seems to have occurred: a poseur takeover by would-be rock stars blathering about Satan. Far from symbolizing black metal’s metamorphosis from guitars to gasoline, Vikemes actually helped to rob black metal of its dark soul. Since then, it has largely been just show biz and record deals.

Since Euronymous‘ murder still haunts Norway’s metal scene, it seems appropriate to give the last word to „Son of Satan,“ who writes in the most recent Slayer:

Welcome to Norway, the Black Metal center of the world. Never has such a small country spawned such a big amount of bands in a somewhat limited genre. Yeah, that’s cool…or is it? The scene is unique and so on, but there is a but… Shouldn’t there be something more? Shouldn’t also Black Metal be extreme? Something went wrong somewhere. In between all bands signing to major labels I think something disappeared. There is [sic] not many in Norway who puts [sic] Satanism before Black Metal in our scene…Everyone has his or her definition of Satanism but at least you can say the extremity is gone. I think many just dress in black because everyone else does it, wearing pentagrams without knowing its potential danger… But nothing is really happening in Norway now as in regard to anti-Christian action. People say that there will be no more church fires which of course is a sad thing. No matter what, the church burnings were great. Even if it didn’t really help in the war against Christianity I thought it was a great thing. A hail to those who committed those deeds. But nothing like that happens now; there is not even proper violence. Everything is so nice up here.

Credits:
The absolutely fantastic pictures were taken from the band Gorgoroth, photographed by Peter Beste. The band Gorgoroth is NOT mentioned in that report. The pictures were chosen only for illustratative reasons.

Notes:
There is an enormous scholarly an. popular literature on fascism, but much of it is sadly deficient. The best general history of fascism is undoubtedly that of Stanley Payne, A History of Fascism, 1914-1945 (Madison: University of Wisconsin. 1995). For the best introductions to „classical“ fascist ideology, see Eugen Weber, Varieties of Fascism: Doctrines of Revolution in the Twentieth Century (New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1964); the many studies by Israeli scholar Zeev Stemhell, including ‚Fascist Ideology“, in Fascism: A Reader’s Guide, ed. by Walter Laquew (Berkeley: University of California, 1976), La droite révolutionnaire, 1885-1914: Les engines françaises du Fascisme (Parts: Seuil, 1978), and Ni gauche, ni droite: L’ideologie fasciste en France (Paris: Seuil. 1983); Emilio Gentile. Le origini dell’ideologia fascista, 1919-1925 (Ban: Laterza, 1975); and A. James Gregor, The Ideology of Fascism: The Rationale for Totalitarianism (New York: Free Press. 1969). All of these works rightly emphasize the left-wing and anti-capitalist features intrinsic to fascist ideology, especially in its earlier ‚movement phase“. Far more on these elements, com-pare Paul Mazgaj, The Action Francaise and Revolutinary Syndicalism (Chapel Hill: University of Horth Carolina, 1979); David D. Roberts, The Syndicalist Tradition and Italian Fascism (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, 1979); Remo De Felice, Mussolini il rivoluzionario (Turin: Einaudi, 1965), the first of many volumes of De Felice’s comprehensive biography of Mussolini; Reinhard Kühnl, Die nationalsozialistische Linke, 1925-1930: Eine Untersuchung über Geschichte, Struktur, und Ideologie der Strasser-Gruppe (Meisenheim: Hain, 1966); Patrick Moreau, Nationalsozialismus von links: Die „Kampfgemeinschaft Revolutionärer Nationalsozialisten“ und die „Schwarze Front“ Otto Strassers, 1930-1935 (‚Stuttgart: Deutsche, 1985); and Rainer Zitelmann, Hitler: Selbstverständnis eines Revolutionärs (Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta. 1990).

Needless to say, the term ‚fascist“ has nowadays become a general epithet used by all sorts of people to smear their political and ideological opponents, so much so that its actual meaning has become hopelessly corrupted and confused and it has been trans-formed into a virtual synonym for absolute ‚evil“, not to mention authoritarianism, genocide, and militarism. (Why the same fate has not befallen the word ‚communist“, a political ideology and system which shares many of the same characteristics and has been responsible for an equal measure of human misery and even more genocidal murders, is a subject worthy of serious study.) Far good surveys of the contemporary Euro-American radical right see Paul Hainsworth. ed.. The Extreme Right in Europe and the USA (New York: St. Martin’s, 1992); Ludano Cheles & others, eds.. The Far Right In Western and Eastern Europe (New York Longman. 1995); and Jeffrey Kaplan & Leonard Weinberg, The Emergence of a Euro-American Radical Right (New Brunswick Rutgers University. 1998).

For an introduction to Julius Evola’s thought, see Richard Drake. ‚Julius Evola and the Ideological Origins of the Radical Right in Contemporary Italy“, in Political Violence and Terror: Motifs and Motivations, ed. by Peter Merki (Berkeley: University of California, 1987), pp. 61-89: and Franco Fenwesi. Threats to Democracy: The Radical Right in Italy after the War (Princeton: Princeton University, 1996), pp. 43-50. For contemporary Far the continental European neo-pagan, anti-American, and ‚metapolitical“ New Right (i.e., the Nouvelle Droite) -which must be carefully distinguished from the conservative, pro-free market Anglo-American New Right- see especially Pierre-André Taguieff, Sur la Nouvelle Droite: Jalons d’une analyse critique (flans: Descartes, 1994).

This Article first appeared at the Print Magazine HITLIST
February/March 1999, Volume one, Number one, Berkeley CA, USA &
Oraclesyndicate.org

PDF Print Version: how black is black metal1 (pdf)
Kevin Coogan is the Autor of: Dreamer of the Day: Francis Parker Yockey and the Postwar Fascist International