afrika

Bewegung in der Parteienlandschaft Südafrikas

Dr. Günter Pabst – In der kurzen Geschichte der jungen Demokratie Südafrikas sind viele politische Parteien gekommen und gegangen. Es gab nur eine wirkliche Konstante in diesen fast 15 Jahren seit den ersten freien Wahlen im April 1994: Der African National Congress (ANC) des legendären Nelson Mandela.

Die ehemalige Befreiungsbewegung hat mit einer Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit das Land politisch fest im Griff, auf Bundes-, Landes- und Kommunalebene (mit der Ausnahme von Kapstadt, wo die Opposition in einer Koalition eine knappe Mehrheit hält). Seit diesen Anfängen wird kontinuierlich spekuliert, wann denn diese mächtige Partei sich spalten wird. Anlass für solche Spekulationen gab es immer wieder. Denn der ANC befindet sich in einer – informellen – Allianz mit zwei Partnern, die nicht so recht in das Erscheinungsbild des ANC passen.

Der eine ist die South African Communist Party (SACP); zweiter Partner ist der Dachverband von 21 Einzelgewerkschaften mit dem Namen Congress of South African Trade Unions (COSATU). Die SACP propagiert einen klassischen sozialistischen Kurs; die Führung von COSATU ist ganz überwiegend in der SACP engagiert. Und beide, SACP und COSATU, sind mit Teilen des Führungspersonals in Spitzenpositionen des ANC vertreten. Einfluss auf die Regierungspolitik des ANC hatten sie jedoch kaum. Im Gegenteil: Der ANC entwickelte sich seit 1995 zu einer waschechten sozialdemokratischen Partei mit einem wirtschaftspolitischen Kurs, den man durchaus als neoliberal bezeichnen kann.

Das hatte immer wieder zu heftigen Zerwürfnissen innerhalb der Allianz geführt – Stoff für Spekulationen, wie lange SACP und COSATU sich die Alleingänge des ANC noch gefallen lassen würden. Es kam nie zum Bruch, aber es schien allen immer klar: Wenn der ANC mal auseinanderfallen würde, dann durch die Abspaltung der Linken in Kooperation mit SACP und COSATU.

Nun ist es ganz anders gekommen. Nicht die Linke hat sich gelöst, sondern Kräfte aus der Mitte der Partei. Zwei Namen stehen für diese Entwicklung: Masiuoa Lekota und Mbhazima Shilowa. Beide sind Schwergewichte in der Politik mit langjährigen Führungspositionen im ANC. Lekota war National Chairman des ANC (1997 – 2007), Premier der Provinz Free State (1996 – 1999) und Verteidigungsminister (1999 – 2007). Shilowa kommt aus der Gewerkschaftsbewegung; 1994 wurde er in das National Executive Committee (NEC) des ANC gewählt; vom 1999 bis zu seinem Rücktritt vor nur wenigen Wochen war er Premier von Gauteng, der wirtschaftlich stärksten Provinz Südafrikas.

Um diese beiden hat sich ein erlauchter Kreis weiterer Amtsträger des ANC gebildet – Leute aus der zweiten Reihe mit Einfluss an der Basis der Partei. Für das vergangene Wochenende hatten Lekota und Shilowa nach Johannesburg geladen und mehr als 6.000 Menschen kamen, um die Weichen für eine neue Partei zu stellen. Bisher gibt es weder einen Namen (der Arbeitsbegriff der Medien für diese neue Bewegung ist “Shikota”), noch ein Programm.

Es gibt nur den festen Willen, eine Partei zu gründen, die an die traditionellen Wurzeln des ANC anknüpfen, der Machtarroganz des ANC seit dem Parteitag in Polokwane im Dezember 2007 aber Einhalt gebieten soll. Für die kommenden Wochen sind Namensgebung, Programm, Strukturierung und Registrierung geplant. Es gibt keinen vernünftigen Zweifel daran, dass Südafrika zum Jahreswechsel eine weitere Partei mit einem Führungsduo Lekota/Shilowa haben wird.

Stellt sich die Frage, wie sich diese Neugründung aus die politische Lage nach den Wahlen 2009 auswirken wird. Prognosen sind schon deshalb schwer, weil im Augenblick noch keine programmatische Einordnung erfolgen kann. Aber immerhin können wohl folgende Prognosen gewagt werden:

Der ANC wird bei den nächsten Wahlen wieder die Mehrheit erringen, wohl aber kaum wieder zwei-drittel der Stimmen. Einen Erdrutsch in Richtung auf die neue Partei wird es 2009 schon deshalb nicht geben, weil traditionell die ehemaligen Befreiungsbewegungen in Afrika einige Jahrzehnte von diesem Bonus zehren, auch wenn die Menschen unzufrieden sind. Viel wird für “Shikota” also davon abhängen, wie stark es gelingt, sich glaubhaft in die Tradition des ANC einzubringen.

Die faktische Monopolstellung des ANC wird in einigen Provinzen beendet werden, wo die neue Bewegung zusammen mit anderen Oppositionsparteien eine Mehrheit gegen den ANC sichern kann. Zu denken ist dabei an das Western Cape, Northern Cape und Eastern Cape sowie an den Free State und KwaZulu-Natal, möglicherweise auch Gauteng, wo Shilowa ein sehr populärer Premier war.

Womit wir bei der weiteren Frage sind, was dies denn für die politische Stabilität Südafrikas bedeuten mag. Und da wird es schwierig. Der ANC ist zunehmend arrogant geworden (nicht erst seit Zuma, sondern schon unter Mbekis Führung); viele Entscheidungen wurden ohne Rücksicht auf die öffentliche Meinung durchgepeitscht.

Das Land ist durch politische Fehler des ANC in einigen Bereichen auf das Niveau einer Bananenrepublik gesunken. Aber die Konstellation mit dem übermächtigen ANC hat Einiges erreicht, was man nicht so häufig antrifft in Afrika: Wahlen werden nicht manipuliert, die Medien haben freie Hand, die Justiz gibt sich selbstbewusst und unabhängig. Der ANC ist politisch so überlegen, dass er das hinnehmen kann. Wenn nun aber diese Überlegenheit gefährdet ist, könnte die Versuchung groß werden, die Macht zu gebrauchen, um dies zu verhindern. Aus Machtarroganz könnte dann Machtmissbrauch werden.

Bei Personen wie Jacob Zuma, Gwede Mantashe und Julius Malema in Spitzenpositionen beim ANC scheinen solche Befürchtungen nicht an den Haaren herbeigezogen. Die drei gehören sicher nicht zur charakterlichen Elite des Landes.

linkDieser Artikel wurde durch Capetown-online ermöglicht

linkDr. Günter Pabst hat in den letzten Jahren zu verschiedenen rechtlichen, steuerlichen, wirtschaftlichen und politischen Themen in Fachzeitschriften und Magazinen Beiträge veröffentlicht. Mehrfach wurde er eingeladen, vor Wirtschaftsdelegationen in Südafrika und auf Seminaren und Workshops in Deutschland Vorträge zu diversen Südafrika-Themen zu halten. Dr. Papst ist Rechtsanwalt, seine Hompage finden sie unter Pabst & Pabst Consulting.

deutschland

Der Fall Susanne Klatten – eine Nachlese

Dr. Alexander von Paleske —- 6.11. 2008 — Der Fall Susanne Klatten kommt etwas aus den Schlagzeilen, Grund genug, eine Nachlese vorzunehmen. Erwartungsgemäss lag die Tendenz der Artikel in der deutschen Presse die einen mehr, die anderen weniger auf der Mitleidswelle: Arme reiche Frau.

Wirtschaftsgefährdende Schadenfreude
Die Financial Times Deutschland warnte darüberhinaus eindringlich vor Häme. Unter dem Titel „Gefährliche Schadenfreude“ wird von der FTD das Gespenst des Rückzugs der Quandt-Klatten Familie und der Ueberdenkung ihrer Investments an die Wand gemalt. Es könne doch niemand ein Interesse daran haben, dass sie ihr Geld einem Dax Unternehmen entziehen, gerade jetzt in der Krise. Also, man muss vorsichtig mit diesen Menschen umgehen. Aber das reichte natürlich nur für einen, bestenfalls zwei Artikel.

Psychologen und Verhaltensforscher an die Front
Also musste jetzt tiefschürfend nachgefragt werden: Wie kommt eine solche Frau dazu, auf einen solchen Mann reinzufallen… Dazu wurden gleich mehrere Hirnforscher, Verhaltensforscher und Psychologen bemüht.

ZEIT-online/Tagesspiegel zitierte die US-amerikanische Neurologin Antonia Damasio und befragte die Psychologin von der Humboldt- Universität, Annakathrin Schacht sowie den Psychologen Philipp Kanske vom Institut für Kognitions-und Neurowissenschaften. Auch der Psychologieprofessor Peter Walschburger von der Freien Universität in Berlin durfte sich erklärend bei diesem schwerwiegenden Thema zu Wort melden. Der Hirnbotenstoff Dopamin, bzw. dessen Fehlen soll bei Gigolo-Affären eine Rolle spielen.

Da will BILD sich nicht lumpen lassen, auch bei ihr kommt Walschburger zu Wort. Nunmehr als Biopsychologe bezeichnet. Und natürlich FOCUS aus dem Hause Burda, auch hier wieder der Bioprofessor Walschburger. Von einem sinnengewollten Chaos im Gehirn ist die Rede. Dieses hat offenbar etwas mit der Arterhaltung Mensch zu tun.

Auch die Anthropologin und Liebesexpertin Helen Fisher aus den USA wird zitiert. Der schweizerische Tagesanzeiger interviewt die Psychologin Onken. Also war Frau Klatten offenbar das Opfer atavistischen Dopaminmangels zielgerichtet im Nachvollzug atavistischer Menschheitserhaltungstriebe, vereinfacht aMET. Tja, da war sie also zweimal Opfer, einmal der Erpressung und dann der aMET.

In dieser Lage wäre es geradezu schändlich, sie auch noch zu einem Opfer der Presse zu machen.

Toller Mut?
Tollen Mut habe sie gezeigt, meinen viele Zeitungen. Trotz der zweifachen Opferrolle sei sie zur Polizei gegangen, und habe sich damit dem Risiko einer über sie herfallenden Presse ausgesetzt. Hut ab.

Mut soll ihr hier keineswegs abgesprochen werden. Zum Thema Mut fällt mir im Zusammenhang mit den Quandt Firmen aber eher die Gruppe der dänischen Widerstandskämpfer ein, die 1944 im KZ Stoecken auf dem Gelände der zum, Quandt-Konzern gehörenden AFA-Werke, später Varta für ihren Kampf gegen den Hitler Faschismus büssen mussten. Sie wurden in der AFA-Fabrik giftigen Bleidämpfen ausgesetzt, einige kamen um. Nur wenige sind heute noch am Leben,einer davon ist Carl-Adolf Soerensen, der auch in dem FernsehfilmDas Schweigen der Quandts“ zu Wort kam.

Quandt, Springer und die Dänen
Dem Herrn Soerensen, mittlerweile 82 Jahre alt, wurde seinerzeit eine Entschädigung seitens der Quandt-Firma verweigert und zwar mit einer Begründung, die einer Demütigung gleichkommt:“Es habe dort kein KZ gegeben“. Und wo kein KZ, da keine KZ Häftlinge
.
Selbst an einer kleinen Geste hat es bis heute gegenüber diesem Überlebenden, der noch immer an seinem KZ-Trauma leidet, offenbar gefehlt. Auch als die dänischen Widerstandskämpfer, die, wie Ruediger Jungbluth in seinem Buch „Die Quandts“ schreibt, nach dem Kriege Kontakt hielten im Jahre 1972 bei der VARTA um einen finanziellen Zuschuss zu einem geplanten Erholungsheim für ehemalige KZ Häftlinge baten, da wurden sie brüsk abgewiesen.

Die gleiche Erfahrung machte übrigens auch Jan Reemtsma, der Geld sammelte für eine Gedenkstätte auf dem Gelände des ehemaligen KZ Neuengamme, dessen Aussenstelle das KZ Stoecken auf dem Grundstück der Quandt-Firma AFA war, und woher Quandt seine Arbeitskräfte bekam.

Schlappe DM 5000 spendete die Quandt-Firma, und das erst auf Nachbohren von Reemtsma, gegen Spendenquittung zwecks Steuerabzug versteht sich.

Eher kommt man offenbar als Gigolo zu 7,2 Millionen mit einer frei erfundenen Geschichte, denn als ehemaliger KZ -Insasse und Zwangsarbeiter mit seiner wahren Lebensgeschichte an einen Bruchteil davon.

Nun soll erst einmal ein Historiker tätig werden aber viel Zeit bleibt den Quandts nicht mehr für eine kleine Geste gegenüber Soerensen,soweit sie das überhaupt jemals vorgehabt hätten.

Da war selbst der Pressezar Axel Springer, der nie etwas mit den Nazis am Hut hatte, einfach besser. Der vermachte ein von ihm gekauftes sehr wertvolles dänisches Gemälde an das Museum in Skagen mit der Begründung: Die Dänen waren (unter Hitler) ein so tapferes Volk, haben so viele Menschen vor den Nazis gerettet (M. Juergs „Der Fall Axel Springer“ S. 114f).

Quandt, Flick und die Zwangsarbeiterentschädigung
Immerhin haben die Quandt- Firmen sich nicht vor der Einzahlung in den Entschädigungsfond für Zwangsarbeiter gedrückt, das sollte hier nicht unerwähnt bleiben, anders als die Flick-Erben. Dem mittlerweile verstorbenen Milliardenerben Friedrich Karl Flick war ausserdem selbst die Erbschaftssteuer in Deutschland noch zu hoch, also wanderte er mit (Geld)Sack und Pack in das Erbschaftssteuerparadies Oesterreich aus.

Dort darf nun ein Banker namens Wolfgang Kulterer, zur Zeit vor Gericht stehend wegen angeblicher Bilanzfälschung, sich um den Flick- Nachlass kümmern. Kulterer war auch ein Freund des jüngst verstorbenen Joerg Haider, österreichischer Rechtsaussen und Bewunderer faschistischer Arbeitsmarktpolitik. So schliesst sich der Kreis.
.
Ende gut, alles gut
In Sachen Klatten-Gigolo steht noch der Strafprozess in diesem Jahr an, bei dem auch intime Details zur Sprache kommen sollen, aber da wird das Gericht dann wohl die Oeffentlichkeit ausschliessen.

Ist doch alles gar nicht so schlecht gelaufen, Frau Klatten. Hätte doch alles viel schlimmer kommen können. Die Ehe ist auch nicht in Gefahr, und, wie ich gestern las, gibt Ihre Familie Ihnen Kraft, also alles letztlich paletti.

Und schön, dass Sie jetzt mit Interviews in den italienischen Zeitungen REPUBLICA und CORRIERE DELLA SERRA in die Offensive gehen, Schlagzeile „Sgarbi (der Gigolo) war faszinierend“.

Richtig gefreut hat mich, dass Sie die 7,5 Millionen Euro nach Rückzahlung nicht etwa wieder in die eigene Tasche stecken wollten, Pardon in den Koffer, der so schwer war, dass Sie ihn kaum tragen konnten, wie sie berichten, sondern vielmehr vorhatten, zu spenden. Das zeigt doch eigentlich, wie grossherzig Sie in Wirklichkeit sind. Schade dass es nicht geklappt hat, sonst hätte vielleicht auch Herr Soerensen noch was abbekommen. Vielleicht beim nächsten Mal…

E-Mail: avpaleske@botsnet.bw

Der Fall Susanne Klatten und die Presse
Kurzer Prozess für den Klatten-Gigolo?
Klatten-Gigolo Prozess: Grund zur Zufriedenheit?
Der Fall Susanne Klatten: Ein Strafprozess der prozessualen Erbärmlichkeiten?
linkBayernLB-Tochter Hypo Group Alpe Adria – Reicht mir die Hand, meine Skandale
Wolfgang Kulterer – vom „erfolgreichsten Bankmanager“ zum bestraften Bilanzfälscher

afrika

Mining in the Ituri Province of the Congo-A Contemporary Profile

David Barouski – 4.11. 2008 — Most people who became aware of the 2nd Congo War (1998-2003) did so because of the violence unleased in the (then) Ituri District, which was created in June of 1999 by General James Kazini of the Ugandan People’s Defense Force (UPDF). After the Lusaka Accords were signed and the UPDF officially pulled out of the country, the neighboring countries of Uganda and Rwanda aggravated and exploited ethnic differences to create numerous militias that went to war over the vast gold tracts in Ituri.

The illegal sale of this gold in neighboring countries served to fund the war by purchasing arms, military uniforms, and other supplies. Incomprehensable acts of violence and rape occurred, and child soldiers were the norm. Today, with the aid of the United Nations Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (MONUC), Ituri has found a relative peace and only small pockets of militas remain.

Ituri is unique compared to the Kivu provinces to the south because throughout the 1st Congo War (1996-1997) to the present day, war over minerals has always been about gold and timber. The rest of Northeastern Congo went through several distict phases where one particular commodity was more sought after than another. When the 2nd Congo War (1998-2003) broke out, diamonds were the most coveted mineral until about mid-2000.

In 2000, the coltan (columbium-tantalite) boom occurred due to increased military-industrial spending on vehicles and equipment for smaller, more mobile armies; the arrival of popular mass-consumption electronics (the cell phone boom, Sony Playstation, etc.); and the globalization process, which included vastly expanded markets and the rapid development ofthe telecommunicatons industry and other technologies, all of which drastically increased market demand for coltan. What started off in 1999 as a $20 (U.S.) per pound commodity rose to $380 (U.S.) per pound by December of 2000. With 80% of the world’s coltan reserves, fierce fighting for the DRC’s mining sites claimed countless innocent victims.1 The world market reserves quickly became so saturated with smuggled coltan that the price plummeted back down by the end of 2001 due to over-supply. This was particularly true after the U.S. Department of Defense’s Defense Logistics Agency (DLA) released the excess coltan from the U.S. reserves.

After the coltan boom ended, a proxy war between Uganda and Rwanda took place in the Ituri District in the northeast corner of the DRC. The wars were faught over the lucrative gold reserves found in the center of the district. This corner of the country saw some of the worst fighting of the 2nd Congo War. Prior to, and during both wars, multinational corporations sought to exploit the same gold mining areas in Ituri that the various militias did. The mines are primarily concentrated around the towns of Mongbwalu, Watsa, Durba, Kilo, and Moto in very remote areas. Today, with some likeness of peace, the political fight for control of the concessions will begin anew. The Deputy Minister of Mines, Victor Kasongo, has begun a review of the mining contracts for the newly elected Congolese Government and he said 50% of the contracts may be voided.2 A number of the concessions in Ituri are under scrutiny. All official negotiations for mining rights have ended until all the contracts have been reviewed. This could prove to be troublesome for both the Congolese Government and the mining companies.

The mining concession that includes the Watsa/Durba area (OKIMO Concession #38) was obtained by the giant Canadian gold-mining firm Barrick Gold from the Office of Kilo-Moto (OKIMO) on 3rd August, 1996 before the fall of (then) President Joseph Mobutu Sese Seko. OKIMO, the state-owned gold mining company, became a joint partner in Barrick’s project. Barrick initially became interested in the concession after the U.S.-based consulting firm Davy McKee Corporation completed a successful feasibility study of the area in 1991. Between October and December of 1996, while war was raging in the area southwest of the concession, Barrick completed several of their own exploratory drills, but the results were less promising than the reports OKIMO gave the company. In 1996, Barrick also made a side deal with General Kpama Baramoto, head of President Mobutu’s notorious Guarde Civile. General Baramoto allowed Barrick to mine gold around his base in Bunia in exchange for funds to rebuild Bunia’s collapsing airport.3

Barrick restructured their mining contract after the Alliance of Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Congo-Zaire (AFDL-CZ) headed by Laurent Kabila took power in 1997, and they successfully retained the mining rights to Concession #38. They reportedly began these negotiations before L. Kabila reached the capital city of Kinshasa.4 Barrick was allowed to keep the contract President Mobutu Sese Seko signed after Laurent Kabila took power because L. Kabila’s Finance Minister Mawampanga Mwana Nanga (who later became Minister of Agriculture) insisted he honor „good faith“ contracts between President Mobutu and certain foreign mining firms. This was an unusual move because Minister Nanga was known to be a staunch critic of foreign mining firms. He had already canceled the mining contracts of Belgium’s Union Minère (now Umicore) and DeBeers/Anglo-American despite strong protests from Nelson Mandela. However, Minister Nanga apparently had a soft spot for American-connected firms, perhaps because he graduated from Pennsylvania State University and taught at Kentucky University.5

Minister Nanga urged AFDL-CZ’s Mining Minister Kambale Kabila Mututulo to sign off a one billion dollar (U.S.) deal to Jean-Raymond Boulle’s Hope, Arkansas-based (at the time) American Mineral Fields Incorporated (AMF) (now Adastra), one of Barrick’s business partners. The deal was for two huge mining concessions in Kipushi and Kolwezi, located in the Katanga Province (then Shaba Province). Mr. Boulle desperately needed access to the minerals because he was bidding to acquire the contract to build a new space station to replace Mir, a $60 billion dollar (U.S.) endeavor. His acquisition of the Mir contract is remarkable when considering AMF was only incorporated in 1995.6

A major competitor of Anglo-American with several former Anglo-American/DeBeers directors on its executive team, AMF already had the deal lined up in April 1997 after Mr. Boulle (a Briton born in Mauritius) visited L. Kabila in Goma after the AFDL-CZ/RPA captured Lubumbashi (Katanga Province) and put Katangan Governor Kyungu ku Mwanza under house arrest.7 Mr. Boulle reportedly fronted $50 million dollars (U.S.) to L. Kabila for the deal and he likely used some of it to buy arms and equipment.8 However, AMF did eventually partner with Anglo-American.

American Diamond Buyers, another company owned by Mr. Boulle and Joseph Martin (and a competitor of DeBeers), reportedly paid L. Kabila $25,000 (U.S.) to buy a diamond mining license from the AFDL-CZ.9 When the company opened for business in Kisangani before the 1st Congo War was even over (but after the ADFL-CZ controlled the town), Zairians literally broke the door down to sell their diamonds. Several people could even be seen around town wearing tee-shirts given out for free by the company.10

Mr. Boulle (a former Anglo-American executive who also acted as an advisor to Guinea’s Mining Minister) also allowed L. Kabila and Minister Nanga to use his personal corporate Lear jet for transportation around the country. In return, besides the mining contracts, L. Kabila allowed Mr. Boulle to set up a trading post in Mbuji-Mayi immediately after the AFDL-CZ captured the city during the same month Lubumbashi fell. He also greatly reduced the price of AMF’s annual mining license fees.11 Mr. Boulle and two other connections to AMF at the time, Chairman Michael McMurrough and business associate Jackson Stephens, were reported to be friends of Bill Clinton since his days as Arkansas‘ governor.12

One week before the AFDL-CZ took Kinshasa, AMF chartered a group of investors to meet L. Kabila. Mr. Boulle hoped to attract investors for his new mining projects. Representatives from CIBC Wood Gundy, Bunting Warburg (a branch of London’s SBC Warburg), First Bank of Boston, Citibank, Deutsche Morgan Grenfell, and Goldman Sachs attended along with several reporters, Robert Briscotti (investment banker), Robin Sanders (Director of African Affairs for the NSC), and Cynthia McKinney (former U.S. Congresswoman for the State of Georgia).13 The meeting went over well. Washington D.C. based New Millenium Investment Limited signed a joint venture deal with the AFDL-CZ to run Goma’s Development Bank. Bethesda, Maryland-based Comsat signed on to sell satellite phones in Goma.14

Almost immediately after AMF got its mingin contract with the AFDL-CZ, DeBeers sent the head of its Kinshasa branch (Nicholas Davenport) and an Anglo-American director to meet with L. Kabila and Minister Mawampanga in Goma to plead for a contract. Under the Mobutu regime, DeBeers held a 4% stake in MIBA while its Central Selling Organization had rights to the entire Zairian state production. DeBeers also had five comptoirs in Zaire that bought from artisian miners.15

DeBeers was also deeply entrenched in Zaire through Anglo-American Corporation (which is nearly 50% owned by DeBeers), one of its business partners. The Canadian company Banro Corporation merged with Belgium-based Mines D’or Du Zaire (MDDZ) in September 1996 shortly before President Mobutu left Zaire in exile. A ~13% shareholder in Banro was U.K.-based Cluff Mining. The majority shareholder in Cluff Mining was Anglo-American.16 Through the MDDZ merger, Banro was able to obtain a 93% interest in SAKIMA.17 Today, Banro is actively mining gold in Twangiza, Kamituga, Lugushwa, and Namoya in South Kivu.

Another company who wanted in on the action was First Quantum Minerals. Their Bwana Mkubwa branch fronted money to Laurent Kabila when he was with the AFDL-CZ and had not yet reached Kinshasa. They received mining authorizations in return.18

First Quantum recently tried to buy out Adastra (formerly AMF) and still holds lucrative concessions in the Congo. On their Board of Directors sits Chairman Phillip Pascall (Rio Tinto), Rupert Pennant-Rea (Chairman of Henderson Group plc; Director of British American Tobacco plc, Sherrit International Corporation, Gold Fields Limited, and Rio Narcea; former editor for The Economist and the former Deputy Governor of the Bank of England), and Andrew Adams (AngloGold).

Barrick created a joint-venture with Anglo-American in March 1998 to explore OKIMO Concession #38 in preparation for active mining. In 1998, Anglo-American created its AngloGold Limited subsidiary and in May 1998, the firm purchased nearly half of Barrick’s stakes in the Congo.19 Exploration occurred from February to August 1998 but their staff was forced to flee in August due to the outbreak of the 2nd Congo War. AngloGold Limited assumed operational control of Concession # 38 on 5 August, 1998, but they were never able to actively mine the concession because of the war. OKIMO repossessed the land after they fled.20 After OKIMO reclaimed the concession, Barrick made a side deal with RCD Mining Minister Alex Thambwe in 1999 for the rights to mine the land, but Barrick was unable to mine on the land because of the ongoing war on the mining concessions in Ituri.21

After the 2nd Congo War began, the UPDF and the Rally for Congolese Democracy-Liberation Movement (RCD-ML) occupied Watsa until they withdrew as a provision of the Lusaka Accords in 1999. Militias in Ituri multiplied drastically in 2000 to seize control of the power void left behind when the UPDF withdrew. Barrick Gold sub-contracted its concession to Uganda’s Caleb International, owned by General Salim Saleh, Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni’s half-brother.22 It appears the intent was to hold and protect the concession for Barrick until the fighting stopped. Meanwhile, the Hema Union for Congolese Patriots (UPC), RCD-ML, Jean-Pierre Bemba’s Movement for the Liberation of Congo (MLC), the Lendu Nationalist and Integrationist Front (FNI), People’s Armed Forces of Congo (FAPC), and various other factions fought over Watsa and Durba until most of them either disarmed or were driven out by MONUC/FARDC offensives last year. The MLC moved into the area until mid-2006, when MONUC gained full control over Watsa.23

Barrick’s business practices have not gone completely unnoticed. In December 2002, Barrick Gold was sued in an anti-trust case for literally manipulating the price of gold on the world market. Banking giant J.P. Morgan (prior to their merger with Chase Manhattan) was an investor in a company called Argo Partnership, who became a significant shareholder in TrizecHahn. Barrick bought TrizecHahn , making J.P. Morgan a shareholder in Barrick Gold by virtue of the buyout. J.P. Morgan reportedly loaned Barrick gold reserves from a central bank to short-sell on the market, increasing the supply and driving the price down. The money from the gold sales was invested in money market instruments at J.P. Morgan for a higher return than the gold borrowing rate, thus creating a profit. The short sales were considered off-sheet assets, so the purchase of gold off the market was not reflected as a loss in their balance sheet.24

Barrick would then mine the gold needed to replace the borrowed stores at the central bank, but a clause in the J.P. Morgan gold lending deal gave Barrick an infinite number of years to pay back the central bank. This meant Barrick could buy up the gold supplies to drive the price up, or they could dump their borrowed stores and drop the price generating a profit for both Barrick and J.P. Morgan. Recall that during 1998, as Barrick was evicted from the Congo, the price of gold was falling considerably. It has been rising steadily since 2001. (Ibid)

Currently, Barrick has terminated all non-project hedge contracts. They have allotted $23 million dollars (U.S.) for exploratory efforts in Africa for the 2007 fiscal year. Another $26 million dollars (U.S.) is delegated to explore the Sedibelo PFM deposit on the Bushveld Complex in South Africa. They completed a feasibility study on the Buzwagi gold project in Tanzania, where Barrick is also opening a joint venture project with Xstrata Nickel in Kabanga. Barrick is also eager to develop their Reko Diq joint venture in the Baluchistan Province of Pakistan.25 They are also selling all their shares in NovaGold.

The Baluchistan Province is the largest province in Pakistan. It borders the Helmand Province of Afganistan, an opium crop district and Taliban (meaning „students“ in Arabic) stronghold. The Baluchistan Province has been used as a rear base for training and staging their armed forces. The Taliban are a Nationalist Sunni faction comprised of Pashtuns, who form a very sizable population in Baluchistan Province. The area is awash in locally ruled fiefdoms by tribal chiefs and mullahs (Islamic clergymen). In Pakistan, they are usually from the Wahhabi or Salafi sect.

The individuals behind Barrick Gold are so well-connected they are worth noting in detail:

Howard Beck: Corporate Director of Barrick Gold. Formerly involved with BAE, and Citibank Canada. BAE bought out United Defense Industries (a company formerly owned by The Carlyle Group) in 2005. Just recently, BAE was the subject of a corruption probe in Great Britain, but Prime Minister Tony Blair and Attorney General Lord Peter Goldsmith ordered the investigation suspended. Some British officials believe the firm lobbied Lord Goldsmith to drop the investigation.26 BAE is a 20% owner of Airbus.27

Gustavos Cisneros: Board Member and International Advisory Board Member of Barrick Gold. He is the Chief Executive Officer of Cisneros Group, which includes television and radio networks, broadcasting and telecommunications operations, programming and production companies for television and radio, supermarkets, beverage production, fast food outlets, video franchises, and music production. He essentially owns the Latin-American media market.

Mr. Cisneros is Venuzeuelan and a stauch opponent of Venezuela’s current Populist President Hugo Chavez. Mr Cisneros is a founding (and current) member of the International Advisory Board of the Council on Foreign Relations and a former Director of the International Advisory Committee of Chase Manhattan Bank. He is director of the Chairman’s Council of the Americas Society and a member of the International Advisory Council of the United States Information Agency, the Board of Overseers of the International Center for Economic Growth, the International Advisory Board of Power Corporation of Canada, the International Advisory Board of Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation, the International Advisory Board of AEA Investors Incorporated, and is a board member of Panamerican Beverages Incorporated (a Coca-Cola bottling company).

In addition, he is a Trustee of Rockefeller University in New York and sits on the Board of Georgetown University. He also sits on the International Advisory Board of Columbia University, the Advisory Committee for the David Rockefeller Center for Latin American Studies at Harvard University, and the Rockefeller University Fund. Mr. Cisneros acts as the Commissioner of the Global Information Infrastructure Commission and is a member of the Council for Latin American Studies at John Hopkins University. In addition, Mr. Cisneros is a Governor of the World Economic Forum.28

Donald Carty: A Corporate Director of Barrick Gold, Dell, Sears, and Roebuck. He is also the Chairman of Virgin America, Porter Airlines, and is the former Chief Executive Officer of American Airlines.

Marshall Cohen: Lawyer for Cassel’s Brock & Blackwell, and former Canadian Deputy Minister of several areas including Finance, Industry, Trade & Commerce, Energy, and Mines & Resources. He is a Corporate Director of Barrick Gold, American-International Group, TD Ameritrade, Premcor Incorporated, Metaldyne Corporation, Toronto-Dominion Bank, and Lafarge Corporation. He is a member of the International Advisory Committee for The Blackstone Group. Formerly, he was the International Councillor for CSIS, and a former member of the Executive Committee of The British-North American Committee and The Trilateral Commission. He was also the Chairman of the International Trade Advisory Committee for the Government of Canada.

John Crow: Corporate Director of Barrick Gold. He is the former Governor of the Bank of Canada (1987-1994); Chairperson of the Central Bank Governors of the Group of Ten countries, and one-time head of the North American Division of the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Brian Mulroney: Corporate Director and Chairman of the International Advisory Board of Barrick Gold and most notably, the former Prime Minister of Canada (1984-1993). He is a Director of Archer Daniels Midland Company, the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies, and the Cendant Corporation. He is Chairman of Trizec Properties Incorporated, America Online-Latin America Incorporated, and Quebecor Incorporated. He sits on the International Advisory Board of the China International Trust and Investment Corporation, JPMorgan Chase, Independent News and Media, Power Corporation, Bombardier Incorporated, Aerospace Group – North America, and General Enterprise Management Services Limited. In addition, he is an honorary trustee of the George H.W. Bush Presidential Library and Senior Partner in the Ogilvy Renault law firm.

Anthony Munk: Peter Munk’s son. He is a Director of Barrick Gold and Onex.

Peter Munk: Founder, Director; member of the International Advisory Board; and former Chief Executive Officer of Barrick Gold and the Trizec Corporation. Mr. Munk also founded Clairtone Sound Corporation. In addition, he is a member of the World Gold Council and the 1001 Club. Mr. Munk is a close friend of infamous Saudi Arabian arms dealer Adnan Khoshoggi, who was involved in financing and setting up arms deals to Iran during the Iran-Contra scandal.29 Mr. Khoshoggi helped Mr. Munk launch Barrick Gold in 1983, but later sold his shares to Mr. Munk just before details of his involvement in Iran-Contra broke in 1985.

Lord Charles Powell of Baywater: Lord Powell is a cross-bench member of Britain’s Upper House of Parliament and the House of Lords, where he sits on the Economic Affairs Committee. He served as the Private Secretary and Advisor on Foreign Affairs and Defense to former Prime Ministers Margaret Thatcher and John Major. Lord Powell is currently an Advisor to the Chairmen of BAE and Eastern Star Publications. He is a principal at New Bridge Strategies, a business advisory firm currently working in Iraq. He holds many directorships, including: British Mediterranean Airways, Caterpillar Incorporated, Financière Agache, Moet-Hennessy Louis Vuitton, Sagitta Asset Management (Chairman), Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group, Jardine Matheson & Company Group, Textron Corporation, Yell Group, Limited Schindler Holdings, Switzerland, and Northern Trust Global Services.

He also serves on the Advisory Board of Barrick Gold, Diligence (a PMC), Hicks Muse. Delta HPC (a former business partner of Lockheed Martin), GEMS Private Equity Fund, Rolls-Royce European Strategy Board, Textron International, Wingate Capital, Magna Corporation, the European Advisory Group GMBH, Thales U.K., and Alfa Capital. Lord Powell is Chairman of the Said Business School Foundation’s (Oxford University) Board of Trustees. He is also active with several non-corporate groups including trustee postitions at the Aspen Institute (USA), British Museum, and the Karim Rida Said Foundation. He is a Director of the Atlantic Partnership, the Singapore Millennium Foundation, and the U.K.-China Forum. He is also President of the China-Britain Business Council and a member of the Council of the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

William Cohen: Member of Barrick Gold and Intel Corporation’s International Advisory Boards. Intel was a major consumer of tantalum in the early 2000s during the computer industry boom. He is currently the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Cohen Group, an international business consulting firm. He is also a current Director at Viacom and AIG. Mr. Cohen is also a Cable Newn Network (CNN) World Affairs Contributor. He was the U.S. Secretary of Defense (1997-2001) during the beginning of the 2nd Congo War and NATO’s bombing of Kosovo.

Prior to working for the DOD, he was a U.S. Senator for the state of Maine (1979-1997) and served on the Select Committee on Intelligence (1983-1991, 1995-1997), the Governmental Affairs Committee (1979-1997), Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs (1989-1993 in George H.W. Bush’s administration) and the Armed Services Committee (1979-1997). In addition, he served on the Iran-Contra investigative committee in 1987. Before he was elected Senator, he was a House Representative for Maine’s 2nd District (1973-1979). While in Congress, he served on the House Judiciary Committee that investigated the Watergate scandal. He served on the Board of Directors of the Council on Foreign Relations (1989-1997) on its Middle East Study Group and currently works for several think-tanks and committees including the CSIS (Counselor and Trustee) , the School for Advanced International Studies, the William S. Cohen Center for International Policy and Commerce at the University of Maine in Orono (Chairman), and the Brookings Institution. He established and led U.S. delegations to the American-Arab Dialogue in Cairo and is the Chairman Emeritus of the U.S.-Taiwan Business Council. Mr. Cohen is also a former trustee of the Africa Foundation. In May 1992, he got Rwandan opposition parties to meet with RPF officials in Brussels.30

Paul G. Desmarais Senior: Member of the International Advisory Board of Barrick Gold and Chase Manhattan Bank N.A. He is Chairman of the Executive Committee of the Power Corporation, and honorary President of the Canada-China Business Council. He is a former Director of TotalElfFina; former member of the Trilateral Commission; current member of the Privy Council, and a Companion of the Order of Canada. He is on the Advisory Board of the Carlyle Group and CSIS. Mr. Desmarais is a personal friend of the Bush family (Former U.S. President George Herbert Walker Bush is the former Chairman of Barrick Gold’s International Advisory Board [1995-1999] and was a personal golfing partner of President Mobutu31) and. Brian Mulroney.32

Vernon Jordan Junior: He was Chairman of Bill Clinton’s presidential transition team and one of his top political advisors as well. He is currently a Senior Counselor practicing general, corporate, legislative and international law with the firm Akin, Gump, Strauss, Hauer, & Feld. In addition, he is a member of the Bilderberger Group, the Iraq Study Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission. He sits on the Board of Directors for American Express, Dow Jones & Company, Lazard Freres and Company, J.C. Penney Company, Xerox Corporation, Ashbury Automotive Group, and the LBJ Foundation. He is also a member of the International Advisory Boards of Barrick Gold and Daimler-Chrysler. Mr. Jordan serves on the Board of Governors for the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies; a Senior Managing Director with Lazard Freres & Company; and a Trustee of Howard University. He is a former Director for Revlon, Sara Lee, Corning, and Nabisco.

He has been involved with several African-American civil rights, equality, and empowerment groups. He served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the National Urban League, Incorporated; Executive Director of the United Negro College Fund; Director of the Voter Education Project of the Southern Regional Council; attorney-consultant at the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity; Assistant to the Executive Director of the Southern Regional Council; and Georgia Field Director of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. He also received numerous presidential appointments including a spot on the Secretary of State’s Advisory Committee on South Africa.

Karl Otto Pöhl: Member of the International Advisory Board of Barrick Gold, the Carlyle Group, former Chairman of the German Bundesbank (Central Bank) from 1980-1991, and former German Governor of the IMF. He served in Germany’s Economics and Finance Ministries. He is currently a partner in Sal. Oppenheim Junior & Cie investment bank; member of the Bilderberger Group; Director of GAMCO Investors Incorporated and Gabelli Funds LLC; and Senior Advisor to the Ahli United Bank.

Nathaniel Rothschild: International Advisory Board member of Barrick Gold and Co-chairman of Atticus Capital. He is a Director of RIT Capital Partners PLC, Trigranit (Chairman), The Rothschild Foundation, JNR Limited (Chairman), and a member of the Belfer Center’s International Council at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government. In addition, Mr. Rothschild is on the International Advisory Council of the Brookings Institute. Mr. Rothschild is the only son of Jacob Rothschild and belongs to the well-known Rothschild family of bankers.

Andrew Young: Member of the International Advisory Board of Barrick Gold, Argus Newspapers, and Delta Airlines. He was a close confidant of Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, a very prominent African-American civil rights activist in the U.S. Mr. Young is was the Ambassador to the U.N. (1977-1979) under President Jimmy Carter and a Georgian Congressman from 1973-1977. He served two terms as Mayor of Atlanta, Georgia, where he was also the Co-Chair of the Atlanta Committee for the Centennial Olympic Games in 1996. He was appointed by President Bill Clinton to chair the Southern Africa Enterprise Development Fund. In addition, Mr. Young is the former Chairman of Working Families for Wal-Mart and the Southern Africa Development Fund. He was also a Director of the Drum Major Institute and a consultant for Nike. In addition, Mr. Young is the former President of the National Council of Churches (2000-2001) and a former member of the National Security Study Group.

Mr. Young is the current Co-Chair and Co-Founder of GoodWorks International (GoodWorks is a member of the CCA; Associate of the African-American Institute; affiliate of the Council of Foreign Relations, and Senior Advisor of the National Democratic Institute for International Affairs. Client corporations of GoodWorks include Barrick Gold, ChevronTexaco, Monsanto, Nike, and Coca-Cola.) and a founder of the CCA. He teaches public affairs as a professor of policy studies at Georgia State University’s Andrew Young School of Policy Studies. Mr. Young is a Director of Argus, Host Marriott Corporation, Archer Daniels Midland, Cox Communications, Atlanta Market Center, the Atlanta Falcons, and Thomas Nelson Publishing. He is currently a member of the Bretton Woods Committee, the Council of Foreign Relations, and is an active Freemason. Mr. Young is also currently promoting international investment in Rwanda and is working on creating a convention of international investors in Kigali that will be the largest African business summit to date. It is currently scheduled for 2010.

In addition to George Herbert Walker Bush, Barrick Gold has several other former directors with major credentials:

Howard Baker Junior: Tennessee’s Republican Senator from 1967-1985, including two terms each as Senate Majority and Senate Minority Leader. Mr. Baker served as a delegate to the United Nations in 1976. He served as President Ronald Regan’s Chief of Staff in 1987-1988. He also served on the President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board from 1985-1987 and again from 1988-1990. After parting ways with President Reagan, he joined Donelson, Bearman & Caldwell (1989-2001), a lobbying firm for hire that represented Barrick Gold. In 2001, he was called to serve as the U.S. Ambassador to Japan. In 2005, he stepped down from his post and reunited with the law firm created by his grandfather, Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, as a full partner. He also joined the Advisory Board of Citigroup. Mr. Baker also runs the University of Tennessee-Knoxville Center for Public Policy named in his honor. In addition, he is a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and the Washington Institute of Foreign Affairs.

Edward Ney: This former director of Barrick was George Herbert Walker Bush’s Ambassador to Canada (1989-1992); a reward for running Mr. Bush’s successful presidential ad campaign in 1988. Mr. Ney took charge of Young and Rubicam (acquired by WPP Group in 2000), a public relations agency-for-hire in 1970 and he built it into the largest firm of its kind. He was appointed by President Gerald Ford to the Board of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty in 1975 and was later appointed by President Reagan to serve on the RFE/RL Successor Board, called the BIB (Board of International Broadcasting), in 1983. Mr. Ney also served as a Trustee (1976-1988) of the National Urban League. He also was a member of the Executive Committee on The Grace Commission, President Reagan’s Private Sector Survey on Cost Control (1982-1986). He was Chairman of the Visiting Committee on Afro-American Studies at Harvard from 1977-1984, and is a member of the Advertising Hall of Fame. He was a Director of the Mattel Corporation as well. Currently, he is a Director of Integrated Defense Technologies (I.D.T.C.) and a Trustee at the James A. Baker III Institute for Public Policy at Rice University and the President George H. W. Bush Presidential Library at Texas A&M University.

Mr. Ney was named Chairman of the Advisory Board at Burson-Marsteller, a subsidiary of Young and Rubicam. Burston-Marsteller is also a public relations firm-for-hire who was hired to cover up Shell’s nefarious business policies in Nigeria. They were also hired by General Jorge Videla’s violent regime in Argentina, and the Government of Indonesia during the time they were enacting their murderous policies during their occupation of East Timor. Burson-Marsteller also worked for Monsanto during their Bovine Growth Hormone scandal; lobbied for the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) and tobacco companies; covered for Union Carbide after the Bhopal disaster, and worked to improve Exxon’s image after the Valdez spill in Alaska.33 Mr. Ney is also currently a member of the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) Advisory Board (since 1986), the Council on Foreign Relations (since 1974), and a Trustee of the Museum of Television and Radio (MTR) in New York City (since 1982).

John Trevor Eyton: Mr. Eyton was a Canadian Senator first appointed in 1990 by (then) Prime Minister Brian Mulroney. He is a Director of Brazoil, Coca Cola, IQ Ludorum, Nayarit Gold, Owen Media Partners, General Motors Canada, IMAX, Partners for Youth, Nestle Canada, Noranda Incorporated, the International Chamber of Commerce (Paris), Excor-Zerust Canada, and Brookfield Asset Management. Mr. Eyton is Chairman of the Canadian Sports Hall of Fame, Excor-Zerust Canada, Ivernia, Multi-Games Incorporated, Richview Resources, and Silver Bear Resources. He is Governor of the Canadian Olympic Foundation, Junior Achievement Canada, and the Canadian Sports Hall of Fame. Previously, he served as a Senior Partner at the law firm of Tory Tory Deslauriers & Binnington and as Chairman of EdperBrascan (now Brookfield Asset Management). He is also a member of the Trilateral Commission.

Richard Helms: Director of the CIA from 1966 to 1973 under President Richard Nixon and Deputy Director of the CIA under John McCone. Prior to this, he worked in the Office of Strategic Services, the parent department of the CIA. During President Nixon’s term, he was the Ambassador to Iran. He was involved with Augusto Pinochet’s coup of Chilean President Salvador Allende in 1973. He also served on the board of the Bank of Credit and Commerce International, which was embroiled in laundering money from international arms dealers and terrorists. He was a Director of the Carlyle Group, a consultant for Bechtel, and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations.

Sources in Aru on the Congo-Uganda border stated „white executives“ from Barrick Gold fly in and inspect Watsa every few months, but the company refuses to resume operations until fighting stops in the area. With MONUC in full control of Watsa, the fighting has ceased. MONUC’s logistics branch has established regular flights there. Barrick can now try and repossess their mining license for the concession. The infrastructure in Watsa, Doko, and Durba has been restored. Durba has a working grinder and Nzoro has an active hydro-electric power source. The Kenyan construction firm Civicon began work on a 108 kilometer road leading from the Vura border post to Watsa and should be finished in nine months time barring the return of armed warfare in the area. The Australian/Canadian mining firm Moto Goldmines Limited provided some of the equipment for the job as per a contractual agreement with the Congolese Government.34

Barrick Gold is a former business partner of the previously mentioned firm American Mineral Fields Incorporated (now named Adastra Minerals), who still owns their extensive concessions in Katanga Province. Barrick was also partnered with the infamous and now defunct mining firm Bre-X Minerals Limited.35

One of Barrick’s current business partners is South Africa-based Gold Fields. Gold Fields purchased Barrick’s stake in South Deep, a mine located west of Johannesburg they acquired when Placer Dome was purchased. As part of the deal, Barrick was given over $300 million dollars (U.S.) worth of shares in Gold Fields.36 Notables associated with Gold Fields include Chief Executive Officer Ian Cockerill (former Executive Officer for Business Development and African International Operations for AngloGold Ashanti Limited), Director John Hopwood (former Director and head of the Mergers and Acquisitions Division of Ernst & Young’s Corporate Finance; former Executive Director of Gold Fields of South Africa Limited), Director Patrick Ryan (former Executive Vice President of Mining Operations, Development and Exploration at Phelps Dodge), Tokyo Sexwale (Chairman of Mvelaphanda Resources Limited), Rupert Pennant-Rea (Chairman of Henderson Group plc; Director of British American Tobacco plc, Sherrit International Corporation, First Quantum Minerals, and Rio Narcea; former editor for The Economist and the former Deputy Governor of the Bank of England)

Barrick also works with Australia-based Emperor Gold, who is a minority stakeholder in Barrick’s Porgera mine project in Papau New Guinea. Emperor’s Non-Executive Director Robert J. McDonald was a Managing Director of NM Rothschild & Sons (Australia) Limited and also held numerous positions with Rio Tinto, who also mines in Papau New Guinea. Non-Executive Chairman Geoffrey Campbell used to manage Merrill Lynch’s Investment Managers‘ Gold and General Fund, one of the largest investment funds of its kind in the world.

Emperor is a subsidiary of DRDGold Limited, based in South Africa. Mr. Campell acts as its Non-Executive Chairman as well. Director James Turk founded GoldMoney Network Limited, a digital gold transaction system. He also worked with Chase Manhattan Bank before managing the Commodity Department of the Abu Dhabi Investment Authority. Alternate Director Kobus Dissel hails from AngloGold.

Another partner of Barrick Gold was Ashanti Goldfields Limited, a company later purchased by Anglo-American Corporation and renamed AngloGold-Ashanti Limited. AngloGold-Ashanti is actively mining on Concession #40 in and around Mongbwalu, where local Anglo officials stand accused of illegally paying off the FNI in 2004 to mine the area in safety. They also reportedly allowed the FNI and its President Floribert Njabu to use company vehicles, jets (chartered by Kilwa Air, who also chartered for MotoGoldmines Limited), lawyers, and housing. Jean-Pierre Bemba was reportedly the man who suggested AngloGold work with the FNI in order to start mining in 2004. William Swing was supportive of AngloGold-Ashanti’s exporation plans in FNI territory. At the time, MONUC did not have a presence in Mongbwalu, only Bunia. AngloGold-Ashanti employees (at the time) who had direct contact with the FNI were Ashley Lassen (Head of AngloGold-Ashanti’s Uganda branch), Howard Fall (Project Manager in Mongbwalu), Jean-Claude Kanku (consultant), Desire Sangara (AngloGold-Ashanti’s Manager in the Kinshasa office), and Mark Hanham (Engineer).37

AngloGold’s Chief Executive Officer Bobby Godsell (former Chairman of the World Gold Council) dismissed the allegations and announced they were going to continue work in Mongbwalu, but he promised to pull out of the Congo if his workers were forced to pay militias off to ensure their safety.38 In the meantime Anglo-American is looking to sell AngloGold-Ashanti. Newmont Mining has shown interest in a merger with AngloGold, which would seriously dilute Anglo-American’s ownership, but not eliminate it. Despite the plans to sell off AngloGold, Anglo-American still plans for formally open two offices in the Congo: one in Kinshasa and one in Lubumbashi. Anglo-American, which posted a whopping 46% profit in 2006, is looking to buy back three billion dollars (U.S.) worth of shares and invest in copper projects in the Congo.39

(Then) AngloGold-Ashanti’s President and Non-Executive Director Sir Samuel Kwesi Jonah, reportedly backed the RCD financially after L. Kabila revoked a mining contract from him while he was the Chief Executive Officer of Ashanti Goldfields Limited. Ashanti originally bought the concession from Mindev for only five million dollars (U.S.). After the RCD/ANC controlled the area, the RCD’s Minister of Mining Alex Thambwe returned the contract to Ashanti Goldfields.40 Sir Jonah resigned from AngloGold-Ashanti’s Board of Directors in February 2007.

Sir Jonah is a Board Member of Lonmin, the Commonwealth African Investment Fund (Comafin), Transnet Limited, Anglo-American Platinum Corporation Limited, the Ashesi University Foundation, Equinox Minerals (Chairman), the uranium-producing nuclear power company UraMin Incorporated (Chairman), Anglo-American Corporation, Ghana Airways, Moto Goldmines Limited, Scharrig Mining (Chairman), Sierra Rutile Limited (Chairman), Sierra Resources Holding, Range Resources Limited (which holds the rights to all the minerals in the Somali semi-autonomous state of Puntland), Titanium Resources Group, Copper Resources Corporation (with George Arthur Forrest and George Andrew Forrest), Standard Bank Group of South Africa, Bayport Holding Limited, Transnet Limited, Equator Exploration Limited in Nigeria and São Tomé & Príncipé (with Baronness Lynda Chalker), and he is a former director of Mittal Steel (currently in the proverbial hot seat for a contract they signed with the government of Liberia)

He is a member of the Advisory Council of the U.N. Secretary General’s Global Compact, South African President Thabo Mbeki’s International Investment Advisory Council, the African Regional Advisory Board of the London Business School, First Atlantic Merchant Bank, Defiance Mining, Ghanian President John Kufuor’s Ghana Investors‘ Advisory Council, President Obasanjo Nigerian Investors‘ Advisory Council, and serves as a Presidential Advisor to President Mohamud Muse Hersi of the Somali state of Puntland. He also holds an honorary British knighthood, the Star of Ghana and several other international awards and titles. He recently announced plans to open his own firm called Jonah Mining.

Currently, the Canadian company African Mineral Fields Incorporated (AMFI), recently purchased by Nevada-based Magnus Resources Incorporated, owns rights to a section of Concession #38. African Mineral Fields also owns gold mining concessions in Uganda at Mwerusandu, and Mitoma, Mubende, and Lugazi. Bruce Milne, AMFI’s Uganda Exploration and Country Manager, originally discovered the concessions Barrick Gold currently owns in Tanzania. John Dixon, a consulting geologist for AMFI, once worked as a consultant for Placer Dome from (2000-2006). Placer Dome was bought out by Barrick in late 2005.

Moto Goldmines Limited (headed by Sir Samuel Jonah) entered into a joint venture on Concessions # 38 and #39 (which includes the mines in Durba, Karagwa, and Chauffeur) through its subsidiary Borgakim Mining SPRL (a subsidiary of Border Energy Limited, which is itself a subsidiary of Moto Goldmines Australia Limited, whose parent company is Moto Goldmines Limited). Originally, a joint venture was created between the privately owned Orgaman SPRL and OKIMO on 10 May, 2003. Moto Goldmines then bought into the existing agreement between the two and became a 60% owner of the property.41

Moto Goldmines Limited was created when Moto Goldmines Australia Limited (formerly Equis Limited) and King Products Incorporated (formerly Wizard Lake Petroleum Corporation) merged in 2005. Moto Goldmines has set up a complicated series of 13 subsidiaries in order to control as much of Concession # 38 as possible. Border Energy Limited is a wholly owned holding company of Moto Goldmines Limited. Moto Goldmines Limited created several subsidiaries as joint ventures with Border Energy, many of which are active in Ituri District and have entered into joint ventures of their own with OKIMO. They include Rambi Mining SPRL, Blue Rose SPRL (owned by Blue Rose Investments Limited in Strathavon, South Africa), Kibali Gold SPRL, Amani Gold SPRL, Gorumbwa Mining SPRL, Tangold SPRL (owned by Greendale Universal Holdings Limited in Roadtown on Tortala Island, British Virgin Islands) , and the aformentioned Borgakim SPRL. Orgaman SPRL was previously established in the Congo to import frozen fruit and is owned by Belgian William Damseaux. Reginald Gillard is the company’s President and Jean-Claude Damseaux is the Vice President.

The deal to include Moto Goldfields Limited in the contract has come under heavy scrutiny by the Congolese Government. Mr. Victor Kasongo Shomary, OKIMO’s (then) Managing Director, never approved the contract, but three of OKIMO’s four directors did. The contract was questionable because it had a clause that allowed OKIMO’s Directors to short-sell additional plots of land to Borgakim SPRL. Additionally, the percentage of ownership allocated to OKIMO was only 30% and any additional joint ventures with another Moto Goldmines Limited subsidiaries would likely reduce the percentage further. The contract also required Borgakim SPRL to pay for prospecting the concessions, but they have opted to rely on old studies (funded entirely by OKIMO) for data as a way to save themselves money, which is a breach of the legal agreement. The Ministry of Finance has suspended all negotiations between OKIMO, Borgakim SPRL, and Moto Goldfields Limited. In addition, the contracts of Moto Goldfields Limited’s smaller subsidiaries are under review because of late payments on the lease agreements. OKIMO gave MotoGoldfields Limited an ultimatum: they have 75 days to invest in a metallurgical plant, a power station, and then begin mining in Durba, or else the contract is null and void. Sir Jonah reassured his shareholder, stating OKIMO’s threats have „no legal value and (are) of no effect.“ He also accused other mining companies of souring Moto Goldmines‘ relationship with President Kabila.42

On top of all this, OKIMO’s management is also under investigation for stealing gold from Concession #38. Mr. Kasongo, OKIMO’s Financial Director, and its Sales Manager all stand accused of diverting mined gold for personal profit. Mr. Kasongo was later exonerated of the charges and appointed President Joseph Kabila’s Deputy Minister of Mining. The outside pressure on Mr. Kasongo is evident as he is now proposing to privatize OKIMO via the London and Toronto stock exchanges.43 Moto Goldmines is counting on Mr. Kasongo’s departure from OKIMO to allow the remaining directors to persuade the incoming director to cooperate with them and approve the contract.

A number of smaller companies with leases on Concession #38 and/or #39 have not honored their contracts because they have been inactive on the mining sites. One is the private firm Aston and Sheffield Commodities-Goldagem SPRL. Aston and Sheffield is Goldagem’s parent company. Goldagem itself is based in Dubai and run by Taoufik Mathlouthi, Chairman of Mecca Cola. Two additional small firms that have not paid for their mining leases are Rambi Mining SPRL and Amani Gold SPRL.

A large company that has failed to honor its mining contract in Ituri is Mwana Africa PLC, owned by Mwana Africa Holdings Limited based in Johannesburg, South Africa. It was founded by three former Anglo-American directors in 2003. The firm began a joint venture project with OKIMO in June of 2005. Mwana Africa is also the vast majority shareholder of a joint venture with Anglo-American located south of Kolwezi, Fungerume, and Likasi in Katanga Province to mine copper and cobalt. With copper prices at records highs, Mwana is agressively seeking to expand its project, while Anglo-American has made deliberate efforts to expand their copper mining assets. They are negotiating with Gécamines to purchase another concession in Katanga Province to expand their project.

Mwana Africa Holdings Limited was bought out by the Dublin-based (Ireland is known to be very leinient on corporate taxes) company African Gold PLC. African Gold PLC purchased Tangold SPRL in June 2004. Tangold SPRL itself owned a single portion of OKIMO Concession #38 at the time of the purchase and that contract is on the verge of being canceled. Mwana Africa Holdings also owns part of Australia-based Gravity Diamonds Limited, a joint venture with BHP Billiton, Asia Marketing Limited (registered in Israel), Intergroup Consultants Limited, and a number of private diamond firms primarily registered in Antwerp, Belgium, home of the Diamond High Council (HRD). Incidentally, Antwerp was also the main port of entry for coltan coming to Europe from the Congo during the coltan boom of the early 2000s. Gravity Diamonds is active in the Congo’s former Kasai Province, Angola, and Australia. Lastly, Mwana also owns Sibika S.A., which had a 20% stake in MIBA (the Congolese state-owned diamond mining entity) at the time of the purchase.44

Mwana Africa Holdings also bought Bindura Nickel Corporation from AngloGold-Ashanti in 2004. Bindura was chiefly active in Zimbabwe as it was a joint venture between AngloGold-Ashanti and the government of Zimbabwe run by President Robert Mugabe. In early May 2004, Bindura’s Chief Executive Officer Leonard Chimimba was shot and killed outside his home in Harare after returning from a meeting with bank executives. He also reportedly visited the Governor of Zimbabwe’s Reserve Bank (Gideon Gono) the day before. The murder occurred after over half a million dollars (U.S.) worth of nickel disappeared from two Bindura trucks driving to South Africa in March. The incident is believed to be the work of business insiders working with criminal syndicates in South Africa.45

Mwana Africa recently sought to expand its operations by bidding for the Canadian diamond exploration company SouthernEra Diamonds (through JPMorgan and OZ Management), who holds joint ventures with BHP Billiton and Nyumba Ya Akiba SPRL, as well as their own exploration projects in the Kasai-Occidental and Kasai-Oriental Provinces of the Congo. In addition, they own 20% of MIBA.46

As can be expected, the company employs several well-connected individuals. Director Dr. Chris Jennings was an assistant vice president of Falconbridge Limited, a company integrated into Xstrata in August 2006. He was also the Deputy Director of Botswana’s Geological Survey. Chief Financial Officer Mr. Chris Reynolds spent several years with accounting giant (then) Price Waterhouse. President Alasdair MacPhee spent 17 years with DeBeers and Mr. Michael Kritzinger, a company lawyers, provided council for Anglo-American, DeBeers, and Gencor/Billiton.

Notables directing African Gold PLC are Hank Slack (Director of Anglo-American [1981-1999], Chief Executive of Minorco [1991-1999], current Director of Terra Industries and Engelhard Corporation, former Director of Solomon Brothers and SAB Miller), John Teeling (Chairman of Minco, Petrel resources, Pan Andean Resources, and African Diamonds), Oliver Baring (Executive Chairman of the First Africa Group; former Anglo-American Director; current Chairman of Cluff Mining PLC; non-executive Director of Merrill Lynch World Mining Trust and the Tiedmann Trust Company, and advisor for the The Senient Resources Fund).

Another major player is African Gold’s Chief Executive Officer Kalaa Mpinga. Mr. Mpinga is the son of a former Prime Minister and nephew of Mr. Pierre-Victor Mpoyo (One of L. Kabila’s advisors; the former Congolese Minister of Economy; former Minister of State; owner of the Central Mining Group, and business partner of Zimbabwean Billy Rautenbach, the Director of Gécamines in 1998). Kalaa received his Agricultural Development and Economics degrees at the University of California-Davis and McGill University (Canada) respectively. After graduating, he went to work for the Bechtel Corporation in San Francisco. In 1991, he left to join LTA Limited, which was owned by Anglo-American Corporation. In 1997, he was promoted to Executive Director of Anglo-American’s mining division and worked in the Congo’s Ministry of Economy under his uncle. To this day, Mr. Mpinga continues to hold strong ties with Anglo-Amcerican.47 From 1998-2000, Mr. Mpinga was a Patron and Board Member of the African Business Roundtable and he was also an Executive Director of New Business Africa. In 2001, he was one a founding member of Mwana Africa Holdings.

He currently is a Director of Group Five Limited (a huge construction firm), and GijimaAST, a technology corporation based in South Africa. In addition, he is Chairman of Bindura Nickel Corporation. Many of Mr. Mpinga’s recent projects are funded by Lansdowne Partners Ltd. and Marshall Wace LLP.48 On a personal note, Mr. Mpinga is an open admirer of the late DeBeers/Anglo-American patriarch Harry Oppenheimer, calling him, „A great African, a man with a vision for the continent and indeed a pioneer of African renaissance.“49

This article was first published at ZMAG

David Barouski is an African Affairs researcher and a Political Science student at the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh. He is a regular contributor to ZNet/ZMagazine. His work has appeared in Waheen Online, the Somaliland Times, Golis News, Congo Vision, and the Congo Panorama. He is also the author of the book, „Laurent Nkundabatware, his Rwandan Allies, and the ex-ANC Mutiny: Chronic Barriers to Lasting Peace in the Democratic Republic of the Congo,“ which he traveled to the Democratic Republic of the Congo and Rwanda to research.

References
1 „Congo’s Coltan Rush,“ BBC News. 1 August 2001.

2 „Half of Congo Licenses May Not Comply,“ David McKay. Mining MX. 3 April, 2007. http://www.miningmx.com/mining_fin/745949.htm.

3 Reno, William. „Sovereignity and Personal Rule in Zaire.“ African Studies Quarterly. Volume 1, Issue 3. May 1997.

4 „New Leaders Take Africa Into Their Own Hands,“ Sam Kiley. The Times. 20 May, 1997.

5 Madsen, Wayne. „Genocide and Covert Operations in Africa: 1993-1999.“ Lampeter, Ceredigion, Wales, United Kingdom: EdwinMellen Press, Limited. 1999. pg. 283, 300-301.

6 Ibid. pg. 281; Baracyetse, Pierre, Loudiebo, Alexandre. „The Geopolitical Stakes of the International Mining Companies in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Ex-Zaire).“ English Translation. 2000.

7 Madsen, Wayne. „Genocide and Covert Operations in Africa: 1993-1999.“ Lampeter, Ceredigion, Wales, United Kingdom: Edwin Mellen Press, Limited. 1999. pg. 280-283.

8 Baracyetse, Pierre, Loudiebo, Alexandre. „The Geopolitical Stakes of the International Mining Companies in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Ex-Zaire).“ English Translation. 2000.

9 „Friends in High Places,“ Richard C. Morais. Forbes. 10 August, 1998.

10 „U.S. Firms Stake Claims in Zaire’s War,“ Cindy Shiner. CNN. 17 April, 1997.

11 Madsen, Wayne. „Genocide and Covert Operations in Africa: 1993-1999.“ Lampeter, Ceredigion, Wales, United Kingdom: Edwin Mellen Press, Limited. 1999. pg. 67, 280-283.

12 Ibid. pg. 70.

13 Ibid. pg. 283; „Firm From Clinton’s Home Town Has Deal With Zaire Rebel Chief,“ Christopher Ruddy. NewsMax. 16 May, 1997; „Congo-Zaire,“ Conor de Lion. Global Finance. June 1997.

14 „U.S. Firms Stake Claims in Zaire’s War,“ Cindy Shiner. CNN. 17 April, 1997.

15 „DeBeers Bows to Zaire Rebels,“ Stefaans Brümmer, Chris McGreal. Mail & Guardian. 18 April, 1997.

16 United States Department of the Interior. „The Mineral Industry of Zaire.“ George J. Coakley. 1997.

17 United States Department of the Interior. „The Mineral Industry of Congo (Kinshasa).“ George J. Coakley. 1998.

18 „Canadian Companies in the Congo and OECD Guidelines.“ Corporate Knights. Issue CK 16. 5 June, 2006.

19 „Gold Producer Buys Barrick Properties,“ Las Vegas Review-Journal. 17 May, 1998.

20 „The Curse of Gold: Democratic Republic of the Congo.“ Human Rights Watch. 26 April, 2005. pg. 16; „OKIMO History,“ ASC Goldagem SPRL. Accessed 9 February, 2007. http://www.goldagem.com/corporate/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12&Itemid=28.

21 United States House of Representatives Subcommittee on International Operations and Human Rights of the Committee on International Relations. „Suffering and Despair: Humanitarian Crisis in the Congo.“ One Hundred Seventh Congress, Session 1. Serial No. 107-16. 17 May, 2001.

22 „Shifting Sands: Oil Exploration in the Rift Valley and the Congo Conflict.“ Dominic Johnson. Pole Institute. 13 March, 2003. pg. 9-10.

23 Private Interview. 2006.

24 „Don Doyle Explains ‘Blanchard vs. Barrick and J.P. Morgan‘.“ Jay Taylor. Jay Taylor’s Gold and Technology Stocks. Volume 22, Number 15. 3 January, 2004.

25 „Barrick Gold Eliminates Non-Project Hedge Contracts but Retains 9.5m Project Gold Hedge,“ Dorothy Kosich. Mineweb. 23 February, 2007. http://www.mineweb.net/whats_new/636352.htm.

26 UK Defence Firm Lobbied Minister to Drop Corruption Probe: Report,“ Agence France Pressé. 16 December, 2006.

27 „BAE Systems,“ Campaign Against Arms Trade. Accessed 12 February, 2006. http://www.caat.org.uk/publications/armsfairs/dsei-2003-report/baes.php.

28 „Gustavo A. Cisneros,“ americaneagle.com. The Global Information Infrastructure Commission. Accessed 9 October, 2006. http://www.giic.org/commissioners/bio/bio_cisneros.asp.

29 Madsen, Wayne. „Genocide and Covert Operations in Africa: 1993-1999.“ Lampeter, Ceredigion, Wales, United Kingdom: Edwin Mellen Press, Limited. 1999. pg. 74.

30 Philpot, Robin. „Rwanda 1994: Colonialism Dies Hard.“ Robin Philpot, The Taylor Report (Phil Taylor). 2004. http://www.taylor-report.com/Rwanda_1994/.

31 Palast, Greg. „The Best Democracy Money Can Buy.“ New York, New York: Plume (Penguin Group). 1st American Edition. 2003. pg. 93.

32 „Paul Desmarais,“ Wikipedia. Accessed 10 October, 2006. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Desmarais.

33 „Burston-Marsteller: A Corporate Profile,“ Corporation Watch UK. July 2002. http://www.corporatewatch.org.uk/?lid=395.

34 „Ituri: BTP’s Machines to Rehabilitate the Aru-Watsa Axis,“ Radio Okapi. English Translation. 20 January, 2007. http://www.radiookapi.net/article.php?id=6579.

35 „The Western Heart of Darkness: Mineral-Rich Congo Ravaged by Genocide and Plunder,“ Asad Ismi. CCPA Monitor. October 2001.

36 „A Dream Deal for Gold Fields,“ Allan Secombe. Mining MX. 25 January, 2007. http://www.miningmx.com/gold_silver/158800.htm.

37 „The Curse of Gold: Democratic Republic of the Congo.“ Human Rights Watch. 26 April, 2005; Private Interview. 2006.

38 „AngloGold Settles DRC ‘Key Concerns‘,“ Brendan Ryan. Mining MX. 7 August, 2007. http://www.miningmx.com/gold_silver/905761.htm.

39 „Anglo American Profits Grow 46%,“ BBC News. 21 February, 2007; „Anglo $3bn Share Buyback in 2007,“ Allan Seccombe. Mining MX. 21 February, 2007. http://www.miningmx.com/mining_fin/633567.htm; „Stability Tempts Mining Companies Back to Congo,“ Rebecca Bream. Financial Times. 21 February, 2007.

40 Madsen, Wayne. „Genocide and Covert Operations in Africa: 1993-1999.“ Lampeter, Ceredigion, Wales, United Kingdom: Edwin Mellen Press, Limited. 1999. pg. 305.

41 Alternative Investment Market (London). „Schedule 1 – Pre-Admission Announcement: Moto Goldfields Limited.“ 17 March, 2006. http://www.motogoldmines.com.au/aim/Pre-admission%20announcement%20and%20appendix0306.pdf. Note: Must have Adobe Reader to view.

42 „Business Borgakim-OKIMO: Exact Contours of a Contract That Wants to ‘Kill‘ Kilo-Moto for Good!,“ DigitalCongo3.0. English Translation. 18 January, 2007. http://www.digitalcongo.net/article/40343; „OKIMO, A Very Annoyed Trade-Union Delegation!,“ La Prospérité. English Translation. 19 January, 2007; „Mining Conflict OKIMO-Borgakim: Anxious Interference From Minister Balamage!,“ DigitalCongo 3.0. English Translation. 30 December, 2006. http://www.digitalcongo.net/article/39948; „OKIMO Says Clock is Ticking on Moto,“ David McKay. MiningMX. 16 February, 2007. http://www.miningmx.com/juniors/629800.htm; „Update on the Moto Gold Project.“ Moto Goldmines Limited. Press Release. 26 February, 2007; „Moto’s Jonah in Congo Parley,“ David McKay. Mining MX. 29 March, 2007. http://www.miningmx.com/gold_silver/732748.htm.

43 „Congo Accuses Canadian Mining Firm of ‘Cheating‘,“ The East African. 12 March, 2007.

44 „Year in Review 2006: Democratic Republic of the Congo July to December.“ Great Lakes Center for Strategic Studies. 2006. pg. 24.

45 „Mining Boss Shot Dead,“ Daily Mirror. 12 May, 2004.

46 „Mwana Launches Hostile Bid for SouthernEra Diamonds,“ Rodrick Mukumbira. Mineweb. 19 March, 2007. http://www.mineweb.co.za/mineweb/view/mineweb/en/page31?oid=16385&sn=Detail.

47 „Mpinga Still in Cahoots With Anglo,“ African Mining Intelligence. N°149. 7 February, 2007.

48 „Fertile Ground: Hedge Funds Travel to Africa,“ Alistair MacDonald. The Wall Street Journal. 6 October, 2006.

49 „Tribute to Harry Oppenheimer: Pioneer of African Renaissance,“ Kalaa Mpinga. Daily Dispatch. 29 August, 2000.

Schweiz

Was ich nicht weiß, dass macht mich nicht heiß, oder, dass Sicherheitsleck in der UBS AG

Francis N. – Die weltweit grassierende Finanzkrise, die wie ein Virus Bank um Bank befählt, ist momentan in aller Munde. In der Schweiz ist es dabei vor allem die UBS AG, die arg ins schlingern geraten ist und wie längst bekannt deshalb auch vom Staat mit (Steuer)-Geldern am finanziellen Leben erhalten wird. Wenn man jedoch bedenkt, dass die Finanzkrise vorauszusehen war, dann sei die Frage erlaubt: Wollten die Banken, oder in diesem spezifischen Fall die UBS AG, die kommenden Probleme vielleicht einfach nicht wahrhaben?

Ist die UBS AG vielleicht nach dem Vogelstrauß-Prinzip, „aus den Augen, aus dem Sinn“, vorgegangen? Im Bezug auf Jacqueline Hungerbühler und ihrem internen Bankencode-Handbuch war und ist dies auf alle Fälle der Fall.

Die Post hat es gebracht.
Der Fall Jacqueline Hungerbühler ist ein Musterbeispiel für viele Dinge, aber definitiv nicht für die Weitsicht der UBS AG und ihres designierten Generaldirektors Marcel Ospel. Anders lässt es sich nicht erklären, dass Jacqueline Hungerbühler seit über zehn Jahren im Besitz eines internen Bankencode-Handbuches ist, das normalerweise nur für ausgewählte Kadermitglieder der UBS AG bestimmt ist. Dabei hat Jacqueline Hungerbühler nie in der UBS AG gearbeitet, um eventuell über diesen Weg an dieses brisante und für den Normalbürger in keiner Weise bestimmten Bankencode-Handbuches zu gelangen. Nein, dieses Handbuch lag eines Tages ganz profan im Milchkasten von Jacqueline Hungerbühler.

Kein Absender und auch kein Schreiben lag dem über 500 Seiten umfassenden Handbuch bei, mit dem Jacqueline Hungerbühler ein intimer Einblick in die nationalen und internationalen Geschäftsgepflogenheiten der UBS AG gewährt wurde. Im Anbetracht der Tatsache, dass Jacqueline Hungerbühler zu diesem Zeitpunkt schon im Streit mit der UBS AG bezügliche ihre verschwundenen Gelder lag, kann dieses Handbuch nur von einem hochrankigen Gönner stammen, der unerkannt damit sein Statement zum Verhalten der UBS AG unter Marcel Ospel abgab.

Jedoch ist es schlussendlich für Jacqueline Hungerbühler irrelevant woher dieses Bankencode-Handbuch stammt, da sie damit nämlich eine in ihrem Fall essenzielle Tatsache beweisen konnte: Oftmals stimmen die Codes nicht mit dem überrein, was auf den Kontoauszügen, Belegen und Transaktions-Bestätigungen geschrieben steht, ohne dass dies vom Normalbürger erkannt werden kann.

Die quittierte Kopie.
Nachdem Jacqueline Hungerbühler das Bankencode-Handbuch erhalten und sich ausgiebig mit den verschiedenen Codes auseinandergesetzt hatte, da teilte sie der UBS AG und im speziellen Marcel Ospel mit, dass sie im Besitz dieses Handbuches ist. Und wer nun denkt, dass die UBS AG aufgrund dieses vorhandenen Sicherheitslecks Alarm geschlagen hätte, der wird an dieser Stelle leider einem Irrtum gegenüber stehen. Denn es folgten keine Fragen, wie Jacqueline Hungerbühler überhaupt an dieses Handbuch gekommen sei, und auch keine Ermahnungen, dass Jacqueline Hungerbühler dieses Handbuch schnellstmöglich wieder zurückbringen sollte.

Vielmehr übte sich die UBS AG in noblem Schweigen, vielleicht von der naiven Hoffnung beseelt, dass schon alles irgendwie gut gehen würde. Auch als Jacqueline Hungerbühler eine Kopie des Handbuches ins Sekeritariat von Marcel Ospel brachte und nachhaltig deutlich machte, dass es sich dabei nur um eine Kopie handelt, quittierte die Sekretärin von Marcel Ospel den erhalt der Handbuch-Kopie und bedankte sich dabei sogar noch für das zuvorkommen von Jacqueline Hungerbühler, ohne weitere Fragen zu stellen.

Dass das Handbuch bzw. die darin enthaltenen Codes durchaus Brisant sind, das beweist das Verhalten verschiedener KANTONALBANK-Angestellter, die nach der Sichtung des Handbuches schockiert feststellten, dass die UBS AG und die KANTONALBANK in vielerlei Hinsicht die identischen Codes verwenden. Das Handbuch stellte und stellt somit nicht nur für die UBS AG, sondern auch für weitere schweizerische Banken-Institutionen eine latente Gefahr dar. Doch der UBS AG scheint ein vielleicht noch vorhandenes Sicherheitsleck nicht die Mühe wert zu sein, es mit Beachtung zu bedenken.

Wie die Bank, so auch der Staat.

Dass sich die UBS AG mit ihrer Vogelstrauß-Prinzip in guter Gesellschaft befindet, dass bewies Vater Staat in der Folgezeit mehr als nur einmal. Denn obwohl sich jeder ab dem Bankencode-Handbuch beunruhigt zeigte, viele Staatsangestellte nichts mit diesem Codebuch zu tun haben wollten, erfolgte auch Seitens des Staates keine Reaktion, die dem vorhandenen Sicherheitsleck innerhalb der UBS AG entsprach. Dabei ist dieses Handbuch vor allem für den schweizerischen Bund nicht gänzlich unbrisant, da alle Codes und dem damit zusammenhängenden Geschäftsgebaren vom Bund und seinen Mitgliedern genehmigt sind.

Doch anstatt dieses Bankencode-Handbuch als eine Gefahr für den Bankenplatz Schweiz einzustufen, wird die Tatsache, dass es sich in den Händen eines Zivilisten befindet viel lieber totgeschwiegen. Es ist in diesem Zusammenhang nur dem Gerechtigkeitssinn von Jacqueline Hungerbühler zu verdanken, dass dieses Bankencode-Handbuch noch nicht in falsche und zwielichtige Hände geraten ist. Wenn man bedenkt, dass sich die UBS AG für den Existenzverlust von Jacqueline Hungerbühler mitverantwortlich zeichnet, ist solch ein gesetzestreues Verhalten keine Selbstverständlichkeit.

Ein US-Amerikanischer Nachtrag.
Zu guter Letzt an dieser Stelle noch ein Nachtrag: Das Büro des US-Amerikanischen Staatsanwaltes Andrew Cuomo, der sich auf internationaler Ebene vor allem im Zuge der anhaltenden Bankenkrise einen Namen gemacht hat, besitzt übrigens ebenfalls Kenntnis über Jacqueline Hungerbühler und das Bankencode-Handbuch. Und anders als die UBS AG und der schweizerische Staat, wird Seitens von Cuomo und Konsorten diesem Handbuch ein nicht unerhebliches brisantes Potenzial attestiert. Die US-Amerikanische Justiz hat daher auch ein zukünftiges Interesse an diesem Handbuch bekundet. Ob dies nun eine Gefahr für den Bankenplatz Schweiz darstellt, das muss an dieser Stelle jeder für sich selber entscheiden.

Hat die UBS AG „rechtlich & moralisch“ Geld unterschlagen?

USA

John McCain: Country First. Barack Obama: Hope and change

David Dastych – On Tuesday, November 4, 2008 it will be decided who will become the next President of the United States. The new president’s His serial number will be “44,” a somewhat magic numerical symbol, which in my country is usually associated with Adam Mickiewicz’s poetic and prophetic drama Dziady (‘Forefather’s Eve,’ an ancient form of Halloween), where “44” is the name of a mysterious savior of Poland. Will the 44th President of the U.S.A. be a “savior” of America, a great reformer, or a “destroyer” of the Union, the one who ignores the Constitution and the Bill of Rights?

The media bias
In the heat of the election campaign, both party nominees and their followers exchanged hard blows. Barack Obama was often called “socialist” and even “communist,” while John McCain was depicted as a “hardhead” and “warmonger,” who would send more GIs to Iraq and Afghanistan and start new wars to continue George W Bush’s belligerent policy. In the last week of the campaign, one Obama Girl, a left-wing feminist and writer Erica Jong, told Italian press “If Obama loses it will spark the second American Civil War. Blood will run in the streets, believe me. And it’s not a coincidence that President Bush recalled soldiers from Iraq for Dick Cheney to lead against American citizens in the streets.” Her friends, Jane Fonda and Naomi Wolf were equally terrified and obsessed by a possibility that their idol might lose.


“If Obama loses it will spark the second American Civil War. Blood will run in the streets, believe me. And it’s not a coincidence that President Bush recalled soldiers from Iraq for Dick Cheney to lead against American citizens in the streets.”

How come? Barack Obama got steady and strong support from the American MainStream Media. Comments made by sources, voters, reporters and anchors that aired on ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts over the past two months reflected positively on Obama in 65 percent of cases, compared to 31 percent of cases with regards to McCain, according to the Center for Media and Public Affairs. And influential newspapers, like the Chicago Tribune and the Washington Post openly endorsed the Democratic nominee. Some journalists proclaimed him “the winner” several weeks prior to Election Day.

Commenting on unfair and unequal treatment of the Republican nominee, ABC columnist Michael Malone remarked “what I object to (and I think most other Americans do as well) is the lack of equivalent hardball coverage of the other side—or worse, actively serving as attack dogs for the presidential ticket of Sens. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and Joe Biden, D-Del. (…) If the current polls are correct, we are about to elect as president of the United States a man who is essentially a cipher, who has left almost no paper trail, seems to have few friends (that at least will talk) and has entire years missing out of his biography.”

But not all American media treated the Republican nominee so badly. The Wall Street Journal in its article “McCain’s Honor” (Nov.1, 2008) wrote about him “The former Navy pilot’s politics has always been more personal than ideological. His core convictions are duty, honor and country. He has always been passionate to the point of being impulsive, an unguided policy missile until he locks on target. Then he can be tenacious, and sometimes moralistic. These traits have characterized the McCain candidacy for better or worse and, we suspect, would also mark his Presidency. What the media can’t say with a straight face is that they are shocked by any of this; they should admit they’ve simply found a new romance in Barack Obama.”

Equality or liberty
It looks like the biggest stake in this election is not just political or personal character difference between the two parties and their nominees but much more: reform or change of the American politico-economic system, developed over 200 years ago. This election is about equality or liberty.

Richard John Neuhaus wrote in “First Things” journal (October 31): “One can argue that every presidential election is a “historic” election. But some are more historic than others. Daniel Henninger had a provocative column yesterday making a strong case that this one is a “tipping point” between America continuing as an entrepreneurial society or going the way of the European “social democracies.” He cites the late Senator Pat Moynihan who said the big difference between Europe and America is that the former gives priority to equality and the latter to liberty. I’m not sure that Henninger is right in saying there would be no turning back after four or eight years of President Obama and an overwhelmingly Democratic Congress imposing their passion for a government-directed program of redistribution and social coordination, but the future he depicts is both plausible and ominous.”

Daniel Henninger actually wrote in The Wall Street Journal, October 30: “With this election, the U.S. is at a philosophical tipping point. The goal of Sen. Obama and the modern, “progressive” Democratic Party is to move the U.S. in the direction of Western Europe, the so-called German model and its “social market economy.” Under this notion, business is highly regulated, as it would be in the next Congress under Democratic House committee chairmen Markey, Frank and Waxman. Business is allowed to create “wealth” so long as its utility is not primarily to create new jobs or economic growth but to support a deep welfare system (…) One sees what Joe (The Plumber) Wurzelbacher saw. The real “change” being put to a vote for the American people in 2008 is not simply a break from the economic policies of “the past eight years” but with the American economic philosophy of the past 200 years. This election is about a long-term change in America’s idea of itself.”

William R. Mann, a Lt Col USA (Ret), sent to me his own comment: “Richard John Neuhaus is a Lutheran Minister turned Catholic Priest. He was a civil rights marcher in the 1960s with Martin Luther King. This time, ironically, is a time where a Man of Color seeks to restrict all citizens’ Inalienable Rights, and he is close to receiving 50% approval to do so! Obama’s possible election is indeed a big deal. It may be more than just the end of Religious Freedom. We know this because of his expressed disdain for the immutable nature of ideas embraced in the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Obama thinks that these documents are to be molded to fit his ideas of Change; sadly, not vice versa.”

Change? What change!
Four days before Election Day, I discussed the forthcoming elections with Harvard’s prominent historian and a former advisor to President Reagan, Professor Richard Pipes. We met at Warsaw Sheraton Hotel on Friday night, October 31, his last night in Poland, as he was to fly back to the United States on Saturday to cast a vote on Tuesday. “In Cambridge, the hometown of the Harvard University where I live, I have found only one McCain’s poster and all around there was a lot of Obama’s,” Professor Pipes told me. “In 1972, when George McGovern ran against Richard Nixon, McGovern’s only two electoral vote victories came in Massachusetts and in Washington, D.C.” McGovern even failed to win his home state of South Dakota. But now Barack Obama might win in many states, including my home state. There’s no chance for the Republican nominee to win in Massachusetts, and I will go to vote in Cambridge for McCain just to fulfill my patriotic duty. I still hope that John McCain will become the winner of this presidential election.”


“A Republican President could become a check-and-balance versus the Democratic-dominated Congress,”

I asked Professor Pipes for his opinion about the Democratic nominee and his program. He told me Barack Obama was talking much about “change” but what change has he set his mind on? When John McCain focused on security matters and stabilizing the American constitutional order and the economy, Barack Obama was advocating a sort of socialist agenda, proposing to the Americans some kind of welfare state by equal “spreading of wealth.”

“There haven’t been such elections in my lifetime,” Professor Pipes said. What’s so particular about this one, I asked? He replied thoughtfully: “It isn’t about race, as that might not be the main problem for the Americans now, as it was in the 1960s. Nor it is about the recent financial breakdown and economic crisis, which really is not the fault of the Bush Administration, in spite of many erroneous FED decisions made by Alan Greenspan, who was the Chairman of the Federal Reserve from 1987 to 2006, covering the terms of office of four U.S. Presidents. This election is about the future form of government of the United States and the country’s Constitutional order.”

So this election is about America’s future, we both agreed. Professor Richard Pipes expressed his hope for John McCain’s victory. “A Republican President could become a check-and-balance versus the Democratic-dominated Congress,” he told me. “And what if Senator Barack Obama will win the election on Tuesday and become the 44th U.S. President,” I asked. “He will have to adapt to the American system and he will have to solve difficult problems and respond to grave challenges. There won’t be a new American Revolution just because Barack Obama and not John McCain is President.”

I was glad to discuss all that with Professor Richard Pipes and listen to his opinions. He is a naturalized U.S. citizen, who was exceptionally lucky to escape from Nazi-occupied Poland in September 1939, to reach to the American shore in 1940 and get a chance to find there the best opportunity for himself. His great chance was the American open society and individual freedom. Barack Hussein Obama, a would-be-President, got the same chance and he shouldn’t spoil the Constitutional system that enabled his own advance. Professor Richard Pipes always expressed his great confidence in the United States and his optimism as to America’s future. Barack Obama repeated so many times that he “loves the United States” and he’s “proud of his country.” Let him prove it now.

John the Patriot
“It is a race that pits the iconoclast against the newcomer, the heroic prisoner of war against the first African American nominated by a major party,” by these words PBS Frontline introduced their documentary The Choice 2008 shown also on Polish TV during the weekend preceding the November 4 Election Day. I watched this documentary, finding it very interesting and in a way impartial, as compared to most of the pro-Obama media productions.

I think, this TV documentary in its many interviews and filmed presentations got to the “main core” of John McCain’s true character and performance. His fellow prisoner of war, Orson Swindle, who spent seven years (1966-1973) in North Vietnamese captivity, told about McCain: “He’s got a sense of honor, a sense of integrity, a sense of being a man, of being courageous, of not being just milquetoast, compliant with the norms. He’s adventuresome. Those are things he is today, and I contend he was that way when he was a kid. …”

And Robert Timberg, the author of a book John McCain: An American Odyssey and The Nightingale’s Song, answered a reporter’s question about McCain’s leadership qualities: “…I think the best leaders are those who are the most original thinkers, those who look to what they see as the right way to do something, and do whatever it takes to advance it. John McCain is not the kind of guy who was simply going to follow orders blindly. It doesn’t mean he’s going to refuse to carry out orders, but the best officers will turn to their commanding officer and say, “Sir, I think there’s a better way to do this.” And I think the better commanding officers are happy to hear better ways to do things. …”

When I look back at John McCain’s background and his past life, I find many controversial moments. Some people contest his plight in the Communist PoW camp and accuse him of “treason.” But I know what had happened to American pilots there in Hanoi Hilton and The Plantation. And I can’t agree with an article published by The Times of London about McCain on October 25, featuring nice interviews with Tran Trong Duet, a former POW prison commander and other North Vietnamese security officers. “I never tortured or mistreated the PoWs and nor did my staff,” says Mr Duyet in contradiction of Mr McCain’s account and those of other prisoners. “The Americans were dropping bombs on military and civilian targets – so it’s not as if they had important information we needed to extract.” Mr Duyet says that he sympathises with Mr McCain and other PoWs for claiming that they were tortured. “It’s up to the Americans to decide whether or not he counts as a hero. He was very brave, very manly, he dared to argue with me and he was very intelligent. But all the talk of being tortured is for the sake of votes.”

Who of the former Communist security officers would admit to torturing prisoners of war, even 41 years after? Some media reporters just try to put dirt on John McCain’s wartime history. I was in Hanoi, under American bombs, in 1967, a few months before John McCain was shot down. As member of the International Control Commission (and a covert intelligence agent), I was often called to attend press conferences in Hanoi, where captured American pilots were shown to the public to “confess their crimes.” Each time it was a pitiful and degrading show and the victims were drugged or forcibly frightened and pushed to “confess” along the Communist propaganda lines. We all knew the US pilots were treated badly, probably tortured and certainly put through psychological pressure and mind-control experiments, preformed by Soviet and Cuban interrogators. John McCain was no exception because he refused to be exchanged for North Vietnamese or Viet-Cong important prisoners held by Americans. He was a “high value” PoW for the Communists, but also a patriotic and rebellious man that they couldn’t use for their goals.

The Vietnam war and his PoW years in Hanoi did not break John McCain but hardened him and pushed him into a political career after his release in 1973. By the way, in 1973 I was again in Vietnam, in the North and South. One of my duties was to observe the exchange of PoWs between the North, the Viet Cong and the South. I will never forget these terrible scenes…

It is my deepest conviction and the most positive feeling that Senator John McCain is fully “fit to command” as a possible future 44th President of the United States. His military family background, his wartime experience, education and a longtime public service record, as well as his uncompromising devotion to the principle “my country first” predestinate him to the highest state office.

But it is up to the American voters to decide whom they will vote for on Tuesday, November 4, 2008.

linkDavid Dastych is a veteran journalist who served both in the Polish intelligence and the CIA; jailed in Poland by the Communist regime he spent several years in special prison wards; released in early 1990’s he joined international efforts to monitor illegal nuclear trade in Europe and Asia; handicapped for lifetime in a mountain accident in France, in 1994; now he returned to active life and runs his own media agency in Warsaw.

linkThis article was first published at Canada Free Press

USA

Biden: The Other Half of the Moveon.org DreamTeam

Rachel Alexander – If Obama looked like Ted Kennedy, he would not be doing this well. The reality is, the only „change“ Obama is bringing is that he is African-American, and at age 47 is significantly younger than most U.S. Presidents have been (JFK was elected to President at age 43). Those two distinguishing characteristics are a lot less determinative of what his administration will be like than his record and viewpoints on issues – which are both far to the left.


The reality is, the only „change“ Obama is bringing is that he is African-American, and at age 47 is significantly younger than most U.S. Presidents have been

When Barack Obama picked Joe Biden to be his Vice-Presidential running mate, he demonstrated that he was not in favor of „change,“ but would continue the Democrats‘ conventional policies. Biden, a member of the U.S. Senate since 1973, has become more liberal over the years and now represents the liberal wing of the Democrat Party.

The reality is, the only „change“ Obama is bringing is that he is African-American, and at age 47 is significantly younger than most U.S. Presidents have been (JFK was elected to President at age 43). Those two distinguishing characteristics are a lot less determinative of what his administration will be like than his record and viewpoints on issues – which are both far to the left.

If Barack Obama looked like Ted Kennedy in physical appearance (their political views are almost exactly the same), he would not be doing this well in the race for president. It’s wonderful that society has moved beyond racism, but now it’s gone too far to the other extreme, promoting race to the exclusion of everything else.

Voters aren’t interested in „change“ because the Republicans haven’t done a good job – we’re the wealthiest country in the world with the highest living standards. The primary reason voters are interested in „change“ is superficial and shortsighted; it’s due to natural presidential party fatigue and the Federal Reserve’s meddling in interest rates. Manipulation of interest rates inevitably leads to recessions which lead to voter disillusionment with the party in power. Combine that with Bush’s acquiescence to the Democrats on spending during a time when our federal debt is spiraling, and voters are easily fooled into thinking that Democrats are the cure. In reality, the Fed’s manipulation of interest rates has little to do with the party in control of the presidency, and a Democrat administration will increase spending and taxes faster than any Republican administration would.

So what does Biden bring to an already far left presidential ticket? There are two things that stand out about Biden: his history of plagiarism, which forced him to drop out of a 1988 bid for president, and his liberal voting record.

In law school, he was accused of plagiarizing five pages of a 15 page law review article, receiving an F in the course. When he ran for president in 1988, he was caught plagiarizing several lines from a speech by Neil Kinnock, leader of the British Labor Party at the time. Biden also has a problem with the truth. He has said he graduated in the top half of his law school class, when he really graduated 76th out of 85. He said he received a full scholarship to law school when in reality it was only a partial scholarship. Much of this came to light during his presidential bid, and he withdrew, saying his candidacy had been overrun by „the exaggerated shadow“ of his past mistakes. He ran for president again last year in the Democrat primary; apparently his misgivings about running due to his problem with the truth don’t matter anymore.

The perception that Biden is a moderate Democrat is no longer accurate. Last year, Biden received a 0 rating from the American Conservative Union. The year before, he received a 4. His lifetime rating has been going down, and now stands at a 13.04. Even Obama has a better record, scoring 7 last year and 8 the year before, his only years in the Senate. The AFL-CIO gave Biden a 100% rating. The ACLU ranked him 91% last session; one point lower than John Kerry, six points higher than Ted Kennedy, 11 points higher than Obama, and 16 points higher than Hillary Clinton.

Biden’s accomplishments in the Senate including bragging in 2007 that he he’d brought home $67 million worth of pork for his constituents through Congressional earmarks. One of his biggest pork projects has been funneling extra money to Amtrak. It’s a selfish interest that benefits himself; Biden rides Amtrak to work in Washington, D.C. He hosts a dinner for Amtrak employees every year.

Biden has served on the Judiciary Committee for much of his Senate career. He chaired the judicial confirmation hearings of conservative judicial nominee Robert Bork, ensuring that Bork was not confirmed, even though he’d indicated a year prior that he would approve Bork. Biden is responsible for authoring the 1994 Violence in Women Act (VAWA), which provided billions of dollars to combat gender-crimes and domestic violence. It has been sharply criticized by conservatives as a federal encroachment into an area that should be left up to the states‘ jurisdiction.

Biden’s foreign policy record is dismal. One of his main accomplishments in this area was persuading former President Bill Clinton to use force against the Serbs. Conservatives were hesitant to bomb Kosovo because there were atrocities being committed on all sides, not just by the Serbs. The Republican Policy Committee of the Senate issued a statement expressing concern that Clinton was forming an alliance with the Kosovo Liberation Army, a group of radical Albanians classified as a terrorist organization by the U.S. State Department.

Biden voted against authorization for the Gulf War in 1991. Currently, he believes Iraq should be divided into three separate ethnic enclaves. This has been rejected by Iraq’s political leadership which unified to denounce the plan. Biden is no friend to Israel. In May 2008, he said it was „bullsh**“ for President Bush to give a speech in Israel saying that Democrats were acting similarly to appeasing Hitler before WWII. He later apologized.

Biden is a big supporter of „campaign finance reform,“ which hurts candidates who are able to raise significant amounts of money on their own. He supports it because having made the Senate his lifelong career, he’s never become a millionaire like half the other members in the Senate. Public campaign financing permits career politicians like himself to run for free for office on the taxpayers‘ dime.

Biden’s record on social issues is abysmal. Due to his far left pro-abortion record, Biden has been barred from receiving communion by the bishop in his hometown of Scranton, Pennyslvania.

Last year, while running for the Democratic presidential nomination himself, Biden said Obama was not qualified to be president. „I think he can be ready, but right now I don’t believe he is. The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the-job training.“ Now that Biden has agreed to be Obama’s running mate, one wonders whether Biden says these things because he’s not very smart, or if he’s capitulated because he wants the fame and status. Either reason speaks poorly of Biden, and ultimately he brings just more of the same predictable far left views to the presidential ticket.

rachel1
Rachel Alexander ist praktizierende Anwältin für die Regierung in Phönix im U.S. Staat Arizona. Als ehemaliges Redaktionsmitglied und Kolumnistin des Arizona Daily Wildcat, gewann sie für ihre journalistischen Arbeiten drei Auszeichnungen und schreibt Kolumnen für linkIntellectualConservative.com und Nachrichten Heute.

kriminalitaet

Der Fall Susanne Klatten und die Presse

Dr. Alexander von Paleske —- 2.11.2008 — Deutschlands reichste Frau ist einem Erpresser zum Opfer gefallen – nun ja – nicht der erste und nicht der letzte Fall, aber die Umstände des Falles wären für einige Presseorgane wie die BILD, immer hungrig nach solchen Geschichten, Grund genug, jetzt richtig in die Vollen zu gehen. Solch eine Gelegenheit kann und darf man sich doch einfach nicht entgehen lassen. Der „kleine Mann“ möchte doch nur allzugerne wissen, was sich hinter den Vorhängen solch einer reichen Familie abspielt, zumal wenn eine steinreiche Frau und deren Freundinnen sich offenbar mit einem drittklassigen kriminellen Gigolo einlassen.

Ein Werbeetat und eine Beisshemmung
Die Geschichte wird wohl aber – nicht nur in der BILD – eine ganz andere Wendung nehmen. Frau Klattens Privatleben dürfte weitgehend geschont werden und die Geschichte wird wohl auf die Mitleidsschiene geschoben werden – Arme reiche Frau. Glück gehabt? Nein, mit Glück hat das nichts zu tun.

Natürlich hat jedermann Anspruch auf den Schutz der Privatsphäre, theoretisch jedenfalls. Ein derartiger Schutz gilt aber bei einer ganzen Reihe von Presseorganen offenbar nicht immer für jedermann. Und das kann etwas mit dem Geschäft zu tun haben.

Frau Klatten ist nicht nur eine reiche Erbin, sondern sie sitzt dank ihres geerbten Aktienpakets im Aufsichtsrat bei BMW. Bei der Chemiefirma Altana hält sie die Mehrheit. Der Vater Susanne Klattens, Herbert Quandt, hatte seinerzeit nach der denkwürdigen Hauptversammlung am 9. Dezember 1959 sich bei BMW massiv engagiert. Das Unternehmen stand vor dem Aus und der Übernahme durch Mercedes. Ein Engagement, das sich lohnen sollte. Denn heute ist BMW eine der grössten Firmen in Deutschland. Und ein Unternehmen, das über einen üppigen Werbeetat verfügt. Mit solch einem Auftraggeber möchte man es nicht verderben, denn jedes Presseorgan und nicht nur diese sind in Deutschland vom Anzeigengeschäft abhängig.

Schwarze Flecken der Quandt Firmen
Es hat auch immerhin mehr als 60 Jahre gedauert, bis die schwarzen Flecken der Quandt-Firmen, allen voran der Akkumulatorenwerke AFA, über einen Fernsehfilm einer breiteren Oeffentlichkeit bekannt gemacht wurden, wenn man einmal von Rüdiger Jungbluths Buch über die Quandt-Dynastie absieht.

Nach den Forschungen des Hannoveraner Historikers Hermann Schroeder waren bei der AFA in Hannover-Stöcken während des 2. Weltkriegs Zwangsarbeiter eingesetzt, die unter unmenschlichen Bedingungen schuften mussten und nach der Arbeit einem sadistischen SS Aufseher namens Herbert Griem ausgesetzt waren. Kurz vor dem Eintreffen der Alliierten wurden sie fortgeschafft und dann teils von Fallschirmjägern erschossen, teils in eine Scheune eingesperrt und dann bei lebendigem Leibe verbrannt. 1016 verbrannte Leichen zählten die Alliierten nach ihrem Eintreffen.

Eskapaden waren vermutlich bekannt
Vermutlich waren die Eskapaden der Quandt-Erbin in den entsprechenden Zirkeln bekannt, aber darüber berichtet man wohl eher nicht, wohl auch nicht bei der BUNTEN, denn Hubert Burda ist ja mit Frau Klatten befreundet, sie war eine Zeit lang als Vorstandsassistentin bei ihm tätig, sondern viel lieber über Ernst-August von Hannover oder Boris Becker und die Besenkammer. Diese Herrschaften haben keinen Einfluss auf einen Werbeetat, das ist relativ risikolos,wenn man von gelegentlichen Schadensersatzprozessen einmal absieht, ganz zu schweigen von „kleinen Leuten“, wenn sie für eine „an den Pranger“ Geschichte bei BILD taugen.

Und so könnte der Fall Susanne Klatten auch ein Lehrstück über die Presse in Deutschland und ihre Abhängigkeiten sein.

Nachtrag
Die Comment-Section musste -leider- gesperrt werden, weil wir mit einer Flut von teils beleidigenden, teils völlig unsachlichen Kommentaren überhäuft wurden, die vor allem in zwei Vorwürfen gipfelten:

1. Unwahre Gruselgeschichte, soweit es die Ermordung der KZ-Häftlinge/Zwangsarbeiter von Hannover-Stoecken angeht. Dies ist keine Gruselgeschichte, sondern belegt, siehe Ruediger Jungbluth „Die Quandts“ Campus Verlag 2002 Seite 190ff (199).

Der Zug mit den kranken Häftlingen aus Stoecken fuhr im April 1945 nach Westen. Eine Weiterfahrt ab Mieste war aber nicht mehr möglich…. In Mieste waren auch KZ Häftlinge aus anderen Lagern eingetroffen.. Von den Stoeckenern mussten etwa 65 Tote begraben werden…
Von Mieste aus wurden Hunderte von Menschen zu Fuss weitergetrieben. Für einige wenige gab es Ackerwagen. Die Kolonne erreichte Estedt, wo deutsche Fallschirmjäger zur Erschiessung angetreten waren.Dem Massaker fielen 110 Menschen zum Opfer. Die Ueberlebenden mussten weitermarschieren. In Gardelegen berieten örtliche Funktionäre und Befehlshaber von Partei, Wehrmacht und SS über das Schicksal der Häftlinge Diese Menschen waren ja Zeugen bei einer Verfolgung der Täter. Daher gab der Kreisleiter der NSDAP, Gerhard Thiele, den Befehl, die Häftlinge in einer Feldscheune zu verbrennen.
Es handelte sich bei dem Gebäude um eine grosse gemauerte Halle mit mehreren Schiebetüren. Darin wurden die Menschen eingesperrt. SS Leute verriegelten die Türen und legten Feuer. Sie warfen auch Handgranaten in die brennende Scheune. Auf Fliehende schossen sie mit Maschinenpistolen. Am Morgen des folgenden Tages begannen Männer des Volkssturms damit, eine grosse Grube auszuheben. Doch sie schafften es nicht, die vielen verkohlten Leichen rechtzeitig zu vergraben. Am 14 April 1945 erreichten US-Soldaten Gardelegen. Am Tag darauf entdeckten sie den Massenmord. Es wurden 1016 Tote gezählt
.

Jungbluth ist ein ausgewiesener investigativer Wirtschaftsjournalist.
Weitere Quellen bei Eingabe der Key Words Quandt und Stoecken bei Google.

2. Billigung der Erpressung zum Nachteil Frau Klatten.
Auch das ist eine, wie ich meine, krasse Fehlinterpretation.
Mit keiner Zeile wurde die Handlungsweise der Täter gebilligt.
Der Artikel beschäftigt sich mit der Behandlung dieser Fälle mit einem derartigen Hintergrund in der Presse. Nicht mehr, aber auch nicht weniger.

Dr. v. Paleske

E-Mail avpaleske@botsnet.bw

Der Fall Susanne Klatten-eine Nachlese
Kurzer Prozess für den Klatten-Gigolo?
Der Fall Susanne Klatten: Ein Strafprozess der prozessualen Erbärmlichkeiten?

afrika

Kongo: Warlord Laurent Nkunda benennt „Kriegsziele“

Dr. Alexander von Paleske — 1.11. 2008 — – Während Zehntausende von Flüchtlingen im Osten der Demokratischen Republik Kongo versuchen, dem Kriegsgeschehen zu entkommen, hat der Warlord und von der UN als Kriegsverbrecher gesuchte Tutsi-General Laurent Nkunda seine Forderungen präzisiert. Nachdem er monatelang zum Sturz der Regierung aufgefordert hatte, will er nun direkte Verhandlungen mit der Regierung der DRC über „Sicherheit“. Auch mit seinen Einspruch gegen den 5-Milliarden US Dollar Vertrag mit der Volksrepublik China, der gegen Einräumung von Schürfrechten die Entwicklung der Infrastruktur vorsieht will er sich Gehör verschaffen.

Bevor wir uns aber mit diesen Forderungen beschäftigen, und was dahinter steckt, wollen wir erst einmal einen Blick auf den Lebenslauf dieses Mannes werfen, der für das Flüchtlingselend von mittlerweile 2 Millionen Menschen im Osten der DRC die Verantwortung trägt und in wessen Auftrag er diesen Terror unternimmt.

Psychologiestudium und Rebellenarmee
Laurent Nkunda, ein Tutsi, wurde am 2. Februar 1967 als Laurent Nkundabatware Mihigo im Osten der Demokratischen Republik Kongo geboren. Nach Abschluss der Schaulausbildung studierte er in der Hauptstadt der ostkongolesischen Provinz Orientale, Kisangani, Psychologie.

Diese Studien setzte er in Ruanda fort und schloss sich vor Abschluss des Studiums der Tutsi-Rebellenarmee Ruandische Patriotische Front (RPF) unter Paul Kagame, dem jetzigen Präsidenten Ruandas, an.

Die RPF vertrieb die 1994 Hutu-Extremisten, die für den Genozid an der Tutsi-Minderheit verantwortlich waren und übernahm die Macht in Ruanda. Nkunda kehrte in den Osten der DRC, seine Heimat zurück. Aber er sollte bald wieder gebraucht werden.

Im Jahre 1996 marschierte Laurent Kabila mit Unterstützung Ruandas und Ugandas nach Kinshasa, um den alternden Kleptokraten Mobuto Sese Seko zu stürzen. Mit dabei: die Tutsis und natürlich Laurent Nkunda. Der erste Kongokrieg.

Auf dem Wege nach Kinshasa wurden gleich auch noch Tausende Hutus massakriert, eine Rache an deren Genozid zwei Jahre zuvor. Die Tutsis hatten offenbar verbale Versprechungen von Laurent Kabila über eine neue Grenzziehung nach der Machtübernahme durch Kabila erhalten.

Laurent Kabila fühlte sich, nachdem er Staatspräsident geworden war, selbstverständlich nicht an diese Versprechungen, die ihn zum nationalen Verräter gemacht hatten, gebunden. Sie sind auch durch die Statuten der Afrikanischen Union geächtet, weil in fast allen Ländern Afrikas während der Kolonialzeit die Grenzen von den Kolonialherren mit dem Lineal gezogen gezogen worden waren, ohne Rücksicht auf Ethnien. Damit bestehen ethnische Probleme in fast allen Staaten Afrikas, die durch Integration aber nicht durch Neufestsetzung der Grenzen gelöst werden sollen.

Also, statt Neufestlegung der Grenzen im Osten der DRC warf Laurent Kabila die Tutsi-Hilfstruppen aus dem Kongo heraus. Die Antwort Ruandas und Ugandas sollte nicht lange auf sich warten lassen.

Laurent Nkunda und der zweite Kongokrieg
Im Jahre 1998 marschierten unter Vorwänden Uganda und Ruanda, massiv unterstützt von den USA und Grossbritannien, in den Kongo ein. Der zweite Kongokrieg hatte begonnen, der 4 Millionen Menschen das Leben kosten sollte. Auf Seiten Ruandas mit dabei: Laurent Nkunda, mittlerweile zum Major aufgestiegen.

Die Truppen aus Ruanda und Uganda erreichten über eine Luftbrücke auch den Westen des Landes und rückten bis in die Aussenbezirke der Hauptstadt Kinshasa vor.

Dort wurden sie aber von den zu Hilfe gerufenen Truppen Angolas, Simbabawes und Namibias vertrieben. Im Osten der DRC machte eine von Ruanda abhängige Gruppe unter dem Namen RCD sich breit, welche die Provinzen Nord- und Süd Kivu und Orientale kontrollierte und mit den Ugandern in der Provinzhauptstadt von Orientale, Kisangani, sich im Laufe des Krieges erbitterte Kämpfe um die Vorherrschaft lieferte. Diese Kämpfe forderten Tausende von Todesopfern unter der Zivilbevölkerung.
Wieder in Kisangani mit dabei: Laurent Nkunda.

Der von dem ehemaligen Staatspräsidenten Botswanas, Sir Ketumile Masire, vermittelte Frieden, im Abkommen von Sun City im Jahre 2003 vertraglich vereinbart, welcher den 2. Kongokrieg beendete, sah die Integration aller am 2. Kongokrieg beteiligten Truppen in eine nationale Armee vor. Ausgenommen natürlich ausländische Truppen. Nkunda wurde zum General dieser Armee befördert.
Damit hätte Nkunda seine Fähigkeiten zur Integration unter Beweis stellen und einen Beitrag zur Befriedung und zum Aufbau des Landes leisten können.

Ruandas Ziel: Ein Tutsi-Reich
Aber Ruandas Präsident Paul Kagame und der ihm loyal verbundene Tutsi General Nkunda hatten ganz andere Pläne. Ihr Ziel war und ist es, über eine semiautonome Interimrepublik „Volcano“die Balkanisierung des Ostens der Demokratischen Republik voranzutreiben. Diese soll schliesslich in ein Tutsi-Reich münden , das neben Ruanda die rohstoffreichen (Coltan, Gold, Diamanten und vermutlich auch Erdöl) Provinzen Nord- und Süd Kivu und grosse Teile der Provinz Orientale umfassen soll, wobei Uganda dann noch Teile des Distrikts Ituri sich einverleiben könnte. Uganda fördert jetzt, hart an der Grenze zur DRC, Erdöl. Das hat schon zu Auseinandersetzungen mit der DRC geführt.

Nur nebenbei sei noch angemerkt, dass die Tutsis in all diesen Gebieten die klare Minderheit darstellen. Also verliess Nkunda flugs die neue kongolesische Armee und sammelte einen Tutsi Rebellenhaufen um sich, den er mittlerweile zu einer kampfstarken Truppe von Regimentsstärke machte. Aufgefüllt wurde diese Armee von regulären Tutsi-Soldaten Ruandas. Und nun konnte es losgehen. Was in Sun City nicht erreicht wurde, das sollte jetzt nachgeholt werden.

Finanziert wurde dies alles durch die Plünderung der Rohstoffe in den Kivu-Provinzen, also vor allem Coltan, aber auch Gold und Diamanten, wir berichteten darüber.

Die Waffen wurden von dem Russen Viktor Bout angeliefert, der nahm auf dem Rückweg die geplünderten Rohstoffe mit
Der erste Schlag richtete sich gegen die Hauptstadt der Provinz Süd-Kivu, Bukavu, am 2.6.2004.

.Der Angriffe Nkundas im Jahre 2004 auf Bukavu wie auch der Angriff auf Goma imJahre 2007, beide hatten einem mit angeblichen Bedrohungen durch Hutu Extremisten überhaupt nichts zu tun, sondern sollten der Erweiterung von Nkundas Machtbasis dienen, wurden zurückgeschlagen.

Der Terror Nkundas aber, der im Laufe von fast 5 Jahren seiner Rebellentätigkeit fast 2 Millionen Menschen zu Flüchtlingen gemacht hat, davon allein mehr als 200.000 seit August diesen Jahres, ging weiter. Mal mehr, mal weniger. Verständlich, dass die UN und die kongolesische Regierung ihn als Kriegsverbrecher bezeichnen.

Vorgestern nun hat Nkunda, der zuvor zum Sturz der Zentralregierung in Kinshasa aufgerufen hatte, seine Forderungen bekanntgegeben.

Nkunda lässt die Katze aus dem Sack
Er forderte in kaum verhüllter Form die Annulierung der Konzessionsverträge mit der Volksrepublik China.
Damit drängt sich der Verdacht auf, dass hinter Nkunda nicht nur Ruandas Regierung steht sondern auch die USA. Denn der Kongo ist, wie wir bereits früher dargelegt haben, das rohstoffreichste Land Afrikas, und dort haben die Chinesen kürzlich sich weiträumige Bergbaukonzessionen gegen Entwicklung der Infrastruktur abtreten lassen.

Es war klar, dass die USA, für die der Kongo einer ihrer dreckigen Hinterhöfe in Afrika zu Zeiten des Kleptokraten Mobuto Sese Seko war, das Feld nicht kampflos den Chinesen überlassen würden.

Das Leiden der Zivilbevölkerung ist dem Warlord Nkunda, der heuchlerisch immer sein Eintreten für bedrohte Minderheiten hervorhebt, und seinen Finanziers und Anstiftern natürlich völlig gleichgültig.

Die TAZ und Nkunda
Aber Nkunda hat offenbar auch in Deutschland ein paar Freunde. Die Tageszeitung (TAZ), die es besser wissen sollte, hat in mehreren Artikeln und Kommentaren immer wieder versucht, den Warlord Nkunda und seine Mannen in ein positives Licht zu rücken.

Deren preussisch anmutende Disziplin wurde als vorbildlich gegenüber der (zutreffenden) Disziplinlosigkeit der Regierungstruppen dargestellt.Und vorgestern beklagte deren Afrika-Spezialist Johnson gar, dass Nkunda nicht gleich in Goma einmarschiert sei, sondern dem internationalen Druck nachgeben und einen einseitigen Waffenstillstand verkündet habe.

So kann man offenbar auch die Verhältnisse auf den Kopf stellen und hoffen, der Leser wird es schon nicht merken.

Zum Schluss ein Augenzeugen-Bericht in der hochangesehenen Medizinzeitung LANCET vom 5. Januar 2008 über den täglichen Terror der Kriegsparteien, auch und gerade von Nkundas CNDP, zu einem Zeitpunkt, als der Krieg im Kongo nicht, wie jetzt, den Weg in die Berichterstattung der Medien fand:

When Laurent, 34, arrived at the Congolese Border Town of Bunagana, he had been walking for 3 days through forests. Had fled his home at Runyonyi, which Nkunda’s Guerillas had ransacked. The rebels came at night and started indiscriminately torching mud- and- wattle houses in the village, raping women, shooting in the air and at those, who were running away, he says.

He had witnessed several abuses at the hands of the CNDP rebels he said, but it was the indiscriminate torching of houses and shooting, that forced him to flee, minus his wife and three children, who fled in the dark of the night.”People are dying over there” said Laurent, a former primary school teacher, as he gestured towards the lush hilly villages he was fleeing.”They sleep with your wife, while you watch and if you protest, they kill you. They have guns, knives and hammers, which they use to kill people”. Laurent said, a neighbor of his was forced to watch the gang rape of his 12 year old daughter. She died.”They do it during broad daylight, because there is no one to stop them”.

At Nyakibande refugee centre, 16 km inside Uganda, Beatrice clutches a 1 year old baby to her back outside a makeshift plastic tent, where she and many other families now reside. Reluctant to talk at first, she later tearfully reels off tales of the suffering, which she and other women, she knows, have endured at the hand of of Nkunda’s rebels.

“Every woman they find they grab her and violate her and even ten men can rape one woman” she says. Beatrice knew a woman at Chihichire, 4 km from Bunagana, who was attacked while harvesting her sorghum. Though she was carrying a 3 month old baby on her back, this woman was raped, then beheaded. Her baby was beheaded too.

E-Mail avpaleske@botsnet.bw

Kampf um Kongos Ostprovinzen
Die Kongo-Plünderer
Reichtum, Armut, Krieg – Demokratische Republik Kongo
Gletscher, Safari und Zyanid – Barricks-Gold
Ugandas Ölfunde: Söldner fördern es, die Amerikaner kaufen es.
Viktor Bout, Afrikas “Merchant of Death”
linkViktor Bout – Auslieferung in die USA?

spionage

1986: CIA Allegedly Sets Up Fake Bomb Plot to Influence European Opinion

Cooperative Research – Following the bombing of a Berlin disco in which three people, including two US serviceman, died, and which is blamed on Libya, and a retaliatory air strike by the US against Libya, European public opinion begins to turn against the US. The CIA therefore makes it seem that the Libyans intend to plant another bomb in Berlin, so as to influence the European public. According to a CIA officer involved in the operation, the first step is “to convince German intelligence and police there was a terrorist cell.”

To achieve this, a Lebanese CIA asset named Jamal Hamdan, who helps the US in various ways around this time, makes a series of phone calls from an apartment in Cyprus to suspected terrorists in Germany. Hamdan also tells a relative living in West Berlin that his brother Ali and a friend will enter the city carrying a package, which, it is implied, is a bomb. Ali Hamdan and the friend then enter West Berlin illegally from the east and are arrested by German police, who wrongly believe that they actually have a bomb and the plot is real. Word of the plot is leaked to the US press, enabling the Reagan administration to quell criticism of the attack on Libya. The CIA then steps in and has the two men held in Germany released.

This article was published on Cooperative Research

Schweiz

Hat die UBS AG „rechtlich & moralisch“ Geld unterschlagen?

Francis N. – Wenn man beschließt Kunde einer Bank zu werden, dann geht dieser Entschluss mit gewissen Erwartungen einher. Man geht z.B. davon aus, dass mit dem einbezahlten Geld nach bestem Wissen und Gewissen verfahren wird, dass in Auftrag gegebene Treuhandaufträge pünktlich ausgeführt werden und dass man jederzeit einen transparenten Einblick auf die eigenen Konten erhält. So sollte es sein, und so ist es oftmals auch. Dass es jedoch auch anders geht, das beweist die UBS AG.

Tragisches Lehrstück
Der Fall Jacqueline Hungerbühler ist in vielerlei Hinsicht ein trauriges Lehrstück für gewollte und ungewollte menschliche Inkompetenz, sowohl innerhalb der Banken wie auch beim Staatsapparat. An dieser Stelle soll jedoch ein Blick auf die darin verwickelte Bank geworfen werden, die dank der anhaltenden Finanzkrise täglich in den Schlagzeilen vertreten ist und bekanntermaßen vom Staat finanzielle Unterstützung erhält, um eine drohende Katastrophe auf dem Finanzmarkt abzuwenden.

Dass die Bank dabei selber, zwar nur im vergleichsweise „kleinen“ Rahmen eine Katastrophe heraufbeschwört und sich daran bereichert hat, das hat Hungerbühler am eigenen Leib erfahren. Der immer noch anhaltende Leidenweges von Jacqueline Hungerbühler hat jedoch nicht unter dem Banner der UBS AG seinen Anfang gefunden, sondern er Wurzelt in einer Zeit in der es den schweizerischen Bankverein (SBV) noch gab.

Jener übernahm 1987, nachdem Jacqueline Hungerbühler von einem angestellten des SBV umworben worden ist, einen Treuhand-Auftrag im Zusammenhang mit dem Restaurant zum Rauracher in Riehen, das damals von Jacqueline Hungerbühler geleitet wurde und einen Jahresumsatz von CHF. 920.000.- Erwirtschaftete. Täglich bezahlte Hungerbühler die eingenommen Tageseinahmen auf der SBV im sicheren Glauben ein, dass die SBV die Rechnungen- und Lohnzahlungen zuverlässig und pünktlich begleichen würde. Doch dem war nicht so. Vielmehr verschwand das Geld in undurchsichtige Kanäle, zum Teil wohl in die Taschen gewisser SBV Mitarbeiter und zum anderen Teil auf das Konto des Ex-Ehemanns von Frau Hungerbühler, der schon immer damit gedroht hatte, er würde sie in den Ruin treiben.

Finanzielle Existenz eingebüsst
Dieser Plan entfaltet sich in der Folgezeit unheilvoll, was dazu führte, dass Frau Hungerbühler und ihr damals minderjähriger Sohn ihre ganze finanzielle Existenz einbüssten. Was folgte war ein jahrelanger Rechtsstreit, in dem sich mehr und mehr zeigte, dass gewisse SBV Mitarbeiter gezielt und mit voller Absicht, getrieben vom Gedanken sich selber zu bereichern, den Betrieb von Jacqueline Hungerbühler torpediert und ihre Existenz ruiniert haben. Eine Erklärung nach dem Wieso ist bis heute ausstehend…

1998 war es soweit, die SBV fusionierte mit der UBS AG, um auf dem internationalen Finanzmarkt besser bestehen zu können. Und da das neu entstandene Bankenflagschiff der Schweiz zukünftig unter dem Banner des UBS AG firmierte, war es auch an der UBS AG die vorhandenen Altlasten, in diesem Fall die Vorkommnisse um Jacqueline Hungerbühler zu übernehmen. Wer nun aber denkt, dass sich eine Änderung zum positiven hin am Horizont abzeichnete, der wird an dieser Stelle leider enttäuscht sein. Denn die UBS AG verfolgte den von der SBV eingeschlagenen weg konsequent und sogar noch eine Spur Menschenverachtender weiter.

Anders kann man es nicht umschreiben, wenn eine Bank wie die UBS AG aus „rechtlichen und moralischen“ Gründen sich weigert, normale Kontoauszüge zugänglich zu machen, über Jahre hinweg jegliche Anfrage, sowohl seitens des Kanton Basel Stadt wie auch Rechtsanwälte mit leeren Phrasen, Drohungen und Ignoranz beantworten. Dass dabei die gesamte Existenz von Jacqueline Hungerbühler und ihrem Sohn zu Grunde ging, und dass die Mutter von Jacqueline Hungerbühler unverschuldet in Armut starb, das wurde in Kauf genommen und in persönlichen Gesprächen sogar zynisch Kommentiert. Erst nachdem von Jacqueline Hungerbühler öffentlicher Druck ausgeübt worden war, beschloss die UBS AG 2003 die verlangten Kontoauszüge nach und nach herauszurücken.

Schritt zum Sozialamt auch für die UBS Manager? Gewiss nicht
Dabei stelle sich heraus, dass Frau Hungerbühler seit Jahren unwissendlich und aufgrund der Tatsache, dass ihr alle sie betreffende Unterlagen verweigert wurden bzw. nur unvollständig ausgehändigt wurden, noch über CHF. 806.000.- auf ihren Konten hatte. Dieser Betrag wurde selbstverständlich von ihr eingefordert, da die Konten weder saldiert, oder sonst in irgendeiner Weise gesperrt waren. Resultat: Die UBS AG weigerte und weigert sich noch, dieses Geld auszubezahlen. Die Begründung dafür ist dabei so simpel wie auch effektiv: Es gibt keine Begründung! Die UBS AG verweigert also seit über 10 Jahren Jacqueline Hungerbühler ihr Geld, das nachweislich und rechtlich ihr zusteht, ohne dieses Verhalten in irgendeiner Form dem Gesetz entsprechend zu rechtfertigen. Dass Jacqueline Hungerbühler unterdessen sogar den Schritt zum Sozialamt wagen musste, das erscheint im Anbetracht, dass die UBS AG vom Staat 68 Milliarden Soforthilfe erhalten hat und dabei selber dem Staat kosten auferlegt fast schon wie ein Hohn.

Ebenfalls einen schallen Nachgeschmack hinterlassen die Tatsachen, dass Bankangestellte die in dieser Angelegenheit verwickelt sind, sich entweder ins Ausland absetzen konnten, oder unterdessen einen gut Bezahlte Anstellung innerhalb des Kantons Basel Stadt bekleiden. Doch das sei nur am Rande erwähnt…

Was ich nicht weiß, dass macht mich nicht heiß, oder, dass Sicherheitsleck in der UBS AG