Unkategorisiert

Background Briefing with Senior Intelligence Official at the Pentagon on Intelligence Aspects of the U.S. Operation Involving Osama Bin Laden

MR. BRYAN WHITMAN (Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs): This is a traditional background briefing, no video or audio from out of here, no photographs please, no taping is permitted by video – by audio device for your note-taking is all. Okay? And, again, the briefer can be referred to and attributed as a senior intelligence official. With that, let’s go ahead and get started.

I’ll turn it over to you.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Thank you all for coming in on a Saturday and especially on Mother’s Day weekend. The operation on Sunday that resulted in the death of al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden was a culmination of years of intelligence collection and analysis focused on disrupting, dismantling, and defeating al Qaeda.

The United States intelligence community salutes the assault team that courageously carried out a dangerous and imperative mission.

In the wake of this major counterterrorism success, the intelligence community remains squarely focused on the safety of the American people. We will sustain intense pressure on al Qaeda and other terrorist groups. Al Qaeda is damaged by bin Laden’s death, but the group remains dangerous.

As a result of the raid, we’ve acquired the single largest collection of senior terrorist materials ever. We are currently reviewing materials retrieved from bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad. The materials have already provided us some important insights and we expect to learn more about al Qaeda and its affiliates, their plans and intentions, and any threats they currently pose.

If potential threat information is discovered, the United States government will take all necessary measures to protect the American people. The collection of bin Laden compound materials is large and is proving valuable. It will take time, therefore, to perform a thorough review. But we are already disseminating intelligence across the U.S. government based on what we found.

Today I’ll review key points on the confirmation of Osama bin Laden’s identity, describe the task force that has been set up to review the intelligence from bin Laden’s compound and share some of the information we have reviewed thus far. Further, I will distribute some of the video footage collected during the raid. It is highly unlikely that some of this material would have been in the possession of anyone other than Osama bin Laden.

I’ll start by briefly reviewing how we confirmed bin Laden’s identity. First, one of the women of the compound identified him to the assault team as Osama bin Laden. Second, using facial recognition methods, CIA [Central Intelligence Agency] specialists compared photos of the body to known photos of bin Laden and were able to determine with 95 percent certainty that the body was his. This process relies on points of similarity of unique facial features, including the shape and size of an individual’s eyes, ears, and nose.

Third, DNA [deoxyribonucleic acid] analysis conducted separately by Department of Defense and CIA labs has positively identified Osama bin Laden. DNA samples collected from his body were compared to a comprehensive DNA profile derived from bin Laden’s large extended family. Based on that analysis, the DNA is unquestionably his. The possibility of a mistaken identity on the basis of this analysis is approximately one in 11.8 quadrillion. (Laughter.) I’ll let you count the zeroes. (Laughter.)

Fourth, from our initial review of the materials, we assessed that much of this information, including personal correspondence between Osama bin Laden and others, as well as some of the video footage you will see today, would only have been in his possession.

Finally, al Qaeda released its own statement yesterday acknowledging the death of bin Laden. We expected that al Qaeda would issue a statement after his death, but it is noteworthy that the group did not announce a new leader, suggesting it is still trying to deal with bin Laden’s demise.

It’s also noteworthy that they acknowledged his death came in Pakistan. In the past, they have tried to obscure the reality of their presence in that country.

The intelligence community is in the initial stages of exploiting materials that the assault team recovered from the compound. Identifying any imminent threats and plotting is, of course, our top priority.

A multiagency task force led by the CIA has been established to triage, catalogue, and analyze this intelligence. The task force is working around the clock and will draw on the expertise of – and you need to be ready for some acronyms here – the CIA, DHS [Department of Homeland Security], DIA [Defense Intelligence Agency], the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, FBI [Federal Bureau of Investigation], the National Media Exploitation Center, NCTC [National Counterterrorism Center], NGA [National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency], NSA [National Security Agency], and Treasury.

This collection represents the most significant amount of intelligence ever collected from a senior terrorist. It includes digital, audio and video files of varying sizes, printed materials, computer equipment, recording devices and handwritten documents.

The following is a key point: the materials reviewed over the past several days clearly show that bin Laden remained an active leader in al Qaeda, providing strategic, operational and tactical instructions to the group. Though separated from many al Qaeda members who are located in more remote areas of the region, he was far from a figurehead. He was an active player making the recent operation even more essential for our nation’s security.

The materials reviewed thus far reveal that bin Laden continued to direct even tactical details of the group’s management and to encourage plotting. The materials show that bin Laden remained focused on inspiring and engineering international terrorism and specifically on attacking the United States. In fact, one previously unreleased video, which we will show momentarily, is a self-styled message to the United States.

Today and in the future, we won’t necessarily be able to provide regular updates on what this operation yielded. As you can understand, much of what we find will remain classified. The war against al Qaeda and its affiliates continues.

I will quickly walk through details from five of the video clips found among the materials at bin Laden’s compound. Because it would be inappropriate to spread the words of terrorists and the propaganda messages, especially Osama bin Laden’s, we’ve removed audio from the footage you’re about to see. The footage has not been altered in any other way. We are releasing this footage to underscore two main points: first, the videos make clear that bin Laden remained active in al Qaeda’s terrorist propaganda operations, especially in shaping his own image; second, as I noted earlier, it is highly unlikely that some of this footage would have resided anywhere else but with bin Laden.

(The 1st video is playing.)

The first video is a complete yet unreleased bin Laden video. He calls it “A Message to the American People” and we believe it was produced sometime between October 9th and November 5th, 2010. We don’t know why the video hasn’t yet appeared.

In this video, you can see that his beard has been dyed black. In this message he repeats his usual themes by condemning U.S. policy and denigrating capitalism.

Let’s go ahead and stop that one and go to the second, please.

Q: There’s a date in there?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I don’t have a date on that. Oh, I’m sorry. Yes. Between October 9th and November 5th, 2010. Yes.

(The 2nd video is playing.)

The second video clip shows him watching his own images on television. Pardon the long lead time, but we’re going to show this is in its entirety. About a minute or a minute and a half, and we don’t have the exact time on it, is focused squarely on the television.

Q: What’s on the screen? Is that various channels?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: It appears to be various channels but it’s unclear if this is –

(Cross talk.)

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Right. It’s different channels, right, but we’re – yes.

Q: It – (inaudible) – he’s getting different channels –

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: We’re unclear if this is live or taped.

Q: Is there a date out there?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Well, you’ll see in a minute that he flips through the various channels but it’s unclear if this is live or taped. Yes.

Q: Is there a date on this?

Q: Do we believe this is from inside the compound where he was taken? Was it just taken from inside the compound or some other location?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: We’re looking into that right now. Okay? But it’s unclear – again, I would reiterate that it’s improbable that this kind of footage would be anywhere but with bin Laden. He jealously guarded his image.

Q: Was this at the compound?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Just a second. You can see that in this video bin Laden has not colored or trimmed his beard, suggesting that this practice is one he reserved for films he planned to distribute. You can also see him gesturing to the person recording him to focus on the image on television of bin Laden firing a rifle. Because we can’t say at this time if the footage he’s watching is taped or live, we can’t determine the date of this video.

Q: That’s him with Zawahiri in the video?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Yes, that was him on screen with Zawahiri.

Q: Did you know, if he’s watching TV or a video, a DVD?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I’m not sure if it’s taped or live – it’s still early.

Q: Do we know which room it is?

Q: Do you know which room in the house this is?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Again, we’re going through the analysis right now.

Q: Do we know if it’s in the compound?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: We’re working through that.

Q: You don’t know.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Right. At this point we’re still discussing where this footage was taken. But, again, I would reiterate, it’s unlikely that this kind of candid footage of Osama bin Laden would be anywhere else than with him.

Q: (Briefer name deleted), if he’s actively changing channels, that indicates that’s a live satellite box. You can’t change channels on a recorded DVD.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: We haven’t reached a final assessment yet, Kim.

Q: Was his beard grey at the time that he was shot? Can you tell us that? Is this fairly contemporary in other words?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: His beard was grey.

Q: Okay.

Q: Was there audio on this one and you guys cut it out of this one too?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: There was audio on this.

(Cross talk.)

Q: Are you able to describe what is on the audio, if not – if you’re not able to give us the words to the propaganda video, is he saying to the guy –

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I don’t have that available.

Q: You don’t. And can I also ask you – I mean, I noticed that he is moving his left arm. And did you not – maybe I don’t remember accurately but did you not think at some point that he had suffered serious injuries and was unable to move his left arm? Do I remember that wrong?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I mean, I’ve seen the speculation about that. I can’t confirm that from the video.

Q: Was any of that equipment recovered by the U.S. during the raid?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: All of this material here seen today was collected during the raid.

Q: Including the television and the satellite box?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Oh, I’m sorry. My apologies. My apologies. I don’t have that information in fact.

Q: Okay.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: All right.

Q: Is at the beginning – (inaudible) – was from – you can’t say that – (inaudible)?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: We’re still going through the analysis of where this actually – the footage was taken.

MR. WHITMAN: So let’s go on with that – (inaudible) – we’ll get the questions then.

(The 3rd video is playing.)

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Let’s go on to the next video. Yes. Okay. Our last three video clips are short and show rehearsal sessions by the al Qaeda leader. Some are clearly outtakes. The first video shows bin Laden practicing in front of an armoire.

Q: His beard is dyed here – (off mic)?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: We believe his beard is dyed.

Q: Do you have a date on this one?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: No date on that one. The next video clip shows the beginning of a video session where either he or the filmmaker missed the cue and fumbled the lighting.

(The 4th video is playing.)

Q: In the last one did he mess up on his Arabic?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I’m not sure what the –

Q: Were these videos shot in the compound? Is the backdrop the same – was in the recording?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Our preliminary analysis suggests that the armoire is an armoire that matches one at the compound. Preliminary analysis.

Q: Clip three?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: First clip. Or, excuse me.

Q: There’s a different background in the second.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: The armoire clip.

Q: The third clip?

Q: Yes. The first of the three short ones.

Q: Yes. Okay.

Q: But the fourth one you’re not sure where that was?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I’m sorry? The fourth –

Q: The fourth clip didn’t have an armoire so we don’t know where that one was taken?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Right. The missed cue. The missed cue. Yes. There’s no armoire in that background.

Q: (Off mic.)

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Right. We’re still assessing that one.

(The 5th video is playing.)

And the third clip (5th video) shows an outtake from a practice session in front of a wrinkled sheet. That was probably used as a temporary backdrop.

Q: And no clues to the times that those were shot.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: We do not know the dates of these clips we just showed you. As Bryan mentioned, the video files are on DVD. They will be provided at the end of the background briefing. I think there’s enough for one per person.

Q: Is that the extent of the clips that will be provided on the DVD, just those five?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Today. They’re yours to use as you like. Just please source them to the U.S. government. Finally, we will hand out with the DVDs an on-the-record comment from Leon Panetta, director of the CIA. And with that, I will open it up to questions.

Kim.

Q: (Inaudible) – a few questions. Has any of the data so far produced actionable intelligence that’s led to targeting in the past week? And what has it told you about Osama bin Laden’s daily life in the compound, the number of kids? Did you put together of kids with some of this to brings us a picture?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: On actionable intelligence I’m not going to comment on that. The important thing, our top priority is of course to identify any threat information and to disseminate that threat information widely within the U.S. government and, as appropriate, with our foreign partners. Of course, another top priority is to exploit the information to attract leads to other members of al Qaeda. But I’m not going to comment on actionable intelligence.

Q: Daily life.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Daily life – we’re still putting together based on this package a sense of what life might have been like, but I don’t have anything firm to characterize that at this time.

Q: (Briefer name deleted), since the al Qaeda statement confirming bin Laden’s death did not include an announcement about who his successor would be, what does that say about the position of the long-known number two, Ayman al-Zawahiri?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Ayman al-Zawahiri is obviously the presumed successor, but there are strong indications that he is not popular within certain circles of the group. So I believe it’s an open question as to who will take over for Osama bin Laden. It is, of course, anathema to al Qaeda to hold free and fair elections. (Laughter.) But if free and fair elections were held, Zawahiri most likely would have a fight on his hands.

Q: If I could follow up. Since you already know that he’s not popular among certain groups, do you know who is emerging as a possible leader among them?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I wouldn’t want to speculate at this time, Mik. I mean, there are a number of senior al Qaeda officials who could in theory step up. But I wouldn’t want to speculate.

Q: Including al-Awlaki?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I think – you know, there are senior terrorist leaders across the al Qaeda organization and its affiliates who could step up. But, again, it would be speculation.

Yes. Spencer.

Q: How often do you have any indication from material you captured about bin Laden being personally in contact with al Qaeda’s affiliates in Yemen or any other affiliates outside of Pakistan?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I’m not going to comment on that today, but suffice it to say the treasure trove of information has provided some golden nuggets of information on communications within the al Qaeda group. And, you know, we hope to get a better sense as exploitation continues.

(A Pentagon fire alarm test occurs with the ringing of a bell over public address system for the entire building for less than 30 seconds.)

Is that the gong?

Q: It’s the lunch bell.

MR. WHITMAN: For those of you who don’t work here regularly, on Saturday this is when we test our fire alarms. (Laughter.)

Q: We’re not done.

MR. WHITMAN: And with that – (laughter) – back to my kids.

Q: Are you old enough to remember the gong show?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Yes. I am in fact. (Laughter.) Should we wait until –

MR. WHITMAN: It could go on a while. He finishes this thing then in another 10 minutes or so we’ll get more dings but we’ll just have time –

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I’m used to dings. Okay. I’m sorry. Let’s start over here then we’ll –

Q: Why did you decide to release these particular ones? How much in terms of time – you know, this is X number of minutes out of – what estimate can you give us so how much video you’ve got – you’ve retrieved if you know yet? And why did you release these particular segments?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: We are still cataloguing the material. It is a large collection. You know, I can’t give a precise quantity of the collection itself and I can’t tell you how many videos like this are contained within the materials. The one thing that in addition to the threat information that we’re focused on from kind of analytical perspective, as we understand that some of this material at the end of the day – you know, there’s quantity and then there’s quality. And we want to make sure that we methodically process this material so that we get the highest quality intelligence from this collection. Yes, sir.

Q: Could you give a couple of examples – when you say he was in control or attempting to assert control of the organization, can you expand on that a little bit, give us an idea of how he was doing that aside from the volume of information that you recovered?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: It’s hard to get specific because, obviously, we’re still fighting al Qaeda. But suffice it to say, this compound in Abbottabad was an active command-and-control center for al Qaeda’s top leader. And it’s clear, as I said in the remarks, that he was not just a strategic thinker for the group. He was active in operational planning and in driving tactical decisions inside al Qaeda.

Barbara.

Q: Two questions: how surprised were you to find out that he was engaged in operational and tactical planning? Was that a surprise? And can you tell us any more of the video of the message to the American people that you put up – even if you can’t show us the audio, was he specifically making threats or in any of this material, were there threats against the United States?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Can you repeat the first question, Barbara?

Q: About the surprise on – were you surprised to find about – because you –

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Osama bin Laden declared war on the United States and is responsible for the deaths of thousands of innocents. It was entirely unsurprising to us and it was always our working assumption that he was involved in aspects of al Qaeda’s operational planning.

Q: And anything more, because you mentioned that it was a message to the American people. I think people are going to be very much wanting to know what was he saying. Can you describe it in any way?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Right. He rehashed many of the themes he’s talked about before, criticizing the United States and, as I said before, denigrating capitalism. We’re obviously reviewing these and other materials, other videos to see if there’s any threat information contained within them. I’m unaware personally that this particular video contains any specific or direct threat information but we’re obviously continuing to analyze that video.

Catherine.

Q: Does the evidence continue to support the idea that he was obsessed with mass casualty attacks and also mass transit and planes? And is there evidence that there really had been a shift in ’06 to the recruitment of Americans?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Yes. I’m not going to be able to characterize the ‘06 scenario, Catherine, but I will tell you that in the materials we’ve seen thus far, he appeared to show continuing interest in transportation and infrastructure targets.

Eli.

Q: Can you talk about any evidence of contacts between Osama bin Laden and Pakistani government officials or other government officials from other Middle Eastern countries, and also members of the bin Laden family? Were there any contacts between bin Laden and the bin Laden family that you found and can talk about that?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I can’t get into the details yet but at this point we have no indication that the Pakistani government was aware that bin Laden was at this compound in Abbottabad. We’re asking some questions and the Pakistanis themselves have said that they’re asking questions of themselves.

The relationship with Pakistan is an important one. It’s also a complicated relationship and it’s important that we find ways in the future to work together, especially on the counterterrorism front. I will note that they have been cooperative in the past on pursuing terrorists inside Pakistan. This is a common fight. Bin Laden is responsible for supporting operations that have killed scores of Pakistanis as well, so there’s a mutual interest in us working together. And we need to find ways to solidify that relationship going forward.

Q: Can you say, though, whether there was evidence –

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: One follow-up, and then –

Q: – Pakistan – Pakistani officials contact with bin Laden? Can you say whether you’ve found evidence of that?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I am unaware at this point of any Pakistani government knowledge of bin Laden’s whereabouts in Abbottabad.

Q: Not just Pakistani government – anybody from Pakistan?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: There – you know, I think another senior U.S. official said earlier this week that there may have been support from within Pakistan, but, you know, that doesn’t necessarily mean the Pakistani government. Okay? So we need to tread carefully here and analyze the information and to see where it takes us. I understand the questions that are being raised and they’re good ones, but again I will repeat at this point I don’t have any indication that the Pakistani government was aware.

Adam.

Q: Does government – wait a minute. Does government include ISI and military?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Pakistani government. Yep.

Adam?

Q: When you say that video was called “Message to America” or “Message to the American People,” is that what it said in Arabic? Is that what you were translating, or is that what you guys are calling it? And also, is there a quote that you can give us from it? I know you explained what’s in it, but is there a quote that you can provide us from that video?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Yeah, I am not an Arabic linguist, to be certain.

Q: (Inaudible.)

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: All right, okay. But, you know, I don’t have that. And in terms of excerpts or transcripts from these videos it is not our intention to release them, as I said. We’re not in the business of spreading the word of al Qaeda and its propaganda.

Yes?

Q: (Inaudible) – video, was it actually saying “Message to the American People”?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: That I don’t know. We need to get the exact translation.

Q: Could we get a translation of that?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: We will attempt to, and I’m sure that some of you know some folks who speak Arabic, okay. All right.

Yes, on the corner?

Q: Elisabeth Bumiller from the New York Times.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Elisabeth, how are you?

Q: Just fine. I just wanted to talk logistically. You say he was very much in command and control of this command and control center. Can you just talk practically how he did that without internet and without phone lines? Apparently he used thumb drives to communicate back and forth. Are you –

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I’m not going to get into specifics, but, you know, it’s been thought for some time, of course, that he would rely heavily on a courier network. That’s precisely what led us to the compound. So it is probable that the couriers at the compound were supporting his communications with other members of al Qaeda.

Q: (Briefer name deleted), can you say what were the – the frequency with which that was happening at this command and control center? How often were messages showing up?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Something we’re obviously looking at, Greg, but I don’t – I can’t characterize frequency at this point.

Mike?

Q: Two questions. One, can you elaborate at all on Zawahiri’s unpopularity within al Qaeda, which you mentioned before? What is it that his fellow al Qaeda members don’t like about him?

And secondly, when you talk about bin Laden as running this as a command and control center, can you give any examples of disrupted plots where you could see bin Laden’s direction involved?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I’m going to have to defer on that. I think we need to analyze the intelligence. I wouldn’t get into that. But on Zawahiri, you know, he – to some members of al Qaeda – is extremely controlling, is a micromanager, and is not especially charismatic.

(Laughter.)

Q: (inaudible) – audio tape of the video of him watching himself, can you tell why he was – what he was saying or why he was watching himself on TV? Is there anything you can glean from that?

Also, of the cell phones that he – that you have, was one of them presumed to be his and were there international calls on that phone?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Yeah, I’m not going to be able to get into that. We’re analyzing these videos right now and haven’t reached any firm conclusions, Jennifer. And in terms of cell phones, I’m just not going to go there.

Yes, in the corner. Yes, sir.

Q: Hi, Kevin Baron, Stars and Stripes. You mentioned targets against infrastructure and things. Were there any targets against U.S troops or the war effort itself? I mean, has there been any – can you characterize any kind of – any kind of backlash or retribution since this raid has happened aimed at the war in Afghanistan.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: That’s a good question, something we’re obviously taking a close look at. And I don’t have, you know, a final answer for you on that, but we are reviewing this information closely for threats to the United States and to our interests, to include American troops.

Obviously al Qaeda has American blood on its hands, and that includes American blood in Afghanistan, and we’re going to, you know, on an around the clock basis mine this information for anything that could suggest that there are continuing threats from bin Laden and his inner circle against our troops.

Yes?

Q: (Inaudible.)

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Yes.

Q: Mike Evans from the Times.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Hello, Mike. How are you?

Q: Hi, (briefer name deleted). Can I just ask, you mentioned about the various measures you used for positive identification of Osama.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Yes.

Q: In the 40 minutes that your guys had there – the SEALs had there, did you have any time before he was actually shot that gave you time to tactically interrogate him or to take a blood sample from him while he was still alive or to photograph his eyes while he was still alive? And was the woman who provided the information that it was Osama bin Laden the woman who was shot in the leg?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I’m not going to get into the specifics of what happened inside the compound that night. This briefing is focused on the intelligence aspects of the operation, but, you know, the assault team, you know, certainly engaged in a hostile environment. This is an al Qaeda compound. And I’ll leave it there.

Bill?

Q: (Briefer name deleted), the information you gained has probably triggered some kind of movement of al Qaeda people around the world. Are you seeing people on the move and can we expect to see any other take-downs in the near future?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: That’d be pure speculation on my part, and I wouldn’t want to get into movements of al Qaeda at this point.

Yes?

Q: (Briefer name deleted), have you asked the ISI – has the U.S. government asked the ISI for names of operatives to compare with names that are seized on this material?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I’m not going to get into discussions with the Pakistanis.

Q: (Inaudible) – hear the audio. Is it different – are these videos different in terms of showing bin Laden’s energy level compared to videos that we’ve seen before?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Oh, gosh. I don’t know how to – I don’t know how to characterize –

(Cross talk.)

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I’ll leave that to you. And I’m not going to characterize the sound. Again, I’m not going to comment on any audio related to these tapes.

Yes, sir?

Q: Can you give us either numbers or at least a better sense of how much material you got – how many thumb drives, discs, computers, whatever you can share?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: There’s actually so much material that we’re still trying to accurately quantify it.

Yes.

(Cross talk.)

Q: Is it fair to say hundreds of items?

Q: Is there anything in the material you found that indicates that he still had his fascination with attacking New York and New York City?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Yeah, I’m not going to get into specific cities or whatnot, but let me just reiterate that what we’ve found so far, he continued to, you know, be strongly interested in plotting attacks against the U.S. homeland.

Yes?

Q: (Inaudible) – the fact that he dyed his beard, what does that say about his vanity or what do you – or what he thought about his public image?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Well, I won’t comment specifically on dying the beard, but this is clearly an al Qaeda leader who was very interested in his own image. And he took very seriously and engaged very heavily in al Qaeda propaganda operations, so, you know, we’ll have to do some more analysis on that, but our take-away is that he jealously guarded his image.

Yes, sir?

Q: Is there – you talk about planning. I think he liked to be into the details. Were there – are there specific things – did he have drawings and plans where he was planning to tell people to do certain things? And off the remote one where he was watching the video, are there other videos that are kind of the Obama’s – Osama’s way of life in a compound? Are there other things you haven’t shown us that show him doing things in the compound?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: We’re going to review the materials and, you know, we’ll be looking for that kind of thing. I’m not in a position to comment on those at this time.

(Cross talk.)

Q: (Inaudible) – about electronic tripwires within the video and audio materials that could cause them to erase or – I mean, are they advanced enough for that or is that something that –

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: You know, I’m not in a position to characterize the security of the videos, but I will say that the U.S. government has excellent technical experts who can exploit this material.

Yes, in the back.

Q: Have the Pakistanis talked to you about questioning the – those noncombatants that were there in the compound? At least trying to get access.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I’m not going to talk about discussions with the Pakistanis, but we obviously have some questions.

Yes?

Q: I have a question about you mentioned the command and control aspect. Is there any indication from what you’ve seen so far that they had a backup for a command and control center if this one in – in this location was compromised in some way that there was a new location that they had picked out?

And also, do you have an estimate in terms of how long the multi-agency task force is going to take to go through this information? Are you planning weeks, months?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: It’s going to take some time. I don’t have an accurate timeline for you and I am unaware of an alternate location for a bin Laden command and control center, but that’s obviously something we’re looking for.

Yes, Rachel?

Q: Can you talk a little more about the courier network? Obviously picking out two of these particular couriers so close to him must have had some kind of operational impact down the network. Can you talk about the impact of that and is the courier network still a focal point? What else have you gleaned from this particular cache of intel?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I’m not going to comment on specifics. We’re obviously interested in any al Qaeda facilitator, to include couriers.

Yes?

Q: What makes it obvious that it was command and control?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: It’s hard for me to describe precisely given the sensitive nature of the intelligence we gleaned, but what we’ve gone through thus far shows that – again, that he was actively involved in plotting operations and in directing the daily operations of the group. He was not simply someone who was penning al Qaeda strategy. He was throwing operational ideas out there and he was also specifically directing other al Qaeda members. Okay?

Yes, who hasn’t asked a question yet? Yes, sir.

Q: Have you found any evidence of linked with al Qaeda and other terrorist outfits in the region like Lashkar-e-Taiba or Jaish-e-Mohammed?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: We’re obviously looking closely for those links. I’m not in a position to say at this time.

Q: And have you also shared any information with India? A moment ago you said you are sharing information with foreign countries. Any information that you have shared with the Indian government so far?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: We have shared information with foreign countries, but I’m not going to say which ones.

Q: Was there any medical equipment like a dialysis machine or anything –

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I’m not going to get into the specifics.

Q: Were there any links to banks?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: We’re obviously looking at al Qaeda financing as an important factor and we’re obviously looking for any insight into how al Qaeda funds its operations.

Yes, Chris?

MR. WHITMAN: As we were trying to – (inaudible) – no reason to get into a frenzy here, but as you know we’re getting to the point where our senior intelligence official is saying that that’s information that’s going to have to come from further assessment and things that we’re not going to be commenting on, so in the last couple of minutes here let’s see if we can’t get to a few of those people who haven’t had an opportunity to ask a question, but we’re going to take maybe four or five more and then bring it to a close, okay?

Q: (Inaudible) – we used to hear that he was sick and getting some doctors to treat him with dialysis and kidney problems and all that. Was it propaganda or do you still believe that somebody was hiding some information about him or it was true? And finally, if Raymond Davis case when it went through there these couple of weeks, did it help or hurt or this operation was underway even during Raymond Davis case?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I’m sorry, the last part?

Q: The Raymond Davis case.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Yes, I’m familiar with that one.

Q: If this operation was still underway, or it – all this happened after Raymond Davis case.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: The intelligence case that led us to this compound, you know, started forming last summer around August, okay?

Q: (Inaudible) – illness?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Yeah, I’m not going to get into those – that speculation. You know, obviously it’s something of interest, but then again our top priority is any threat information and secondly leads to other al Qaeda terrorists. You know, the secondary questions will come later.

Q: Do you still – finally, do you still believe really – (inaudible) – that up until last days of death he was running his al Qaeda mission and nobody in the Pakistani government knew because he was delivering messages and all these messengers and all that?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I think I’ve said what I’ve said on Pakistan.

Chris?

Q: For years it was said that bin Laden was hiding in the tribal regions of Pakistan or Afghanistan and that, you know, A.Q. core wasn’t necessarily operational – that it had been denigrated. So – I mean, how is this not somewhat of an intelligence failure that, you know, you find out that bin Laden was operational and was command and control?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: If anyone defines this as an intelligence failure, I’ll be happy to have that argument. This is the greatest intelligence success perhaps of a generation. This is a hunt for a top al Qaeda leader that has spanned nearly 10 years. And this government, our intelligence community, and counterterrorism agencies have expended relentless effort to pursue leads on Osama bin Laden. This has always been a top priority. And this is a classic and historic intelligence success.

Intelligence cases aren’t built overnight. And it took a great deal of precision work, and persistence and perseverance on the part of collectors and analysts over many years to piece together the intelligence case that led to the raid. This was a circumstantial case up until the very end – a very strong one. But the intelligence picture didn’t become clear, obviously, until last Sunday.

Yes?

Q: Can you tell us what the overall impact has been on al Qaeda? Are they knocked back on their heels? Are they in disarray? What has been the read so far?

Q: And is Awlaki a possible successor as part of that?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I think we addressed Awlaki before, but –

(Cross talk.)

Q: — to bin Laden? Is that shown in the records?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I can’t say specifically at this point whether that’s in the records, per se, or in the documents, but, you know, it would be highly unsurprising if bin Laden didn’t know about Anwar al-Awlaki.

Q: Right, but back to the overall impact, are they really set back on their heels? Are they in disarray? What’s the take so far?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: They’ve been on their heels for some time, Mik. I mean, they’ve suffered extensive damage, and the fact that bin Laden is off the streets only exacerbates that damage for them, and that’s good for the United States and our allies.

Q: So can al Qaeda – (Briefer name deleted), can al Qaeda survive?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: I guess we’ll go to maybe two or three more questions. Yes, in the back. Yes?

Q: Did you – (inaudible) – the materials from the compound which you – only you, the people were left in the compound. Is it a choice – a technical choice? I mean, what happened in the immediate aftermath of the raid to all those people who still alive in the compound?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Repeat that, sir. I’m sorry.

Q: I’m sorry. You choose to pick up all the technical materials that was n the compound for intelligence purposes, but you left all the people who were still alive in the compound. You didn’t want to bring people with you to interrogate them. Why? Is it a technical choice?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: There was one objective for this mission and it was to find Osama bin Laden. And if that – and if he wasn’t there to get out.

(Cross talk.)

MR. WHITMAN: Come on, guys. Come on. Everybody settle down. We’re going to take one more question. It needs to be a question that really can help all of you in this room. (Laughter.) Some insight that hasn’t been asked yet and not just kind of another way of asking the same question that our senior defense official – our senior intelligence official has either answered or declined to answer. Who has that probing, final question.

Q: We all do.

MR. WHITMAN: All right, so we’re going to do two. We’re going to – we’re going to do Bill and we’re going to do Barbara and close down.

Q: You’ve said frequently that al Qaeda was trying to get weapons of mass destruction. The U.S. government has said that. Is there any indication from what you found that al Qaeda was pursuing nuclear, biological, chemical, radiological –

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: That’s obviously a top priority as we exploit these materials. You know, I don’t have anything on that to report today, but we’re focused squarely on that because obviously that would fall squarely into the threat category.

Barbara?

Q: My probing and insightful question –

MR. WHITMAN: It has to be good because you’ve got the last one.

Q: It might be. With respect, why do you have someone in this room taking photographs of us – this lady over here in black. Why was she standing up taking pictures of us?

MR. WHITMAN: That was your question? Those photographs are for the agency and for the official. They’re not public records, so don’t worry about that. So we won’t let that be the last question since it wasn’t real probing, but we will –

(Cross talk.)

MR. WHITMAN: You didn’t get a question in? You got a question in. Let’s go.

Q: Did you glean anything about the relationship between al Qaeda and the Taliban and did you find any American contacts in those phones?

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: It’s a good question and one that we’re trying to seek answers on one way or the other.

MR. WHITMAN: Ladies and gentlemen, I want to think you again. No. I want to thank you again for showing up today.

SR. INTEL OFFICIAL: Thank you. I appreciate it.

[At the conclusion of the briefing, DVDs with the five video segments were handed out to the press corps along with the following ON THE RECORD statement from Leon E. Panetta, Director of the Central Intelligence Agency:

“This mission goes to the heart of what the CIA is all about: protecting America and building a better world for our children. It demonstrates the perseverance, skill, and sheer courage of the men and women who stand watch for our nation, day in and day out. And it is a model of seamless collaboration, both within the Intelligence Community and with the US military. The material found in the compound only further confirms how important it was to go after Bin Laden. Since 9/11, this is what the American people have expected of us. In this critical operation, we delivered“

spionage

Killing Osama: Seeing Through Walls with VisiBuilding

onlineredaktion – The recent Osama bin Laden operation needed to model, and understand the internal structure of Osama’s compound before the kill operation began. The Whitehouse has already said that the seal team practiced on a mock up of the compound before the actual mission began.

Three Special Operations sites have training mock-ups with helicopter support for killing. One mock-up of the bin Laden compound was constructed for training at a US east coast facility. See US Training Bases for Special Operations Killing

How did they know the internal lay out of the compound to build the practice model before the team went in? It’s not likely that US operatives were invited in to take pre-mission planning photos.

This stray bit of information says that it is likely that the DARPA VisiBuilding program or some variant of it, is now both operational and field-tested. It is a high-resolution ultra wideband “radar” in the 1.85–6 GHz range and includes the necessary processing software application for thru the wall imaging and surveillance.

One such DARPA program is VisiBuilding – an urban sensing and planning tool capable to determe building layouts, find anomalous quantities of materials and locate people within the building. To achieve these goals, VisiBuilding could exploit phenomenology of signal penetration into buildings, measuring propagation and backscatter off urban structures. The system will utilize various means to position and monitor sensors in the vicinity of the objective, gaining an insight about the building, developing hypothesized ‚best guess‘ model of theinternal layout of rooms, walls and utility infrastructure that best fits the available sensor data.

Another program recently launched at DARPA is ‚Harnessing Infrastructure for Building Reconnaissance‘ (HIBR), a capability that translates VisiBuilding into practical terms: DARPA believes that ‚opportunistic sensing‘ could be a practical approach to ‚guess‘ such interior structure, using exterior observations. Information could be gathered from geometrical and stimulus response (for example, seismic or acoustic vibrations performing a sonar effect). Such stimulus could uncover minute details that, when processed, could provdie tactically useful information, for example, ad-hoc mapping of structural, electrical, plumbing, and ventilation systems.

SATIRE

Herbert Rechtslastig schreibt an Bundeskanzlerin Angela Merkel: Große Freude über Tötung bin Ladens war goldrichtig

Dr. Alexander von Paleske — Folgende Mail landete heute in meiner Mailbox

7.5. 2011
Herbert Rechtslastig
Oswald Spengler Gedächtnisplatz 33
Brandenburg

An
Frau Bundeskanzlerin
Angela Merkel
Im Regierungsviertel 1
Berlin

Werte Frau Bundeskanzlerin,

darf ich mich zunächst vorstellen: Ich bin NPD-Mitglied und im öffentlichen Dienst beschäftigt.

Ich möchte meiner Empörung Ausdruck geben, daß Sie offenbar Abstriche machten von Ihrer grenzenlosen Freude darüber, dass dieser internationale Völkerschädling Osama Bin Laden durch einen gezielten Todesschuss eliminiert wurde.

Ich hatte mich am Montag, wie große Teile der Deutschen Volksgemeinschaft, nicht nur klammheimlich sondern offen gefreut, dass es diesen Kerl nun endlich erwischt hat.

Und ich war zum ersten Mal seit Ihrem Amtsantritt stolz auf Sie, Deutsche Bundeskanzlerin, die aus ihrem (rechten) Herzen keine Mördergrube gemacht, und stattdessen offen mitgefeiert hat.

Linkes Gejaule unbeachtlich
Natürlich haben erwartungsgemäß linke Spinner, Pfaffen und sogenannte Liberale gleich aufgejault, als bekannt wurde, dass eine Verhaftung bin Ladens zu keinem Zeitpunkt geplant war.

Ordentliche Gerichtsverfahren sollten aber nur denjenigen zustehen, die sich nicht als große Staatsfeinde entpuppen. Die anderen gehören auf eine Todesliste, die abgearbeitet werden muss, Rechtsstaat hin Völkerrecht her. Das praktizieren die USA in Afghanistan mit der „Task Force 373“ tag-täglich, wie sich aus Dokumenten ergibt, die Wikileaks vor einem Jahr veröffentlichte.

Zwar heißt es in der Bibel: „Du sollst nicht töten“, aber genau so heißt es dort auch „Aug um Auge Zahn um Zahn“.
Bei derartig widersprüchlichen Textstellen sollten wir von Fall zu Fall entscheiden, welcher wir folgen wollen.

Wir Rechtslastige halten ohnehin nichts von diesem Rechtsstaats-Quark, jedenfalls dann nicht, wenn er in Konflikt mit den wahren Interessen einer Volksgemeinschaft gerät.

Todesschuss-Entscheidung war richtig
Die Todesschussentscheidung kann man auf Seiten der USA sehr gut nachvollziehen, ja begrüssen!. Denn bin Laden hätte sonst nach Guantanamo verfrachtet werden müssen, und dies wäre dann zu einem Ausflugsziel, und zu einer Pilgerstätte für Islamisten aus der ganzen Welt geworden.

Ganz abgesehen von dem Gerichtsverfahren, das in einem Stammheim-ähnlichen Bunker hätte stattfinden müssen, und das bin Laden zur Bühne für seine Terrorismus-Ideologie genutzt hätte.
Außerdem hätte die Gefahr bestanden, dass diese Terrorgruppe, ähnlich wie diese RAF in Deutschland seinerzeit, nun US Staatsbürger als Geiseln genommen hätte, um die Freilassung bin Ladens zu erpressen, was den US Präsidenten in eine außerordentlich schwierige Lage gebracht hätte.

So besteht zwar die Gefahr, dass es zu Tötungen von US-Bürgern als Racheakt kommen kann, aber das zieht keine weiteren politischen Konsequenzen nach sich.

Keine Abstriche
Ich denke, Frau Bundeskanzlerin, Sie sollten in einer Stellungnahme noch einmal klarstellen, dass Sie keineswegs Abstriche von Ihrer spontanen Freudenkundgebung machen.

Und diesem Gnomen von Staatsbürger, der es wagte, Sie wegen Ihrer Äußerung anzuzeigen, sollten Sie sofort mit einer Gegenanzeige wegen Beleidigung antworten.

Ganz untertänigst

Herbert Rechtslastig

Keine Satire
Exekution Osama bin Ladens: Ein schwerer Verstoß gegen den Rechtsstaat
Verfrühter Jubel nach der Tötung Osama bin Ladens

Mehr von Herbert Rechtslastig
Herbert Rechtslastig schreibt an BILD-Chefredakteur Kai Diekmann
Herbert Rechtslastig schreibt an Thilo Sarrazin
Herbert Rechtslastig an ZDF und an Reporterin Katrin Müller-Hohenstein
Herbert Rechtslastig schreibt an SPD-Andrea Nahles

Unkategorisiert

Former US Congressman Brokers Arms Deals between Ex-Soviet Arms Dealers and Middle Eastern Governments

Historycommons – Former Republican Congressman Curt Weldon, newly hired by private US defense consulting firm Defense Solutions, begins helping that firm broker deals between Russian and Ukranian arms dealers and the governments of Iraq and Libya.

The US has banned its citizens from participating in any such deals with Libya. Weldon visits Libya to discuss a possible military arms deal, and, in the company of Defense Solutions CEO Timothy Ringgold and another Defense Solutions representative, travels to Moscow to discuss working with Russia’s weapons-export agency on arms sales to the Middle East. Defense Solutions is one of a number of American and other firms trying to profit from the growing pipeline between weapons suppliers of the former Soviet bloc and Afghanistan and various countries in the Middle East.

According to a letter from Ringgold to his colleagues, Russia finds that an “intermediary” like Weldon, with his political and defense industry connections, helps it move products in Iraq. “They [the Russians] have not spoken with any American company that can offer the quid pro quo that we can or that has the connections in Russia that we have,” Ringgold wrote. Wired News will note that, a few years ago, any American firm trying to broker arms deals involving a sponsor of terrorism such as Libya would have run afoul of Congressional oversight committees.

Now, though, the Bush administration is so eager to outfit countries like Afghanistan and Iraq with modern weapons that it allows, at least informally, such contacts. Defense Solutions has hired a number of influential Washington advisers such as Weldon, a former member of the House Armed Services Committee, and retired General Barry McCaffrey.

Weldon speaks enthusiastically about setting up a “front company” to work with Rosoboronexport, a Russian arms agency, in selling arms to Middle Eastern nations. He also claims that the director of Rosoboronexport has approached him to work with “an American company that would act as a front for weapons these nations want to buy,” and calls the proposal an “unbelievable offer.” Rosoboronexport is barred from doing business with the US government after violating the Iran and Syria Nonproliferation Act, and Libya is on the State Department’s arms embargo list.

Rachel Stohl, an expert on the international arms trade and a senior analyst at the Center for Defense Information, will say that many expert observers believe that Defense Solutions and other defense contractors may be engaging in illegal and corrupt activities, such as selling shoddy, substandard arms and equipment, or in some cases making deals for arms that are never delivered. Ringgold will deny having signed any deals with Libya, but admits he is interested in doing business there. He will also confirm Weldon’s trip to Libya on behalf of the firm, and will openly admit trying to cut deals with Rosoboronexport.

Krieg

Pakistani security officer sold Photos of dead bodies after raid in Abbottabad

onlineredaktion – Photographs acquired by Reuters and taken about an hour after the U.S. assault on Osama bin Laden’s compound in Abbottabad in Pakistan show three dead men lying in pools of blood, but no weapons.

The photos, taken by a Pakistani security official who entered the compound after the early morning raid on Monday, show two men dressed in traditional Pakistani garb and one in a t-shirt, with blood streaming from their ears, noses and mouths.


The official, who wished to remain anonymous, sold the pictures to Reuters.

None of the men looked like bin Laden. President Barack Obama decided not to release photos of his body because it could have incited violence and used as an al Qaeda propaganda tool, the White House said on Wednesday.

Based on the time-stamps on the pictures, the earliest one was dated May 2, 2:30 a.m., approximately an hour after the completion of the raid in which bin Laden was killed.

Other photos, taken hours later at between 5:21 a.m. and 6:43 a.m. show the outside of the trash-strewn compound and the wreckage of the helicopter the United States abandoned. The tail assembly is unusual, and could indicate some kind of previously unknown stealth capability.

Reuters is confident of the authenticity of the purchased images because details in the photos appear to show a wrecked helicopter from the assault, matching details from photos taken independently on Monday.

Reuters published then withdrew the top three photos below as part of a series of eight.

Krieg

Killing Bin Laden: Seal Team 6

Globalsecurity – The Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU), previously identified as Mobility 6 (MOB Six), Seal Team 6 (SEAL Team Six), and Marine Research Facility (MARESFAC), is based in Dam Neck, Virginia. DEVGRU is responsible for US counter-terrorist operations, primarily in the maritime environment. The DEVGRU has as a primary function intelligence, counter-intelligence, investigative, and national security work, and the provisions of Chapter 71 of Title 5 of the United States Code cannot be applied to this organization in a manner consistent with national security requirements and considerations.

Training for SEAL Team Six was conducted throughout the United States and abroad, both on military and civilian facilities. Exchange programs and joint training were expanded with the more experienced international teams such as Germany’s GSG-9, Great Britain’s Special Boat Squadrons (SBS), and France’s combat divers. In all cases, emphasis was placed on realism in training, in accordance with the „Train as you Fight, Fight as you Train“ philosophy popular amongst most of the world’s leading special operations and counter-terrorism units.

SEAL Team Six participated in a number of operations, both overt and covert, throughout the 1980’s before being revamped and renamed. The reasons for these transformations were vague. However the primary factor cited has often been the need for the unit to evolve out of a poor reputation of the group within the Navy. SEAL Team Six was subsequently renamed as the Marine Research Facility (MARESFAC), and then Naval Special Warfare Development Group (DEVGRU).

The origins of DEVGRU and its predecessor organizations can be traced to the aftermath of the failed 1980 attempted to rescue American hostages at the Iranian Embassy as part of Operation Eagle Claw/Operation Evening Light. Prior to that operation, the SEALs had already begun counter-terrorism training. All 12 platoons in SEAL Team One on the West Coast had completed this training prior to the hostage rescue attempt.

On the East Coast, however, elements of the SEAL Team Two had taken the issue one step father. They had formed a dedicated 2-platoon group known as MOB Six (short for Mobility Six) in anticipation of a maritime scenario requiring a counter-terrorism response, and had subsequently begun training to that end. This included the development of advanced tactics such as fast roping.

Yet, as was the case with the US Army’s initial counter-terrorism unit, Blue Light, and the activation of Delta Force, only one group was needed and could be recognized as official. With the formal activation of SEAL Team Six (a name selected primarily to confuse Soviet intelligence as to the number of SEAL Teams in operation) in October 1980, MOB Six was demobilized. A large number of members, however, including the former MOB Six commander, were asked to join the fledgling group. With prior experience from these operators, aggressive leadership, and an accelerated training program, SEAL Team Six was declared mission-ready just 6 months later.

During the 1980s, SEAL Team Six participated in a number of operations. SEAL Team Six members were responsible for the rescue and evacuation of Governor Sir Paul Scoon from Grenada during Operation Urgent Fury. Four SEALs were lost to drowning during helicopter insertion offshore. Other aspect of the operation included the securing of a radio transmitter which resulted in heavy contact with Grenadian forces. Six deployed to the site of the Achille Lauro hijacking in anticipation of a possible assault on the vessel in 1985. The unit also took part in Operation Just Cause in 1989 as part of Task Force White, which included SEAL Team Two. Their primary task, along with Delta Force, was the location and securing of Panamanian strongman Manuel Noriega.

A great deal of controversy was also generated in the 1980s, due to charges of misappropriation of funds and equipment by team members, as well as the conviction of unit founder Commander Richard Marcinko on charges of conspiracy, conflict of interest, making false claims against the government, and bribery. He was sentenced to nearly 2 years in a Federal penitentiary in addition to being forced to pay a $10,000 fine. Despite this turn of events, Marcinko was still revered in some SEAL circles as an almost mythical figure. This status was attained, in no small part, to a best selling-book series, which centered on fictional maritime special operations and counter-terrorism.

The unit was also active during the 1990s. The unit again operated in Panama as part of a secret operation code-named „Pokeweed,“ which had as its goal the apprehension of Colombian drug lord Pablo Escobar. The mission was unsuccessful due to poor pre-assault intelligence. By some accounts, the unit was deployed from the US aircraft carrier USS Forrestal offshore, although other sources dispute this claim (the ship’s summary history discloses no operations in Panamanian waters during 1990). In 1991, SEAL Team Six reportedly recovered Haitian President Jean Bertrand Aristide under cover of darkness following the coup that deposed him. Later in 1991, the unit was also part of contingency planning for the shooting down Saddam Hussein’s personal helicopter with Stinger missiles, although this operation never got beyond the planning stage. The unit reportedly deployed to Atlanta, Georgia as part of a large US counter-terrorist contingency plan for the 1996 Summer Olympics. Whatever the case, the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Hostage Rescue Team (HRT) is generally responsible for domestic counter-terrorism and was the primary response unit for the event.

By 2000, the US government described DEVGRU as having been established to oversee development of naval special warfare tactics, equipment, and techniques. This, of course, was only partly true. While the unit was under the direct command of Naval Special Warfare Command, however it was also a component of Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) at Pope Air Force Base, North Carolina). JSOC served as a joint command for other counter-terrorism units as well, such as the Army’s Delta Force and the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment (SOAR). It was believed that DEVGRU maintained its own helicopter support unit (possibly 2 squadrons with 18 HH-60H Seahawks for SEAL transport and support), but that the unit trained frequently with the 160th SOAR, especially in support of ship assaults, which frequently made use of the small MH-6 „Little Bird“ type helicopters, operated exclusively by the 160th SOAR.

Organization and manpower of DEVGRU was a classified, and could only be guessed at. It was estimated that DEVGRU numbered approximately 200 operators, broken down by teams, much like the British SAS and Delta Force. It had been reported that there were 4 such teams within the group, assault units Red, Blue, Gold, and a special boat unit, Gray. The missions of these units were, again, a cause for speculation, however it was logical that they were specialized amongst themselves, perhaps along the lines of the SAS: Mountain, Mobility, Boat, and HALO troops (within a single Squadron). It was also possible that these units might have focused on specific target types instead, such as shipping, oil rigs, and structures, (although this scenario seems less likely due to the obvious need for all members of DEVGRU to be current and proficient should a large scale operation arise).

There was also an administrative and testing section, which numbered approximately 300 personnel. These individuals were responsible for the actual testing and development of new NAVSPECWAR equipment, including weapons.

It has been reported that DEVGRU was one of only a handful of US military units authorized to conduct preemptive actions against terrorists and terrorist facilities (NOTE: Red Cell once shared this charter, although it was never put into practice before the unit was disbanded). DEVGRU operators reportedly fire an average of 2,500 to 3,000 rounds per week in training.

Wirtschaftskrise

Deutsche Bank: „Raubtierkapitalismus“, Staatsknete und rechtswidriges Vorgehen als Geschäftsidee?

Dr. Alexander von Paleske — 4.5. 2011 — Die Deutsche Bank macht erneut negative Schlagzeilen, diesmal in den USA, und dort auch nicht zum ersten Mal.

Angesichts der bekannt gewordenen Geschäftspraktiken muß befürchtet werden: nicht das letzte Mal..


Deutsche Bank, Wall Street, New York …negative Schlagzeilen. Screenshots: Dr. v. Paleske

Forderung: 400 Millionen
Diesmal haben staatliche Behörden in den USA die Deutsche Bank auf Zahlung von fast 400 Millionen US Dollar verklagt es geht um rund 39.000 Kredite mit einem Volumen von über fünf Milliarden Dollar.

Allerdings wirft das nun laufende Verfahren ein bezeichnendes Schlaglicht darauf, mit welchen brutalen und betrügerischen Methoden offenbar die Deutsche Bank, bzw. eine ihrer Töchter operierte.

Gleichzeitig klingt es nun wie Hohn, was der Deutsche Bank-Chef Josef Ackermann im Zuge der Finanzkrise 2008 erklärte: Dass er sich schämen würde, Finanzhilfen vom Staat zu erbitten.

Immer deutlicher schält sich nämlich heraus: Die Deutsche Bank hat Geschäfte betrieben, teils offenbar auf krumme Art, deren Verluste schließlich die Steuerzahler in den USA und Deutschland zu tragen hatten, indirekte Staatshilfen sozusagen.

Dubiose Geschäfte der Deutschen Bank in den USA
Starten wir also mit dem jetzt laufenden Verfahren in den USA:
Die Deutsche Bank übernahm im Jahre 2007 die Hypothekenbank Mortgage IT. Diese Hypothekenbank vergab Hypothekenkredite zunächst an einigermaßen solvente Kunden, später spielte deren Solvenz offenbar gar keine Rolle mehr. Man könnte das auch so umschreiben:

Du bist ein erwachsener Mensch?

Du brauchst ein Haus?

Kein Geld?

Macht nix, Du kriegst auf jeden Fall eine Hypothek von uns.

Denn die Hypothekenbank hatte es geschafft, sich mit offenbar falschen Angaben in ein Regierungsprogramm zu schleichen, das bei Insolvenz der Kunden einsprang.

Dieses Programm setzte selbstverständlich voraus, dass die Hypothekenbank mit der nötigen Sorgfalt prüfte, ob der Kunde überhaupt in der Lage war, die Kreditzinsen zu bedienen. Das war bei der Deutsche Bank Tochter angeblich nicht der Fall.

Insgesamt musste der Staat nun mit 386 Millionen US Dollar für notleidende Kredite einspringen. Und die will er sich von der Deutschen Bank zurückholen.

Was gestern seitens der staatlichen Vertreter der Deutschen Bank vorgeworfen wurde, war alles andere als schmeichelhaft: Betrug, Vorspiegelung falscher Tatsachen, Erschleichen von staatlichen Garantien, Rücksichtslosigkeit.

Fort mit Euch!
Aber das war noch nicht alles, denn die Deutsche Bank, bzw. deren Tochter, hat Hypotheken von anderen Instituten aufgekauft, und, wenn die Kredite notleidend wurde, in angeblich rücksichtsloser Art und Weise die Hauseigentümer auf die Strasse gesetzt.

Wiederholungstäter
Die ist jedoch keineswegs der erste Skandal, in den die Deutsche Bank in den USA verwickelt ist.
Bereits im Jahre 2006 hatten wir berichtet, wie die Bank im Jahre 2001 über ihre Filiale in Toronto mit einem kriminellen Stockbroker einen Schaden in den USA in Höhe von 350 Millionen US Dollar verursacht hatte, und trotz des erdrückenden Beweismaterials sich fast bis zum Schluss, als die Sache schließlich vor Gericht ging, geweigert hatte, Schadenersatz zu leisten.
Involviert in diesen Skandal war unter anderem auch der Großbetrüger und Waffenhändler Adnan Khashoggi.

Dann die Ermittlungen gegen die Deutsche Bank Tochter Bankers Trust im Jahre 2001

Auch Prospektbetrug
Im August 2008, also noch vor der globalen Finanzkrise, schlug die Staatsanwaltschaft in New York erneut zu, und beschuldigte die Deutsche Bank, mit sogenannten Auction Rate Securities (ARS) Prospektbetrug begangen zu haben. Die Deutsche Bank konnte sich damals nur durch eine Strafzahlung in Millionenhöhe aus der Affäre ziehen, wir berichteten darüber.
.
Eine Bank als Graf Steuerspar
Dann folgte der Steuersparmodell-Skandal der dem US-Staat Steuermindereinnahmen in Milliardenhöhe beschert hatte – illegal versteht sich. Im Dezember 2010 zahlte die Deutsche Bank unter Anerkennung kriminellen Verhaltens 550 Millionen US Dollar um sich weitere Ermittlungen und eine Verurteilung vom Hals zu halten.

Affäre AIG
Schließlich die Affäre American International Group (AIG), einstmals größter Versicherer der Welt, der aber nach der Weltfinanzkrise vor dem Zusammenbruch stand.

Der Grund: Credit Default Swaps (CDS), Versicherungen auf Kredite die mit der Krise und der Fäulnis bzw. der Abnahme der Kreditwürdigkeit bzw. der Zunahme des Risikos nun Zahlungspflichten seitens der AIG auslösten. Zahlungspflichten, welche die Finanzkraft von AIG bei weitem überstiegen und deshalb unter normalen Umstanden zu dem geführt hätten, was früher als Bankrott, modern aber als Insolvenz bezeichnet wird.

Ein zweiter Fall Lehman Brothers ………das durfte es auf gar keinen Fall geben, also setzte die US-Regierung die Finanzpumpe in Bewegung, und wurde de facto 80%iger Eigentümer von AIG.

180 Milliarden US Dollar flossen in Richtung AIG und wurden gleich weitergeleitet, einen Riesenbatzen erhielt vermutlich auch die Deutsche Bank, die zu den Hauptgläubigern gehörte. Motto: Mit US-Staatsgeldern aus der Krise.
Jetzt versteht man die Worte Ackermanns um einiges besser.

Wie viel genau und an wen floss, will AIG-Mann und US-Notenbank-Vize Donald Kohn nicht sagen – noch nicht – aber die US-Senatoren und Abgeordneten drängen.
Wenn herauskommt, wie viel die Deutsche Bank eingesackt hat, dann könnte in den USA ein Wutgeheul losgehen, denn dieser Bank will in den USA nun wirklich niemand Geld zuschieben.

Ein Zittern in Europas Banken nahm deshalb die Wirtschaftswoche im März wahr.
Zu den Swaps und ihr Beitrag zur Weltfinanzkrise siehe hier.

Zu Hause nicht besser
Aber nicht nur in den USA, auch in Europa und insbesondere in Deutschland fiel die Deutsche Bank mit unerquicklichen Geschäftspraktiken auf, die entweder gegen geltendes Recht verstießen oder sich hart am Rande der Legalität bewegten. Von Moral ganz zu schweigen.

Die Deutsche Bank schaffte es, Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDO) – Schrottpapiere in großem Umfang Kunden anzudrehen, und zwar zu einem Zeitpunkt, als bankenintern diese Papiere bereits als Wertpapiermüll bezeichnet wurden.

Zu den Kunden gehörten u.a. die damals staatseigene Industriekreditbank (IKB), die österreichischen Bundesbahnen (ÖBB) und an die BayernLB-Skandaltochter Hypo-Alpe Adria.

Weiter ging es mit unzähligen Zinsswap-Geschäften, die finanziell hochverschuldeten Kommunen angedient wurden, offenbar getreu dem Motto: „Kleinvieh macht auch Mist“. Zinsswaps, welche die betroffenen Gemeinden und Städte überwiegend noch tiefer in den Schuldensumpf trieben, wir berichteten darüber.

Jetzt hat der Bundesgerichtshof sich erstmalig und letztinstanzlich mit einem derartigen Geschäft befasst, und dabei der Deutschen Bank die Leviten gelesen. Auch die (leere) Drohung des Rechtsvertreters der Deutschen Bank, ein negativer Ausgang würde eine neue Finanzkrise herbeiführen, konnte das Gericht nicht beeindrucken.

Fragen an Ackermann
Wenn also Deutsche Bank Chef Josef Ackermann wieder großartige Betriebsergebnisse ankündigt, dann sollten sich die Fragen stellen: Wie viele von diesen Geschäften waren an der Legalität vorbei? Wie viele Geschäfte, obgleich legal, führten zu Verlusten, die letztlich vom Steuerzahler zu bezahlen sind? Unangenehme Fragen an den Tausendsassa und Angela Merkel-Freund cum Berater.

Nachtrag
Heute abend (4.5.) wurde bekannt, dass eine weitere Klage in den USA gegen die Deutsche Bank eingereicht wurde, diesmal seitens der Staatsanwaltschaft in Los Angeles mit folgenden Vorwürfen:.

– Die Bank habe sich 2200 Häuser nach Zwangsvollstreckungen unter den Nagel gerissen und in der Folgezeit nichts zu deren Unterhaltung bzw. Instandhaltung getan:

– dadurch die systematische Verslumung ganzer Stadtbezirke verursacht.

– Illegal Hauseigentümer zu vertreiben, die mit Zahlungen vorübergehend in Verzug geraten waren

– Wohnungen in baufälligen Häusern zu vermieten.

Zum Verkauf von Anlageschrott
Deutsche Bank und CDO’s oder: wie man Schrottpapiere losschlägt und dabei noch einen Riesen-Reibach macht. Drei Beispiele

Zinsswaps
Deutsche Bank, Anlagemüll und die Zinswetten mit hochverschuldeten Kommunen
Deutschbanker Ackermann stoppt Swapserei mit Kommunen
linkDeutsche Bank-Swapsen in Würzburg oder: Wir zocken – Ihr zahlt
linkNeues aus der Swap-und Meinl-Welt
Die Artisten in den Finanz- und Wirtschaftsministerien: ratlos und planlos

Zur Swapserei
linkDefault Swaps oder: Die nächste Weltfinanzkrise rückt näher
linkWeltfinanzkrise – Staatsbank KfW zockte bei Swaps kräftig mit
linkDie Finanzkrise, Casinos und Zockerchips
linkDie Krise am Finanzmarkt und Swaps

Zur Finanzaufsicht BaFin
Finanzkrise, Bankenkrisen, Kleinanlegerbetrug – Hat die Finanzaufsicht BaFin versagt?
Finanzgauner, ihre Opfer und die BaFin
linkDie Grossbanken und der Staatsanwalt

Mehr zur Deutschen Bank
linkProstituierte, Parties, Pferderennen, Penny Stocks, Deutsche Bank in Toronto und Khashoggi
linkDie Grossbanken und der Staatsanwalt
Söldner, Gauner, Waffen und Rohstoffe

terror

Exekution Osama bin Ladens: Ein schwerer Verstoß gegen den Rechtsstaat

Dr. Alexander von Paleske — 3.5. 2011 — War die Kommandoaktion eine „kill mission“ fragt die FAZ heute, eine höchst rhetorische Frage, die längst beantwortet ist.

Eine Verhaftung Osama bin Ladens war offensichtlich nicht geplant, auch wenn die Obama Administration jetzt versucht sich rauszureden. Dies bestätigt auch der gewöhnlich gut unterrichtete US-Sender CNN unter Bezugnahme auf ungenannte Quellen.

Dafür spricht auch die gezielte Tötung durch Kopfschuss, dafür spricht auch, daß die See-Bestattung der Leiche offenbar im Voraus geplant war.

Notwendige Klarstellung
Um es vorab klarzustellen: Osama bin Laden ist sicherlich ein Schwerverbrecher gewesen, und ich hegte und hege keinerlei Sympathie für ihn.
Aber auch Schwerverbrecher, wie auch die vor dem Nürnberger Tribunal seinerzeit angeklagten Naziverbrecher, und Adolf Eichmann später, haben einen Anspruch auf ein ordentliches Gerichtsverfahren, gerade auch das gehört zu den Werten, auf die US-Präsident Obama in seiner Ansprache gestern Bezug nahm.

Und so hat mit seinem Tode Osama bin Laden den USA noch einen Schlag versetzt, einen Schlag gegen ihre Prinzipienfestigkeit, am Rechtsstaatsprinzip ohne wenn und aber festzuhalten.

Despoten kümmern sich nicht um solche Prinzipien, Israel kümmert sich nicht darum, wenn es sich um Palästinenser handelt, wie die israelische Journalistin Anat Kam aufdeckte, die deswegen in einem Geheimprozess in Israel vor Gericht steht.

Solche Prinzipienfestigkeit unterscheidet eben gerade Demokratien von Diktaturen oder aggressiven Staaten.

Hinzu kommt, worauf der Altbundeskanzler Helmut Schmidt gestern hingewiesen hat, die Verletzung der Souveränität Pakistans, also ein Verstoß gegen das Völkerrecht.

Keine Rechtfertigung
Daher erhebt sich die Frage, welche Gründe Obama und die US Administration zu diesem Vorgehen bewogen haben.

Dazu hat sich bereits der Al Qaida Experte Peter Bergen in seinem Buch „The longest warim Januar 2011 wie folgt geäußert (aao S. 348):

A U.S. official involved in the hunt for bin Laden said, that if the al-Qaeda’s leader were captured, it would likely produce a subsequent significant problem – Americans being taken hostage with the aim to free him. And in the unlikely event that bin Laden ever was put on trial, he would inevitably try to turn the proceedings into a platform for his views.

So dachten offenbar auch Obama und seine Administration, und warfen, um diesen Schwierigkeiten aus dem Wege zu gehen, eines der elementarsten Rechtsstaats-Prinzipien über Bord.

God bless America

Verfrühter Jubel nach der Tötung Osama bin Ladens
Investigative israelische Journalistin Anat Kam schuldig gesprochen

Israel: Journalismus, illegale Staatsgeheimnisse und Todesschwadronen

deutschland

Kurskorrektur in deutscher Außenpolitik: Krethi und Plethi bleiben draußen

Luz María De Stéfano Zuloaga de Lenkait – Der SZ-Redaktion ist eine elementare Frage in Bezug zu Libyen entgangen: Wer hätte Interesse, das Land so sehr zu destabilisieren, dass Chaos und mörderische Gewalt plötzlich in offenbaren Vordergrund stehen und westliche Länder dazu veranlassen, unter dem Vorwand „humanitäre Intervention“ ihre eigene Lesart von Freiheit und Demokratie dorthin exportieren zu wollen. Ausgerechnet aus den Öl-Provinzen im Osten begannen britische Stellen wie Reuter und BBC zu berichten.

Zu Recht verlangte die UN-Kommissarin für Menschenrechte eine Untersuchung über die Bombardierung von Zivilisten durch Luftangriffe in Libyen, um die Verantwortlichen zu identifizieren. Die offizielle Regierung in Tripolis dementierte kategorisch von Anfang an angeordnet zu haben, die Demonstranten zu bombardieren. Also bleibt die Frage offen: Wer ordnete an zu morden? Wer hat Interesse daran, Gaddafi so zu diskreditieren und zu demontieren, und das genau dann, als sich Ägypten aus den Fängen des Westens anfängt zu befreien? Perfiderweise begannen die NATO-Bombardierungen in Libyen gerade dann, als die von der UN-Kommissarin für Menschenrechte angestrebte Untersuchung in Libyen beginnen sollte, um die Bombardierung von Zivilisten zu klären. Die Untersuchung wurde somit verhindert, eine Untersuchung, die die Zustimmung der Regierung Gaddafis hatte.

Europa ist in vielerlei Hinsicht weit davon entfernt, eine freiheitliche demokratische Rechtsstaatlichkeit glaubhaft zu repräsentieren. Eine europäische Außenpolitik hat es nie gegeben. Auf europäischer Bühne geht das egoistische Klein-Klein unvermindert weiter. Ein Grünen-Politiker, der nach Washington eilt, um dort seinen persönlichen Frust und eigene Orientierungslosigkeit auf höchste Ebene zu demonstrieren, sollte jedenfalls für die Grünen und für den deutschen Bundestag ein unerwünschter Politiker sein. Solche kleinkarierten Figuren, die schon bei den US-amerikanischen Falken wie Madeleine Albright an der Seite der US-Marionette, dem Grünen Joschka Fischer eine triste Rolle spielten, wissen jetzt weder aus noch ein, als ein deutscher solider Politiker des großen Kalibers wie Thomas de Mazière selbstsicher in Washington vor seinen Kollegen Robert Gates tritt. Dem dummen Grünen fiel nichts anderes ein, als nach Washington zu eilen, um sich selbst und seine Partei zu diskreditieren, indem er sich für die Position seines Landes „entschuldigt“ (SZ-30.4.). Dadurch zeigt er schamlos völlig bloßgestellt seine Verblendung und seine Inkompetenz. Dämlicher kann es kaum werden. Er disqualifiziert sich selbst, als Abgeordneter des deutschen Volkes im Parlament zu sitzen. Der Bundesvorstand von Bündnis90/Die Grünen muss diesen kleinen eitlen Mann sofort aus seinen Positionen entfernen und ihn durch einen kompetenteren seriösen Politiker ersetzen. Sonst verliert diese Partei trotz augenblicklichen Hochs mittelfristig an Respekt vor der deutschen Öffentlichkeit.

Es ist an der Zeit zu verstehen und zu begreifen, dass die Bundesregierung Deutschlands zu Recht eine Kurskorrektur der lange stagnierenden gebeugten Nachkriegszeit-Außenpolitik anzustreben hat, und zwar in der Hoffnung, dass andere europäische Länder und die USA selbst bald auch erwachen werden, um ihre Kurskorrektur zu verwirklichen.

Natürlich wird diese Kurskorrektur nicht mit Vasallen wie Tom Koenig stattfinden. Ideologisch steht er an der Seite des rückständigen reaktionären Republikaner John McCain, der für weitere Bombardierungen und weiteren Mord an der Seite der Rebellen plädiert.

Der arabische Aufstand lässt unmissverständlich erkennen, dass Europa nicht den Gang der Welt bestimmt. Genauso wie die Europäer ihre Einheit anstreben, haben die Araber dasselbe Recht, sich zu vereinigen. Europa sollte diese Entwicklung unterstützen, anstatt sie zu bremsen und sich für eine verheerende Intervention herzugeben.

Anstatt mit Verstand realistisch und fair die Ereignisse zu beurteilen, sind kleinkarierte Politiker wieder dabei, Europa in militärische mörderische Inkursionen zu stürzen, weil sie es anders offensichtlich nicht wollen oder können. Die neueste sinnlose Tötung des 29-jährigen Sohnes von Gaddafi (Meldung von 1.5.) demonstriert, wie sehr ein ursprüngliches Verteidigungsbündnis degradiert ist: Es gibt gezielte Tötung, gezielten Mord, geplant und gelenkt von hoch-postierten Verbrechern im europäischen Zirkus. Menschliches Mitgefühl gilt allen Angehörigen der durch NATO-Bomben Terror in Libyen ermordeten Menschen einschließlich der Gaddafi-Familie und allen Kameraden und Freunde des Jungen, der an der Universität München studierte.

Vom europäischen Zirkus ist der Vatikan leider nicht ausgenommen. Im Gegenteil, er repräsentiert diesen Zirkus am besten. Anstatt eine ehrliche Würdigung des Papst Johannes-Paul II zu offenkundigen und seine unbeirrte Botschaft für den Frieden zu übertragen, verfällt der Vatikan in mittelalterliche Rituale, die gar nichts mit der Würdigung von Johannes-Paul II als authentischen Vorkämpfer gegen den Krieg zu tun haben, eine Würdigung, die jetzt hoch aktuell und notwendig ist, sollte der heutige Summo Pontifex einen Sinn für die internationale Aktualität haben. Die katholische Welt vermisst klare Worte von Frieden und Hoffnung in dieser trüben Zeit.

Abstoßende Mörder-Regierungen wie die von Großbritannien und Frankreich haben als solche längst keinen Platz mehr in der zivilisierten Welt. Sie stoßen auf generelle Verachtung und immer größeren Abstand, auf Isolierung in der Weltstaatengemeinschaft.

Es ist zu begrüßen, dass sich Deutschland in einen von Frankreich und Großbritannien ausgehenden längst überwunden geglaubten Kolonialismus nicht dirigieren lässt. Der britische Versuch, eine neue Sicherheitsordnung im Nahen Osten mit Paris abzusprechen, hat keine Legitimation. Keine dieser im Nahen Osten fremden aggressiven Mächte kann erwarten, von einem arabischen Volk anerkannt zu werden, um dort nach Zerstörung und Tod der Bevölkerung, die Gründung einer Ordnung gemäß ihrer fremden Interessen zu beanspruchen. Diese Zeiten sind vorbei.

Mit einer trügerischen, unseriösen und stark vom Kolonialwahn geprägten Politik gegenüber der arabischen Welt will Deutschland selbstverständlich nicht kooperieren. Im Gegenteil, diese fatale Politik verdient von den USA, von Deutschland und von aller Welt verurteilt zu werden oder mindestens, sich davon zu distanzieren. SPD und Grünen haben dies versäumt. Deshalb verlieren sie die Glaubwürdigkeit, eine bessere und gerechtere Weltordnung zu errichten, die nicht mit allen, sondern nur mit gerechten und rechtlichen Mitteln zu schaffen ist.

Vollkommen im Klaren über die unbeständige Haltung Washingtons musste der deutsche Verteidigungsminister Thomas de Mazière seinen Kollegen Robert Gates in Washington damit sachlich konfrontieren, als Gates sich wagte, die eigenständige Position Berlins als „schädlich“ zu bezeichnen. Im Gegensatz zu europäischen Regierungen hielt sich Washington am Anfang in der Sache Libyen auffällig zurück, wie vor der Dringlichkeitssitzung des UN-Sicherheitsrates in New York (22.2.2011) offensichtlich war. Dort hatte sich Washington nicht dem Antrag der Europäer zur Einberufung der Sitzung angeschlossen. In der Tat gab es keinen völkerrechtlichen Grund für eine solche Einberufung des UN-Sicherheitsrats, der nur zuständig ist, wenn der Frieden eines Landes durch den Angriff eines anderen Landes bedroht ist. Libyen drohte niemanden, also gab es einen solchen Fall nicht. Der Nachbar Ägypten verstand auch nicht die Lage in Libyen als Bedrohung, wie sicherlich der britische Premier David Cameron mit seinem überraschenden Besuch in Kairo (21.2.) versuchte, die ägyptische Führung zu alarmieren. Vergebens. Die seltsame britische Geheim-Mission in Ägypten scheiterte. Kein ägyptischer Diplomat hat sich für die Dringlichkeitssitzung des UN-Sicherheitsrates entschieden. Anders als früher, war diesmal der britische Premier nicht zuerst nach Washington geflogen, sondern direkt nach Kairo, da London aller Wahrscheinlichkeit nach wusste, dass die US-Regierung von Barack Obama sich nicht wie die vorherigen auf eine solche abgekartete Intrige einlassen würde.

Die große Politik stellte sich jetzt von Anfang an anders da, als es sich einige schräge Gestalten in deutschen Medien und Politikzirkeln zu wünschen scheinen: Zwei „dringliche“ NATO-Sondersitzungen, die erste am 25.2. und die zweite am 2.3. 2011, verliefen ohne Ergebnis: Weder die USA noch Großbritannien beauftragten den Einsatz militärischer Gewalt in Libyen. Auch nicht die Vereinten Nationen und keine ihrer Unterorganisationen. Auch kam nichts dergleichen aus der Afrikanischen Union, der Arabischen Liga oder authentisch von den Oppositionskräften in Libyen selbst, die ursprünglich keine ausländische Einmischung wollten.

Die Arabische Liga wandte sich nach einem Außenministertreffen in Kairo entschieden gegen eine Militärintervention. Russland und China erteilten Überlegungen der EU und der USA über eine Einrichtung von sogenannten Flugverbotszonen über Libyen eine Absage. Eine solche Idee sei „überflüssig“. So der russische Außenminister Sergej Lawrow (1.3.) Das Außenamt in Peking sprach sich klar gegen militärische Schritte zur Absetzung Gaddafis aus. Entsprechende Überlegungen im Westen verfolge man mit Sorge. „Wir hoffen, dass das Land so bald wie möglich zu Stabilität zurückkehrt und seine Probleme durch einen Dialog friedlich gelöst werden können.“ So die Verlautbarung aus dem chinesischen Außenministerium.

Selbst der US-Verteidigungsminister Robert Gates äußerte sich in der NATO-Sondersitzung (2.3.) eindeutig: „Eine solche Flugverbotszone bedeutet Krieg gegen Libyen. Das will Amerika nicht“ (ARD-Tagesschau 3.3.11 um 20 Uhr). Wohl daher spucken die Militaristen Gift und Galle. Mit ihnen ein dummer Grünen-Politiker wie Tom Koenig, der keinen Sinn für außenpolitische Kompetenz und parlamentarische Würde hat, wie er sich in Washington selbst bloßstellte. Dagegen ist der Auftritt vom Verteidigungsminister Thomas de Mazière hoch zu schätzen: Er kritisierte offen die USA-Einstellung und erinnerte seinen US-Kollege Robert Gates, dass er selbst gegen eine Flugverbotszone argumentiert hatte. Gerade auf Gates Einfluss hatte die Bundesregierung ja gesetzt in ihrer Ablehnung einer Flugverbotszone. Sie hatte gehofft, Robert Gates werde sich gegen Außenministerin Hillary Clinton durchsetzen, die für die Flugverbotszone geworben hatte. (Meldung vom 30.4.)

Während die Sprache aus dem Weißen Haus unter US-Präsident Barack Obama deutlich war, erschien die Einstellung der Außenministerin Hillary Clinton unbeständig und wackelig, da sie offensichtlich nach der Pfeife der Militaristen tanzt. Vermutlich will sie eine weitere Rolle spielen, sollten die Falken wieder die Oberhand gewinnen, was eine Katastrophe für Amerika und die gesamte Welt wäre. Es war offensichtlich ein Fehler von Präsident Barack Obama, seine Rivalin als Außenministerin zu ernennen, anstatt eine zuverlässige Person, die von der Richtung seiner Politik wirklich überzeugt ist.

Bestimmte ultrarechte europäische Kreise in Verbindung mit ultrarechten Cliquen in Deutschland und Europa bleiben immer noch mit der Bush-Cheney-Clique verbunden und sind bis heute nicht bereit, sich mit der Obama-Linie abzufinden, darunter der armselige Grünen-Politiker Tom Koenig, der an der Seite der Ultras unter den Demokraten mit Madeleine Albright seine Karriere im Höhenflug sah. Dass sich solche Gespenster-Figuren als UN-Experte ausgeben, ist ein Hohn für das Völkerrecht und für die UN-Charta, von der sie kein Jota verstehen. Niemand sollte sich wundern, wenn solche faschistoiden Populisten einen Konflikt wie in Libyen benutzen, um zu versuchen, Obama zu stürzen. Energisch muss der US-Präsident solchem unheilvollen militaristischen Druck widerstehen.

Das Bundeskanzleramt hat glücklicherweise die Außenpolitik in voller Konsonanz mit dem Außenminister bedacht und formuliert. Damit bleiben das blamabel kleinkarierte Krethi und Plethi draußen. Hoffentlich für immer.

sendenDie Autorin Luz María De Stéfano Zuloaga de Lenkait ist Juristin und Diplomatin a.D.

terror

Wikileaks, Twitter, die Riesenklatsche und der Tod von Osama Bin Laden

Stephan Fuchs – Im verschlafenen pakistanischen Nest Abbottabad wurde Osama Bin Laden getötet. Osamas Kurier wurde ihm zum Verhängnis. Die Geheimdienste folgten ihm. Die Operation wurde live in Twitter übertragen. Wikileaks liefert den Namen des Kuriers frei Haus und rechtfertigt so beinahe die Folterpraktiken der CIA.

Abu Faraj al-Libi wurde am 2. Mai 2005 (!) von Pakistans Geheimdienst ISI in Mardan verhaftet. An der Verhaftung waren die Special Activities Division der CIA und Special Forces der Pakistaner beteiligt. Am 6. Juni 2005 wurde er den Amerikanern überstellt und nach Guantanamo gebracht.


„Haut ab, Helikopter, bevor ich meine Riesenklatsche raushole“

2004 wollen die Pakistaner herhausgefunden haben, dass al-Libbi zur Nummer drei der Terrororganisation aufgestiegen war. Nebst zwei Mordversuchen an Pakistans General und damaligen Präsidenten Pervez Musharref, wurde er auch als Hauptplaner des sogenannten Transatlantic Aircraft Plot mit John Reid von 2006 verdächtigt. In Guantanamo hat Libbi wohl gesungen und verrät, dass auch er in Abbottabad gewesen sei.

In July 2003, detainee received a letter from UBL’s (Osama Bin Laden) designated courier, Maulawi Abd al-Khaliq Jan, requesting detainee take on the responsibility of collecting donations, organizing travel, and distributing funds to families in Pakistan. UBL stated detainee would be the official messenger between UBL and others in Pakistan. In mid-2003, detainee moved his family to Abbottabad, PK and worked between Abbottabad and Peshawar.

Am 2.Mai 2011 twittert Sohaib Athar @ReallyVirtual den Begin einer Operation, die seit langem im Geheimen vorbereitet worden war:

– Helicopter hovering above Abbottabad at 1AM (is a rare event).
– Go away helicopter – before I take out my giant swatter :-/
– A huge window shaking bang here in Abbottabad Cantt. I hope its not the start of something nasty :-S
– Since taliban (probably) don’t have helicpoters, and since they’re saying it was not „ours“, so must be a complicated situation
– Bin Laden is dead. I didn’t kill him. Please let me sleep now.